FabGuys.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

The best place to meet real guys.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Lucy Letby Legal Team

Jump to newest
 

By *our-slave OP   Man
4 weeks ago

nottingham

I’ve just been watching the new legal team giving a press conference.

They are saying that one of the samples showing high insulin levels also had ludicrously high glucose levels. It looks as if the sample was contaminated. It appears that the high glucose level was not divulged to the court.

They also say that when enough air is injected into the bloodstream to kill someone, the nitrogen content hangs around for long enough to show up on a X-Ray but there’s doubt as to whether they are showing on any X-Rays.

A lot of experts from all over the world are giving their time free of charge to help.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aciallover5Man
4 weeks ago

wrexham

I am not easy with the way the trial went If what I heard on the radio is true then there were a lot of things that could be construed as a miscarriage of justice I am not saying she is innocent but not happy with the way the facts were presented and hjer team did not do a lot

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *our-slave OP   Man
4 weeks ago

nottingham


"I am not easy with the way the trial went If what I heard on the radio is true then there were a lot of things that could be construed as a miscarriage of justice I am not saying she is innocent but not happy with the way the facts were presented and hjer team did not do a lot "

Like you, I’m not qualified to say if she’s guilty or not, but she deserves to have this looked at properly.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orcester GuyMan
4 weeks ago

Worcestershire North

I watched a documentary few months back & had lots & lots of doubts about the evidence

Just feels like huge miscarriage of justice

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *our-slave OP   Man
4 weeks ago

nottingham


"I watched a documentary few months back & had lots & lots of doubts about the evidence

Just feels like huge miscarriage of justice "

Lucy Letby's legal team has said the lead prosecution expert has "now changed his mind" on the cause of death of three babies.

If my understanding is correct, It seems that one baby died when a doctor accidentally pierced the baby’s liver. Letby was accused of causing that baby’s death but she had nothing to do with it.

There is an ongoing public inquiry into how Letby was able to allegedly kill and carry on killing at the Countess of Chester Hospital. Its findings are expected to be published in autumn next year. But this new evidence complicates that somewhat.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rTongueTasticMan
4 weeks ago

Close_To_Chichester

It is all very complicated..

I have friends or have been in healthcare ( nursing) all their careers & they have concerns..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *our-slave OP   Man
4 weeks ago

nottingham


"It is all very complicated..

I have friends or have been in healthcare ( nursing) all their careers & they have concerns.. "

Yes it’s complicated. To be honest, I didn’t take a lot of notice regarding the original appeal, but the evidence I heard tonight has shocked me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *angtMan
4 weeks ago

Wednesfield /Wolverhampton

From how this case is going, I’m just glad we don’t have capital punishment.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *our-slave OP   Man
4 weeks ago

nottingham


"From how this case is going, I’m just glad we don’t have capital punishment."

Absolutely. I’m beginning to wonder how some people sleep at night.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ogwhammerMan
4 weeks ago

Rainham KENT

The sad thing is which ever way it goes her reputation is trashed because a lot of people will think she got off on a technicality. Plus none of this is going to help the greaving families

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *etmepants offMan
4 weeks ago

dartford

I think this could be another miscarriage of justice.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *astDevonGuyMan
4 weeks ago

East Devon

Trial by jury is never infallible. I think in this case the debate isn’t “ did she kill” but “ how many”. All this public airing of appeals isn’t helpful, yes appeal , reconsider, revisit, but it serves no real purpose to do so in full media circus mode.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *our-slave OP   Man
4 weeks ago

nottingham


"The sad thing is which ever way it goes her reputation is trashed because a lot of people will think she got off on a technicality. Plus none of this is going to help the greaving families "

There are no winners, as you say.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *our-slave OP   Man
4 weeks ago

nottingham


"Trial by jury is never infallible. I think in this case the debate isn’t “ did she kill” but “ how many”. All this public airing of appeals isn’t helpful, yes appeal , reconsider, revisit, but it serves no real purpose to do so in full media circus mode. "

It might be that she killed none of them. If Letby was my daughter and I was given evidence casting doubt on her convictions, I’d want the whole world to know about it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *om9Man
4 weeks ago

Saint Helens

iv never felt convinced don't trust nhs like post office stitch people up but saying that my daughter in law a practitioner cancer nurse she says no doubt she's guilty I don't know

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *our-slave OP   Man
4 weeks ago

nottingham


"iv never felt convinced don't trust nhs like post office stitch people up but saying that my daughter in law a practitioner cancer nurse she says no doubt she's guilty I don't know"

I don’t know either. I’m just shocked by what I heard tonight.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *etmepants offMan
4 weeks ago

dartford

It seems to me this is not unlike the post office scandal, senior managers more interested in protecting the organisation than seeking the truth. Maybe she is guilty but all the evidence is circumstantial.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tar33Man
4 weeks ago

North London (outer)

I have no doubt whatsoever that she is guilty.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *0yguyMan
4 weeks ago

Cumberland


"I have no doubt whatsoever that she is guilty."

Did you attend all the hearing and listen to all the evidence? Or is this trial by media reporting.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tar33Man
4 weeks ago

North London (outer)


"I have no doubt whatsoever that she is guilty.

Did you attend all the hearing and listen to all the evidence? "

No, but the jury did and they found her guilty. I also know someone who worked on the enquiry, and as with many major cases there some matters that are not within the public domain.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oggoglasMan
4 weeks ago

Lincoln

MD from Private Eye is far from convinced..dodgy evidence from the prosecution and how useless her defence team were.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andomguy321Man
4 weeks ago

reading

A sacrificial lamb slaughtered on the alter of the blessed NHS

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *our-slave OP   Man
4 weeks ago

nottingham


"I have no doubt whatsoever that she is guilty.

Did you attend all the hearing and listen to all the evidence?

No, but the jury did and they found her guilty. I also know someone who worked on the enquiry, and as with many major cases there some matters that are not within the public domain."

The jury found her guilty based on evidence that appears to be incorrect and potentially exonerating evidence that was withheld. And I don’t believe for one moment that proof of her guilt is not within the public domain.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
4 weeks ago

Had the hospital investigated the situation properly at the start when concerns were first raised, then evidence may well have been clearer and less babies would have died.

But instead, there was a cover up and more deaths occurred, memories blurred, evidence lost or became weaker etc. So, here we are today doubting that evidence and the strength of the conviction.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top