 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So we spent billions with European partners developing the Euro fighter Other European Countries will not buy American jets Then Trump fed Starmer some shite Who is buying the F35’s now….us! Seems special relationship was one sided after all " Other European countries apart from Belgium, Finland, Switzerland, Poland, Germany, Czech Republic and Greece? I was also under the impression we’ve been in talks to buy F35A for ages so it’s hardly news that we’ve decided to go ahead. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can we afford the petrol though? Rachel from Claims is going to make us all paupers...." Misogyny, such a tough look | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can we afford the petrol though? Rachel from Claims is going to make us all paupers.... Misogyny, such a tough look" Whatever you do don’t give a woman a nickname, like you equally might do for a man. It’s MISOGYNY | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can we afford the petrol though? Rachel from Claims is going to make us all paupers.... Misogyny, such a tough look Whatever you do don’t give a woman a nickname, like you equally might do for a man. It’s MISOGYNY" Tell me, what did you call Rishi, Kwasi, Osbourne, Brown, Clarke??? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can we afford the petrol though? Rachel from Claims is going to make us all paupers.... Misogyny, such a tough look" Rachel Reeves is provably awful in her role, how is criticism equivalent of Misogyny. You are the one that is treating women differently. Any person in politics should be able to take criticism, why do you feel Ms Reeves needs special protection. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can we afford the petrol though? Rachel from Claims is going to make us all paupers.... Misogyny, such a tough look Rachel Reeves is provably awful in her role, how is criticism equivalent of Misogyny. You are the one that is treating women differently. Any person in politics should be able to take criticism, why do you feel Ms Reeves needs special protection. " Criticism is indeed welcome, and would look something like she fluffed the WF announcement mismanagement the communications or you disagree with her on business NICS. A nickname that demeans her position and undermines her as a women is misogyny. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can we afford the petrol though? Rachel from Claims is going to make us all paupers.... Misogyny, such a tough look Rachel Reeves is provably awful in her role, how is criticism equivalent of Misogyny. You are the one that is treating women differently. Any person in politics should be able to take criticism, why do you feel Ms Reeves needs special protection. Criticism is indeed welcome, and would look something like she fluffed the WF announcement mismanagement the communications or you disagree with her on business NICS. A nickname that demeans her position and undermines her as a women is misogyny." And how often have you demeaned Liz Truss. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can we afford the petrol though? Rachel from Claims is going to make us all paupers.... Misogyny, such a tough look Rachel Reeves is provably awful in her role, how is criticism equivalent of Misogyny. You are the one that is treating women differently. Any person in politics should be able to take criticism, why do you feel Ms Reeves needs special protection. Criticism is indeed welcome, and would look something like she fluffed the WF announcement mismanagement the communications or you disagree with her on business NICS. A nickname that demeans her position and undermines her as a women is misogyny. And how often have you demeaned Liz Truss. " Never for being a women. Only a terrible prime minister. Criticism | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can we afford the petrol though? Rachel from Claims is going to make us all paupers.... Misogyny, such a tough look Rachel Reeves is provably awful in her role, how is criticism equivalent of Misogyny. You are the one that is treating women differently. Any person in politics should be able to take criticism, why do you feel Ms Reeves needs special protection. Criticism is indeed welcome, and would look something like she fluffed the WF announcement mismanagement the communications or you disagree with her on business NICS. A nickname that demeans her position and undermines her as a women is misogyny. And how often have you demeaned Liz Truss. Never for being a women. Only a terrible prime minister. Criticism " You read: "Rachel from Claims is going to make us all paupers" and see it as criticism of her sex. That's a you problem. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can we afford the petrol though? Rachel from Claims is going to make us all paupers.... Misogyny, such a tough look Rachel Reeves is provably awful in her role, how is criticism equivalent of Misogyny. You are the one that is treating women differently. Any person in politics should be able to take criticism, why do you feel Ms Reeves needs special protection. Criticism is indeed welcome, and would look something like she fluffed the WF announcement mismanagement the communications or you disagree with her on business NICS. A nickname that demeans her position and undermines her as a women is misogyny. And how often have you demeaned Liz Truss. Never for being a women. Only a terrible prime minister. Criticism You read: "Rachel from Claims is going to make us all paupers" and see it as criticism of her sex. That's a you problem. " Week week week, your frit!! Your looking for an argument and fluffed your lines. It's Rachel from accounts. She's the most powerful women in the country chancellor of the exchequer and your demeaning her position by making out she's a lowly pen pusher from the accounts department. Misogyny is an endemic problem in the UK. You have just shown you are a part of the problem | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Waste....Russia poses no threat to us China's power is overwhelming ...spend taxes on health and welfare. " The Skripals would beg to differ | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can we afford the petrol though? Rachel from Claims is going to make us all paupers.... Misogyny, such a tough look Rachel Reeves is provably awful in her role, how is criticism equivalent of Misogyny. You are the one that is treating women differently. Any person in politics should be able to take criticism, why do you feel Ms Reeves needs special protection. Criticism is indeed welcome, and would look something like she fluffed the WF announcement mismanagement the communications or you disagree with her on business NICS. A nickname that demeans her position and undermines her as a women is misogyny. And how often have you demeaned Liz Truss. Never for being a women. Only a terrible prime minister. Criticism You read: "Rachel from Claims is going to make us all paupers" and see it as criticism of her sex. That's a you problem. Week week week, your frit!! Your looking for an argument and fluffed your lines. It's Rachel from accounts. She's the most powerful women in the country chancellor of the exchequer and your demeaning her position by making out she's a lowly pen pusher from the accounts department. Misogyny is an endemic problem in the UK. You have just shown you are a part of the problem " You didn't stand up for women when it came to their legitimate concerns re trans identified males invading women's spaces. Denied and dismissed the existence of trans identified male predators. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can we afford the petrol though? Rachel from Claims is going to make us all paupers.... Misogyny, such a tough look Rachel Reeves is provably awful in her role, how is criticism equivalent of Misogyny. You are the one that is treating women differently. Any person in politics should be able to take criticism, why do you feel Ms Reeves needs special protection. Criticism is indeed welcome, and would look something like she fluffed the WF announcement mismanagement the communications or you disagree with her on business NICS. A nickname that demeans her position and undermines her as a women is misogyny. And how often have you demeaned Liz Truss. Never for being a women. Only a terrible prime minister. Criticism You read: "Rachel from Claims is going to make us all paupers" and see it as criticism of her sex. That's a you problem. Week week week, your frit!! Your looking for an argument and fluffed your lines. It's Rachel from accounts. She's the most powerful women in the country chancellor of the exchequer and your demeaning her position by making out she's a lowly pen pusher from the accounts department. Misogyny is an endemic problem in the UK. You have just shown you are a part of the problem You didn't stand up for women when it came to their legitimate concerns re trans identified males invading women's spaces. Denied and dismissed the existence of trans identified male predators. " Desperate stuff!! I can hold more than one thought in my mind! I'm pro women and pro trans! Unless your brains boiled most sensible people can see the nuances and complexities of the toxic debate. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can we afford the petrol though? Rachel from Claims is going to make us all paupers.... Misogyny, such a tough look Rachel Reeves is provably awful in her role, how is criticism equivalent of Misogyny. You are the one that is treating women differently. Any person in politics should be able to take criticism, why do you feel Ms Reeves needs special protection. Criticism is indeed welcome, and would look something like she fluffed the WF announcement mismanagement the communications or you disagree with her on business NICS. A nickname that demeans her position and undermines her as a women is misogyny. And how often have you demeaned Liz Truss. Never for being a women. Only a terrible prime minister. Criticism You read: "Rachel from Claims is going to make us all paupers" and see it as criticism of her sex. That's a you problem. Week week week, your frit!! Your looking for an argument and fluffed your lines. It's Rachel from accounts. She's the most powerful women in the country chancellor of the exchequer and your demeaning her position by making out she's a lowly pen pusher from the accounts department. Misogyny is an endemic problem in the UK. You have just shown you are a part of the problem " Lol, you just don't get it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can we afford the petrol though? Rachel from Claims is going to make us all paupers.... Misogyny, such a tough look Rachel Reeves is provably awful in her role, how is criticism equivalent of Misogyny. You are the one that is treating women differently. Any person in politics should be able to take criticism, why do you feel Ms Reeves needs special protection. Criticism is indeed welcome, and would look something like she fluffed the WF announcement mismanagement the communications or you disagree with her on business NICS. A nickname that demeans her position and undermines her as a women is misogyny. And how often have you demeaned Liz Truss. Never for being a women. Only a terrible prime minister. Criticism You read: "Rachel from Claims is going to make us all paupers" and see it as criticism of her sex. That's a you problem. Week week week, your frit!! Your looking for an argument and fluffed your lines. It's Rachel from accounts. She's the most powerful women in the country chancellor of the exchequer and your demeaning her position by making out she's a lowly pen pusher from the accounts department. Misogyny is an endemic problem in the UK. You have just shown you are a part of the problem Lol, you just don't get it" Gladly | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" You didn't stand up for women when it came to their legitimate concerns re trans identified males invading women's spaces. Denied and dismissed the existence of trans identified male predators. Desperate stuff!! I can hold more than one thought in my mind! I'm pro women and pro trans! Unless your brains boiled most sensible people can see the nuances and complexities of the toxic debate." You seem to be pro everything. Except original thought. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" You didn't stand up for women when it came to their legitimate concerns re trans identified males invading women's spaces. Denied and dismissed the existence of trans identified male predators. Desperate stuff!! I can hold more than one thought in my mind! I'm pro women and pro trans! Unless your brains boiled most sensible people can see the nuances and complexities of the toxic debate. You seem to be pro everything. Except original thought. " Pro humanity, pro empathy and pro intelligence. Seems lacking on here | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" You didn't stand up for women when it came to their legitimate concerns re trans identified males invading women's spaces. Denied and dismissed the existence of trans identified male predators. Desperate stuff!! I can hold more than one thought in my mind! I'm pro women and pro trans! Unless your brains boiled most sensible people can see the nuances and complexities of the toxic debate. You seem to be pro everything. Except original thought. " .... ... 🏴 What original thought do you offer? Your perspectives are based on the thinking of others rather than being any remotely novel. Practice what you preach 🏴 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" You didn't stand up for women when it came to their legitimate concerns re trans identified males invading women's spaces. Denied and dismissed the existence of trans identified male predators. Desperate stuff!! I can hold more than one thought in my mind! I'm pro women and pro trans! Unless your brains boiled most sensible people can see the nuances and complexities of the toxic debate. You seem to be pro everything. Except original thought. .... ... 🏴 What original thought do you offer? Your perspectives are based on the thinking of others rather than being any remotely novel. Practice what you preach 🏴" It's hard for a slacktivist that goes thought life signalling their support for the latest thing, to imagine how someone could consider a range of sources to reach a conclusion; more so if that conclusion differs from the approved narrative. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Which wouldn't be original thought per se. Do keep up old bean." So you condone just making stuff up. That explains many of your interpretations. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" You didn't stand up for women when it came to their legitimate concerns re trans identified males invading women's spaces. Denied and dismissed the existence of trans identified male predators. Desperate stuff!! I can hold more than one thought in my mind! I'm pro women and pro trans! Unless your brains boiled most sensible people can see the nuances and complexities of the toxic debate. You seem to be pro everything. Except original thought. .... ... 🏴 What original thought do you offer? Your perspectives are based on the thinking of others rather than being any remotely novel. Practice what you preach 🏴 It's hard for a slacktivist that goes thought life signalling their support for the latest thing, to imagine how someone could consider a range of sources to reach a conclusion; more so if that conclusion differs from the approved narrative. " Yeah, define the latest thing? Seeing as your guys are in power in America, Israel, Hungary, Russia and on the rise through Europe and Britain. I'd say your line of thought is the latest thing! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" You didn't stand up for women when it came to their legitimate concerns re trans identified males invading women's spaces. Denied and dismissed the existence of trans identified male predators. Desperate stuff!! I can hold more than one thought in my mind! I'm pro women and pro trans! Unless your brains boiled most sensible people can see the nuances and complexities of the toxic debate. You seem to be pro everything. Except original thought. .... ... 🏴 What original thought do you offer? Your perspectives are based on the thinking of others rather than being any remotely novel. Practice what you preach 🏴 It's hard for a slacktivist that goes thought life signalling their support for the latest thing, to imagine how someone could consider a range of sources to reach a conclusion; more so if that conclusion differs from the approved narrative. Yeah, define the latest thing? Seeing as your guys are in power in America, Israel, Hungary, Russia and on the rise through Europe and Britain. I'd say your line of thought is the latest thing!" The Latest Thing: Orange Man Bad, Queers for Palestine, Putin is Hitler, Criticism of any woman is Misogyny. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Who is making what up? My interpretations are based on empirical evidence and engagement/or lack of from posters around said evidence. " "What original thought do you offer? Your perspectives are based on the thinking of others rather than being any remotely novel." Keep up old bean. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Who is making what up? My interpretations are based on empirical evidence and engagement/or lack of from posters around said evidence. "What original thought do you offer? Your perspectives are based on the thinking of others rather than being any remotely novel." Keep up old bean. " .... 🏴 You've missed the obvious:I never suggested otherwise. Digging! Still digging! 😱 🏴 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"F35A, the 'air superiority' version, longer range more weapons and 25% cheaper per plane than the F35B. UK bought the F35B as it meant the two aircraft carriers it was building could be built without catapult launch and arrested landing equipment thus saving several £ on the build cost of the aircraft carriers. The F35B is built for short (and non-catapult) take off and vertical unassisted landing. This makes it very flexible and works on smaller ships, but also on makeshift runways. (The F35C is designed for 'classic type' aircraft carriers used by the USA and France. It, like the F35A has a longer range and can carry more weapons than the F35B.) The nuclear weapon that the F35A is designed to carry for the UK is a 'free fall bomb'. You drop it and it falls to the ground. It can use its fins to guide it to target once dropped, but doesn't have a motor or rocket so cannot be 'fired' from a plane at a distant target. It is US built weapon. Its already deployed in Europe as part of NATOs nuclear sharing program. As part of that program I believe the US has to agree to the use of any of these weapons." Oh yes This thread was about buying planes to defend ourselves. I'd almost forgotten about that amongst all the shite and drivel  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" You didn't stand up for women when it came to their legitimate concerns re trans identified males invading women's spaces. Denied and dismissed the existence of trans identified male predators. Desperate stuff!! I can hold more than one thought in my mind! I'm pro women and pro trans! Unless your brains boiled most sensible people can see the nuances and complexities of the toxic debate. You seem to be pro everything. Except original thought. .... ... 🏴 What original thought do you offer? Your perspectives are based on the thinking of others rather than being any remotely novel. Practice what you preach 🏴 It's hard for a slacktivist that goes thought life signalling their support for the latest thing, to imagine how someone could consider a range of sources to reach a conclusion; more so if that conclusion differs from the approved narrative. Yeah, define the latest thing? Seeing as your guys are in power in America, Israel, Hungary, Russia and on the rise through Europe and Britain. I'd say your line of thought is the latest thing! The Latest Thing: Orange Man Bad, Queers for Palestine, Putin is Hitler, Criticism of any woman is Misogyny. " Sounds like your against modernity, progressivism and kindness. Lucky for you it's 2025 and they're in retreat. Unlucky for you, these things ebb and flow and people like me will always exist to make the case for all those good stuff. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So we spent billions with European partners developing the Euro fighter Other European Countries will not buy American jets Then Trump fed Starmer some shite Who is buying the F35’s now….us! Seems special relationship was one sided after all " We already have the F35B for the Navy, this is an additional 12 F35As for the RAF. British companies are part of the consortium that builds the F35. F35 and Eurofighter Typhoon fulfil different roles. It not a case of one or the other. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
