 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Are they just plain dim, or just plain greedy ??" They are just corrupt, that’s not a dig at Labour specifically though they do make it easy, the last government were no better but having spent the last 14 years calling out the conservatives you’d think Labour would do a better job of keeping squeaky clean | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t see the financial misconduct in this " Hello Rachel, welcome to fab  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Labour were forever banging on about how corrupt members of the last government were, yet they are proving to be even more corrupt" However as others have previously pointed out, there doesn't appear any corruption or dishonesty in this case. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t see the financial misconduct in this " I didn’t know you needed a license to rent a property. It’s news to me. Why should I demand a higher standard from anyone else. A simple omission. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Labour were forever banging on about how corrupt members of the last government were, yet they are proving to be even more corrupt" Oh I don't think there is a comparison just yet. How many million did Moan get for worthless goods? Remember Zahawi trying to block a reporter from telling the truth about him owing about 5 million in tax? Slightly bigger fry there. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t see the financial misconduct in this I didn’t know you needed a license to rent a property. It’s news to me. Why should I demand a higher standard from anyone else. A simple omission." Not so sure about England but there are very strict rules here in Wales. You certainly need a certificate. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A friend of mine is a financial adviser and mortgage broker. Because of this and wanting to be squeaky clean he gives me the stake to place a football accumulator online for him. He doesn't want gambling on his current account. If he has the foresight to do that, the Chancellor should have the gumption to stay squeaky clean too. " He's bending the rules though, by getting you to do it for him | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A friend of mine is a financial adviser and mortgage broker. Because of this and wanting to be squeaky clean he gives me the stake to place a football accumulator online for him. He doesn't want gambling on his current account. If he has the foresight to do that, the Chancellor should have the gumption to stay squeaky clean too. " I imagine her view was that the letting agent in charge of renting it would have done it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A friend of mine is a financial adviser and mortgage broker. Because of this and wanting to be squeaky clean he gives me the stake to place a football accumulator online for him. He doesn't want gambling on his current account. If he has the foresight to do that, the Chancellor should have the gumption to stay squeaky clean too. I imagine her view was that the letting agent in charge of renting it would have done it." She’s denying all knowledge of needing a licence but then should the renting agent have asked for a licence? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How about indict her for crimes against haircuts? " 👎👎👎 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A friend of mine is a financial adviser and mortgage broker. Because of this and wanting to be squeaky clean he gives me the stake to place a football accumulator online for him. He doesn't want gambling on his current account. If he has the foresight to do that, the Chancellor should have the gumption to stay squeaky clean too. I imagine her view was that the letting agent in charge of renting it would have done it. She’s denying all knowledge of needing a licence but then should the renting agent have asked for a licence?" You would assume the letting agent would have a checklist before proceeding along with the normal gas certs and so on, so either someone hasn't done the job correctly or supplied false information | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How about indict her for crimes against haircuts? 👎👎👎" 👎 👎 👎 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How about indict her for crimes against haircuts? 👎👎👎 👎 👎 👎" 🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"She tweeted about licences for landlords in Leeds a week or so ago so she must have had an inkling about them I don’t think it’s a resigning matter though I’m no fan but I don’t think she’s evading tax etc I’m more concerned about how she’s going to shaft us with more taxes in a few weeks time " She simply has no choice but to shaft some group or other. Her party won't allow cuts to state spending, and spending is only going to go up. Tens of billions of additional borrowing every single month. She's fucked | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A friend of mine is a financial adviser and mortgage broker. Because of this and wanting to be squeaky clean he gives me the stake to place a football accumulator online for him. He doesn't want gambling on his current account. If he has the foresight to do that, the Chancellor should have the gumption to stay squeaky clean too. He's bending the rules though, by getting you to do it for him" A fiver accumulator on 6 teams? Which rule is he bending? Not a gambling law as he is over 18. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Labour were forever banging on about how corrupt members of the last government were, yet they are proving to be even more corrupt However as others have previously pointed out, there doesn't appear any corruption or dishonesty in this case." Apart from it being a legal requirement and the appropriate fee dodged. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A friend of mine is a financial adviser and mortgage broker. Because of this and wanting to be squeaky clean he gives me the stake to place a football accumulator online for him. He doesn't want gambling on his current account. If he has the foresight to do that, the Chancellor should have the gumption to stay squeaky clean too. He's bending the rules though, by getting you to do it for him A fiver accumulator on 6 teams? Which rule is he bending? Not a gambling law as he is over 18." Why does he get you to do it for him then? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m no fan of the current mob; but think we should leave her alone. Yes, she made a mistake, an oversight… but she hasn’t tried to evade tax, like the bitch Rayner, or try to kick out tenants, do a bit of work on the place, then put the place back on the market for 50% more - like a senior housing minister did 🤣 - whilst at the same time, trying to get an Act through Parliament banning exactly what she did! You can’t make it up! Can’t believe that I’m saying this, but on this occasion, give her a break. "  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not bothered if she has to resign over this or not. Probably won't have to as not that serious. At best an oversight. At worse being hypocritical which politicians are so good at. If she did resign she might get replaced with something worse like David Dummy or Ed Siliband. So perhaps better she stays put." you have spelled Poor David wrong its Lammy. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
But isn’t it always 😂 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sack her she knows exactly what she upto . £ 36.000 year in rent . What that paid into LTD offshore company. Tax free no doubt . There all on fiddle " 👎👎👎 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sack her she knows exactly what she upto . £ 36.000 year in rent . What that paid into LTD offshore company. Tax free no doubt . There all on fiddle " Proof? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hardly a problem , just another reason to try and get rid of an MP, it's a wonder any ever want to do the job nowadays with all the over the top scrutiny. It's hardly a hanging offence. " Hoist by her own petard | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hardly a problem , just another reason to try and get rid of an MP, it's a wonder any ever want to do the job nowadays with all the over the top scrutiny. It's hardly a hanging offence. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lawmakers can't be lawbreakers " Keep up, she is innocent. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lawmakers can't be lawbreakers Keep up, she is innocent." Not sure about completely innocent. She should, due to her position, be setting an example, so should have double and triple checked about the licence. Ignorance of the law is not an acceptable defence. However she is not guilty of anything serious enough to require her resignation, in my opinion. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lawmakers can't be lawbreakers Keep up, she is innocent. Not sure about completely innocent. She should, due to her position, be setting an example, so should have double and triple checked about the licence. Ignorance of the law is not an acceptable defence. However she is not guilty of anything serious enough to require her resignation, in my opinion." If you looked at genuine news agencies you will see that there is an apology from the letting agent. You could check 10 times, but is someone else has made an honest mistake, you can not be held responsible. Innocent to proven guilty. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lawmakers can't be lawbreakers Keep up, she is innocent." Wasn't the same thing said of Angela Rayner? How did that 'innocent oversight' work out in the end? Funny how it is always 'an honest mistake' when they get caught out ... But is 'an offence when someone else does the same. She will have the full support of Starmer, until the moment when he's told that it threatens his own position. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lawmakers can't be lawbreakers Keep up, she is innocent. Wasn't the same thing said of Angela Rayner? How did that 'innocent oversight' work out in the end? Funny how it is always 'an honest mistake' when they get caught out ... But is 'an offence when someone else does the same. She will have the full support of Starmer, until the moment when he's told that it threatens his own position. " It’s a poison chalice job. No one wants it in labour 
Starmer be better off fronting out one of the morons in tories or reform and get their chancellor in on a work placement to see if they can do better 
Certainly be comical politics at least | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lawmakers can't be lawbreakers Keep up, she is innocent. Wasn't the same thing said of Angela Rayner? How did that 'innocent oversight' work out in the end? Funny how it is always 'an honest mistake' when they get caught out ... But is 'an offence when someone else does the same. She will have the full support of Starmer, until the moment when he's told that it threatens his own position. It’s a poison chalice job. No one wants it in labour
Starmer be better off fronting out one of the morons in tories or reform and get their chancellor in on a work placement to see if they can do better
Certainly be comical politics at least "I wonder who'll actually get the short straw once Rachel goes off to pen her memoirs and do a stint on Strictly? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lawmakers can't be lawbreakers Keep up, she is innocent. Wasn't the same thing said of Angela Rayner? How did that 'innocent oversight' work out in the end? Funny how it is always 'an honest mistake' when they get caught out ... But is 'an offence when someone else does the same. She will have the full support of Starmer, until the moment when he's told that it threatens his own position. " Again for the umpteenth time read the latest news! Her letting agent has apologised for their mistake. Remember. Innocent until proven guilty" is a fundamental legal principle that means an accused person is presumed to be innocent until the prosecution proves their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lawmakers can't be lawbreakers Keep up, she is innocent. Wasn't the same thing said of Angela Rayner? How did that 'innocent oversight' work out in the end? Funny how it is always 'an honest mistake' when they get caught out ... But is 'an offence when someone else does the same. She will have the full support of Starmer, until the moment when he's told that it threatens his own position. Again for the umpteenth time read the latest news! Her letting agent has apologised for their mistake. Remember. Innocent until proven guilty" is a fundamental legal principle that means an accused person is presumed to be innocent until the prosecution proves their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lawmakers can't be lawbreakers Keep up, she is innocent. Wasn't the same thing said of Angela Rayner? How did that 'innocent oversight' work out in the end? Funny how it is always 'an honest mistake' when they get caught out ... But is 'an offence when someone else does the same. She will have the full support of Starmer, until the moment when he's told that it threatens his own position. Again for the umpteenth time read the latest news! Her letting agent has apologised for their mistake. Remember. Innocent until proven guilty" is a fundamental legal principle that means an accused person is presumed to be innocent until the prosecution proves their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. " The man formerly known as Duke of York remains without a formal stain of successfully prosecuted guilt to his name. Breaking News - 'Andrew is stripped of his Prince title and his home: King's shamed brother will be Mr Mountbatten Windsor and has his lease on Royal Lodge revoked' Never underestimate the Court of Public Opinion.... Ms Reeves doesn't exactly have the people on her side ... or even that many of her own MPs. Dirty old business, politics. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lawmakers can't be lawbreakers Keep up, she is innocent. Wasn't the same thing said of Angela Rayner? How did that 'innocent oversight' work out in the end? Funny how it is always 'an honest mistake' when they get caught out ... But is 'an offence when someone else does the same. She will have the full support of Starmer, until the moment when he's told that it threatens his own position. Again for the umpteenth time read the latest news! Her letting agent has apologised for their mistake. Remember. Innocent until proven guilty" is a fundamental legal principle that means an accused person is presumed to be innocent until the prosecution proves their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. " So first she wasn't aware that she needed a licence, then up comes the correspondence between the husband and estate agent discussing it last year. If her husband didn't feel the need totell her they needed to shell out £900 for it they obviously are suffering the financial woes the rest of the country is | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Surely she should be extra careful as Chancellor? " She should have been fired and replaced as Chancellor by now! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hope all landlords who might 'misunderstand' something get similar let off then." Quite so. They wage war on private landords and they cannot cope with a simple but serious task that Landlords can be prosecuted for. When it comes to hypocricy the left have no competition. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Surely she should be extra careful as Chancellor? She should have been fired and replaced as Chancellor by now! " He hasn't got the guts to do that. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lawmakers can't be lawbreakers Keep up, she is innocent. Wasn't the same thing said of Angela Rayner? How did that 'innocent oversight' work out in the end? Funny how it is always 'an honest mistake' when they get caught out ... But is 'an offence when someone else does the same. She will have the full support of Starmer, until the moment when he's told that it threatens his own position. Again for the umpteenth time read the latest news! Her letting agent has apologised for their mistake. Remember. Innocent until proven guilty" is a fundamental legal principle that means an accused person is presumed to be innocent until the prosecution proves their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. " Yes but a Labour cCancellor will not even be charged with an offence, so "guilty or 'Innocent' does not come into it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think she needs to be interviewed in detail about this. I suggest while she's bent over a table, with me giving her some of what she's been doing to the rest of us. " 👎👎👎 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hope all landlords who might 'misunderstand' something get similar let off then. Quite so. They wage war on private landords and they cannot cope with a simple but serious task that Landlords can be prosecuted for. When it comes to hypocricy the left have no competition. " Except of course, the hypocrisy of Boris Johnson and Sunak getting fined for breaking their own rules on social distancing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is no suggestion that there was any financial impropriety and as she has registered her home on the members interest it would appear she has not attempted to conceal anything. Southwark council have a selective registration policy so imho the letting agent should take responsibility for this " You gotta love a pair of rose tinted glasses  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think she needs to be interviewed in detail about this. I suggest while she's bent over a table, with me giving her some of what she's been doing to the rest of us. " Shes done plenty of that in her time, how do you think she got her job? Its not due to her brains lol 😆 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think she needs to be interviewed in detail about this. I suggest while she's bent over a table, with me giving her some of what she's been doing to the rest of us. Shes done plenty of that in her time, how do you think she got her job? Its not due to her brains lol 😆 " Yes. All women only got the job because they spread their legs. Welcome back to the middle ages. Because you aren't living in the 21st century, evidently. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think she needs to be interviewed in detail about this. I suggest while she's bent over a table, with me giving her some of what she's been doing to the rest of us. Shes done plenty of that in her time, how do you think she got her job? Its not due to her brains lol 😆 Yes. All women only got the job because they spread their legs. Welcome back to the middle ages. Because you aren't living in the 21st century, evidently." She didnt get the job for her skills did she? 😆! Not work skills anyway lol. Shes fuckin useless 👍 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just watching her budget speech, at least that’s what it’s titled . Sounds more like an episode of Jackanory. Seems it everything is all previous governments fault. Despite her growing a 22m black hole into a 40+ one. Never heard such delusional rhetoric." The increase in the size of that black hole is due to interest payments on the massive debt left by 13 years of Tory misrule. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lawmakers can't be lawbreakers Keep up, she is innocent. Wasn't the same thing said of Angela Rayner? How did that 'innocent oversight' work out in the end? Funny how it is always 'an honest mistake' when they get caught out ... But is 'an offence when someone else does the same. She will have the full support of Starmer, until the moment when he's told that it threatens his own position. Again for the umpteenth time read the latest news! Her letting agent has apologised for their mistake. Remember. Innocent until proven guilty" is a fundamental legal principle that means an accused person is presumed to be innocent until the prosecution proves their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. Yes but a Labour cCancellor will not even be charged with an offence, so "guilty or 'Innocent' does not come into it." There's no offence she can be charged with though. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Surely she should be extra careful as Chancellor?" I wish her parents had been more carefu, and used a condom. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Surely she should be extra careful as Chancellor? I wish her parents had been more carefu, and used a condom. " The best part of her was wiped on her mums curtain. 😆 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
