FabGuys.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

The US has bombed Iran!!

Jump to newest
 

By *oodheadR OP   TV/TS
1 week ago

Higham /Bosworth 15 miles

US launches strikes on Iran.

US warplanes have bombed three nuclear sites in Iran, Donald Trump has announced.

“We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan,” the US president posted on Truth Social.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ytradesMan
1 week ago

colchester

Well get your dick sorted as we might not have much time.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *adBod1986Man
1 week ago

Cheshire

Yet that orange cunt said Obama would attack Iran? And then said we'd get WW3 under a Harris administration? God fucking help us all. "I don't start new wars" my ass. I never understand the double standards that mean 'murica can have nukes but somehow nobody else is allowed them. God, I hate the USA.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *evanianMan
1 week ago

Tegeingl, Gogledd Cymru


"US launches strikes on Iran.

US warplanes have bombed three nuclear sites in Iran, Donald Trump has announced.

“We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan,” the US president posted on Truth Social.

"

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *haron1701ETV/TS
1 week ago

Southport


"US launches strikes on Iran.

US warplanes have bombed three nuclear sites in Iran, Donald Trump has announced.

“We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan,” the US president posted on Truth Social.

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

"

Iran's nuclear programme was well under control with the deal Obama made with them. Then that fucking orange dickhead cancelled them because they weren't his.

Somebody seriously needs to take trump out - he's far too dangerous and unhinged

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *onduMan
1 week ago

North Angus


"US launches strikes on Iran.

US warplanes have bombed three nuclear sites in Iran, Donald Trump has announced.

“We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan,” the US president posted on Truth Social.

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

Iran's nuclear programme was well under control with the deal Obama made with them. Then that fucking orange dickhead cancelled them because they weren't his.

Somebody seriously needs to take trump out - he's far too dangerous and unhinged "

Yet everyone so far has had subpar training in handling a rifle plus they’re using the worst guns you can imagine

500+ school shootings in America last year yet no one can put one in a Cheeto

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
1 week ago


"

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

"

When did dropping bombs on a country ever persuade its leadership to go "Oh, alright then, I'll just roll over now and give you what you want"?

It always has the opposite effect.

Give it a while, and you'll see an American nuclear plant melt down by way of retaliation or whatever.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ver45Man
1 week ago

A Town near You!

Trump is SATANjahu's bitch! 👿

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *abassguyMan
1 week ago

fife

Mans a fkn complete bellend

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
1 week ago

If you look, you'll find Trump's hyprocisy.

In this case, a whole series of Twitter outbursts in 2013 at President Obama, accusing him of resorting to bombing Iran because he was so bad at negotiating.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *thleticSensualMan
1 week ago

town

This is weird. Is Trump expecting Iranian regime to buckle and vacate? Who will fill the vacuum? That will create a problem 10 times iraq.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ames canMan
1 week ago

monaghan


"US launches strikes on Iran.

US warplanes have bombed three nuclear sites in Iran, Donald Trump has announced.

“We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan,” the US president posted on Truth Social.

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

"

...do you really think that's what's going to happen?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *3versMan
1 week ago

glasgow


"US launches strikes on Iran.

US warplanes have bombed three nuclear sites in Iran, Donald Trump has announced.

“We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan,” the US president posted on Truth Social.

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

"

The USA is and hss been Iran's biggest enemy. There is no chance on earth of Iran capitulating

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
1 week ago

Don't you remember, when Germany dropped bombs on Britain, the people rose up against our leadership and demand they sue for peace with Herr Hitler?

No, neither do i.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ot older guyTV/TS
1 week ago

exmouth


"US launches strikes on Iran.

US warplanes have bombed three nuclear sites in Iran, Donald Trump has announced.

“We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan,” the US president posted on Truth Social.

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

Iran's nuclear programme was well under control with the deal Obama made with them. Then that fucking orange dickhead cancelled them because they weren't his.

Somebody seriously needs to take trump out - he's far too dangerous and unhinged "

You seriously think irans nuclear ambitions were under control,then you are a fool,no muslim power with nuclear capabilities is safe

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
1 week ago


"

You seriously think irans nuclear ambitions were under control,then you are a fool,no muslim power with nuclear capabilities is safe"

Pakistan is unsafe?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley

Iran always retaliate after acts of aggression, usually it's not proportionate (just for show mainly) but the stakes are so much higher at this point, American bases in the Middle East will be taken out along with the personnel.

Some bases won't even be able to stand drone attacks let alone Iran's highly technical hypersonic missiles.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ewBrumBiMan
1 week ago

Birmingham B15


"Well get your dick sorted as we might not have much time."

What do you think is going to happen?

Do you think Iran is going to be able to retaliate in any significant fashion with most of their military and terrorist leadership dead, their military decimated, and their nuclear sites destroyed?

And why would we need to worry, as opposed to the Great Satan's who is actually attacking them?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley

Evidence for Iran making nuclear bombs:

One poster of a cartoon ACHME bomb presented by Netanyahu.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *3versMan
1 week ago

glasgow


"

You seriously think irans nuclear ambitions were under control,then you are a fool,no muslim power with nuclear capabilities is safe

Pakistan is unsafe?"

Ask India

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
1 week ago

The USA funds various programmes in Pakistan to train and equip those responsible for protecting the country's stock of weapons and materials.

"Pakistan has a professional and dedicated security force that fully understands the importance of nuclear security."

- US State Department

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
1 week ago

Saudi Arabia has said publicly on several occasions it will acquire the bomb if Iran does.

(It's been rumoured for years that Saudi part-funds the Pakistan programme in exchange for a promise for quick access to materials and technology should the need arise)

That said, both the IAEA and US intelligence say there is no evidence of an active weapons programme in Iran.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley

It's Israel who have a secret nuclear program as they don't allow IAEA inspections.

Israel is the terrorist state, the U.S.A. are the worlds greatest terrorists.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *airythighs61Man
1 week ago

North Norfolk

America should have bombed Iran ages ago ... it's well over due !

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ad Bod ManMan
1 week ago

Gloucester

So Trump didn’t consult with congress he dismissed his top intelligence advisor he said he would wait two weeks for Iran to negotiate which they have been. He tells Americans to drink bleach to cure COVID and was convinced that people were eating cats and dogs. So what part of all of that suggests he is a logical person to be in charge of a nuclear warhead?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ames canMan
1 week ago

monaghan


"America should have bombed Iran ages ago ... it's well over due ! "
...why do you say that...?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ibuddy200Man
1 week ago

leominster

I'm pretty sure it about the enriched material iran has which is way beyond civilian use but not quite enough to create a bomb so it's very much pre emotive.. if seen the chants death to America, death to uk and so on..if we are right or wrong are any of us willing to to that chance ? And before anyone tells me about countries that do have them ..well they haven't been used since 1945 so I think all the countries that have them right now have been proven in terms of restrain...yes even putin. First thing Iran would have done was try and wipe isreal of the map..they have said so.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *urple beretMan
1 week ago

Belfast

To be fair Iran has been chanting death to us for the last 40 odd years funding while hamas hezbollah the houthis and more plus actively seeking not just to destroy Israel but eradicate Jewish people the planet Anybody that says otherwise is merely delusional has anybody actually read whats written n the quaran? Its there duty to destroy by that book sooooo they kinda had all this shit coming

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ildwestheroMan
1 week ago

Llandrindod Wells

The world would definitely be a better place without the Ayatollahs evil regime but not so sure that this action will bring them down. Just hope it does not escalate and that the UK doesn't get involved.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ames canMan
1 week ago

monaghan


"I'm pretty sure it about the enriched material iran has which is way beyond civilian use but not quite enough to create a bomb so it's very much pre emotive.. if seen the chants death to America, death to uk and so on..if we are right or wrong are any of us willing to to that chance ? And before anyone tells me about countries that do have them ..well they haven't been used since 1945 so I think all the countries that have them right now have been proven in terms of restrain...yes even putin. First thing Iran would have done was try and wipe isreal of the map..they have said so."
...you're forgetting about the agreement with Iran that trump tore up...do you remember what was in it?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ary1066Man
1 week ago

Preston

We are lead by a moron, starmer is calling for Iran to return to the negotiating table .

What the hell was happening at Geneva

Just shows his stature on the world stage

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iExCuckMan
1 week ago

Lowestoft

It's very easy for us sitting safe here in the UK to believe diplomacy works with everyone. The only time Terrorists will agree to diplomacy is if their own strict thoughts are followed and agreed with. Even then, it won't stop them from brutal and barbaric regime rule. Yes everyone has their own believe as to who is termed as a Terrorist organization or not. Unless you live in those areas of Terrorist activity, you can only speculate and use your own life experiences to determine what should be done.

There are many international agencies that work with intelligence schemes to determine who is actively using Terrorism and the threat of Nuclear Weapons to target the free world. I know many will say you can't trust these agencies, but my personal choice is to trust them.

For that reason, I believe that what both Israel and America are doing the correct thing.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
1 week ago


"

There are many international agencies that work with intelligence schemes to determine who is actively using Terrorism and the threat of Nuclear Weapons to target the free world. I know many will say you can't trust these agencies, but my personal choice is to trust them.

For that reason, I believe that what both Israel and America are doing the correct thing."

The advice from the expert nuclear and intelligence agencies is contrary to what the politicians are saying. Both the IAEA and US intelligence say there is no evidence of an active weapons programme, and both have been over-ruled by Messrs Trump and Netanyahu.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *anmannersMan
1 week ago

Notts

I've just seen a pig in earrings flying.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iggreenockMan
1 week ago

Greenock

Oh no we're all going to die

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *anmannersMan
1 week ago

Notts


"It's very easy for us sitting safe here in the UK to believe diplomacy works with everyone. The only time Terrorists will agree to diplomacy is if their own strict thoughts are followed and agreed with. Even then, it won't stop them from brutal and barbaric regime rule. Yes everyone has their own believe as to who is termed as a Terrorist organization or not. Unless you live in those areas of Terrorist activity, you can only speculate and use your own life experiences to determine what should be done.

There are many international agencies that work with intelligence schemes to determine who is actively using Terrorism and the threat of Nuclear Weapons to target the free world. I know many will say you can't trust these agencies, but my personal choice is to trust them.

For that reason, I believe that what both Israel and America are doing the correct thing."

And I agree with you.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley

Yes because the Trump and Netanyahu administrations are such proven truth tellers. [/sarcasm]

This is from the Iraq playbook.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *tephen_b50Man
1 week ago

Bristol


"Oh no we're all going to die

"

Well ... sooner or later

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *olin1951Man
1 week ago

worcester

If Trump says something my first thought is it a lie . I think he is a dangerous demented lunatic.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *tephen_b50Man
1 week ago

Bristol


"

There are many international agencies that work with intelligence schemes to determine who is actively using Terrorism and the threat of Nuclear Weapons to target the free world. I know many will say you can't trust these agencies, but my personal choice is to trust them.

For that reason, I believe that what both Israel and America are doing the correct thing.

The advice from the expert nuclear and intelligence agencies is contrary to what the politicians are saying. Both the IAEA and US intelligence say there is no evidence of an active weapons programme, and both have been over-ruled by Messrs Trump and Netanyahu."

Trump has utmost faith in experts - as long as they're telling him what he wants to hear. As soon as they aren't, he fires them and hires new ones, who are a lot less expert, but a lot more compliant.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oosterladMan
1 week ago

ipswich

It was obvious the US were going to bomb them when the president started warning that we were days or weeks away from the Iranians having their nukes ready to use. Remember Blairs warnings about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? At least now the evil Iranian regimes military capabilities have been decimated.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ldderMan
1 week ago

Oxford and Sevenoaks

He'll be happy when he starts ww3

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ary1066Man
1 week ago

Preston


"Well get your dick sorted as we might not have much time.

What do you think is going to happen?

Do you think Iran is going to be able to retaliate in any significant fashion with most of their military and terrorist leadership dead, their military decimated, and their nuclear sites destroyed?

And why would we need to worry, as opposed to the Great Satan's who is actually attacking them?"

Cyprus is a strategic airbase for British forces and well within reach of Iran ,

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annyDanielleMan
1 week ago

Street, Somerset


"

There are many international agencies that work with intelligence schemes to determine who is actively using Terrorism and the threat of Nuclear Weapons to target the free world. I know many will say you can't trust these agencies, but my personal choice is to trust them.

For that reason, I believe that what both Israel and America are doing the correct thing.

The advice from the expert nuclear and intelligence agencies is contrary to what the politicians are saying. Both the IAEA and US intelligence say there is no evidence of an active weapons programme, and both have been over-ruled by Messrs Trump and Netanyahu."

American National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard reported to congress in March this year stating quite clearly that Iran was not building nuclear weapons and that the long dormant nuclear weapons programme, suspended in 2003, remained dormant. Trump chose to ignore this testimony saying that Iran was 'very close'.

The IAEA continue to closely monitor the situation and every intelligence report comes back saying the same thing. Iran maintains that it's nuclear programme remains peaceful.

Israel is the only nation in the region that has nuclear weapons yet it's refusal to sign up to the IAEA means that the organisation is unable to inspect them. In a recent interview the president of the IAEA repeatedly fudged the question, refusing to confirm or deny Israel's weapons capability, whether they had them or not let alone how many.

Israel has also refused to sign up to the nuclear weapons NPT. The only country to have actually used nuclear weapons in conflict attacks a sovereign nation at the behest of a nuclear power that itself refuses to play by the rules, against all other evidence. Therein lies the hypocrisy.

Putting aside our western prejudice and viewing this objectively is it possible that the Iranians are not the bad guys, in this at least?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ary1066Man
1 week ago

Preston


"It's very easy for us sitting safe here in the UK to believe diplomacy works with everyone. The only time Terrorists will agree to diplomacy is if their own strict thoughts are followed and agreed with. Even then, it won't stop them from brutal and barbaric regime rule. Yes everyone has their own believe as to who is termed as a Terrorist organization or not. Unless you live in those areas of Terrorist activity, you can only speculate and use your own life experiences to determine what should be done.

There are many international agencies that work with intelligence schemes to determine who is actively using Terrorism and the threat of Nuclear Weapons to target the free world. I know many will say you can't trust these agencies, but my personal choice is to trust them.

For that reason, I believe that what both Israel and America are doing the correct thing."

On that basis explain the Good Friday Agreement or was the UDF and IRA just a Friday night in the town and not terrorists Where they not brought to a diplomatic solution .

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
1 week ago

It appears that Messers Trump and Netanyahu are relying on their instincts, not the evidence.

If you are happy to support Mr Trump because you trust his instincts, so be it.

People are being killed for this.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *arcusUK2Man
1 week ago

Winchester

Brilliant. Iran is the centre of all evil in the Middle East. They had it coming.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *orn7Man
1 week ago

high Wycombe


"

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

When did dropping bombs on a country ever persuade its leadership to go "Oh, alright then, I'll just roll over now and give you what you want"?

It always has the opposite effect.

Give it a while, and you'll see an American nuclear plant melt down by way of retaliation or whatever."

Can't you remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki... Jesus Christ it ended the bloody war dumb ass

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
1 week ago


"

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

When did dropping bombs on a country ever persuade its leadership to go "Oh, alright then, I'll just roll over now and give you what you want"?

It always has the opposite effect.

Give it a while, and you'll see an American nuclear plant melt down by way of retaliation or whatever.

Can't you remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki... Jesus Christ it ended the bloody war dumb ass "

I'm clearly not as old as you

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lexieMan
1 week ago

Just north of Southampton


"Saudi Arabia has said publicly on several occasions it will acquire the bomb if Iran does.

(It's been rumoured for years that Saudi part-funds the Pakistan programme in exchange for a promise for quick access to materials and technology should the need arise)

That said, both the IAEA and US intelligence say there is no evidence of an active weapons programme in Iran."

No evidence...! Iran is a large land mass, they don't always cooperate with IAEA searches and checks... leading to the suspicion that they are hiding something! If Iran would cooperate fully so that it could be verified that they are not secretly making a device, everyone would feel a might secure; especially the Israelis, who Iran has persistantly threatened to drive into the sea or annihilate! The middle East is a hotbed of conflicting ideologies and religious fanatics... perhaps the current situation is inevitable in an area where history tells us the guy with the biggest stick always wins!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *anmannersMan
1 week ago

Notts


"Brilliant. Iran is the centre of all evil in the Middle East. They had it coming. "

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley


"

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

When did dropping bombs on a country ever persuade its leadership to go "Oh, alright then, I'll just roll over now and give you what you want"?

It always has the opposite effect.

Give it a while, and you'll see an American nuclear plant melt down by way of retaliation or whatever.

Can't you remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki... Jesus Christ it ended the bloody war SNIPped [/childish abuse] "

It was an unnecessary act, the Japanese were already beaten.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *orn7Man
1 week ago

high Wycombe


"

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

When did dropping bombs on a country ever persuade its leadership to go "Oh, alright then, I'll just roll over now and give you what you want"?

It always has the opposite effect.

Give it a while, and you'll see an American nuclear plant melt down by way of retaliation or whatever.

Can't you remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki... Jesus Christ it ended the bloody war SNIPped [/childish abuse]

It was an unnecessary act, the Japanese were already beaten.

"

Don't poke the Bear...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ames canMan
1 week ago

monaghan


"Saudi Arabia has said publicly on several occasions it will acquire the bomb if Iran does.

(It's been rumoured for years that Saudi part-funds the Pakistan programme in exchange for a promise for quick access to materials and technology should the need arise)

That said, both the IAEA and US intelligence say there is no evidence of an active weapons programme in Iran.

No evidence...! Iran is a large land mass, they don't always cooperate with IAEA searches and checks... leading to the suspicion that they are hiding something! If Iran would cooperate fully so that it could be verified that they are not secretly making a device, everyone would feel a might secure; especially the Israelis, who Iran has persistantly threatened to drive into the sea or annihilate! The middle East is a hotbed of conflicting ideologies and religious fanatics... perhaps the current situation is inevitable in an area where history tells us the guy with the biggest stick always wins! "

...but Iran was cooperating fully...then trump tore up the agreement...but do you know who's refusing to cooperate at all,or allow any inspections...?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ary1066Man
1 week ago

Preston


"Brilliant. Iran is the centre of all evil in the Middle East. They had it coming.

"

Yet Israel are the only nation in that area that made plans to deploy nuclear weapons as they looked defeat in the face during the Egyptian war

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley

Iran even kept to the agreement for one year after it was torn up until the U.S. invited the Iranian head of military to Baghdad for peace talks and killed him when he was on the journey.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *tephen_b50Man
1 week ago

Bristol


"

................

American National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard reported to congress in March this year stating quite clearly that Iran was not building nuclear weapons and that the long dormant nuclear weapons programme, suspended in 2003, remained dormant. Trump chose to ignore this testimony saying that Iran was 'very close'.

..............................

"

Trump not only ignored Gabbard: he said she was wrong - and then she retracted her statement and agreed with his view. Because she knows what happens to people who don't.

Trump's toadies will argue that black is white if he says so, rather than disagree with him. If they weren't willing to do that they wouldn't have their jobs.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annyDanielleMan
1 week ago

Street, Somerset


"Saudi Arabia has said publicly on several occasions it will acquire the bomb if Iran does.

(It's been rumoured for years that Saudi part-funds the Pakistan programme in exchange for a promise for quick access to materials and technology should the need arise)

That said, both the IAEA and US intelligence say there is no evidence of an active weapons programme in Iran.

No evidence...! Iran is a large land mass, they don't always cooperate with IAEA searches and checks... leading to the suspicion that they are hiding something! If Iran would cooperate fully so that it could be verified that they are not secretly making a device, everyone would feel a might secure; especially the Israelis, who Iran has persistantly threatened to drive into the sea or annihilate! The middle East is a hotbed of conflicting ideologies and religious fanatics... perhaps the current situation is inevitable in an area where history tells us the guy with the biggest stick always wins! ...but Iran was cooperating fully...then trump tore up the agreement...but do you know who's refusing to cooperate at all,or allow any inspections...?"

Israel.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *3versMan
1 week ago

glasgow


"

................

American National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard reported to congress in March this year stating quite clearly that Iran was not building nuclear weapons and that the long dormant nuclear weapons programme, suspended in 2003, remained dormant. Trump chose to ignore this testimony saying that Iran was 'very close'.

..............................

Trump not only ignored Gabbard: he said she was wrong - and then she retracted her statement and agreed with his view. Because she knows what happens to people who don't.

Trump's toadies will argue that black is white if he says so, rather than disagree with him. If they weren't willing to do that they wouldn't have their jobs."

It's all about personal enrichment for these guys

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lexieMan
1 week ago

Just north of Southampton


"

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

When did dropping bombs on a country ever persuade its leadership to go "Oh, alright then, I'll just roll over now and give you what you want"?

It always has the opposite effect.

Give it a while, and you'll see an American nuclear plant melt down by way of retaliation or whatever.

Can't you remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki... Jesus Christ it ended the bloody war SNIPped [/childish abuse]

It was an unnecessary act, the Japanese were already beaten.

"

Yes, they were beaten, but the Japanese would not surrender and lay down there arms; they determined to fight fanatically to the last man! That would have involved the death of thousands more USA service men! The use of those two nuclear devices stopped that war in its tracks and saved the lives of thousands of service personnel on both sides! However... the Genie was out of the bottle, and we have all lived with the consequences ever since.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndy61hMan
1 week ago

Plymouth

This is typical Trump, does what he feels is right at the time, and waits to see what the result of it will be. He's not worried about the innocent people dying in the Middle East, he's just boosting his own ego. If it backfires he'll either carry on bombing or walk away leaving everyone else to pick up the pieces.

I thought I had read that Russia had a deal to go to the aid of Iran if they were attacked, or was that invaded.

Clock moving towards nuclear extinction or a quick reset by everyone just to see how silly the major leaders are.

1. Is Europe a threat to Russia, answer no, we aren't going to invade, and we never will, just Putin baring his balls.

2. Are China going to invade Taiwan, doubtful because like Hong Kong it's a trading partner, and previous to the current regime in Taiwan they were happy with their relationship. They also like to posture that they are a great power in the world and in that region. Makes more sense for China to attack Russia, because who would intervene. Russia weakened on the western front, China massive war machine rolls in from the east, game over.

If the bomb comes, I'm glad in live in Plymouth, we'd be wiped out real early on, do nuclear winter killing me, I'll be dust.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lexieMan
1 week ago

Just north of Southampton


"

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

When did dropping bombs on a country ever persuade its leadership to go "Oh, alright then, I'll just roll over now and give you what you want"?

It always has the opposite effect.

Give it a while, and you'll see an American nuclear plant melt down by way of retaliation or whatever.

Can't you remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki... Jesus Christ it ended the bloody war SNIPped [/childish abuse]

It was an unnecessary act, the Japanese were already beaten.

Don't poke the Bear... "

TO LATE!!!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annyDanielleMan
1 week ago

Street, Somerset


"

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

When did dropping bombs on a country ever persuade its leadership to go "Oh, alright then, I'll just roll over now and give you what you want"?

It always has the opposite effect.

Give it a while, and you'll see an American nuclear plant melt down by way of retaliation or whatever.

Can't you remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki... Jesus Christ it ended the bloody war SNIPped [/childish abuse]

It was an unnecessary act, the Japanese were already beaten.

Yes, they were beaten, but the Japanese would not surrender and lay down there arms; they determined to fight fanatically to the last man! That would have involved the death of thousands more USA service men! The use of those two nuclear devices stopped that war in its tracks and saved the lives of thousands of service personnel on both sides! However... the Genie was out of the bottle, and we have all lived with the consequences ever since. "

Alternatively the Americans hugely exaggerated that claim simply because they wanted to live test of their new technology.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lexieMan
1 week ago

Just north of Southampton


"Saudi Arabia has said publicly on several occasions it will acquire the bomb if Iran does.

(It's been rumoured for years that Saudi part-funds the Pakistan programme in exchange for a promise for quick access to materials and technology should the need arise)

That said, both the IAEA and US intelligence say there is no evidence of an active weapons programme in Iran.

No evidence...! Iran is a large land mass, they don't always cooperate with IAEA searches and checks... leading to the suspicion that they are hiding something! If Iran would cooperate fully so that it could be verified that they are not secretly making a device, everyone would feel a might secure; especially the Israelis, who Iran has persistantly threatened to drive into the sea or annihilate! The middle East is a hotbed of conflicting ideologies and religious fanatics... perhaps the current situation is inevitable in an area where history tells us the guy with the biggest stick always wins! ...but Iran was cooperating fully...then trump tore up the agreement...but do you know who's refusing to cooperate at all,or allow any inspections...?"

The country's currently (officially declared) possessing nuclear weapons have not stated that they are going to annihilate a neighboring country! Iran has!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *tephen_b50Man
1 week ago

Bristol


"

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

When did dropping bombs on a country ever persuade its leadership to go "Oh, alright then, I'll just roll over now and give you what you want"?

It always has the opposite effect.

Give it a while, and you'll see an American nuclear plant melt down by way of retaliation or whatever.

Can't you remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki... Jesus Christ it ended the bloody war SNIPped [/childish abuse]

It was an unnecessary act, the Japanese were already beaten.

Yes, they were beaten, but the Japanese would not surrender and lay down there arms; they determined to fight fanatically to the last man! That would have involved the death of thousands more USA service men! The use of those two nuclear devices stopped that war in its tracks and saved the lives of thousands of service personnel on both sides! However... the Genie was out of the bottle, and we have all lived with the consequences ever since.

Alternatively the Americans hugely exaggerated that claim simply because they wanted to live test of their new technology."

And to send a message to the Russians.

Not that it told them anything they didn't already know. Klaus Fuchs had already spilled the lot, and it took them very little time to develop their own weapons.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
1 week ago


"

I thought I had read that Russia had a deal to go to the aid of Iran if they were attacked, or was that invaded.

"

Both Israel and USA have avoided hitting the one nuclear facility in Iran where 200 Russian personnel are working - Bushehr.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lexieMan
1 week ago

Just north of Southampton


"

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

When did dropping bombs on a country ever persuade its leadership to go "Oh, alright then, I'll just roll over now and give you what you want"?

It always has the opposite effect.

Give it a while, and you'll see an American nuclear plant melt down by way of retaliation or whatever.

Can't you remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki... Jesus Christ it ended the bloody war SNIPped [/childish abuse]

It was an unnecessary act, the Japanese were already beaten.

Yes, they were beaten, but the Japanese would not surrender and lay down there arms; they determined to fight fanatically to the last man! That would have involved the death of thousands more USA service men! The use of those two nuclear devices stopped that war in its tracks and saved the lives of thousands of service personnel on both sides! However... the Genie was out of the bottle, and we have all lived with the consequences ever since.

Alternatively the Americans hugely exaggerated that claim simply because they wanted to live test of their new technology.

And to send a message to the Russians.

Not that it told them anything they didn't already know. Klaus Fuchs had already spilled the lot, and it took them very little time to develop their own weapons. "

That as well.

Kid... 'We aren't going to make it are we, the human race I mean?' Arnie... 'No!'

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ottom_only_CDTV/TS
1 week ago

Lenzie

Iran have been on the hit list long before any that has happened recently. The American Neo Con list for regime change included Iran from the outset.

Iraq, Libya, Syria ticked off the list. Iran , North Korea to go.

In August 1992, the Israeli-American political scientist Yossef Bodansky wrote a paper entitled "Tehran, Baghdad & Damascus: The New Axis Pact" while serving as the Director of the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare of the US House of Representatives.

I don't think it mattered what the Iranian leadership did. Apart from swearing loyalty to the US and allowing free markets and recognising Israel.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lexieMan
1 week ago

Just north of Southampton


"

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

When did dropping bombs on a country ever persuade its leadership to go "Oh, alright then, I'll just roll over now and give you what you want"?

It always has the opposite effect.

Give it a while, and you'll see an American nuclear plant melt down by way of retaliation or whatever.

Can't you remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki... Jesus Christ it ended the bloody war SNIPped [/childish abuse]

It was an unnecessary act, the Japanese were already beaten.

Yes, they were beaten, but the Japanese would not surrender and lay down there arms; they determined to fight fanatically to the last man! That would have involved the death of thousands more USA service men! The use of those two nuclear devices stopped that war in its tracks and saved the lives of thousands of service personnel on both sides! However... the Genie was out of the bottle, and we have all lived with the consequences ever since.

Alternatively the Americans hugely exaggerated that claim simply because they wanted to live test of their new technology.

And to send a message to the Russians.

Not that it told them anything they didn't already know. Klaus Fuchs had already spilled the lot, and it took them very little time to develop their own weapons. "

That as well.

Kid... 'We aren't going to make it are we, the human race I mean?' Arnie... 'No!'

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
1 week ago


"

I thought I had read that Russia had a deal to go to the aid of Iran if they were attacked, or was that invaded.

."

Ot maybe you are thinking about "Threads", the 1984 BBC drama about a nuclear bomb dropped on Sheffield.

The context for that was the USSR moving into Iran from the north to protect its old fields, the USA moving in from the south, and the two forces clashing on the ground.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lexieMan
1 week ago

Just north of Southampton


"

I thought I had read that Russia had a deal to go to the aid of Iran if they were attacked, or was that invaded.

Both Israel and USA have avoided hitting the one nuclear facility in Iran where 200 Russian personnel are working - Bushehr."

True, but don't forget that Mr Putin and Trump have a hotline to each other... Trump would not have sent his B52's without knowing Russia's reaction first! A new world order is in the making... lets all hope we live through it!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley

The U.S. seem to be playing it up, saying that the facilities are completely destroyed and Iran seem to be playing it down, saying that they aren't.

This could be good (not for the pro war) as maybe both sides are looking for an off ramp, that ramp being U.S. escalation into the Iran Israel battle.

Of course the U.S. do want to collapse Iran but I think at this point they are happy for Israel to do the work.

Problem for Israel being that they will lose a war of attrition with Iran.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley

[Removed by poster at 22/06/25 12:45:13]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley

Trump probably thinks these strikes will satisfy the Israel lobby- but they won't.

If the both the U.S. and Iran are looking to deescalate with each other then this does actually play into Iran's hand because, again, Israel will not win a war of attrition with Iran.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *andomguy321Man
1 week ago

reading

Israel is the tail that wags the dog

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ornyfeckerMan
1 week ago

Dundee

The bottom line is that, Iran promised that the would have a nuclear weapon and delivery system by the end of 2025. They have the delivery system and they were a short time away from having the warhead. They also promised to wipe Israel off the face of the earth. I will leave you to guess as to how. Iran have been in negotiation aka delay the enemy for years. If the USA had not taken action then there would have been a nuclear war by the end of this year. The question is, will Russia, China or North Korea supply Iran with a delivery system and warhead.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ornyfeckerMan
1 week ago

Dundee


"Israel is the tail that wags the dog "

Lol. Utter drivel. Please explain how a nation of six million people, a third of which are Arab Muslims, are telling the USA what to do.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ausagesMan
1 week ago

carlisle


"The world would definitely be a better place without the Ayatollahs evil regime but not so sure that this action will bring them down. Just hope it does not escalate and that the UK doesn't get involved."

Once in a blue moon I agree with you

You are right

I just hope we don’t have - pro Iran protests in the UK - Iran regime undemocratic terrorist religious dictatorship- openly calling to wipe Israel off the map

Anything that can bring down the vile Iranian regime is a good thing besides believe if Iran were successful in finalising nuclear weapons - it wouldn’t just be Israel that they would try to wipe off the map

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annyDanielleMan
1 week ago

Street, Somerset


"Israel is the tail that wags the dog

Lol. Utter drivel. Please explain how a nation of six million people, a third of which are Arab Muslims, are telling the USA what to do."

AIPAC.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *uckbudyMan
1 week ago

somewherenear

Trump is using Iran as a warning to Putin, we will see a difference in Ukraine and in Taiwan regarding China invasion.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *andomguy321Man
1 week ago

reading


"Israel is the tail that wags the dog

Lol. Utter drivel. Please explain how a nation of six million people, a third of which are Arab Muslims, are telling the USA what to do."

Enjoy your blissful state of ignorance

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inaCD66TV/TS
1 week ago

Wimbledon


"US launches strikes on Iran.

US warplanes have bombed three nuclear sites in Iran, Donald Trump has announced.

“We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan,” the US president posted on Truth Social.

"

Good.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inaCD66TV/TS
1 week ago

Wimbledon


"

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

When did dropping bombs on a country ever persuade its leadership to go "Oh, alright then, I'll just roll over now and give you what you want"?

It always has the opposite effect.

Give it a while, and you'll see an American nuclear plant melt down by way of retaliation or whatever."

No you wont.. the world is shittng itself now as the USA have a bloke who does press red buttons be it right or wrong !

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
1 week ago


"

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

When did dropping bombs on a country ever persuade its leadership to go "Oh, alright then, I'll just roll over now and give you what you want"?

It always has the opposite effect.

Give it a while, and you'll see an American nuclear plant melt down by way of retaliation or whatever.

No you wont.. the world is shittng itself now as the USA have a bloke who does press red buttons be it right or wrong !"

You think a sovereign state like Iran will just shrug its shoulders and cower now?

I don’t.

Their payback will come one day.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inaCD66TV/TS
1 week ago

Wimbledon


"

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

When did dropping bombs on a country ever persuade its leadership to go "Oh, alright then, I'll just roll over now and give you what you want"?

It always has the opposite effect.

Give it a while, and you'll see an American nuclear plant melt down by way of retaliation or whatever.

No you wont.. the world is shittng itself now as the USA have a bloke who does press red buttons be it right or wrong !

You think a sovereign state like Iran will just shrug its shoulders and cower now?

I don’t.

Their payback will come one day."

I dont think they will send one missile towards usa or nato countries as they are weak and will just terrorise under the blanket as all these regimes do.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ornyfeckerMan
1 week ago

Dundee


"Israel is the tail that wags the dog

Lol. Utter drivel. Please explain how a nation of six million people, a third of which are Arab Muslims, are telling the USA what to do.

Enjoy your blissful state of ignorance"

As ever, you don't, won't or can't explain.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley


"

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

When did dropping bombs on a country ever persuade its leadership to go "Oh, alright then, I'll just roll over now and give you what you want"?

It always has the opposite effect.

Give it a while, and you'll see an American nuclear plant melt down by way of retaliation or whatever.

No you wont.. the world is shittng itself now as the USA have a bloke who does press red buttons be it right or wrong !

You think a sovereign state like Iran will just shrug its shoulders and cower now?

I don’t.

Their payback will come one day.

I dont think they will send one missile towards usa or nato countries as they are weak and will just terrorise under the blanket as all these regimes do."

They seem to be outside the blanket in regards to their bombing Israel. You think they look weak in what they are doing?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
1 week ago


"

I dont think they will send one missile towards usa or nato countries as they are weak and will just terrorise under the blanket as all these regimes do."

I don't think they will launch missiles either.

That's why I envisionioned some US nuclear plant going into meltdown as the quid pro quo.

Not today, not tomorrow, but in the near future.

When the USA blew up Iran Air flight 655 over the Persian Gulf in July 1988, killing all 290 on board, the retaliation came 5 months later.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *andomguy321Man
1 week ago

reading


"Israel is the tail that wags the dog

Lol. Utter drivel. Please explain how a nation of six million people, a third of which are Arab Muslims, are telling the USA what to do.

Enjoy your blissful state of ignorance

As ever, you don't, won't or can't explain."

If you can't see it by now then you never will.

Pandering to your innate incomprehension would be a waste of my time.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ottom_only_CDTV/TS
1 week ago

Lenzie


"Israel is the tail that wags the dog

Lol. Utter drivel. Please explain how a nation of six million people, a third of which are Arab Muslims, are telling the USA what to do."

Total population is over 9 million.

73.2% (about 7,208,000 people) are Jews, including about 503,000 living outside the self-defined borders of the State of Israel in the West Bank

21.1% (around 2,080,000 people) are Israeli citizens classified as Arab, some identifying as Palestinian, and including Druze, Circassians, all other Muslims, Christian Arabs, Armenians (which Israel considers "Arab")

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *evanianMan
1 week ago

Tegeingl, Gogledd Cymru

Diplomacy is always a better humanitarian approach than military action in addressing international tensions.

Military strikes inevitably lead to significant retaliation and escalation, destabilising and worsening humanitarian crisies.

Iran is likely to focus on regional targets with terrorism rather than directly targeting the US or NATO due to their military strength.

Despite the challenge of Iran's approach to international relations, multilateral talks, economic incentives, and dialogue might still help reduce tensions. However, given Iran's track record, a peaceful solution currently seems unlikely.

The possible outcome is likely to be continued tensions and instability in the region and at remote targets in the West.

Military action could lead to significant escalation, while diplomatic efforts might face challenges due to Iran's response.

The situation is likely to remain volatile unless the politicians get their acts together.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ottom_only_CDTV/TS
1 week ago

Lenzie


"Israel is the tail that wags the dog

Lol. Utter drivel. Please explain how a nation of six million people, a third of which are Arab Muslims, are telling the USA what to do."

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee has become a fundraising juggernaut in recent years, raising more money for candidates than any similar organization as part of its mission to back candidates who support Israel.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ickeMan
1 week ago

watford


"Yet that orange cunt said Obama would attack Iran? And then said we'd get WW3 under a Harris administration? God fucking help us all. "I don't start new wars" my ass. I never understand the double standards that mean 'murica can have nukes but somehow nobody else is allowed them. God, I hate the USA. "

Hate USA thank the Lord , their on our side .

Iran with nuclear weapons is like giving a Christian to the lions .

It only end one way .

Shia Muslims are terrorist follow Quran to the word .

Which means death to none believer.

That’s you ?

Remember these people death to them is way to Heaven JIHAD

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley

The more information coming through the more the U.S. strikes look like theatrics, could even have been coordinated. The Iranians say that they removed all enriched uranium from the sites a couple of days ago.

Let's face it, it would be silly had they have not.

Iran have kept their eye on the ball with a 20th wave of missile attacks and another new missile that has evaded the Israeli defences and detection.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *hirtyguyMan
1 week ago

Coleraine

[
"Israel is the tail that wags the dog

Lol. Utter drivel. Please explain how a nation of six million people, a third of which are Arab Muslims, are telling the USA what to do.

Enjoy your blissful state of ignorance

As ever, you don't, won't or can't explain."

A reasonable question, until one recognises that Trump is a convicted fraudster, ra_est and a persistent lier. Then it becomes clear that Netenyahu has information which this criminal does not want released to even the very stupid American public.]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
1 week ago

One good outcome of this might be that it diminishes the supply of arms to Russia to use in Ukraine because of damage to its military-industrial complex.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ornyfeckerMan
1 week ago

Dundee


"Israel is the tail that wags the dog

Lol. Utter drivel. Please explain how a nation of six million people, a third of which are Arab Muslims, are telling the USA what to do.

Enjoy your blissful state of ignorance

As ever, you don't, won't or can't explain.

If you can't see it by now then you never will.

Pandering to your innate incomprehension would be a waste of my time."

Yes, you always avoid answering a question, always avoid justifying your comment. That says more about your comprehension than mine. You crack on with the inane one liners. Don't worry about justifying your comment.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *andomguy321Man
1 week ago

reading


"Israel is the tail that wags the dog

Lol. Utter drivel. Please explain how a nation of six million people, a third of which are Arab Muslims, are telling the USA what to do.

Enjoy your blissful state of ignorance

As ever, you don't, won't or can't explain.

If you can't see it by now then you never will.

Pandering to your innate incomprehension would be a waste of my time.

Yes, you always avoid answering a question, always avoid justifying your comment. That says more about your comprehension than mine. You crack on with the inane one liners. Don't worry about justifying your comment."

Not worried in the slightest

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ottom_only_CDTV/TS
1 week ago

Lenzie

Keep telling people Saddam has weapons of mass destruction so we got to take him out.

Keep telling people the crazy Mullahs are looking to get nukes so, they can at the earliest possible moment use them to attack Israel and the West, but not has a deterrent from hostile neighbours like all the other countries claim they developed them for.

Nuremberg in 1946, Hermann Goering was asked how he got the German people to accept Nazism.

He allegedly responded: “It was very easy, it has nothing to do with Nazism, it has something to do with human nature. You can do it in a Nazi, socialist, communist regime, in a monarchy and even in a democracy. The only thing that needs to be done to ensl*ve people is to scare them. If you manage to find a way to scare people, you can make them do what you want.”

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ever000Man
1 week ago

beccles


"US launches strikes on Iran.

US warplanes have bombed three nuclear sites in Iran, Donald Trump has announced.

“We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan,” the US president posted on Truth Social.

"

About time carry on trumpy

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ickeMan
1 week ago

watford

[Removed by poster at 22/06/25 14:44:45]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *wansmickMan
1 week ago

Belfast

Trump and Netanyahu will start ww3 mark my fucking words 😕😕😕

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annyDanielleMan
1 week ago

Street, Somerset


"Israel is the tail that wags the dog

Lol. Utter drivel. Please explain how a nation of six million people, a third of which are Arab Muslims, are telling the USA what to do.

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee has become a fundraising juggernaut in recent years, raising more money for candidates than any similar organization as part of its mission to back candidates who support Israel."

As i said earlier, AIPAC. Bear in mind also that America is governed by fundamentalist Christians, fuck buddies of Judaism.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ewBrumBiMan
1 week ago

Birmingham B15


"Trump and Netanyahu will start ww3 mark my fucking words 😕😕😕"

That would explain why Pakistan suggested him for the Novel Peace Prize...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ewBrumBiMan
1 week ago

Birmingham B15

*Nobel

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ickeMan
1 week ago

watford


"Trump and Netanyahu will start ww3 mark my fucking words 😕😕😕"

No they won’t ,

It all cooled down now unless Iran keep bombing Isreal .

Nobody likes Iran in Middle East.

Those Shia Muslims supporting terrorism thoughout world .

Chin shot 1 million looked up in Muslim forced labour camps .

Russia got their problems with Chechen Muslims .

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *OMPLACIENT GUYMan
1 week ago

Hove


"Yet that orange cunt said Obama would attack Iran? And then said we'd get WW3 under a Harris administration? God fucking help us all. "I don't start new wars" my ass. I never understand the double standards that mean 'murica can have nukes but somehow nobody else is allowed them. God, I hate the USA. "

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley

The U.S. are bluffing. There's no way of measuring the success of the strikes. Iran closed the entrances etc and claim to have moved all the enriched uranium out in preparation as they're obviously expecting an attack.

Meanwhile business as usual between Iran and Israel and Israel are running low on intercepter missiles and the U.S. has already said that their own stocks are depleted.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *OMPLACIENT GUYMan
1 week ago

Hove

Where have you been living under a rock.It had to be done and you know it.Why all this hatred for Trump save it for Starmer FFS.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *anmannersMan
1 week ago

Notts


"The U.S. are bluffing. There's no way of measuring the success of the strikes. Iran closed the entrances etc and claim to have moved all the enriched uranium out in preparation as they're obviously expecting an attack.

Meanwhile business as usual between Iran and Israel and Israel are running low on intercepter missiles and the U.S. has already said that their own stocks are depleted.

"

Utter tosh

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley

[Removed by poster at 22/06/25 15:04:07]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley


"The U.S. are bluffing. There's no way of measuring the success of the strikes. Iran closed the entrances etc and claim to have moved all the enriched uranium out in preparation as they're obviously expecting an attack.

Meanwhile business as usual between Iran and Israel and Israel are running low on intercepter missiles and the U.S. has already said that their own stocks are depleted.

Utter tosh"

It's a fact that has been widely reported.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *igDickEnergyMan
1 week ago

cardiff


"Israel is the tail that wags the dog

Lol. Utter drivel. Please explain how a nation of six million people, a third of which are Arab Muslims, are telling the USA what to do."

Netenyah and Trump are very much of a criminal ilk!!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *igDickEnergyMan
1 week ago

cardiff


"Trump is using Iran as a warning to Putin, we will see a difference in Ukraine and in Taiwan regarding China invasion."

Lol!!

Still playing 4D chess is he???

Or are we on another level by now??

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ames canMan
1 week ago

monaghan


"Saudi Arabia has said publicly on several occasions it will acquire the bomb if Iran does.

(It's been rumoured for years that Saudi part-funds the Pakistan programme in exchange for a promise for quick access to materials and technology should the need arise)

That said, both the IAEA and US intelligence say there is no evidence of an active weapons programme in Iran.

No evidence...! Iran is a large land mass, they don't always cooperate with IAEA searches and checks... leading to the suspicion that they are hiding something! If Iran would cooperate fully so that it could be verified that they are not secretly making a device, everyone would feel a might secure; especially the Israelis, who Iran has persistantly threatened to drive into the sea or annihilate! The middle East is a hotbed of conflicting ideologies and religious fanatics... perhaps the current situation is inevitable in an area where history tells us the guy with the biggest stick always wins! ...but Iran was cooperating fully...then trump tore up the agreement...but do you know who's refusing to cooperate at all,or allow any inspections...?

The country's currently (officially declared) possessing nuclear weapons have not stated that they are going to annihilate a neighboring country! Iran has! "

..answer the question...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley

That's why they moved unmanned air defence systems out of Ukraine recently- because they're running low.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *igDickEnergyMan
1 week ago

cardiff

Even though it is like cutting your nose off to spite your face if things escalate and the allies continue to support America and Israel.

My prediction will be that the straight of Hormuz will be blocked to raise the price of oil.

The population of Western democracies are more likely to protest and dissent than the their own population

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *igDickEnergyMan
1 week ago

cardiff


"Trump and Netanyahu will start ww3 mark my fucking words 😕😕😕

No they won’t ,

It all cooled down now unless Iran keep bombing Isreal .

Nobody likes Iran in Middle East.

Those Shia Muslims supporting terrorism thoughout world .

Chin shot 1 million looked up in Muslim forced labour camps .

Russia got their problems with Chechen Muslims . "

Muslims are the 1930s Jews

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icariusMaximusMan
1 week ago

Handsworth

Will be interesting what Russia does. Iran has sent a delegation to Moscow. Thing is Putin and Trump aren't close, or pretending to be, anymore. Giving the political finger to the US by arming Iran is certainly within the MO of Putin...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icariusMaximusMan
1 week ago

Handsworth


"Even though it is like cutting your nose off to spite your face if things escalate and the allies continue to support America and Israel.

My prediction will be that the straight of Hormuz will be blocked to raise the price of oil.

The population of Western democracies are more likely to protest and dissent than the their own population "

Isn't the Straight of Hormuz BI now?

😎😁

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *orkchopperMan
1 week ago

horsham

[Removed by poster at 22/06/25 15:49:34]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ildwestheroMan
1 week ago

Llandrindod Wells

I cannot imagine why anyone, especially on this site, would have the slightest bit of sympathy for the evil Ayatollah's regime in Iran.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *hubsloverMan
1 week ago

East/west sussex


"The more information coming through the more the U.S. strikes look like theatrics, could even have been coordinated. The Iranians say that they removed all enriched uranium from the sites a couple of days ago.

Let's face it, it would be silly had they have not.

Iran have kept their eye on the ball with a 20th wave of missile attacks and another new missile that has evaded the Israeli defences and detection."

Indeed, it is absurd and yet another falsehood propagated by the terrorist ayatollahs. I am puzzled as to why you are drawn to the fabricated news from these ayatollahs, who have been deceiving the Iranian people for over 45 years. The attack was aimed at Fordow, located 100 meters underground. Given the circumstances, with Israel dropping tons of bombs and maintaining complete aerial dominance over Tehran, how could they possibly move the enriched uranium? They themselves confirmed the damage. Additionally, refer to the IAEA for accurate information. That misleading news pertained to Natanz, not Fordow.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley

[Removed by poster at 22/06/25 16:07:12]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ames canMan
1 week ago

monaghan


"I cannot imagine why anyone, especially on this site, would have the slightest bit of sympathy for the evil Ayatollah's regime in Iran."
...well the "evil regime "...is a product of American intervention in another country...didn't you know?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icariusMaximusMan
1 week ago

Handsworth

The US and Israel would know if the uranium had been removed. Reconnaissance and informants would have revealed this. They wouldn't waste the very expensive weaponry on empty targets...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *urray66Man
1 week ago

Farnham


"I cannot imagine why anyone, especially on this site, would have the slightest bit of sympathy for the evil Ayatollah's regime in Iran."

AGREED

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ornyfeckerMan
1 week ago

Dundee


"I cannot imagine why anyone, especially on this site, would have the slightest bit of sympathy for the evil Ayatollah's regime in Iran."

To answer your question, many, probably the majority of posters as you will see from related posts, have a greater hatred, and I do mean hatred, of Israel. They don't sympathise with Iran, they just hate Israel more. A case of my enemy's enemy is my friend.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley


"The more information coming through the more the U.S. strikes look like theatrics, could even have been coordinated. The Iranians say that they removed all enriched uranium from the sites a couple of days ago.

Let's face it, it would be silly had they have not.

Iran have kept their eye on the ball with a 20th wave of missile attacks and another new missile that has evaded the Israeli defences and detection.

Indeed, it is absurd and yet another falsehood propagated by the terrorist ayatollahs. I am puzzled as to why you are drawn to the fabricated news from these ayatollahs, who have been deceiving the Iranian people for over 45 years. The attack was aimed at Fordow, located 100 meters underground. Given the circumstances, with Israel dropping tons of bombs and maintaining complete aerial dominance over Tehran, how could they possibly move the enriched uranium? They themselves confirmed the damage. Additionally, refer to the IAEA for accurate information. That misleading news pertained to Natanz, not Fordow."

Of course they're just complete fucking idiots and didn't prepare for a U.S. strike or anything.

And that's odd, since Israel don't even have control over their own skies hence the highly technical missiles coming in without even being detected.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icariusMaximusMan
1 week ago

Handsworth


"I cannot imagine why anyone, especially on this site, would have the slightest bit of sympathy for the evil Ayatollah's regime in Iran....well the "evil regime "...is a product of American intervention in another country...didn't you know?"

The absurd self-important defence of regimes that would imprison, torture and kill those on here simply because of their sexual lifestyle choices...

🙄🤔🤮

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ames canMan
1 week ago

monaghan


"The US and Israel would know if the uranium had been removed. Reconnaissance and informants would have revealed this. They wouldn't waste the very expensive weaponry on empty targets... "
..is that based on any intelligence, or is it just your opinion..?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ames canMan
1 week ago

monaghan


"I cannot imagine why anyone, especially on this site, would have the slightest bit of sympathy for the evil Ayatollah's regime in Iran....well the "evil regime "...is a product of American intervention in another country...didn't you know?

The absurd self-important defence of regimes that would imprison, torture and kill those on here simply because of their sexual lifestyle choices...

🙄🤔🤮"

....but I don't live in Iran...do you?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley


"The US and Israel would know if the uranium had been removed. Reconnaissance and informants would have revealed this. They wouldn't waste the very expensive weaponry on empty targets... "

Yeah I'm sure the fucking idiots just left it all right under the target.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *igDickEnergyMan
1 week ago

cardiff


"I cannot imagine why anyone, especially on this site, would have the slightest bit of sympathy for the evil Ayatollah's regime in Iran."

Regime change has always worked out so well

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *hubsloverMan
1 week ago

East/west sussex


"I cannot imagine why anyone, especially on this site, would have the slightest bit of sympathy for the evil Ayatollah's regime in Iran."

Exactly. Eighty percent of Iranians desire a change in regime, as the ayatollahs have squandered the nation's wealth on bombs, rockets, and uranium enrichment, leaving them to live in squalor while the populace suffers. There have been no air raid sirens thus far; the skies over Tehran are completely dominated by Israeli fighters. The ayatollahs are hiding in their rat holes, excelling only in the killing of Iranians. Aside from that, they have contributed nothing but terrorism in various countries. The mullahs are utterly despicable, and the nation is anticipating a counterattack to completely dismantle them from within. That supreme leader, a disgrace, has been holed up for about two weeks. It's amusing to compare him with Zelensky and observe the stark differences

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *hirtyguyMan
1 week ago

Coleraine

[
"The US and Israel would know if the uranium had been removed. Reconnaissance and informants would have revealed this. They wouldn't waste the very expensive weaponry on empty targets... "

Yes of course they would, Trump is a proven criminal and cares nothing about the American tax payer, he exists only to steal as much as he can from them.]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley


"I cannot imagine why anyone, especially on this site, would have the slightest bit of sympathy for the evil Ayatollah's regime in Iran.

Exactly. Eighty percent of Iranians desire a change in regime, as the ayatollahs have squandered the nation's wealth on bombs, rockets, and uranium enrichment, leaving them to live in squalor while the populace suffers. There have been no air raid sirens thus far; the skies over Tehran are completely dominated by Israeli fighters. The ayatollahs are hiding in their rat holes, excelling only in the killing of Iranians. Aside from that, they have contributed nothing but terrorism in various countries. The mullahs are utterly despicable, and the nation is anticipating a counterattack to completely dismantle them from within. That supreme leader, a disgrace, has been holed up for about two weeks. It's amusing to compare him with Zelensky and observe the stark differences"

Iranians are begging for a good old U.S. carpet bombing, please Trump, send bombs! No doubt. [/sarcasm]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *igDickEnergyMan
1 week ago

cardiff


"I cannot imagine why anyone, especially on this site, would have the slightest bit of sympathy for the evil Ayatollah's regime in Iran.

Exactly. Eighty percent of Iranians desire a change in regime, as the ayatollahs have squandered the nation's wealth on bombs, rockets, and uranium enrichment, leaving them to live in squalor while the populace suffers. There have been no air raid sirens thus far; the skies over Tehran are completely dominated by Israeli fighters. The ayatollahs are hiding in their rat holes, excelling only in the killing of Iranians. Aside from that, they have contributed nothing but terrorism in various countries. The mullahs are utterly despicable, and the nation is anticipating a counterattack to completely dismantle them from within. That supreme leader, a disgrace, has been holed up for about two weeks. It's amusing to compare him with Zelensky and observe the stark differences"

And you can assure the rest of the world, that if they were toppled what would follow would be better????

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ianca del MonteTV/TS
1 week ago

Somewhere nr Reading

If there is a choice:

Iran with a nuclear capability

vs

Iran without a nuclear capability

I'll opt for the latter.

It would appear that (thus far) the US has only targeted the nuclear infrastructure. That's a whole different ball game from regime change.

Not a fan of USA government.

Not a fan of Israeli government.

Not a fan of Palestinian government.

Not a fan of Iranian government.

Even less of a fan of a nuclear armed Iran.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *obbleTV/TS
1 week ago

manchester

Thats the problem, who knows what the next regime would be. It went tits up when they got rid of Hussein.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icariusMaximusMan
1 week ago

Handsworth


"The US and Israel would know if the uranium had been removed. Reconnaissance and informants would have revealed this. They wouldn't waste the very expensive weaponry on empty targets...

Yeah I'm sure the fucking idiots just left it all right under the target."

Do you honestly think uranium is EASILY to just move around? And the fact is the US would know if they had done this.

They sent out 7 Stealth Bombers costing $2.2billion each, putting them at risk along with their expensive payloads. Along with another 100+ expensive aircraft. Which were deployed. At great expense.

They just did this for fun? A PR exercise? Symbolism?

🤔🙄🙄🙄😂🤣😅😁😁😁

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *hubsloverMan
1 week ago

East/west sussex


"I cannot imagine why anyone, especially on this site, would have the slightest bit of sympathy for the evil Ayatollah's regime in Iran....well the "evil regime "...is a product of American intervention in another country...didn't you know?"

Correct . Engineered by jimmy carter and co .

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ewBrumBiMan
1 week ago

Birmingham B15

Remember that Israeli intelligence is so good that they've been annihilating Iranian leadership. It seems very unlikely that they wouldn't have been watching their primary targets.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *likhan200Man
1 week ago

West midlands

[Removed by poster at 22/06/25 16:38:19]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icariusMaximusMan
1 week ago

Handsworth


"Thats the problem, who knows what the next regime would be. It went tits up when they got rid of Hussein."

But Iraq has been rendered impotent as a threat. Not much fun for their populace but has it ever been?

Iran with the current fundamentalist regime certainly could launch a nuke. And Israel and the UK could certainly be targeted...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *igDickEnergyMan
1 week ago

cardiff


"Remember that Israeli intelligence is so good that they've been annihilating Iranian leadership. It seems very unlikely that they wouldn't have been watching their primary targets."

So good!

Can't differentiate between Hamas and Palestinian civilian though

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *igDickEnergyMan
1 week ago

cardiff


"Thats the problem, who knows what the next regime would be. It went tits up when they got rid of Hussein.

But Iraq has been rendered impotent as a threat. Not much fun for their populace but has it ever been?

Iran with the current fundamentalist regime certainly could launch a nuke. And Israel and the UK could certainly be targeted... "

If they had nukes......do they have nukes???

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icariusMaximusMan
1 week ago

Handsworth


"Remember that Israeli intelligence is so good that they've been annihilating Iranian leadership. It seems very unlikely that they wouldn't have been watching their primary targets."

Remember they just targeted a side building with a super-accurate missile because they saw the HVT entering the building? Killing him and sparing those in the main building? Their technology is super accurate and their intelligence/reconnaissance is top level. Israel and the US are the two top military nations on the planet. To suggest they don't know what they are doing and just 'hitting and hoping' is preposterous...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *igDickEnergyMan
1 week ago

cardiff


"Remember that Israeli intelligence is so good that they've been annihilating Iranian leadership. It seems very unlikely that they wouldn't have been watching their primary targets.

Remember they just targeted a side building with a super-accurate missile because they saw the HVT entering the building? Killing him and sparing those in the main building? Their technology is super accurate and their intelligence/reconnaissance is top level. Israel and the US are the two top military nations on the planet. To suggest they don't know what they are doing and just 'hitting and hoping' is preposterous...

"

Accurate.

But the Palestinians of Gaza are just collateral?????

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icariusMaximusMan
1 week ago

Handsworth


"Thats the problem, who knows what the next regime would be. It went tits up when they got rid of Hussein.

But Iraq has been rendered impotent as a threat. Not much fun for their populace but has it ever been?

Iran with the current fundamentalist regime certainly could launch a nuke. And Israel and the UK could certainly be targeted...

If they had nukes......do they have nukes???"

You are completely missing the point of the attack. If they did they probably don't now. If they were close they certainly have been damaged now. If they get nukes the ideology of their fundamentalist regime certainly does put Israel and the UK as its ally at risk of a nuclear attack. Prevention is better than cure...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley


"The US and Israel would know if the uranium had been removed. Reconnaissance and informants would have revealed this. They wouldn't waste the very expensive weaponry on empty targets...

Yeah I'm sure the fucking idiots just left it all right under the target.

Do you honestly think uranium is EASILY to just move around? And the fact is the US would know if they had done this.

They sent out 7 Stealth Bombers costing $2.2billion each, putting them at risk along with their expensive payloads. Along with another 100+ expensive aircraft. Which were deployed. At great expense.

They just did this for fun? A PR exercise? Symbolism?

🤔🙄🙄🙄😂🤣😅😁😁😁"

Yeah because the Americans know everything don't they?

I'm sure those weapons of mass destruction will turn up soon- you still waiting?..

I know you think that the Iranians are just fucking idiots who didn't think this through when they began enrichment, I never said it would be easy but you cant say it cant be done.

Never forget that war is a theatre.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *igDickEnergyMan
1 week ago

cardiff


"Thats the problem, who knows what the next regime would be. It went tits up when they got rid of Hussein.

But Iraq has been rendered impotent as a threat. Not much fun for their populace but has it ever been?

Iran with the current fundamentalist regime certainly could launch a nuke. And Israel and the UK could certainly be targeted...

If they had nukes......do they have nukes???

You are completely missing the point of the attack. If they did they probably don't now. If they were close they certainly have been damaged now. If they get nukes the ideology of their fundamentalist regime certainly does put Israel and the UK as its ally at risk of a nuclear attack. Prevention is better than cure...

"

Unless your Iranian, brown lives don't matter

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icariusMaximusMan
1 week ago

Handsworth


"Remember that Israeli intelligence is so good that they've been annihilating Iranian leadership. It seems very unlikely that they wouldn't have been watching their primary targets.

Remember they just targeted a side building with a super-accurate missile because they saw the HVT entering the building? Killing him and sparing those in the main building? Their technology is super accurate and their intelligence/reconnaissance is top level. Israel and the US are the two top military nations on the planet. To suggest they don't know what they are doing and just 'hitting and hoping' is preposterous...

Accurate.

But the Palestinians of Gaza are just collateral?????"

They use the cheaper weaponry on the lesser targets. Sounds flippant but it's true. Those pin-point guided weapons cost a fortune and are limited in numbers. The unguided missiles/bombs get used on the Hamas small-fry cowering among the population in Gaza. Collateral damage from the IDFs perspective. And only a few top-level Hamas leaders are deemed worthy of the precise weaponry. But they have used them on HVT Hamas leaders. See the footage...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icariusMaximusMan
1 week ago

Handsworth


"The US and Israel would know if the uranium had been removed. Reconnaissance and informants would have revealed this. They wouldn't waste the very expensive weaponry on empty targets...

Yeah I'm sure the fucking idiots just left it all right under the target.

Do you honestly think uranium is EASILY to just move around? And the fact is the US would know if they had done this.

They sent out 7 Stealth Bombers costing $2.2billion each, putting them at risk along with their expensive payloads. Along with another 100+ expensive aircraft. Which were deployed. At great expense.

They just did this for fun? A PR exercise? Symbolism?

🤔🙄🙄🙄😂🤣😅😁😁😁

Yeah because the Americans know everything don't they?

I'm sure those weapons of mass destruction will turn up soon- you still waiting?..

I know you think that the Iranians are just fucking idiots who didn't think this through when they began enrichment, I never said it would be easy but you cant say it cant be done.

Never forget that war is a theatre."

Do you actually want Iran to have nukes and ourselves to be put at risk of an attack?

Sick...

🤮🤔

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *igDickEnergyMan
1 week ago

cardiff


"Remember that Israeli intelligence is so good that they've been annihilating Iranian leadership. It seems very unlikely that they wouldn't have been watching their primary targets.

Remember they just targeted a side building with a super-accurate missile because they saw the HVT entering the building? Killing him and sparing those in the main building? Their technology is super accurate and their intelligence/reconnaissance is top level. Israel and the US are the two top military nations on the planet. To suggest they don't know what they are doing and just 'hitting and hoping' is preposterous...

Accurate.

But the Palestinians of Gaza are just collateral?????

They use the cheaper weaponry on the lesser targets. Sounds flippant but it's true. Those pin-point guided weapons cost a fortune and are limited in numbers. The unguided missiles/bombs get used on the Hamas small-fry cowering among the population in Gaza. Collateral damage from the IDFs perspective. And only a few top-level Hamas leaders are deemed worthy of the precise weaponry. But they have used them on HVT Hamas leaders. See the footage... "

What's a Palestinian worth?

What's an Iranian worth?

What's a Human worth?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ames canMan
1 week ago

monaghan


"I cannot imagine why anyone, especially on this site, would have the slightest bit of sympathy for the evil Ayatollah's regime in Iran....well the "evil regime "...is a product of American intervention in another country...didn't you know?

Correct . Engineered by jimmy carter and co . "

...long before that I'm afraid

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icariusMaximusMan
1 week ago

Handsworth


"Thats the problem, who knows what the next regime would be. It went tits up when they got rid of Hussein.

But Iraq has been rendered impotent as a threat. Not much fun for their populace but has it ever been?

Iran with the current fundamentalist regime certainly could launch a nuke. And Israel and the UK could certainly be targeted...

If they had nukes......do they have nukes???

You are completely missing the point of the attack. If they did they probably don't now. If they were close they certainly have been damaged now. If they get nukes the ideology of their fundamentalist regime certainly does put Israel and the UK as its ally at risk of a nuclear attack. Prevention is better than cure...

Unless your Iranian, brown lives don't matter "

Dont get a job within the political regime or in the states nuclear program...

😁

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *weet LisaTV/TS
1 week ago

Crawley


"The US and Israel would know if the uranium had been removed. Reconnaissance and informants would have revealed this. They wouldn't waste the very expensive weaponry on empty targets...

Yeah I'm sure the fucking idiots just left it all right under the target.

Do you honestly think uranium is EASILY to just move around? And the fact is the US would know if they had done this.

They sent out 7 Stealth Bombers costing $2.2billion each, putting them at risk along with their expensive payloads. Along with another 100+ expensive aircraft. Which were deployed. At great expense.

They just did this for fun? A PR exercise? Symbolism?

🤔🙄🙄🙄😂🤣😅😁😁😁

Yeah because the Americans know everything don't they?

I'm sure those weapons of mass destruction will turn up soon- you still waiting?..

I know you think that the Iranians are just fucking idiots who didn't think this through when they began enrichment, I never said it would be easy but you cant say it cant be done.

Never forget that war is a theatre.

Do you actually want Iran to have nukes and ourselves to be put at risk of an attack?

Sick...

🤮🤔"

Don't tell me, they have the capability to drop one on us in 45 minutes.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *igDickEnergyMan
1 week ago

cardiff


"The US and Israel would know if the uranium had been removed. Reconnaissance and informants would have revealed this. They wouldn't waste the very expensive weaponry on empty targets...

Yeah I'm sure the fucking idiots just left it all right under the target.

Do you honestly think uranium is EASILY to just move around? And the fact is the US would know if they had done this.

They sent out 7 Stealth Bombers costing $2.2billion each, putting them at risk along with their expensive payloads. Along with another 100+ expensive aircraft. Which were deployed. At great expense.

They just did this for fun? A PR exercise? Symbolism?

🤔🙄🙄🙄😂🤣😅😁😁😁

Yeah because the Americans know everything don't they?

I'm sure those weapons of mass destruction will turn up soon- you still waiting?..

I know you think that the Iranians are just fucking idiots who didn't think this through when they began enrichment, I never said it would be easy but you cant say it cant be done.

Never forget that war is a theatre.

Do you actually want Iran to have nukes and ourselves to be put at risk of an attack?

Sick...

🤮🤔"

I see, only allies are allowed nukes???

Keep that white supremacy world order intact!!

Gutting when Vlad the insaner the king of white supremacy turns his eyes on Russia!!

But hey, don't let them Persions have nukes

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ames canMan
1 week ago

monaghan


"Remember that Israeli intelligence is so good that they've been annihilating Iranian leadership. It seems very unlikely that they wouldn't have been watching their primary targets."
...they killed "leadership " where they lived, along with countless civilians...hardly rocket science

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ames canMan
1 week ago

monaghan


"The US and Israel would know if the uranium had been removed. Reconnaissance and informants would have revealed this. They wouldn't waste the very expensive weaponry on empty targets...

Yeah I'm sure the fucking idiots just left it all right under the target.

Do you honestly think uranium is EASILY to just move around? And the fact is the US would know if they had done this.

They sent out 7 Stealth Bombers costing $2.2billion each, putting them at risk along with their expensive payloads. Along with another 100+ expensive aircraft. Which were deployed. At great expense.

They just did this for fun? A PR exercise? Symbolism?

🤔🙄🙄🙄😂🤣😅😁😁😁

Yeah because the Americans know everything don't they?

I'm sure those weapons of mass destruction will turn up soon- you still waiting?..

I know you think that the Iranians are just fucking idiots who didn't think this through when they began enrichment, I never said it would be easy but you cant say it cant be done.

Never forget that war is a theatre.

Do you actually want Iran to have nukes and ourselves to be put at risk of an attack?

Sick...

🤮🤔

Don't tell me, they have the capability to drop one on us in 45 minutes."

...well in fairness...bibi has been warning us for over 20 years...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *igDickEnergyMan
1 week ago

cardiff


"The US and Israel would know if the uranium had been removed. Reconnaissance and informants would have revealed this. They wouldn't waste the very expensive weaponry on empty targets...

Yeah I'm sure the fucking idiots just left it all right under the target.

Do you honestly think uranium is EASILY to just move around? And the fact is the US would know if they had done this.

They sent out 7 Stealth Bombers costing $2.2billion each, putting them at risk along with their expensive payloads. Along with another 100+ expensive aircraft. Which were deployed. At great expense.

They just did this for fun? A PR exercise? Symbolism?

🤔🙄🙄🙄😂🤣😅😁😁😁

Yeah because the Americans know everything don't they?

I'm sure those weapons of mass destruction will turn up soon- you still waiting?..

I know you think that the Iranians are just fucking idiots who didn't think this through when they began enrichment, I never said it would be easy but you cant say it cant be done.

Never forget that war is a theatre.

Do you actually want Iran to have nukes and ourselves to be put at risk of an attack?

Sick...

🤮🤔

Don't tell me, they have the capability to drop one on us in 45 minutes."

Since 1992 they've been 6 months away

33 years later and Trump is living out Netanyahu's wet dream

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icariusMaximusMan
1 week ago

Handsworth


"Remember that Israeli intelligence is so good that they've been annihilating Iranian leadership. It seems very unlikely that they wouldn't have been watching their primary targets.

Remember they just targeted a side building with a super-accurate missile because they saw the HVT entering the building? Killing him and sparing those in the main building? Their technology is super accurate and their intelligence/reconnaissance is top level. Israel and the US are the two top military nations on the planet. To suggest they don't know what they are doing and just 'hitting and hoping' is preposterous...

Accurate.

But the Palestinians of Gaza are just collateral?????

They use the cheaper weaponry on the lesser targets. Sounds flippant but it's true. Those pin-point guided weapons cost a fortune and are limited in numbers. The unguided missiles/bombs get used on the Hamas small-fry cowering among the population in Gaza. Collateral damage from the IDFs perspective. And only a few top-level Hamas leaders are deemed worthy of the precise weaponry. But they have used them on HVT Hamas leaders. See the footage...

What's a Palestinian worth?

What's an Iranian worth?

What's a Human worth?"

I'm just saying what occurs. I'm not justifying it. I know about the economics of the military. I don't condone what the Idf or the US military do. I'm just stating the facts of the matter...

FFS when has humanity not been at war on some level? This is just the latest chapter. It will never end... Adapt or die,as they say. Sad times.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ewBrumBiMan
1 week ago

Birmingham B15


"Remember that Israeli intelligence is so good that they've been annihilating Iranian leadership. It seems very unlikely that they wouldn't have been watching their primary targets....they killed "leadership " where they lived, along with countless civilians...hardly rocket science "

You completely miss the point regarding intelligence quality.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icariusMaximusMan
1 week ago

Handsworth


"Remember that Israeli intelligence is so good that they've been annihilating Iranian leadership. It seems very unlikely that they wouldn't have been watching their primary targets....they killed "leadership " where they lived, along with countless civilians...hardly rocket science "

Well... 🤔😂🤣😭

Guided missiles... It is certainly 'rocket science', Einstein...

😁😭🤣

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ames canMan
1 week ago

monaghan


"Remember that Israeli intelligence is so good that they've been annihilating Iranian leadership. It seems very unlikely that they wouldn't have been watching their primary targets....they killed "leadership " where they lived, along with countless civilians...hardly rocket science

You completely miss the point regarding intelligence quality."

what point did I miss...what happened to the mossad guy...?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ames canMan
1 week ago

monaghan


"Remember that Israeli intelligence is so good that they've been annihilating Iranian leadership. It seems very unlikely that they wouldn't have been watching their primary targets....they killed "leadership " where they lived, along with countless civilians...hardly rocket science

Well... 🤔😂🤣😭

Guided missiles... It is certainly 'rocket science', Einstein...

😁😭🤣"

...you still haven't answered my question..?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndrewdavid101Man
1 week ago

Stretford/Urmston


"US launches strikes on Iran.

US warplanes have bombed three nuclear sites in Iran, Donald Trump has announced.

“We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan,” the US president posted on Truth Social.

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

Iran's nuclear programme was well under control with the deal Obama made with them. Then that fucking orange dickhead cancelled them because they weren't his.

Somebody seriously needs to take trump out - he's far too dangerous and unhinged "

alongside his best mate putin

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndrewdavid101Man
1 week ago

Stretford/Urmston


"US launches strikes on Iran.

US warplanes have bombed three nuclear sites in Iran, Donald Trump has announced.

“We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan,” the US president posted on Truth Social.

Let's hope the US action leads to peace in the region, with Iran reducing its nuclear activities and working towards a diplomatic solution; far too many lives have been lost in the conflict.

Iran's nuclear programme was well under control with the deal Obama made with them. Then that fucking orange dickhead cancelled them because they weren't his.

Somebody seriously needs to take trump out - he's far too dangerous and unhinged

Yet everyone so far has had subpar training in handling a rifle plus they’re using the worst guns you can imagine

500+ school shootings in America last year yet no one can put one in a Cheeto "

when they try his body parts just grow back

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icariusMaximusMan
1 week ago

Handsworth


"Remember that Israeli intelligence is so good that they've been annihilating Iranian leadership. It seems very unlikely that they wouldn't have been watching their primary targets....they killed "leadership " where they lived, along with countless civilians...hardly rocket science

You completely miss the point regarding intelligence quality."

They have numerous sources within Iran itself. On the ground. Close enough to acknowledge that a HVT has walked into a side building. Then act on information received with state-of-the-art precision... Sure a few underlings were killed inevitably, collateral damage. But better a handful of innocent victims than hundreds by just blowing up the whole embassy...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *igDickEnergyMan
1 week ago

cardiff


"Remember that Israeli intelligence is so good that they've been annihilating Iranian leadership. It seems very unlikely that they wouldn't have been watching their primary targets....they killed "leadership " where they lived, along with countless civilians...hardly rocket science

You completely miss the point regarding intelligence quality.

They have numerous sources within Iran itself. On the ground. Close enough to acknowledge that a HVT has walked into a side building. Then act on information received with state-of-the-art precision... Sure a few underlings were killed inevitably, collateral damage. But better a handful of innocent victims than hundreds by just blowing up the whole embassy...

"

Wow, human life really is cheap to you

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ames canMan
1 week ago

monaghan


"Remember that Israeli intelligence is so good that they've been annihilating Iranian leadership. It seems very unlikely that they wouldn't have been watching their primary targets....they killed "leadership " where they lived, along with countless civilians...hardly rocket science

You completely miss the point regarding intelligence quality.

They have numerous sources within Iran itself. On the ground. Close enough to acknowledge that a HVT has walked into a side building. Then act on information received with state-of-the-art precision... Sure a few underlings were killed inevitably, collateral damage. But better a handful of innocent victims than hundreds by just blowing up the whole embassy...

"

...you mean like the time they blew up the Iranian embassy in Syria?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ames canMan
1 week ago

monaghan


"Remember that Israeli intelligence is so good that they've been annihilating Iranian leadership. It seems very unlikely that they wouldn't have been watching their primary targets....they killed "leadership " where they lived, along with countless civilians...hardly rocket science

You completely miss the point regarding intelligence quality.

They have numerous sources within Iran itself. On the ground. Close enough to acknowledge that a HVT has walked into a side building. Then act on information received with state-of-the-art precision... Sure a few underlings were killed inevitably, collateral damage. But better a handful of innocent victims than hundreds by just blowing up the whole embassy...

Wow, human life really is cheap to you"

...in fairness...he only means brown people...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *igDickEnergyMan
1 week ago

cardiff


"Remember that Israeli intelligence is so good that they've been annihilating Iranian leadership. It seems very unlikely that they wouldn't have been watching their primary targets....they killed "leadership " where they lived, along with countless civilians...hardly rocket science

You completely miss the point regarding intelligence quality.

They have numerous sources within Iran itself. On the ground. Close enough to acknowledge that a HVT has walked into a side building. Then act on information received with state-of-the-art precision... Sure a few underlings were killed inevitably, collateral damage. But better a handful of innocent victims than hundreds by just blowing up the whole embassy...

Wow, human life really is cheap to you...in fairness...he only means brown people..."

Accurate!!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ames canMan
1 week ago

monaghan


"Remember that Israeli intelligence is so good that they've been annihilating Iranian leadership. It seems very unlikely that they wouldn't have been watching their primary targets....they killed "leadership " where they lived, along with countless civilians...hardly rocket science

You completely miss the point regarding intelligence quality.

They have numerous sources within Iran itself. On the ground. Close enough to acknowledge that a HVT has walked into a side building. Then act on information received with state-of-the-art precision... Sure a few underlings were killed inevitably, collateral damage. But better a handful of innocent victims than hundreds by just blowing up the whole embassy...

Wow, human life really is cheap to you...in fairness...he only means brown people...

Accurate!!"

...the so called intellectual....hahaha

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icariusMaximusMan
1 week ago

Handsworth


"Remember that Israeli intelligence is so good that they've been annihilating Iranian leadership. It seems very unlikely that they wouldn't have been watching their primary targets....they killed "leadership " where they lived, along with countless civilians...hardly rocket science

You completely miss the point regarding intelligence quality.

They have numerous sources within Iran itself. On the ground. Close enough to acknowledge that a HVT has walked into a side building. Then act on information received with state-of-the-art precision... Sure a few underlings were killed inevitably, collateral damage. But better a handful of innocent victims than hundreds by just blowing up the whole embassy...

Wow, human life really is cheap to you"

My fee starts at £5k per 'turkey' but rises depending on how difficult it is to get to the 'turkey'. The social 'importance' of said 'turkey' also raises the price...

Let's say the 'turkey' was called 'Nigel'. With his status/security level that's an expensive 'turkey', at least £250k...

😎😎😎🥷🥷🥷🏹🏹🏹🦃🦃🦃🍗🍗🍗

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 
 

By *ames canMan
1 week ago

monaghan


"Remember that Israeli intelligence is so good that they've been annihilating Iranian leadership. It seems very unlikely that they wouldn't have been watching their primary targets....they killed "leadership " where they lived, along with countless civilians...hardly rocket science

Well... 🤔😂🤣😭

Guided missiles... It is certainly 'rocket science', Einstein...

😁😭🤣...you still haven't answered my question..?"

....hahaha...I think everyone can see who the "turkey is...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
back to top