 | Back to forum list |
| Back to FabGuys.com site feedback |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"FåB Message Filters + Blocks. You can block TV/TS/CD. BUT TS people are entirely different from TV/CD. Does it need a review?" I think it should be separated. In "Looking for" - it says TV/TS as a category. No mention of CD. In "Message Filters" - you only get the option to Block "TV/TS/CD". I think "TV/CD" as 1 category and TS as a separate one in both parts of FABGUYS. I don't want to cause offence to anyone in those categories but if someone in those groups is offended, I apologise in advance. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"FåB Message Filters + Blocks. You can block TV/TS/CD. BUT TS people are entirely different from TV/CD. Does it need a review?" Here is a comment I put on a similar question on FabSwingers... If the current and possibly new 'gender options' are there on the site, we all have the clear opportunity to FILTER correctly who we want messages from and to meet and who we don't. Simple. The Binary and non-Binary camps nicely separated. As for the categories and 'gender options' tick boxes, I wonder if FåbSwingers can come up with those and definitions, that the UN, EU, Westminster and Scottish Parliaments can't reach a concensus of opinion. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't know really, I saw a person on here that had a vagina with a large clitoris and had breast removal. I found that intriguing. " Interesting, but the answer to a different question. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"FåB Message Filters + Blocks. You can block TV/TS/CD. BUT TS people are entirely different from TV/CD. Does it need a review?" Agreed, but should also be extended to cover Search Filters as well (you can exclude TV/TS). Also one of the privacy settings makes no sense, that is “Show Profile to non-registered users”. This also prevents search engines from picking up your profile - that is something that should be blocked automatically anyway. As you have to register to be able to login there is no such thing as a non-registered users. Would make more sense if it was either “hide profile from un-verified users” (the old verification not the age verification) or “hide profile from non-subscribers”. Or have both options, and let the individual have control over how much they want to limit the availability of their profile. However as others have already said “I can’t see it happening”. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"TV, TS, & CD are all very different. The CD category can include hairy guys, that occasionally on a pair of their wifes knickers, but have zero desire to make themselves fem." CD category can also include guys who choose to remain masculine but do wear lingerie they've chosen for themselves, and groom a bit to make themselves presentable. Not feminine but sexy. I get a bit sick of this trope that all CDs are just fat hairy blokes in their wife's knickers. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It will be a first when this site listened to the people who pay for it with there hard earned cash." Trouble is there are so many who don’t want to pay because they get so much for free here, unlike other sites that are mostly useless unless you pay what are very high monthly charges. But for paying members yes it is very frustrating, as the site could be so much better. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"FåB Message Filters + Blocks. You can block TV/TS/CD. BUT TS people are entirely different from TV/CD. Does it need a review? Agreed, but should also be extended to cover Search Filters as well (you can exclude TV/TS). Also one of the privacy settings makes no sense, that is “Show Profile to non-registered users”. This also prevents search engines from picking up your profile - that is something that should be blocked automatically anyway. As you have to register to be able to login there is no such thing as a non-registered users. Would make more sense if it was either “hide profile from un-verified users” (the old verification not the age verification) or “hide profile from non-subscribers”. Or have both options, and let the individual have control over how much they want to limit the availability of their profile. However as others have already said “I can’t see it happening”." You may be misunderstanding the setting: it's intended to prevent your profile being discovered by non-site users, via search engines. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You may be misunderstanding the setting: it's intended to prevent your profile being discovered by non-site users, via search engines." If you read what I said - “This also prevents search engines from picking up your profile - that is something that should be blocked automatically anyway.” I doubt very many of the people on the site would be happy for there profile details to show up in a google search - profiles should be blocked from being accessed by all search engines automatically, in which case there is no such thing as an “unregistered user”. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You may be misunderstanding the setting: it's intended to prevent your profile being discovered by non-site users, via search engines. If you read what I said - “This also prevents search engines from picking up your profile - that is something that should be blocked automatically anyway.” I doubt very many of the people on the site would be happy for there profile details to show up in a google search - profiles should be blocked from being accessed by all search engines automatically, in which case there is no such thing as an “unregistered user”" I read and understood, "This also prevents search engines from picking up your profile - that is something that should be blocked automatically anyway." and re-iterate that your post seems to be confusing one thing with another… Respectfully, "if you read what I said" and re-read your own post, carefully, you may understand. In any case I disagree with the notion that search engines "should be blocked automatically anyway." People are capable of adjusting their settings to suit themselves  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You may be misunderstanding the setting: it's intended to prevent your profile being discovered by non-site users, via search engines. If you read what I said - “This also prevents search engines from picking up your profile - that is something that should be blocked automatically anyway.” I doubt very many of the people on the site would be happy for there profile details to show up in a google search - profiles should be blocked from being accessed by all search engines automatically, in which case there is no such thing as an “unregistered user” I read and understood, "This also prevents search engines from picking up your profile - that is something that should be blocked automatically anyway." and re-iterate that your post seems to be confusing one thing with another… Respectfully, "if you read what I said" and re-read your own post, carefully, you may understand. In any case I disagree with the notion that search engines "should be blocked automatically anyway." People are capable of adjusting their settings to suit themselves "Let me break it down for you. The full statement on the privacy settings page says “Show profile to non-registered users: You can choose to have your profile page hidden from anyone who isn't a member (also hides it from search engines).” “Show profile to non-registered users” - in order to access this site you have to register an account (login and password) in order to be able to view other users profiles. There is no way to access the site without registering an account (unless they get hacked). This is confirmed by the statement “ You can choose to have your profile page hidden from anyone who isn't a member” - if you register an account you are a member. Then we also get the second statement “(also hides it from search engines).”. The operative word there is “also” - it blocks search engines from accessing your profile IN ADDITION TO non-members. But as I have already shown non-members should not be able to access the site (beyond the login page) as you need register an account to get access thereby becoming a member. From a matter of privacy (and data protection) search engines should be automatically blocked from accessing profiles, access to view members profiles should always be restricted to other members (the purpose for which the data is supplied), otherwise anything (including pictures and videos) uploaded to the site could be swept up by bots and web crawlers and appear in any search engine result set. Therefore the option to “Show profile to non-registered users” is a meaningless option because it is not possible, and “(also hides it from search engines).” should be done automatically as a matter of privacy and data protection. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You may be misunderstanding the setting: it's intended to prevent your profile being discovered by non-site users, via search engines. If you read what I said - “This also prevents search engines from picking up your profile - that is something that should be blocked automatically anyway.” I doubt very many of the people on the site would be happy for there profile details to show up in a google search - profiles should be blocked from being accessed by all search engines automatically, in which case there is no such thing as an “unregistered user” I read and understood, "This also prevents search engines from picking up your profile - that is something that should be blocked automatically anyway." and re-iterate that your post seems to be confusing one thing with another… Respectfully, "if you read what I said" and re-read your own post, carefully, you may understand. In any case I disagree with the notion that search engines "should be blocked automatically anyway." People are capable of adjusting their settings to suit themselves
Let me break it down for you. The full statement on the privacy settings page says “Show profile to non-registered users: You can choose to have your profile page hidden from anyone who isn't a member (also hides it from search engines).”
“Show profile to non-registered users” - in order to access this site you have to register an account (login and password) in order to be able to view other users profiles. There is no way to access the site without registering an account (unless they get hacked). This is confirmed by the statement “ You can choose to have your profile page hidden from anyone who isn't a member” - if you register an account you are a member.
Then we also get the second statement “(also hides it from search engines).”. The operative word there is “also” - it blocks search engines from accessing your profile IN ADDITION TO non-members. But as I have already shown non-members should not be able to access the site (beyond the login page) as you need register an account to get access thereby becoming a member.
From a matter of privacy (and data protection) search engines should be automatically blocked from accessing profiles, access to view members profiles should always be restricted to other members (the purpose for which the data is supplied), otherwise anything (including pictures and videos) uploaded to the site could be swept up by bots and web crawlers and appear in any search engine result set.
Therefore the option to “Show profile to non-registered users” is a meaningless option because it is not possible, and “(also hides it from search engines).” should be done automatically as a matter of privacy and data protection."There was no need to "break it down" for me, or for you to automatically engage patronising mode! There's no need for you to expend any more effort in attempting to expand my level of understanding. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Agreed ,but it won't happen . People have been asking for years The problem is when they self identify as something they frankly aren't ,imagine the disappointment when you thought you were getting Lola the Brazilian TS and you got Fat Fred with his hairy legs in his wife's stockings ,because he's ticked the box to say he's a TS " Funny as fuck but so true | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
