 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Turned?" Given up to law enforcement. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK " Because he made an impact in the UK | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK " He was a horrible racist, woman hating social media guy who was friends with Trump. He was a massive proponent of less gun control in the US and had previously said that he is will to accept the regular shootings of children and other innocent people if that was the price of gun ownership. Ironically he was shot and killed. He probably never thought he could be a victim of gun violence. Americans are so stupid that they probably dont consider being at risk of being shot even though thousands of people die from gun violence every year. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK " A large number of people have a habit of looking beyond their own navels  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK He was a horrible racist, woman hating social media guy who was friends with Trump. He was a massive proponent of less gun control in the US and had previously said that he is will to accept the regular shootings of children and other innocent people if that was the price of gun ownership. Ironically he was shot and killed. He probably never thought he could be a victim of gun violence. Americans are so stupid that they probably dont consider being at risk of being shot even though thousands of people die from gun violence every year. " He was well aware of the risks to his life by the 'words are violence' mob who actually use extreme violence as a tool of opposition. He was wearing a BP-Vest under his top. When you murder someone who just wants to sit down and talk things over respectfully, just to silence debate ... You won't like the man who is left. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK " Exactly - we have our own issues in the UK! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK " I believe he was the guy who said and I paraphrase A few deaths are acceptable to protect 2nd amendment rights. It’s a cost that needs to be paid | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK Because he made an impact in the UK" Did he actually? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK I believe he was the guy who said and I paraphrase A few deaths are acceptable to protect 2nd amendment rights. It’s a cost that needs to be paid " Post the full quote. I bet you wont. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK I believe he was the guy who said and I paraphrase A few deaths are acceptable to protect 2nd amendment rights. It’s a cost that needs to be paid Post the full quote. I bet you wont. " The full quote makes no difference | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Who is he " He was just a minor MAGA troll. More fuss being made about him than JFK or MLK combined. But good Epstein distraction. Everything a bit different to the Democrat politicians shot in Wisconsin in June. Hardly a word about that. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Oh thank God they cut away, (press conference) just that prick Cash Patel, the Sheriff and the Governor all patting each other on the back. Not much except confirmation of the suspects name, I think they said Tyler Robinson and confirmation of inscriptions on bullets including the chorus from Bella Ciao, an anti fascist song and some other ramblings like 'if you read this you're gay, lol' and something from 4chan. Sounds like an unhinged troll. He had confessed to a family member and they turned him in." Looks to be a very active member of Antifa | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Who is he He was just a minor MAGA troll. More fuss being made about him than JFK or MLK combined. But good Epstein distraction. Everything a bit different to the Democrat politicians shot in Wisconsin in June. Hardly a word about that. " Or the kids that were killed in a recent Colorado school shooting - Trumps public comment was “you need to get over it”. Response to Kirk is massively over the top and like you said a distraction to Epstein and the cost of living issues. Kirk didn’t need to die by any means but he was part of the system that put him on the course to being a victim with his hatred and disregard to other humans. Even commenting it was ok for a few people a year to be killed by a gun in order to keep the 2nd Amendment. Bizarre politics, bizarre people, so much hatred within that country across all spectrums of society. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"ANTIFA are Democratfar leftists, Charlie was a republican. " The suspect bears all the hallmarks of being an Antifa activist | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK Because he made an impact in the UK" Never heard of him...obviously didn't make an impact on me | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK Because he made an impact in the UK Never heard of him...obviously didn't make an impact on me" I'm surprised the British media haven't taken your lack of awareness/interest into consideration when reporting on the current event involving CK. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Who is he " Charles (Charlie) Kirk was a prominent American conservative activist who co-founded Turning Point USA that advocates conservative politics in high school and college campuses, promoting principles of freedom, free markets, and limited government intervention. He supported Donald Trump and held strong views on issues like gun rights, immigration, and LGBTQ+ rights. He was known for promoting conservative values and he also addressed the Oxford Union earlier this year, he was fatally shot on Tuesday this week at a political rally in Utah aged 32. Requiescat In Pace. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK " The US increasing dominates British culture. Too many people spending too much time on-line. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK He was a horrible racist, woman hating social media guy who was friends with Trump. He was a massive proponent of less gun control in the US and had previously said that he is will to accept the regular shootings of children and other innocent people if that was the price of gun ownership. Ironically he was shot and killed. He probably never thought he could be a victim of gun violence. Americans are so stupid that they probably dont consider being at risk of being shot even though thousands of people die from gun violence every year. " IYHO | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Requiescat In Pace. " Are you trolling him? That’s a bit low. Requiescat is gender neutral. He certainly wouldn’t appreciate that | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Turned? Given up to law enforcement." The FBI offered $100k for information leading to the arrest of the shooter (Tyler Robinson age 22). I just hope he was turned in by his famiy before that announcement was made and it wasn't just the cash inventive. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK " Would suggest check out his content and make up your own mind. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I heard that there has been 18,000 gun deaths in the USA so far this year let America keep their 2nd amendment and madness to there self." This is why they have the 2nd ammendment. https://youtu.be/lLAHLiSwYUU?si=s9Is3q1qEkiiK20g I used to live in the USA. For a while I was living with a family who kept a shotgun in the kitchen and a handgun in the car because they were closed to mountains and regularly bears and mooses would break into the property. As they had a 4 year old son it was the only way of protecting the family. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK I believe he was the guy who said and I paraphrase A few deaths are acceptable to protect 2nd amendment rights. It’s a cost that needs to be paid Post the full quote. I bet you wont. " “It’s worth it. I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe.” — Charlie Kirk In full, just for you. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK Exactly - we have our own issues in the UK!" He's big in the uk for exactly the same reason why anyone in any country is big in the uk. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK " He was a bigoted man who used his charlatan confidence to convince those with mildly similar views that he was speaking factual information. He, just like trump, farage and others similar to them, cherry picked a fact, embellished it with opinion and used his ability to manipulate a conversation so it sounded like he was "winning" an argument. He then selectively posted his highly edited "victories" on his social medias, promoted to the youngest and most influenceable society to further ram home his points. Most recently, he partook in a debate in oxford or cambridge, whereby he was absolutely torn apart by real facts causing his media team and legal team to attempt to prevent the university from publishing anything that purported the truth. Like many on that side, they rely on the gullibility and vulnerableness of the target audience. Sadly, he lost his life because of the decisions he's made in life. I wholeheartedly disagree and despise what has happened. My opinion of him and his types has no bearing on the reality which is a man, with a wife, 2 children and a family has been savagely assassinated because someone disagreed with his hurty words and whatever side of the aisle you are on, that is undeniably disgraceful. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK He was a bigoted man who used his charlatan confidence to convince those with mildly similar views that he was speaking factual information. He, just like trump, farage and others similar to them, cherry picked a fact, embellished it with opinion and used his ability to manipulate a conversation so it sounded like he was "winning" an argument. He then selectively posted his highly edited "victories" on his social medias, promoted to the youngest and most influenceable society to further ram home his points. Most recently, he partook in a debate in oxford or cambridge, whereby he was absolutely torn apart by real facts causing his media team and legal team to attempt to prevent the university from publishing anything that purported the truth. Like many on that side, they rely on the gullibility and vulnerableness of the target audience. Sadly, he lost his life because of the decisions he's made in life. I wholeheartedly disagree and despise what has happened. My opinion of him and his types has no bearing on the reality which is a man, with a wife, 2 children and a family has been savagely assassinated because someone disagreed with his hurty words and whatever side of the aisle you are on, that is undeniably disgraceful. " "he lost his life because of the decisions he made in life" A ridiculous argument. You could decide to cross the road and get knocked down by a d*unk driver, so it would be your own fault by your reasoning. Was it John Lennons fault he was assassinated because the shooter didn't like his music? Full debate is here. https://youtu.be/IP5LDxhBod0?si=a6zOF5IgVW14j3n9 | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Kirk wasnt wearing a bullet proof vest. You can see his nipple under his shirt just before he was shot. " Considering he was shot in the neck. A vest wouldn't made any difference. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK He was a bigoted man who used his charlatan confidence to convince those with mildly similar views that he was speaking factual information. He, just like trump, farage and others similar to them, cherry picked a fact, embellished it with opinion and used his ability to manipulate a conversation so it sounded like he was "winning" an argument. He then selectively posted his highly edited "victories" on his social medias, promoted to the youngest and most influenceable society to further ram home his points. Most recently, he partook in a debate in oxford or cambridge, whereby he was absolutely torn apart by real facts causing his media team and legal team to attempt to prevent the university from publishing anything that purported the truth. Like many on that side, they rely on the gullibility and vulnerableness of the target audience. Sadly, he lost his life because of the decisions he's made in life. I wholeheartedly disagree and despise what has happened. My opinion of him and his types has no bearing on the reality which is a man, with a wife, 2 children and a family has been savagely assassinated because someone disagreed with his hurty words and whatever side of the aisle you are on, that is undeniably disgraceful. "he lost his life because of the decisions he made in life" A ridiculous argument. You could decide to cross the road and get knocked down by a d*unk driver, so it would be your own fault by your reasoning. Was it John Lennons fault he was assassinated because the shooter didn't like his music? Full debate is here. https://youtu.be/IP5LDxhBod0?si=a6zOF5IgVW14j3n9" You are comparing apples and pears. If someone encouraged people to break the spend limit and use their phones whilst driving, and got run over by someone doing just that, you would have a different view than if the person wasn’t a fucking idiot who suffered as a result of the stupidity he was espousing. That’s what happened to this scrote. The world is not worse off for his death, sad though it undoubtedly is for those who are close to him. The world has one less intolerant wee shit espousing violence and division. It’s a shame someone had to die, but there is intense irony and some might say poetic justice. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK He was a bigoted man who used his charlatan confidence to convince those with mildly similar views that he was speaking factual information. He, just like trump, farage and others similar to them, cherry picked a fact, embellished it with opinion and used his ability to manipulate a conversation so it sounded like he was "winning" an argument. He then selectively posted his highly edited "victories" on his social medias, promoted to the youngest and most influenceable society to further ram home his points. Most recently, he partook in a debate in oxford or cambridge, whereby he was absolutely torn apart by real facts causing his media team and legal team to attempt to prevent the university from publishing anything that purported the truth. Like many on that side, they rely on the gullibility and vulnerableness of the target audience. Sadly, he lost his life because of the decisions he's made in life. I wholeheartedly disagree and despise what has happened. My opinion of him and his types has no bearing on the reality which is a man, with a wife, 2 children and a family has been savagely assassinated because someone disagreed with his hurty words and whatever side of the aisle you are on, that is undeniably disgraceful. "he lost his life because of the decisions he made in life" A ridiculous argument. You could decide to cross the road and get knocked down by a d*unk driver, so it would be your own fault by your reasoning. Was it John Lennons fault he was assassinated because the shooter didn't like his music? Full debate is here. https://youtu.be/IP5LDxhBod0?si=a6zOF5IgVW14j3n9" See, this is the problem with people who follow these types, jumping to irrational comparisons in order to have some faux victory, ironically, just like Kirk did. Ultimately, his choices led to his death. He chose to take his "message" online and intentionally aggravate people to ensure his victim mentality followers and listeners could "see" the problem was really the other side. Typically, the only people online who are angry and trying to apportion blame right now are the right leaning sources. The ultimate decision to promote his ideals for money cost him his life. It shouldn't have, but it did. Once again, I will say the same thing. Your irrationality has made you conclude that I said the full debate wasn't online or public. Because you thought irrationally, you failed to read (possibly comprehend) the word try. I'll leave it at that on that subject. Notably, your incoherent irrationalities have been brought to the forefront whilst defending something that never existed. Maybe you are the person to fill the shoes of the person whose now passed, considering his incoherent irrationalities seem to match consistently. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK He was a bigoted man who used his charlatan confidence to convince those with mildly similar views that he was speaking factual information. He, just like trump, farage and others similar to them, cherry picked a fact, embellished it with opinion and used his ability to manipulate a conversation so it sounded like he was "winning" an argument. He then selectively posted his highly edited "victories" on his social medias, promoted to the youngest and most influenceable society to further ram home his points. Most recently, he partook in a debate in oxford or cambridge, whereby he was absolutely torn apart by real facts causing his media team and legal team to attempt to prevent the university from publishing anything that purported the truth. Like many on that side, they rely on the gullibility and vulnerableness of the target audience. Sadly, he lost his life because of the decisions he's made in life. I wholeheartedly disagree and despise what has happened. My opinion of him and his types has no bearing on the reality which is a man, with a wife, 2 children and a family has been savagely assassinated because someone disagreed with his hurty words and whatever side of the aisle you are on, that is undeniably disgraceful. "he lost his life because of the decisions he made in life" A ridiculous argument. You could decide to cross the road and get knocked down by a d*unk driver, so it would be your own fault by your reasoning. Was it John Lennons fault he was assassinated because the shooter didn't like his music? Full debate is here. https://youtu.be/IP5LDxhBod0?si=a6zOF5IgVW14j3n9 You are comparing apples and pears. If someone encouraged people to break the spend limit and use their phones whilst driving, and got run over by someone doing just that, you would have a different view than if the person wasn’t a fucking idiot who suffered as a result of the stupidity he was espousing. That’s what happened to this scrote. The world is not worse off for his death, sad though it undoubtedly is for those who are close to him. The world has one less intolerant wee shit espousing violence and division. It’s a shame someone had to die, but there is intense irony and some might say poetic justice." The only thing he encouraged was open debate and free speech. If someone didn't agree with him he was always open to have his own opinions challenged. That's what debate is. He never resorted to violent actions or abusing the challenger if there was a difference of option. Whatever views he had come from his Christian beliefs. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK He was a bigoted man who used his charlatan confidence to convince those with mildly similar views that he was speaking factual information. He, just like trump, farage and others similar to them, cherry picked a fact, embellished it with opinion and used his ability to manipulate a conversation so it sounded like he was "winning" an argument. He then selectively posted his highly edited "victories" on his social medias, promoted to the youngest and most influenceable society to further ram home his points. Most recently, he partook in a debate in oxford or cambridge, whereby he was absolutely torn apart by real facts causing his media team and legal team to attempt to prevent the university from publishing anything that purported the truth. Like many on that side, they rely on the gullibility and vulnerableness of the target audience. Sadly, he lost his life because of the decisions he's made in life. I wholeheartedly disagree and despise what has happened. My opinion of him and his types has no bearing on the reality which is a man, with a wife, 2 children and a family has been savagely assassinated because someone disagreed with his hurty words and whatever side of the aisle you are on, that is undeniably disgraceful. "he lost his life because of the decisions he made in life" A ridiculous argument. You could decide to cross the road and get knocked down by a d*unk driver, so it would be your own fault by your reasoning. Was it John Lennons fault he was assassinated because the shooter didn't like his music? Full debate is here. https://youtu.be/IP5LDxhBod0?si=a6zOF5IgVW14j3n9 You are comparing apples and pears. If someone encouraged people to break the spend limit and use their phones whilst driving, and got run over by someone doing just that, you would have a different view than if the person wasn’t a fucking idiot who suffered as a result of the stupidity he was espousing. That’s what happened to this scrote. The world is not worse off for his death, sad though it undoubtedly is for those who are close to him. The world has one less intolerant wee shit espousing violence and division. It’s a shame someone had to die, but there is intense irony and some might say poetic justice. The only thing he encouraged was open debate and free speech. If someone didn't agree with him he was always open to have his own opinions challenged. That's what debate is. He never resorted to violent actions or abusing the challenger if there was a difference of option. Whatever views he had come from his Christian beliefs." Of course he did, completely innocent. No possibility of any bad intentions. It's everyone else with bad intentions, he was just a sweet innocent boy who never did anything wrong. 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️ | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Requiescat In Pace. Are you trolling him? That’s a bit low. Requiescat is gender neutral. He certainly wouldn’t appreciate that " Given the tragic nature of Charlie Kirk's death, your comment about my 'Requiescat in Pace' tribute seems totally insensitive, disrespectful, and highly inappropriate, particularly during a time of mourning for his family and friends. As you know, it's a Latin phrase meaning 'May he/she rest in peace,' used to wish eternal tranquillity to the soul of the deceased. A more considerate approach would be fitting in these tragic circumstances, where compassion and respect should take precedence over political differences. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I used to watch Charlie now and again. He would debate anyone, but his style could be abrasive. Or so I thought... Then I watched a clip where someone was transgender, but still trying to really give themselves. It was a genuinely open and warm exchange between both of them. I think he would respond in kind if people go into it to bait their opponent. " Um sure he was totally honest in all his opinions and beliefs. The problem is that those opinions were from the 1950s America and pretty vile. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Requiescat In Pace. Are you trolling him? That’s a bit low. Requiescat is gender neutral. He certainly wouldn’t appreciate that Given the tragic nature of Charlie Kirk's death, your comment about my 'Requiescat in Pace' tribute seems totally insensitive, disrespectful, and highly inappropriate, particularly during a time of mourning for his family and friends. As you know, it's a Latin phrase meaning 'May he/she rest in peace,' used to wish eternal tranquillity to the soul of the deceased. A more considerate approach would be fitting in these tragic circumstances, where compassion and respect should take precedence over political differences. " Come down off your confected high horse. It makes you look brittle and foolish. You aren’t, but you choose to try that approach in a vain attempt to do others down and appear better than them. You know you are better than that. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Requiescat In Pace. Are you trolling him? That’s a bit low. Requiescat is gender neutral. He certainly wouldn’t appreciate that Given the tragic nature of Charlie Kirk's death, your comment about my 'Requiescat in Pace' tribute seems totally insensitive, disrespectful, and highly inappropriate, particularly during a time of mourning for his family and friends. As you know, it's a Latin phrase meaning 'May he/she rest in peace,' used to wish eternal tranquillity to the soul of the deceased. A more considerate approach would be fitting in these tragic circumstances, where compassion and respect should take precedence over political differences. Come down off your confected high horse. It makes you look brittle and foolish. You aren’t, but you choose to try that approach in a vain attempt to do others down and appear better than them. You know you are better than that." Again, no substance, just an attack on their method, not their content. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK Because he made an impact in the UK" No he hasn't, no one in the UK had even heardcofvhim before he was shot. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"You can tell a lot about a person by their reaction when somebody dies... As for some on here, I don't know how they carry that amount of hate around without exploding. " I agree totally PendleGuy. I posted a sincere tribute to Charlie Kirk's memory with his family's feelings in mind and was appalled when someone seized it as a crass trolling opportunity! It's unfortunate how some people's reactions to someone's passing can reveal much about their true character. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"actually I've been following him for sometime so logically I'm assuming many other must be to.to everyone else.. Im shocked and appalled that many In here are so venomous towards a person who championed free speech and open debate...the same speech they are exercising to degrade a Dead husband father, the only difference between everyone in here and him was opinion and people think he deserved to die because of that ? Shame on you all." They will probably tell you it was hate speech he spouted, when actually it was just speech they hated to hear. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"actually I've been following him for sometime so logically I'm assuming many other must be to.to everyone else.. Im shocked and appalled that many In here are so venomous towards a person who championed free speech and open debate...the same speech they are exercising to degrade a Dead husband father, the only difference between everyone in here and him was opinion and people think he deserved to die because of that ? Shame on you all." No one deserves to die for their opinions, but he had free speech and chose to you use it to speak racist rhetoric, saying that if a pilot got on a plane with a strong white chin he would be fine, but if he were a black women he would Want to see their qualifications is racist. He thought women should submit to their husbands, is practically medieval. He still didn't deserve to die. But seeing him held up as some kind of martyr in the USA is pretty sick when 2 lawmakers were murdered on their doorstep but no fuss was made. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Requiescat In Pace. Are you trolling him? That’s a bit low. Requiescat is gender neutral. He certainly wouldn’t appreciate that Given the tragic nature of Charlie Kirk's death, your comment about my 'Requiescat in Pace' tribute seems totally insensitive, disrespectful, and highly inappropriate, particularly during a time of mourning for his family and friends. As you know, it's a Latin phrase meaning 'May he/she rest in peace,' used to wish eternal tranquillity to the soul of the deceased. A more considerate approach would be fitting in these tragic circumstances, where compassion and respect should take precedence over political differences. Come down off your confected high horse. It makes you look brittle and foolish. You aren’t, but you choose to try that approach in a vain attempt to do others down and appear better than them. You know you are better than that." Once again, Mr. 'lookingaround', your assumption about my intentions is entirely incorrect. My tribute to Charlie Kirk was a genuine expression of heartfelt respect, please address this solemn matter with an appropriate air of respect and dignity, particularly given the tragic circumstances of his passing. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Requiescat In Pace. Are you trolling him? That’s a bit low. Requiescat is gender neutral. He certainly wouldn’t appreciate that Given the tragic nature of Charlie Kirk's death, your comment about my 'Requiescat in Pace' tribute seems totally insensitive, disrespectful, and highly inappropriate, particularly during a time of mourning for his family and friends. As you know, it's a Latin phrase meaning 'May he/she rest in peace,' used to wish eternal tranquillity to the soul of the deceased. A more considerate approach would be fitting in these tragic circumstances, where compassion and respect should take precedence over political differences. Come down off your confected high horse. It makes you look brittle and foolish. You aren’t, but you choose to try that approach in a vain attempt to do others down and appear better than them. You know you are better than that. Once again, Mr. 'lookingaround', your assumption about my intentions is entirely incorrect. My tribute to Charlie Kirk was a genuine expression of heartfelt respect, please address this solemn matter with an appropriate air of respect and dignity, particularly given the tragic circumstances of his passing. " Indeed. That’s very very telling. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK " Need help shifting that big rock? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Requiescat In Pace. Are you trolling him? That’s a bit low. Requiescat is gender neutral. He certainly wouldn’t appreciate that Given the tragic nature of Charlie Kirk's death, your comment about my 'Requiescat in Pace' tribute seems totally insensitive, disrespectful, and highly inappropriate, particularly during a time of mourning for his family and friends. As you know, it's a Latin phrase meaning 'May he/she rest in peace,' used to wish eternal tranquillity to the soul of the deceased. A more considerate approach would be fitting in these tragic circumstances, where compassion and respect should take precedence over political differences. Come down off your confected high horse. It makes you look brittle and foolish. You aren’t, but you choose to try that approach in a vain attempt to do others down and appear better than them. You know you are better than that. Once again, Mr. 'lookingaround', your assumption about my intentions is entirely incorrect. My tribute to Charlie Kirk was a genuine expression of heartfelt respect, please address this solemn matter with an appropriate air of respect and dignity, particularly given the tragic circumstances of his passing. " May I ask if you were just as remorseful at the death of Melissa Hortman and her husband | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Requiescat In Pace. Are you trolling him? That’s a bit low. Requiescat is gender neutral. He certainly wouldn’t appreciate that Given the tragic nature of Charlie Kirk's death, your comment about my 'Requiescat in Pace' tribute seems totally insensitive, disrespectful, and highly inappropriate, particularly during a time of mourning for his family and friends. As you know, it's a Latin phrase meaning 'May he/she rest in peace,' used to wish eternal tranquillity to the soul of the deceased. A more considerate approach would be fitting in these tragic circumstances, where compassion and respect should take precedence over political differences. Come down off your confected high horse. It makes you look brittle and foolish. You aren’t, but you choose to try that approach in a vain attempt to do others down and appear better than them. You know you are better than that. Once again, Mr. 'lookingaround', your assumption about my intentions is entirely incorrect. My tribute to Charlie Kirk was a genuine expression of heartfelt respect, please address this solemn matter with an appropriate air of respect and dignity, particularly given the tragic circumstances of his passing. Indeed. That’s very very telling. " Thank you, please now allow the matter to rest with respect to the departed. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK Because he made an impact in the UK No he hasn't, no one in the UK had even heardcofvhim before he was shot. " Absolute rubbish. You need to get out of your tiny bubble. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"May I ask if you were just as remorseful at the death of Melissa Hortman and her husband " You may indeed '_espectdue'. The tragic passing of Melissa Hortman and her husband, like all lives lost, is a reminder of the fragility and value of life and the importance of cherishing every moment until we too meet our maker. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK Because he made an impact in the UK No he hasn't, no one in the UK had even heardcofvhim before he was shot. " He had had a huge impact (some positive and some negative) on the younger generations. Just because the old people on here haven’t heard of him doesn’t mean that it’s not big news for the UK. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Requiescat In Pace. Are you trolling him? That’s a bit low. Requiescat is gender neutral. He certainly wouldn’t appreciate that Given the tragic nature of Charlie Kirk's death, your comment about my 'Requiescat in Pace' tribute seems totally insensitive, disrespectful, and highly inappropriate, particularly during a time of mourning for his family and friends. As you know, it's a Latin phrase meaning 'May he/she rest in peace,' used to wish eternal tranquillity to the soul of the deceased. A more considerate approach would be fitting in these tragic circumstances, where compassion and respect should take precedence over political differences. Come down off your confected high horse. It makes you look brittle and foolish. You aren’t, but you choose to try that approach in a vain attempt to do others down and appear better than them. You know you are better than that. Once again, Mr. 'lookingaround', your assumption about my intentions is entirely incorrect. My tribute to Charlie Kirk was a genuine expression of heartfelt respect, please address this solemn matter with an appropriate air of respect and dignity, particularly given the tragic circumstances of his passing. Indeed. That’s very very telling. " Telling of what exactly? Either say what you're going to say, or don't comment. It's almost as if you have no interest in the content. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK He was a horrible racist, woman hating social media guy who was friends with Trump. He was a massive proponent of less gun control in the US and had previously said that he is will to accept the regular shootings of children and other innocent people if that was the price of gun ownership. Ironically he was shot and killed. He probably never thought he could be a victim of gun violence. Americans are so stupid that they probably dont consider being at risk of being shot even though thousands of people die from gun violence every year. " You are so brainwashed it's embarrassing | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK He was a horrible racist, woman hating social media guy who was friends with Trump. He was a massive proponent of less gun control in the US and had previously said that he is will to accept the regular shootings of children and other innocent people if that was the price of gun ownership. Ironically he was shot and killed. He probably never thought he could be a victim of gun violence. Americans are so stupid that they probably dont consider being at risk of being shot even though thousands of people die from gun violence every year. You are so brainwashed it's embarrassing" How so? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Glad they have the suspect in custody ... Kudos to his Father for doing the right thing and turning the piece of shit in. " The right thing to do: his Father probably saved his life. Else he could have been shot on sight! Such a waste of two young mens lives!  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"who is this guy anyway ? and why is it big news in the UK I believe he was the guy who said and I paraphrase A few deaths are acceptable to protect 2nd amendment rights. It’s a cost that needs to be paid " Your paraphrasing left out the the most important part of his statement where he said its | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" That’s very very telling. Thank you, please now allow the matter to rest with respect to the departed. " No, you don’t get to dictate how people respond based on some confected tabloid morality. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
 to find a like minded soul. Oh well took me longer to try and puzzle out what he was saying as text speak and shorthand are not really my forte | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" That’s very very telling. Thank you, please now allow the matter to rest with respect to the departed. No, you don’t get to dictate how people respond based on some confected tabloid morality. " But you do? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Oh dear someone took Umbridge at my post. I often wonder why people want to reply privately but are afraid to post on the forum. Could it be they really don't trust their arguments or opinions to stand up to scrutiny. Maybe he had to head off to today's big march for freedom to find a like minded soul. Oh well took me longer to try and puzzle out what he was saying as text speak and shorthand are not really my forte "It’s always funny when people send a rant over PM. You wonder how absolutely raging they have to have got to do that. 😆 I’ve developed an obsessive little limpet in the forums who follows me everywhere trying to start arguments, it’s very sweet that someone is so interested in me. 😍 | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I call it like i see it 🤣" What a hero | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Yep so I've read through those ..it's worth remembering that these are live debates and these are written snippets from a larger context...even with that said I can't see the racism or woman hate maybe you could elaborate. Im genuinely interested where he crossed the line in your view that he should be executed for what he said." I don’t believe anyone said he should have been executed. Many people have said they struggle to shed a tear over it. It’s very different and curious that to show disapproval, it has to be shown on something which was not said, instead of to what has been said. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Yep so I've read through those ..it's worth remembering that these are live debates and these are written snippets from a larger context...even with that said I can't see the racism or woman hate maybe you could elaborate. Im genuinely interested where he crossed the line in your view that he should be executed for what he said. I don’t believe anyone said he should have been executed. Many people have said they struggle to shed a tear over it. It’s very different and curious that to show disapproval, it has to be shown on something which was not said, instead of to what has been said. " A couple of days ago you put someone down by telling them that defending the murder of Charlie Kirk was something they didn't understand, but you do understand it. Please elaborate on what justifies taking Charlie's life? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Yep so I've read through those ..it's worth remembering that these are live debates and these are written snippets from a larger context...even with that said I can't see the racism or woman hate maybe you could elaborate. Im genuinely interested where he crossed the line in your view that he should be executed for what he said." He had views on topics like gender and sex and free speech, informed by his religious upbringing and life experience. That's no different to many of us. They didn't always align with others, but he would choose debate on campus to discuss these. I don't see the problem. I do see the problem where a gunman chooses a rifle to express their disagreement, or a machete to a bunch of kids at a dance group. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I wonder how the public debate might go if the shooter had turned out to be a parent of one of the Sandy Hook kids or any of the other school massacres. Poetic justice, justified revenge?" It could go in any direction, if reality was different but I guess the facts are what matters. As much as he was a cretin, it’s still tough to see grieving spouses trying to come to terms with it. But no matter what the obsessive followers try to twist, no one has suggested someone should be shot, simply explained that they don’t feel too much remorse with it having happened. Which is a legitimate perspective, agree or not. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I wonder how the public debate might go if the shooter had turned out to be a parent of one of the Sandy Hook kids or any of the other school massacres. Poetic justice, justified revenge? It could go in any direction, if reality was different but I guess the facts are what matters. As much as he was a cretin, it’s still tough to see grieving spouses trying to come to terms with it. But no matter what the obsessive followers try to twist, no one has suggested someone should be shot, simply explained that they don’t feel too much remorse with it having happened. Which is a legitimate perspective, agree or not. " Very well put. I wonder what you're going to argue about next. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Yep so I've read through those ..it's worth remembering that these are live debates and these are written snippets from a larger context...even with that said I can't see the racism or woman hate maybe you could elaborate. Im genuinely interested where he crossed the line in your view that he should be executed for what he said. He had views on topics like gender and sex and free speech, informed by his religious upbringing and life experience. That's no different to many of us. They didn't always align with others, but he would choose debate on campus to discuss these. I don't see the problem. I do see the problem where a gunman chooses a rifle to express their disagreement, or a machete to a bunch of kids at a dance group. " Spot on, just what i was going to post | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" That’s very very telling. Thank you, please now allow the matter to rest with respect to the departed. No, you don’t get to dictate how people respond based on some confected tabloid morality. But you do? " Hi 'sucker4u80', it seems totally futile to engage in conversation with that particular member. It's clear their goal is to provoke rather than discuss respectfully, especially given the tragic context. Their comments seem designed to antagonise and elicit reactions. I think it's wise to give them a wide berth and engage with the others on the Forum who offer a decent and constructive exchange of views. Best wishes - Dev. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Requiescat In Pace. Are you trolling him? That’s a bit low. Requiescat is gender neutral. He certainly wouldn’t appreciate that Given the tragic nature of Charlie Kirk's death, your comment about my 'Requiescat in Pace' tribute seems totally insensitive, disrespectful, and highly inappropriate, particularly during a time of mourning for his family and friends. As you know, it's a Latin phrase meaning 'May he/she rest in peace,' used to wish eternal tranquillity to the soul of the deceased. A more considerate approach would be fitting in these tragic circumstances, where compassion and respect should take precedence over political differences. " ...you didn't use the word empathy...was that on purpose...? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" That’s very very telling. Thank you, please now allow the matter to rest with respect to the departed. No, you don’t get to dictate how people respond based on some confected tabloid morality. But you do? Hi 'sucker4u80', it seems totally futile to engage in conversation with that particular member. It's clear their goal is to provoke rather than discuss respectfully, especially given the tragic context. Their comments seem designed to antagonise and elicit reactions. I think it's wise to give them a wide berth and engage with the others on the Forum who offer a decent and constructive exchange of views. Best wishes - Dev. " 🤣🤣🤣🤣 A classic trait there, shifting the responsibility for your failure to emotionally regulate your reactions on to the other person. I’m sorry that you cannot not be antagonised and that you expect to be able to speak condescending nonsense in a public forum with impunity. But that’s no one’s problem but yours. Trying to shift the locus of responsibility onto other people is a tactic doomed to fail, and doomed to get you into the same obsessive spiral as your rather poorly chosen ally. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Oh dear someone took Umbridge at my post. I often wonder why people want to reply privately but are afraid to post on the forum. Could it be they really don't trust their arguments or opinions to stand up to scrutiny. Maybe he had to head off to today's big march for freedom to find a like minded soul. Oh well took me longer to try and puzzle out what he was saying as text speak and shorthand are not really my forte
It’s always funny when people send a rant over PM. You wonder how absolutely raging they have to have got to do that. 😆
I’ve developed an obsessive little limpet in the forums who follows me everywhere trying to start arguments, it’s very sweet that someone is so interested in me. 😍"... ... 😭 Have they started any threads in your honour? Do they obsessively mention you indirectly across threads? Pot/kettle Self-awareness like a vagina is a useful thing. 🤡😿🏌️🤪 | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| back to top |  |
