FabGuys.com forum: Exclude interests

By *im_obeys OP Man
2 weeks ago

Southborough

I know it would probably be a big bit of development but would it be possible to allow us to exclude people with specific interests from search results (in this case I was thinking about Bareback, but I'm sure other people would like to exclude others).

By *lackbootzMan
2 weeks ago

Hayes, Middx

"I know it would probably be a big bit of development but would it be possible to allow us to exclude people with specific interests from search results (in this case I was thinking about Bareback, but I'm sure other people would like to exclude others)."

How do you exclude the people who haven’t flagged either Bareback or Safe Sex but may engage in one or both..? Omission can’t be run through a programme. How do you exclude the people who have ticked every sexual interest box but when you ask them about something they actually reveal they didn’t read it and just ticked everything (surprisingly common)? How do you exclude the people who say they only practice safe sex BUT LIE and do actually bareback?

People are often careless and cavalier when setting up profiles on sites like this. And lots of men don’t tell the truth. Sometimes you can’t just press buttons to work something out but actually have to use your own brain.

By *iss TTV/TS
2 weeks ago

Durham

Have any of these suggestions ever been taken up by the owners...I don't think so.

They won't spend money on improving the site so you have two choices, stay or go.

By *oodpeckerMan
2 weeks ago

Falkirk

"Have any of these suggestions ever been taken up by the owners...I don't think so.

They won't spend money on improving the site so you have two choices, stay or go."

The site HAS made improvements (and some retrograde steps, IMO), but the preceding post accurately points out several reasons as to why the OP's suggestion might not be worth the effort.

By *altoniansCouple (MM)
2 weeks ago

Dalton in Furness

"Have any of these suggestions ever been taken up by the owners...I don't think so.

They won't spend money on improving the site so you have two choices, stay or go."

You are incorrect.