FabGuys.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Wrongly jailed for 38 years.

Jump to newest
 

By *acingfan OP   Man
18 hours ago

Huddersfield

How much will Peter Sullivan get charged for his prison board and lodgings?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aul349Man
17 hours ago

North of the Tyne

That's a disgrace.

There is no way he should charged a penny.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JevoTV/TS
17 hours ago

Bristol East

That's an awful story - and the most demonstrable evidence ever of why capital punishment is for the hard of thinking.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nthebuffMan
17 hours ago

Liskeard


"That's an awful story - and the most demonstrable evidence ever of why capital punishment is for the hard of thinking.

"

I have friends who back the death penalty and I've never understood them. This case is another example of why the death penalty should stay a thing if the past

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JevoTV/TS
17 hours ago

Bristol East

Doctors are the only ones allowed to bury their mistakes.

Let's not allow the state to do it, too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ookingFor...Man
16 hours ago

West Sussex

He deserves compensation...just not sure how any figure covers what he's lost.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *im125Man
16 hours ago

Perth

DNA one of the biggest breakthroughs in forensic science.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *dffikMan
13 hours ago

surrey


"That's an awful story - and the most demonstrable evidence ever of why capital punishment is for the hard of thinking.

"

I agree

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *a123Man
13 hours ago

anglesey

Ive been married for 40 years

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oosterladMan
13 hours ago

ipswich

So they found dna that wasn't available 40 years ago which reprieved him. Thats good. We should question what happend then but the prosecutors most likely dead by now.

Give him a hood life now.

As we have much better evidence on camera these days and with dna then hanging for murderers with proper evidence becomes possible.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ookingFor...Man
11 hours ago

West Sussex


"Ive been married for 40 years"

Difference being that you can leave at any time.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tevejbMan
11 hours ago

Leeds

It was a terrible miscarriage of justice and terrible suffering for the prisoner but of course he will now get compensation though that doesn't undo his suffering.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *laudia dickmanTV/TS
8 hours ago

north Wales

The sad thing is had he of pleaded guilty he would have been out a long time ago but because he always protested his innocence he did not get parole

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uy near ArundelMan
8 hours ago

Nr Arundel


"That's a disgrace.

There is no way he should charged a penny."

Lol

He'll be owed a fair few!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tar33Man
7 hours ago

North London (outer)

I've read a few reports on this case, his release is due to the conviction being ruled as 'unsafe'.

This does NOT mean he didn't carry out the murder, there is still plenty of evidence pointing to the fact that he did.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nthebuffMan
7 hours ago

Liskeard


"So they found dna that wasn't available 40 years ago which reprieved him. Thats good. We should question what happend then but the prosecutors most likely dead by now.

Give him a hood life now.

As we have much better evidence on camera these days and with dna then hanging for murderers with proper evidence becomes possible.

"

Until you factor in the possibility of AI intervention

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tar33Man
7 hours ago

North London (outer)


"So they found dna that wasn't available 40 years ago which reprieved him. Thats good. We should question what happend then but the prosecutors most likely dead by now.

Give him a hood life now.

As we have much better evidence on camera these days and with dna then hanging for murderers with proper evidence becomes possible.

Until you factor in the possibility of AI intervention "

Or the possibility there was an accomplice.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uy near ArundelMan
7 hours ago

Nr Arundel


"I've read a few reports on this case, his release is due to the conviction being ruled as 'unsafe'.

This does NOT mean he didn't carry out the murder, there is still plenty of evidence pointing to the fact that he did."

Well apart from the DNA which isn't his, I believe.

It sounds like the police just found him guilty to close the case and wash their hands off it.

There have been similar other cases, and 1 involving a well known presenter too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irtdom300Man
7 hours ago

chesterfield

The police dont look for the truth. They look for a conviction

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *_sayMan
6 hours ago

Cardiff


"Ive been married for 40 years

Difference being that you can leave at any time. "

and you know were your bread is buttered as they say

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mma_EvansTV/TS
6 hours ago

Colchester


"I've read a few reports on this case, his release is due to the conviction being ruled as 'unsafe'.

This does NOT mean he didn't carry out the murder, there is still plenty of evidence pointing to the fact that he did."

Other than the DNA from the semen that was found which proved it wasn't his DNA xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *acingfan OP   Man
6 hours ago

Huddersfield

And sympathy to the family of the young lady who was killed. This must be awful for them too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JevoTV/TS
6 hours ago

Bristol East


"The police dont look for the truth. They look for a conviction"

They are under pressure yes, understandably because a grieving family deserves justice.

I’d like to think these cases are genuine mistakes, rather than deliberate errors.

It must be awful for the family to discover 38 years later they still don’t have justice, and someone got away with raaaape and murder

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uy near ArundelMan
6 hours ago

Nr Arundel


"The police dont look for the truth. They look for a conviction

They are under pressure yes, understandably because a grieving family deserves justice.

I’d like to think these cases are genuine mistakes, rather than deliberate errors.

It must be awful for the family to discover 38 years later they still don’t have justice, and someone got away with raaaape and murder"

Yes but the trouble is they find a likely weirdo and push for a conviction, because it looks good for them.

It's not right.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *acingfan OP   Man
6 hours ago

Huddersfield

The finding a conviction reminds me of the Stefan Kiszko case. Such a sad tale. I wonder how many more times this has happened.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tar33Man
6 hours ago

North London (outer)


"I've read a few reports on this case, his release is due to the conviction being ruled as 'unsafe'.

This does NOT mean he didn't carry out the murder, there is still plenty of evidence pointing to the fact that he did.

Other than the DNA from the semen that was found which proved it wasn't his DNA xx"

Entirely possible if he was not acting alone.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mma_EvansTV/TS
5 hours ago

Colchester


"

Entirely possible if he was not acting alone."

Were the Police looking for an accomplice do you know? Do you know if the CoA have released the transcript yet? That would be interesting to read xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *im125Man
5 hours ago

Perth

The real perpetrator (if not Sullivan)of course could now be deceased. Or if still alive, provided he hasn't committed any crime since the innovation of DNA, then he will never be traced

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JevoTV/TS
5 hours ago

Bristol East


"The police dont look for the truth. They look for a conviction

They are under pressure yes, understandably because a grieving family deserves justice.

I’d like to think these cases are genuine mistakes, rather than deliberate errors.

It must be awful for the family to discover 38 years later they still don’t have justice, and someone got away with raaaape and murder

Yes but the trouble is they find a likely weirdo and push for a conviction, because it looks good for them.

It's not right."

Home Secretaries demand conviction rates - it makes them look "tough on crime" during their term in office.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tar33Man
5 hours ago

North London (outer)


"

Entirely possible if he was not acting alone.

Were the Police looking for an accomplice do you know? Do you know if the CoA have released the transcript yet? That would be interesting to read xx"

I've no idea if they were either looking for or discounting the fact that there may have been a second suspect, as I don't have access to the case papers.

What I do know is that both prosecution, defence and the judge would have had access to all the evidence, and that the jury would have listened to that evidence, unless ruled inadmissible during voir dire, beore deciding he was guilty.

The evidence included an admission of guilt which, although it was argued was made under duress, they still believed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mma_EvansTV/TS
5 hours ago

Colchester


"The evidence included an admission of guilt which, although it was argued was made under duress, they still believed. "

Interesting...I have just looked to see if the court transcript had been released but I couldn't find anything. I have taken early retirement and I don't have access to databases or websites as I would have had whilst in employment. I am sure it won't be long before the transcript is released, thanks xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orny t 32Man
5 hours ago

Fazakerley

Because the jury was full of idiots like u who will believe anything they were never lookin for a second person the bite marks an dna came from one man an it wasn’t peters

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tar33Man
5 hours ago

North London (outer)


"Because the jury was full of idiots like u who will believe anything they were never lookin for a second person the bite marks an dna came from one man an it wasn’t peters "

Using the 'reply +quote' option is obviously beyond your limited capacity. I will however refer you to my previous response:

"You are quite clearly invested in the case, and seem to be lacking the mental capacity to consider the various alternatives."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orny t 32Man
5 hours ago

Fazakerley


"Because the jury was full of idiots like u who will believe anything they were never lookin for a second person the bite marks an dna came from one man an it wasn’t peters

Using the 'reply +quote' option is obviously beyond your limited capacity. I will however refer you to my previous response:

"You are quite clearly invested in the case, and seem to be lacking the mental capacity to consider the various alternatives.""

I know the case unlike u who has just read a newspaper article an formed your own judgement you absolute fool

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *utSouthenderMan
5 hours ago

Southend-on-Sea

The problem here is was there a second person here and was he used by the second person and most definitely by the police as he had learning problems and probably not able to defend himself and maybe would not have understood what was going on 38 years in jail is such along time he's never going to get his life back and at the end of the day the police were going to get someone for this crime.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ngel50TV/TS
4 hours ago

Kinross


"How much will Peter Sullivan get charged for his prison board and lodgings?"

Maybe they will let him stay in,

I strongly suspect with the length of time he has been locked away, he will be in a steady routine which will help his mental illness

I suspect the Stockholm syndrome will be high in his mind

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyasfkMan
4 hours ago

SOUTHPORT

For those muppets who say not to have the death penalty returned...for 2 reasons why it SHOULD be reinstated...firstly in modern times with evidence, cctv, dna guilty are guilty, its not like years ago when there was none of it, lack of solid evidence now the CPS demand 100% proof so its very very rare for mistakes now and #2 why should the tax payers fund keeping these pedos, killers and sick individuals in a comfy lifestyle for years costing us millions and millions, get rid of them wasters

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hubsloverMan
4 hours ago

East/west sussex


"How much will Peter Sullivan get charged for his prison board and lodgings?"

This is an astonishing case; it is difficult to find anyone who has experienced greater misfortune. Spending 38 years in prison for a crime one did not commit constitutes a significant portion of one's life. The opportunities for joy, such as raising children, nurturing family relationships, and exploring the world, are lost. Instead, one is forced to confront the harsh realities of life among other inmates, which underscores the flaws in the death penalty system.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tar33Man
4 hours ago

North London (outer)


"Because the jury was full of idiots like u who will believe anything they were never lookin for a second person the bite marks an dna came from one man an it wasn’t peters

Using the 'reply +quote' option is obviously beyond your limited capacity. I will however refer you to my previous response:

"You are quite clearly invested in the case, and seem to be lacking the mental capacity to consider the various alternatives."I know the case unlike u who has just read a newspaper article an formed your own judgement you absolute fool "

The jury are the ones who formed their judgement after considering all available evidence, including his confession. That's how it works.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ranford cruiserTV/TS
4 hours ago

Heathrow


"That's an awful story - and the most demonstrable evidence ever of why capital punishment is for the hard of thinking.

"

correct

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tar33Man
4 hours ago

North London (outer)


"How much will Peter Sullivan get charged for his prison board and lodgings?

This is an astonishing case; it is difficult to find anyone who has experienced greater misfortune..."

Do you not think that the victim and her family may have 'experienced greater misfortune'?

Why do you think he didn't do it? The courts haven't said as much.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hubsloverMan
4 hours ago

East/west sussex


"How much will Peter Sullivan get charged for his prison board and lodgings?

This is an astonishing case; it is difficult to find anyone who has experienced greater misfortune...

Do you not think that the victim and her family may have 'experienced greater misfortune'?

Why do you think he didn't do it? The courts haven't said as much."

He was temporarily released unless there is a desire to deem him guilty; the victims endured a harrowing experience due to the case , yet this discussion initially centered on him rather than the victims. Should you seek my perspective on that matter, I suggest initiating a separate discussion focused on the victims of this case, as individuals are likely to engage with you. Best of luck

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tar33Man
3 hours ago

North London (outer)


"How much will Peter Sullivan get charged for his prison board and lodgings?

This is an astonishing case; it is difficult to find anyone who has experienced greater misfortune...

Do you not think that the victim and her family may have 'experienced greater misfortune'?

Why do you think he didn't do it? The courts haven't said as much.

He was temporarily released unless there is a desire to deem him guilty...."

The Crown won't be calling for a retrial, that's for sure as it clearly isn't in the public internet. Even if guilty he's served his time.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ngel50TV/TS
1 hour ago

Kinross


"How much will Peter Sullivan get charged for his prison board and lodgings?

Maybe they will let him stay in,

I strongly suspect with the length of time he has been locked away, he will be in a steady routine which will help his mental illness

I suspect the Stockholm syndrome will be high in his mind "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top