 | Back to forum list |
| Back to FabGuys.com site feedback |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is there any plans to revamp / update the forum options, A lot of CD/TV/TS/TG on here isn’t it about time that a grouping was made so people can discuss / debate particular subjects in a group for ourselves without having to wade through hate to find genuine answers / comment or response of relevance Think it’s time to align the forums with more relatable content for the varied membership within the site. " No thanks. 👎🦘🇦🇺 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is there any plans to revamp / update the forum options, A lot of CD/TV/TS/TG on here isn’t it about time that a grouping was made so people can discuss / debate particular subjects in a group for ourselves without having to wade through hate to find genuine answers / comment or response of relevance Think it’s time to align the forums with more relatable content for the varied membership within the site. No thanks. 👎🦘🇦🇺" Why would you not be in favour of a forum board for us and admirers? It doesn't mean exclusion from the forum or a separate site, it would just mean adding a board to the forum. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've said before that a dedicated forum board for us and admirers would be a nice idea, posting anything CD/TV related in the Lounge usually attracts derogatory comments from the usual minority of very vocal haters. " Exactly this. See multiple forum posts either full of derogatory comments, hate or just people saying that it’s not for them. All of that is fine and expected as we all have different tastes. However CD/TV/TS/TG are all within the LGBT community and all have a seat at the table on this site as the common interest is men. Having a separate safe space to discuss, debate etc is common sense Glad someone shares my view | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is there any plans to revamp / update the forum options, A lot of CD/TV/TS/TG on here isn’t it about time that a grouping was made so people can discuss / debate particular subjects in a group for ourselves without having to wade through hate to find genuine answers / comment or response of relevance Think it’s time to align the forums with more relatable content for the varied membership within the site. No thanks. 👎🦘🇦🇺" You don’t have to agree for it to be a thing. It makes sense to have options available for topical discussion where it’s known what’s being discussed rather than one big section where anything goes. My view is by having specific areas to discuss particular topics it will make for a better experience for website users. Better experience means more people will stay on the site helping it grow, options create opportunities to participate and that leads to more social engagement - which is the point of the site engagement leading to physical encounters. I appreciate that you even being within the group I’m discussing might not want that and that’s ok we are all entitled to have our personal preferences but there are others on here who don’t participate because of the negative responses in the main forums and those are the people that this move could benefit. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hi all. Under new photos , category id like to see under Men - calves - as an option to tag photos in. "A leg man I see - sky sports see loads of them  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm no expert but think it'd just need a mirror site called FabDressers. It'd compliment guys and swingers. You will tho always find the wrong fellas on the wrong site tho. " Doesn’t need a separate site just needs a better spread of options to enable engagement. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm no expert but think it'd just need a mirror site called FabDressers. It'd compliment guys and swingers. You will tho always find the wrong fellas on the wrong site tho. " No wen don't, we have as much right to be on here as you do, the addition of some special interest boards including one for CD/TV/TG/TS would be nice as the bigots wouldn't see the threads and thus wouldn't have any need to leave the usual derogatory comments. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm no expert but think it'd just need a mirror site called FabDressers. It'd compliment guys and swingers. You will tho always find the wrong fellas on the wrong site tho. " but its a lot more admind especially with payments are u willing to pay more for it? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm no expert but think it'd just need a mirror site called FabDressers. It'd compliment guys and swingers. You will tho always find the wrong fellas on the wrong site tho. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ No wen don't, we have as much right to be on here as you do, the addition of some special interest boards including one for CD/TV/TG/TS would be nice as the bigots wouldn't see the threads and thus wouldn't have any need to leave the usual derogatory comments." . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . PMFJI : I may be wrong but I don't think the poster of the comment was questioning anyone's right to be here. I took the broader view of the post to include heterosexual men who dress; they have nowhere to go other than gay bars or sites like this; fabswingers so far as I can see doesn't cater. Dressing isn't exclusively gay although the knuckle-dragging neanderthals (I refuse to capitalise that word) might have 'the lads' think / speak otherwise. And as for 'cost' mentioned in other posts, is £5 for 50days silver support beyond most budgets? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
". . PMFJI : I may be wrong but I don't think the poster of the comment was questioning anyone's right to be here. I took the broader view of the post to include heterosexual men who dress; they have nowhere to go other than gay bars or sites like this; fabswingers so far as I can see doesn't cater. Dressing isn't exclusively gay although the knuckle-dragging neanderthals (I refuse to capitalise that word) might have 'the lads' think / speak otherwise. And as for 'cost' mentioned in other posts, is £5 for 50days silver support beyond most budgets?" Maybe not in that case but in the past whenever the subject is brought up it has attracted comments from members who clearly do not want us on this site. there is not need for another site, a forum board would be nice though. I think the reference to cost is the cost to run a separate site, not cost of membership. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" PMFJI : I may be wrong but I don't think the poster of the comment was questioning anyone's right to be here. I took the broader view of the post to include heterosexual men who dress; they have nowhere to go other than gay bars or sites like this; fabswingers so far as I can see doesn't cater. Dressing isn't exclusively gay although the knuckle-dragging neanderthals (I refuse to capitalise that word) might have 'the lads' think / speak otherwise. And as for 'cost' mentioned in other posts, is £5 for 50days silver support beyond most budgets? Maybe not in that case but in the past whenever the subject is brought up it has attracted comments from members who clearly do not want us on this site. there is not need for another site, a forum board would be nice though. I think the reference to cost is the cost to run a separate site, not cost of membership." . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . I have no notion as to server costs or whatever. I would hope there would be plenty interested in the unpaid Forum Mod and pic authorisation pepes. I think a separate are would be good, not because I don't want "them" here but gives a space for them and admirers plus - as I have already alluded - encompasses those of the hetero tribe who like to dress. Might be easier to turf out the haters were any to go on. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
". I'm no expert but think it'd just need a mirror site called FabDressers. It'd compliment guys and swingers. You will tho always find the wrong fellas on the wrong site tho. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ No wen don't, we have as much right to be on here as you do, the addition of some special interest boards including one for CD/TV/TG/TS would be nice as the bigots wouldn't see the threads and thus wouldn't have any need to leave the usual derogatory comments. . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . PMFJI : I may be wrong but I don't think the poster of the comment was questioning anyone's right to be here. I took the broader view of the post to include heterosexual men who dress; they have nowhere to go other than gay bars or sites like this; fabswingers so far as I can see doesn't cater. Dressing isn't exclusively gay although the knuckle-dragging neanderthals (I refuse to capitalise that word) might have 'the lads' think / speak otherwise. And as for 'cost' mentioned in other posts, is £5 for 50days silver support beyond most budgets?" This is not a site for heterosexual men. Even if they dress. It's a site for men who have sex with men. Don't invite time-wasting cocks-in-frocks if they don't want a cock inside them
A forum for crossdressers and transvestites who do meet men for sex seems a good idea, as there is already a separate section for their photos. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
". Don't invite time-wasting cocks-in-frocks if they don't want a cock inside them ---- I wasn't. I was suggesting that the mooted fabdressers would give straight men who like to dress somewhere to "go". Dressing is not exclusively gay or bi." We don't need another site that specialises in CD/TV/TG/TS, there are already some exclusively for this which I'm sure will cater for heterosexual crossdressers. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
". Don't invite time-wasting cocks-in-frocks if they don't want a cock inside them ---- I wasn't. I was suggesting that the mooted fabdressers would give straight men who like to dress somewhere to "go". Dressing is not exclusively gay or bi." Erm, I am well aware that dressing isn't just for gays and bi's, hence my comment on your comment. Doh! This is a site for men who meet men for sex, whether they dress or not. It is not a space for straight men, whether they dress or not. And yes you were saying that we should make a space on this site for straight men who dress. And I am saying no to that. Let straight men who dress create their own site. As for a forum on this site dedicated to dressers and their admirers (which is what the OP was on about), I am all for it. That wasn't difficult to understand. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And yes you were saying that we should make a space on this site for straight men who dress. And I am saying no to that. That wasn't difficult to understand. " . No, I was not. I was responding to a subsequent suggestion - user _uperted - of a separate *site*. The name fabdressers was mooted to complement fabguys and fabswingers. I was "voting" for that | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
