![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The eighties version was what I saw " It was televised in1999 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Obviously I DID watch the massively inferior uk qaf.. it’s not everyday you get to see gay male fucking naked on the telly.. But the US version is infinitely superior.. in every way. And it was in for longer. And the guys were hotter. And the gay fucking was much more graphic and explicit. I have the USA version on dvd. I cannot reiterate just how fucking impressive the fucking was. All that having been typed.. Charlie Hunnam’s bare, naked glutes were a thing of beauty " Horses for courses. We cannot all like the same thing. Quite enjoyed the UK version. Got the DVD box set. Must watch it again. Couldn't get on with the American version at all. Thought it was too soap-opera-ish, not particularly well acte and boring. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nathan was a beautiful boy" Yes he was, I watched a few episodes of Sons of Anarchy, which he was in a few years later and he had completely lost his looks, a common occurrence in twinks, especially blond ones (They usually start balding, though Charlie Hinnan hadn't in that, he just looked rougher and no longer pretty) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nathan was a beautiful boy Yes he was, I watched a few episodes of Sons of Anarchy, which he was in a few years later and he had completely lost his looks, a common occurrence in twinks, especially blond ones (They usually start balding, though Charlie Hinnan hadn't in that, he just looked rougher and no longer pretty)" In the 2017 version of Papillon, he still had a great body but evolved from being a pretty boy to a very handsome man | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |