 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"And you think your going to slim the world by posting this on a gay/bi sex meet website? A place where a bigger bear type or a young chubby lad is seen to be absolutely gorgeous to some? Don't understand what your post was going to achieve?" Oh dear. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This is not fat shaming but a genuine concern. The sheer volume of very over weight young men (40) is alarming. The dangers to their health is huge, it’s worrying. " How worried are you? Other than this thread, what have you done about it? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This is not fat shaming but a genuine concern. The sheer volume of very over weight young men (40) is alarming. The dangers to their health is huge, it’s worrying. " it is body shaming though,dont you think that we are aware of our health? There may be reasons your unaware off for a persons weight, would you walk up to person on street and say it to them ? Perhaps its best left alone as a subject in here as it may upset some people even though it may not be your intention to so. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This is not fat shaming but a genuine concern. The sheer volume of very over weight young men (40) is alarming. The dangers to their health is huge, it’s worrying. it is body shaming though,dont you think that we are aware of our health? There may be reasons your unaware off for a persons weight, would you walk up to person on street and say it to them ? Perhaps its best left alone as a subject in here as it may upset some people even though it may not be your intention to so. " Well said! It came off as a conflation of humble boasting and passive-aggressive condescension. To me these types of comment are very unpleasant and just turn me off the person. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
"Old and obese here" No body shaming thank you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Old and obese here" Or. Bloody lovely? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This is not fat shaming but a genuine concern. The sheer volume of very over weight young men (40) is alarming. The dangers to their health is huge, it’s worrying. " Not buying it sorry. You mention concern for aged 40, you’re 47. It smacks of look at me, I’m older and in better shape, you fat fucks. If it’s not what I say then it’s just a weird post. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This is not fat shaming but a genuine concern. The sheer volume of very over weight young men (40) is alarming. The dangers to their health is huge, it’s worrying. Not buying it sorry. You mention concern for aged 40, you’re 47. It smacks of look at me, I’m older and in better shape, you fat fucks. If it’s not what I say then it’s just a weird post." It's okay to say that people are fat and that being fat can be problematic for health, without fat shaming. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Yeah this was a poor attempt at fat shaming, thinly disguised with a 'won't somebody think of the fatties?!' Fuck off" How is it fat shaming?! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It's okay to say that people are fat and that being fat can be problematic for health, without fat shaming. " I agree but on this site??? It’s a kink, a preference or whatever for some. A lot of sportsmen are medically regarded as obese, rugby for eg, but fit as fuck and with many admirers. Some people live a religiously healthy life and drop dead at 40, a mate of mine did. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It's okay to say that people are fat and that being fat can be problematic for health, without fat shaming. I agree but on this site??? It’s a kink, a preference or whatever for some. A lot of sportsmen are medically regarded as obese, rugby for eg, but fit as fuck and with many admirers. Some people live a religiously healthy life and drop dead at 40, a mate of mine did. " Yes, on this site. You can say that someone is fat without being offensive. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" How is it fat shaming?!" C’mon! He’s really concerned about anonymous individuals on a sex site? Even if he has does he really need to broadcast it? Everyone has to meet his standards? Bs | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I might be fat and have a high BMI but that does not make me unloveable. I am still a real person with a job, skills, experience, knowledge, and interests. I also have values and morals. Some people never struggle with their weight. Others do their entire lives. Fabguys is a very broad church. Users come in all shapes and sizes. I'm sure other "dating" apps have a higher percentage of gym bunnies and BMI-normative users. But not here."  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" How is it fat shaming?! C’mon! He’s really concerned about anonymous individuals on a sex site? Even if he has does he really need to broadcast it? Everyone has to meet his standards? Bs" He didn't say that he was concerned about individuals on here. He raised a health issue which is a massive problem in this country. He didn't say anyone had to meet his standards. Fact check. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I look forward to your post about smokers on this site warning them of the dangers of smoking" And How about Alcohol consumption , particularly when exceeding 14 units per week. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Some people live a religiously healthy life and drop dead at 40, a mate of mine did. " Ahh well in that case let's stuff ourselves like pigs, drink like a fish and smoke like a chimney. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This is not fat shaming but a genuine concern. The sheer volume of very over weight young men (40) is alarming. The dangers to their health is huge, it’s worrying. " Give up mate. All you will get is stick on here from the inordinate number of obese men who seem to like themselves that way. Let the NHS worry about their diabetes, joint problems, blood pressure, heart disease etc etc because they are don’t seem to care. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"So many very overweight people both on here and in swingers. So many seem to glorify and fetishise it it now. Hiding behind terms like BBW etc just avoids the reality. " I agree... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Moaning about too many fat people on here is giving the TV/ CDs and Married men a rest, I suppose. " All the fat, married, trannies consoling themselves with a tub of ice-cream just now. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I’m classed as obese however my blood pressure heart rate and cholesterol is bang on I am trying to lose weight though as want to be fitter " Let’s see how fit you are in 10 years. Hip or knee replacement on the horizon. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I’m classed as obese however my blood pressure heart rate and cholesterol is bang on I am trying to lose weight though as want to be fitter Let’s see how fit you are in 10 years. Hip or knee replacement on the horizon. " Most of the people that I know that needed early hip and knee replacements (40s 50s) were joggers and marathon runners despite not being overweight. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I’m classed as obese however my blood pressure heart rate and cholesterol is bang on I am trying to lose weight though as want to be fitter Let’s see how fit you are in 10 years. Hip or knee replacement on the horizon. " didnt he say that he is trying to lose weight? how come knee replacement in 10 years doctor? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This is not fat shaming but a genuine concern. The sheer volume of very over weight young men (40) is alarming. The dangers to their health is huge, it’s worrying. " I'm more concerned about the world shortage of tops | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"And you think your going to slim the world by posting this on a gay/bi sex meet website? A place where a bigger bear type or a young chubby lad is seen to be absolutely gorgeous to some? Don't understand what your post was going to achieve?" Why not? It's a general discussion forum. Not just about sex. Room for both I think. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Just to say that I'm fat chu by obese , call I what you like. Nearly 80, still do all my own cooking cleaning f shopping and gardening. No medication for blood pressure or diabetes and gave own teeth Why the fuck should I listen to some body fascist telling me I need to be skinny" He's talking about young guys, he's not being a fascist, and he's not telling you that you need to be skinny. The first paragraph was great, the second not so much. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If you are over 12 stone you are obese according to doctors charts" I've seen that too. Apparently I was obese as a fit 22y/o with a 31 inch waist and a six-pack.  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't need people like the original poster and his followers to be concerned on my behalf Fuck off and find a cure for leprosy or something equally worthy and stop being so damned condescending " Clearly you're not happy, but the OP is not concerned for you and is not being condescending. Much like your last post where he was being a fascist. You do seem to blow things out of proportion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Just to say that I'm fat chu by obese , call I what you like. Nearly 80, still do all my own cooking cleaning f shopping and gardening. No medication for blood pressure or diabetes and gave own teeth Why the fuck should I listen to some body fascist telling me I need to be skinny" I didn't get to where I am today by listening to other people! And I am unanimous in that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't need people like the original poster and his followers to be concerned on my behalf Fuck off and find a cure for leprosy or something equally worthy and stop being so damned condescending Clearly you're not happy, but the OP is not concerned for you and is not being condescending. Much like your last post where he was being a fascist. You do seem to blow things out of proportion. " Surprised you're not recommending mindfulness as a cure for sensitivity and obesity. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This is not fat shaming but " But??? Yeah, it’s fat shaming. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Maybe you should concentrate on your health ? If you're not into chubby guys that's fine, but don't just post on a forum about how people should live their lives." The OP raised a genuine concern, being overweight can cause health issues, and pointed out that there seem to be more people in that category in recent times. He didn't say that he wasn't in to chubby guys and he didn't post about how people should live their lives, he raised an issue which affects a lot of people. Also, he explicitly stated that he was not fat shaming. It sure seems like a few people are trying to get offended over this. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Maybe op should try approaching strangers on the street and tell them the same ,be interesting to see how he gets on there and will the same posters here defending his post be there to support him ????" Take a quick browse through the long list of forum topics and consider how many of them you would pose to a stranger on the street. The OP is not being offensive, he raised an issue which has massive (pun intended) health concerns, and the issue is only getting bigger (...). Why can't it be talked about reasonably by adults? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The OP raised a genuine concern, being overweight can cause health issues, and pointed out that there seem to be more people in that category in recent times. He didn't say that he wasn't in to chubby guys and he didn't post about how people should live their lives, he raised an issue which affects a lot of people. Also, he explicitly stated that he was not fat shaming. It sure seems like a few people are trying to get offended over this. " Mate, he’s posted this ‘concern’ on a gay hookup site where it’s essentially like a meat market where members overwhelmingly flounce their naked bodies to all & sundry. I’m well over 40 but his post is surreptitiously sneering at those large 40 yr olds absolutely. Why not go on some health/nhs etc forum to convey his concerns instead? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The OP raised a genuine concern, being overweight can cause health issues, and pointed out that there seem to be more people in that category in recent times. He didn't say that he wasn't in to chubby guys and he didn't post about how people should live their lives, he raised an issue which affects a lot of people. Also, he explicitly stated that he was not fat shaming. It sure seems like a few people are trying to get offended over this. Mate, he’s posted this ‘concern’ on a gay hookup site where it’s essentially like a meat market where members overwhelmingly flounce their naked bodies to all & sundry. I’m well over 40 but his post is surreptitiously sneering at those large 40 yr olds absolutely. Why not go on some health/nhs etc forum to convey his concerns instead?" So before anything else, you need to justify 'surreptitiously sneering'. Which words in the original post point to that? Or is it just a feeling? He explicitly stated that he's not fat shaming. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The OP raised a genuine concern, being overweight can cause health issues, and pointed out that there seem to be more people in that category in recent times. He didn't say that he wasn't in to chubby guys and he didn't post about how people should live their lives, he raised an issue which affects a lot of people. Also, he explicitly stated that he was not fat shaming. It sure seems like a few people are trying to get offended over this. Mate, he’s posted this ‘concern’ on a gay hookup site where it’s essentially like a meat market where members overwhelmingly flounce their naked bodies to all & sundry. I’m well over 40 but his post is surreptitiously sneering at those large 40 yr olds absolutely. Why not go on some health/nhs etc forum to convey his concerns instead? So before anything else, you need to justify 'surreptitiously sneering'. Which words in the original post point to that? Or is it just a feeling? He explicitly stated that he's not fat shaming." Let us be clear, we are not children. If he has employed pleasant language to justify his actions and avoid criticism from others, the underlying intention remains evident. It is akin to someone placing an advertisement for a local church within a pornographic magazine. What message does that convey? While it may not cause any direct harm, it certainly raises questions about its purpose. WTF? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The OP raised a genuine concern, being overweight can cause health issues, and pointed out that there seem to be more people in that category in recent times. He didn't say that he wasn't in to chubby guys and he didn't post about how people should live their lives, he raised an issue which affects a lot of people. Also, he explicitly stated that he was not fat shaming. It sure seems like a few people are trying to get offended over this. Mate, he’s posted this ‘concern’ on a gay hookup site where it’s essentially like a meat market where members overwhelmingly flounce their naked bodies to all & sundry. I’m well over 40 but his post is surreptitiously sneering at those large 40 yr olds absolutely. Why not go on some health/nhs etc forum to convey his concerns instead? So before anything else, you need to justify 'surreptitiously sneering'. Which words in the original post point to that? Or is it just a feeling? He explicitly stated that he's not fat shaming. Let us be clear, we are not children. If he has employed pleasant language to justify his actions and avoid criticism from others, the underlying intention remains evident. It is akin to someone placing an advertisement for a local church within a pornographic magazine. What message does that convey? While it may not cause any direct harm, it certainly raises questions about its purpose. WTF? " Since, as you say, we're not children we should be able to be reasonable and honest. What actions is he trying to justify? What pleasant language has he employed? What criticism is he trying to avoid? What is the evident underlying intention? After answering these questions, which of the answers are directly asserted through the literal words in his original post, and which of the answers are supposition? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The OP raised a genuine concern, being overweight can cause health issues, and pointed out that there seem to be more people in that category in recent times. He didn't say that he wasn't in to chubby guys and he didn't post about how people should live their lives, he raised an issue which affects a lot of people. Also, he explicitly stated that he was not fat shaming. It sure seems like a few people are trying to get offended over this. Mate, he’s posted this ‘concern’ on a gay hookup site where it’s essentially like a meat market where members overwhelmingly flounce their naked bodies to all & sundry. I’m well over 40 but his post is surreptitiously sneering at those large 40 yr olds absolutely. Why not go on some health/nhs etc forum to convey his concerns instead? So before anything else, you need to justify 'surreptitiously sneering'. Which words in the original post point to that? Or is it just a feeling? He explicitly stated that he's not fat shaming. Let us be clear, we are not children. If he has employed pleasant language to justify his actions and avoid criticism from others, the underlying intention remains evident. It is akin to someone placing an advertisement for a local church within a pornographic magazine. What message does that convey? While it may not cause any direct harm, it certainly raises questions about its purpose. WTF? Since, as you say, we're not children we should be able to be reasonable and honest. What actions is he trying to justify? What pleasant language has he employed? What criticism is he trying to avoid? What is the evident underlying intention? After answering these questions, which of the answers are directly asserted through the literal words in his original post, and which of the answers are supposition?" Why don't you respond to all those questions you posed to yourself if you comprehend what he truly means? We are on a dating site with diverse preferences, body types, blondes, whites, the elderly, the young, and so on. Yet, someone enters and discusses diets for overweight individuals. Do you believe they are children who have no understanding of what might be beneficial for them before visiting a website dedicated solely to sexual encounters? If you wish to offer advice, consider going to the NHS, opening an office, and speaking to individuals during their check-ups, rather than here. This is similar to those who comment on ethnicity, skin color, who is good or bad. Who do they think they are to provide counsel to others? A doctor? Who? Do they possess any credentials? This is the reason why his statement appears somewhat questionable and does not convey a genuine concern for the health of individuals. He gives the impression of being disinterested in overweight individuals. If you believe the contrary, that is your prerogative; however, I advise you to reconsider before agreeing with any assertions. Best of luck. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The OP raised a genuine concern, being overweight can cause health issues, and pointed out that there seem to be more people in that category in recent times. He didn't say that he wasn't in to chubby guys and he didn't post about how people should live their lives, he raised an issue which affects a lot of people. Also, he explicitly stated that he was not fat shaming. It sure seems like a few people are trying to get offended over this. Mate, he’s posted this ‘concern’ on a gay hookup site where it’s essentially like a meat market where members overwhelmingly flounce their naked bodies to all & sundry. I’m well over 40 but his post is surreptitiously sneering at those large 40 yr olds absolutely. Why not go on some health/nhs etc forum to convey his concerns instead? So before anything else, you need to justify 'surreptitiously sneering'. Which words in the original post point to that? Or is it just a feeling? He explicitly stated that he's not fat shaming. Let us be clear, we are not children. If he has employed pleasant language to justify his actions and avoid criticism from others, the underlying intention remains evident. It is akin to someone placing an advertisement for a local church within a pornographic magazine. What message does that convey? While it may not cause any direct harm, it certainly raises questions about its purpose. WTF? Since, as you say, we're not children we should be able to be reasonable and honest. What actions is he trying to justify? What pleasant language has he employed? What criticism is he trying to avoid? What is the evident underlying intention? After answering these questions, which of the answers are directly asserted through the literal words in his original post, and which of the answers are supposition? Why don't you respond to all those questions you posed to yourself if you comprehend what he truly means? We are on a dating site with diverse preferences, body types, blondes, whites, the elderly, the young, and so on. Yet, someone enters and discusses diets for overweight individuals. Do you believe they are children who have no understanding of what might be beneficial for them before visiting a website dedicated solely to sexual encounters? If you wish to offer advice, consider going to the NHS, opening an office, and speaking to individuals during their check-ups, rather than here. This is similar to those who comment on ethnicity, skin color, who is good or bad. Who do they think they are to provide counsel to others? A doctor? Who? Do they possess any credentials? This is the reason why his statement appears somewhat questionable and does not convey a genuine concern for the health of individuals. He gives the impression of being disinterested in overweight individuals. If you believe the contrary, that is your prerogative; however, I advise you to reconsider before agreeing with any assertions. Best of luck. " Fact check: he is not discussing diets. He is not offering advice. His statement appearing questionable is your interpretation as is the impression of being disinterested. People can post whatever they want in the forum, within the rules. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This is not fat shaming but a genuine concern. The sheer volume of very over weight young men (40) is alarming. The dangers to their health is huge, it’s worrying. " They say a picture paints 1000 words but I can also be very misleading. Body shape in itself isn’t always indicative of health look at the amount of athletes that die young due over exertion in the pursuit of perfection, body builders same thing. Then look at a rugby player, strongman, heavyweight boxers all appear on the surface to be overweight but are in fact just fine for their chosen lifestyles Point is don’t judge a book by its cover read a few pages first | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The OP raised a genuine concern, being overweight can cause health issues, and pointed out that there seem to be more people in that category in recent times. He didn't say that he wasn't in to chubby guys and he didn't post about how people should live their lives, he raised an issue which affects a lot of people. Also, he explicitly stated that he was not fat shaming. It sure seems like a few people are trying to get offended over this. Mate, he’s posted this ‘concern’ on a gay hookup site where it’s essentially like a meat market where members overwhelmingly flounce their naked bodies to all & sundry. I’m well over 40 but his post is surreptitiously sneering at those large 40 yr olds absolutely. Why not go on some health/nhs etc forum to convey his concerns instead? So before anything else, you need to justify 'surreptitiously sneering'. Which words in the original post point to that? Or is it just a feeling? He explicitly stated that he's not fat shaming. Let us be clear, we are not children. If he has employed pleasant language to justify his actions and avoid criticism from others, the underlying intention remains evident. It is akin to someone placing an advertisement for a local church within a pornographic magazine. What message does that convey? While it may not cause any direct harm, it certainly raises questions about its purpose. WTF? Since, as you say, we're not children we should be able to be reasonable and honest. What actions is he trying to justify? What pleasant language has he employed? What criticism is he trying to avoid? What is the evident underlying intention? After answering these questions, which of the answers are directly asserted through the literal words in his original post, and which of the answers are supposition? Why don't you respond to all those questions you posed to yourself if you comprehend what he truly means? We are on a dating site with diverse preferences, body types, blondes, whites, the elderly, the young, and so on. Yet, someone enters and discusses diets for overweight individuals. Do you believe they are children who have no understanding of what might be beneficial for them before visiting a website dedicated solely to sexual encounters? If you wish to offer advice, consider going to the NHS, opening an office, and speaking to individuals during their check-ups, rather than here. This is similar to those who comment on ethnicity, skin color, who is good or bad. Who do they think they are to provide counsel to others? A doctor? Who? Do they possess any credentials? This is the reason why his statement appears somewhat questionable and does not convey a genuine concern for the health of individuals. He gives the impression of being disinterested in overweight individuals. If you believe the contrary, that is your prerogative; however, I advise you to reconsider before agreeing with any assertions. Best of luck. Fact check: he is not discussing diets. He is not offering advice. His statement appearing questionable is your interpretation as is the impression of being disinterested. People can post whatever they want in the forum, within the rules." Fact check .. anyone can share whatever they want as long as it follows the rules, but if it's nonsense and totally illogical, they'll get hit with 170 mean responses too, so it's their choice.. you could kick off a thread saying the sky is blue.. but seriously, what's your point with that thread? Do you think nobody knows it's blue and you’re the first to point it out? Any smart person can see the negativity behind those words, so don’t bother trying to interpret what he means. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The OP raised a genuine concern, being overweight can cause health issues, and pointed out that there seem to be more people in that category in recent times. He didn't say that he wasn't in to chubby guys and he didn't post about how people should live their lives, he raised an issue which affects a lot of people. Also, he explicitly stated that he was not fat shaming. It sure seems like a few people are trying to get offended over this. Mate, he’s posted this ‘concern’ on a gay hookup site where it’s essentially like a meat market where members overwhelmingly flounce their naked bodies to all & sundry. I’m well over 40 but his post is surreptitiously sneering at those large 40 yr olds absolutely. Why not go on some health/nhs etc forum to convey his concerns instead? So before anything else, you need to justify 'surreptitiously sneering'. Which words in the original post point to that? Or is it just a feeling? He explicitly stated that he's not fat shaming. Let us be clear, we are not children. If he has employed pleasant language to justify his actions and avoid criticism from others, the underlying intention remains evident. It is akin to someone placing an advertisement for a local church within a pornographic magazine. What message does that convey? While it may not cause any direct harm, it certainly raises questions about its purpose. WTF? Since, as you say, we're not children we should be able to be reasonable and honest. What actions is he trying to justify? What pleasant language has he employed? What criticism is he trying to avoid? What is the evident underlying intention? After answering these questions, which of the answers are directly asserted through the literal words in his original post, and which of the answers are supposition? Why don't you respond to all those questions you posed to yourself if you comprehend what he truly means? We are on a dating site with diverse preferences, body types, blondes, whites, the elderly, the young, and so on. Yet, someone enters and discusses diets for overweight individuals. Do you believe they are children who have no understanding of what might be beneficial for them before visiting a website dedicated solely to sexual encounters? If you wish to offer advice, consider going to the NHS, opening an office, and speaking to individuals during their check-ups, rather than here. This is similar to those who comment on ethnicity, skin color, who is good or bad. Who do they think they are to provide counsel to others? A doctor? Who? Do they possess any credentials? This is the reason why his statement appears somewhat questionable and does not convey a genuine concern for the health of individuals. He gives the impression of being disinterested in overweight individuals. If you believe the contrary, that is your prerogative; however, I advise you to reconsider before agreeing with any assertions. Best of luck. Fact check: he is not discussing diets. He is not offering advice. His statement appearing questionable is your interpretation as is the impression of being disinterested. People can post whatever they want in the forum, within the rules. Fact check .. anyone can share whatever they want as long as it follows the rules, but if it's nonsense and totally illogical, they'll get hit with 170 mean responses too, so it's their choice.. you could kick off a thread saying the sky is blue.. but seriously, what's your point with that thread? Do you think nobody knows it's blue and you’re the first to point it out? Any smart person can see the negativity behind those words, so don’t bother trying to interpret what he means. " That sure says something about the average IQ of site users. Sad times. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" That sure says something about the average IQ of site users. Sad times. " Tell them how mindfulness could solve all their problems, end obesity and boost IQ. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The OP raised a genuine concern, being overweight can cause health issues, and pointed out that there seem to be more people in that category in recent times. He didn't say that he wasn't in to chubby guys and he didn't post about how people should live their lives, he raised an issue which affects a lot of people. Also, he explicitly stated that he was not fat shaming. It sure seems like a few people are trying to get offended over this. Mate, he’s posted this ‘concern’ on a gay hookup site where it’s essentially like a meat market where members overwhelmingly flounce their naked bodies to all & sundry. I’m well over 40 but his post is surreptitiously sneering at those large 40 yr olds absolutely. Why not go on some health/nhs etc forum to convey his concerns instead? So before anything else, you need to justify 'surreptitiously sneering'. Which words in the original post point to that? Or is it just a feeling? He explicitly stated that he's not fat shaming. Let us be clear, we are not children. If he has employed pleasant language to justify his actions and avoid criticism from others, the underlying intention remains evident. It is akin to someone placing an advertisement for a local church within a pornographic magazine. What message does that convey? While it may not cause any direct harm, it certainly raises questions about its purpose. WTF? Since, as you say, we're not children we should be able to be reasonable and honest. What actions is he trying to justify? What pleasant language has he employed? What criticism is he trying to avoid? What is the evident underlying intention? After answering these questions, which of the answers are directly asserted through the literal words in his original post, and which of the answers are supposition? Why don't you respond to all those questions you posed to yourself if you comprehend what he truly means? We are on a dating site with diverse preferences, body types, blondes, whites, the elderly, the young, and so on. Yet, someone enters and discusses diets for overweight individuals. Do you believe they are children who have no understanding of what might be beneficial for them before visiting a website dedicated solely to sexual encounters? If you wish to offer advice, consider going to the NHS, opening an office, and speaking to individuals during their check-ups, rather than here. This is similar to those who comment on ethnicity, skin color, who is good or bad. Who do they think they are to provide counsel to others? A doctor? Who? Do they possess any credentials? This is the reason why his statement appears somewhat questionable and does not convey a genuine concern for the health of individuals. He gives the impression of being disinterested in overweight individuals. If you believe the contrary, that is your prerogative; however, I advise you to reconsider before agreeing with any assertions. Best of luck. Fact check: he is not discussing diets. He is not offering advice. His statement appearing questionable is your interpretation as is the impression of being disinterested. People can post whatever they want in the forum, within the rules. Fact check .. anyone can share whatever they want as long as it follows the rules, but if it's nonsense and totally illogical, they'll get hit with 170 mean responses too, so it's their choice.. you could kick off a thread saying the sky is blue.. but seriously, what's your point with that thread? Do you think nobody knows it's blue and you’re the first to point it out? Any smart person can see the negativity behind those words, so don’t bother trying to interpret what he means. That sure says something about the average IQ of site users. Sad times. " It is sad indeed ..no need even to have an average iq to get his point ..all the best | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The OP raised a genuine concern, being overweight can cause health issues, and pointed out that there seem to be more people in that category in recent times. He didn't say that he wasn't in to chubby guys and he didn't post about how people should live their lives, he raised an issue which affects a lot of people. Also, he explicitly stated that he was not fat shaming. It sure seems like a few people are trying to get offended over this. Mate, he’s posted this ‘concern’ on a gay hookup site where it’s essentially like a meat market where members overwhelmingly flounce their naked bodies to all & sundry. I’m well over 40 but his post is surreptitiously sneering at those large 40 yr olds absolutely. Why not go on some health/nhs etc forum to convey his concerns instead? So before anything else, you need to justify 'surreptitiously sneering'. Which words in the original post point to that? Or is it just a feeling? He explicitly stated that he's not fat shaming. Let us be clear, we are not children. If he has employed pleasant language to justify his actions and avoid criticism from others, the underlying intention remains evident. It is akin to someone placing an advertisement for a local church within a pornographic magazine. What message does that convey? While it may not cause any direct harm, it certainly raises questions about its purpose. WTF? Since, as you say, we're not children we should be able to be reasonable and honest. What actions is he trying to justify? What pleasant language has he employed? What criticism is he trying to avoid? What is the evident underlying intention? After answering these questions, which of the answers are directly asserted through the literal words in his original post, and which of the answers are supposition? Why don't you respond to all those questions you posed to yourself if you comprehend what he truly means? We are on a dating site with diverse preferences, body types, blondes, whites, the elderly, the young, and so on. Yet, someone enters and discusses diets for overweight individuals. Do you believe they are children who have no understanding of what might be beneficial for them before visiting a website dedicated solely to sexual encounters? If you wish to offer advice, consider going to the NHS, opening an office, and speaking to individuals during their check-ups, rather than here. This is similar to those who comment on ethnicity, skin color, who is good or bad. Who do they think they are to provide counsel to others? A doctor? Who? Do they possess any credentials? This is the reason why his statement appears somewhat questionable and does not convey a genuine concern for the health of individuals. He gives the impression of being disinterested in overweight individuals. If you believe the contrary, that is your prerogative; however, I advise you to reconsider before agreeing with any assertions. Best of luck. Fact check: he is not discussing diets. He is not offering advice. His statement appearing questionable is your interpretation as is the impression of being disinterested. People can post whatever they want in the forum, within the rules. Fact check .. anyone can share whatever they want as long as it follows the rules, but if it's nonsense and totally illogical, they'll get hit with 170 mean responses too, so it's their choice.. you could kick off a thread saying the sky is blue.. but seriously, what's your point with that thread? Do you think nobody knows it's blue and you’re the first to point it out? Any smart person can see the negativity behind those words, so don’t bother trying to interpret what he means. That sure says something about the average IQ of site users. Sad times. It is sad indeed ..no need even to have an average iq to get his point ..all the best " Slight contradiction there, any smart person you said, now it's any person with a low IQ also. Basically, you just don't like that he's posted the topic on the forum, you're not bothered about the content, just that it's in this space. Unfortunately, it not your space. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The OP raised a genuine concern, being overweight can cause health issues, and pointed out that there seem to be more people in that category in recent times. He didn't say that he wasn't in to chubby guys and he didn't post about how people should live their lives, he raised an issue which affects a lot of people. Also, he explicitly stated that he was not fat shaming. It sure seems like a few people are trying to get offended over this. Mate, he’s posted this ‘concern’ on a gay hookup site where it’s essentially like a meat market where members overwhelmingly flounce their naked bodies to all & sundry. I’m well over 40 but his post is surreptitiously sneering at those large 40 yr olds absolutely. Why not go on some health/nhs etc forum to convey his concerns instead? So before anything else, you need to justify 'surreptitiously sneering'. Which words in the original post point to that? Or is it just a feeling? He explicitly stated that he's not fat shaming. Let us be clear, we are not children. If he has employed pleasant language to justify his actions and avoid criticism from others, the underlying intention remains evident. It is akin to someone placing an advertisement for a local church within a pornographic magazine. What message does that convey? While it may not cause any direct harm, it certainly raises questions about its purpose. WTF? Since, as you say, we're not children we should be able to be reasonable and honest. What actions is he trying to justify? What pleasant language has he employed? What criticism is he trying to avoid? What is the evident underlying intention? After answering these questions, which of the answers are directly asserted through the literal words in his original post, and which of the answers are supposition? Why don't you respond to all those questions you posed to yourself if you comprehend what he truly means? We are on a dating site with diverse preferences, body types, blondes, whites, the elderly, the young, and so on. Yet, someone enters and discusses diets for overweight individuals. Do you believe they are children who have no understanding of what might be beneficial for them before visiting a website dedicated solely to sexual encounters? If you wish to offer advice, consider going to the NHS, opening an office, and speaking to individuals during their check-ups, rather than here. This is similar to those who comment on ethnicity, skin color, who is good or bad. Who do they think they are to provide counsel to others? A doctor? Who? Do they possess any credentials? This is the reason why his statement appears somewhat questionable and does not convey a genuine concern for the health of individuals. He gives the impression of being disinterested in overweight individuals. If you believe the contrary, that is your prerogative; however, I advise you to reconsider before agreeing with any assertions. Best of luck. Fact check: he is not discussing diets. He is not offering advice. His statement appearing questionable is your interpretation as is the impression of being disinterested. People can post whatever they want in the forum, within the rules. Fact check .. anyone can share whatever they want as long as it follows the rules, but if it's nonsense and totally illogical, they'll get hit with 170 mean responses too, so it's their choice.. you could kick off a thread saying the sky is blue.. but seriously, what's your point with that thread? Do you think nobody knows it's blue and you’re the first to point it out? Any smart person can see the negativity behind those words, so don’t bother trying to interpret what he means. That sure says something about the average IQ of site users. Sad times. It is sad indeed ..no need even to have an average iq to get his point ..all the best Slight contradiction there, any smart person you said, now it's any person with a low IQ also. Basically, you just don't like that he's posted the topic on the forum, you're not bothered about the content, just that it's in this space. Unfortunately, it not your space. " It looks like you're having a hard time responding logically, shifting the conversation all over the place. I don't mind addressing that... just to clarify... when I mentioned that any smart person was a general quote, I didn't mean to exclude those with below-average IQs. Or is that just your own interpretation? Absolutely, this is definitely not the right spot to share those words for a certain group of folks who are just here to have a good time and nothing more. It's completely unnecessary, and no one sees it that way that he is concerned about chubby guys . Many people, including myself, have pointed this out to you, but it seems like you're not picking up on the message. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It looks like you're having a hard time responding logically, shifting the conversation all over the place. I don't mind addressing that... just to clarify... when I mentioned that any smart person was a general quote, I didn't mean to exclude those with below-average IQs. Or is that just your own interpretation? Absolutely, this is definitely not the right spot to share those words for a certain group of folks who are just here to have a good time and nothing more. It's completely unnecessary, and no one sees it that way that he is concerned about chubby guys . Many people, including myself, have pointed this out to you, but it seems like you're not picking up on the message. " So, this topic is not okay but inane threads about Trump and word games and lego are okay? Also, is not the growing rate of obesity in this country a concern? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This is not fat shaming but a genuine concern. The sheer volume of very over weight young men (40) is alarming. The dangers to their health is huge, it’s worrying. " It is alarming. So alarming that reducing obesity is one of the NHS priorities. Those people are more likely to cost the state more in healthcare and die younger due to their weight. Obesity is a problem across all of society and here is no exception. Glorification of obesity, a health crisis, is quite repugnant. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It looks like you're having a hard time responding logically, shifting the conversation all over the place. I don't mind addressing that... just to clarify... when I mentioned that any smart person was a general quote, I didn't mean to exclude those with below-average IQs. Or is that just your own interpretation? Absolutely, this is definitely not the right spot to share those words for a certain group of folks who are just here to have a good time and nothing more. It's completely unnecessary, and no one sees it that way that he is concerned about chubby guys . Many people, including myself, have pointed this out to you, but it seems like you're not picking up on the message. So, this topic is not okay but inane threads about Trump and word games and lego are okay? Also, is not the growing rate of obesity in this country a concern?" Feel free to discuss Trump and STARMER as much as you want since it's your political opinion and it doesn't hurt anyone. However, when you mention specific individuals here, you need to be mindful of your words and their implications. This is just how social media works, and it's not a new concept. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It looks like you're having a hard time responding logically, shifting the conversation all over the place. I don't mind addressing that... just to clarify... when I mentioned that any smart person was a general quote, I didn't mean to exclude those with below-average IQs. Or is that just your own interpretation? Absolutely, this is definitely not the right spot to share those words for a certain group of folks who are just here to have a good time and nothing more. It's completely unnecessary, and no one sees it that way that he is concerned about chubby guys . Many people, including myself, have pointed this out to you, but it seems like you're not picking up on the message. So, this topic is not okay but inane threads about Trump and word games and lego are okay? Also, is not the growing rate of obesity in this country a concern? Feel free to discuss Trump and STARMER as much as you want since it's your political opinion and it doesn't hurt anyone. However, when you mention specific individuals here, you need to be mindful of your words and their implications. This is just how social media works, and it's not a new concept. " Specific being a category, not actually a specific people? So, we can't talk about the fact that some people are fat and the number of fat people is growing? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It looks like you're having a hard time responding logically, shifting the conversation all over the place. I don't mind addressing that... just to clarify... when I mentioned that any smart person was a general quote, I didn't mean to exclude those with below-average IQs. Or is that just your own interpretation? Absolutely, this is definitely not the right spot to share those words for a certain group of folks who are just here to have a good time and nothing more. It's completely unnecessary, and no one sees it that way that he is concerned about chubby guys . Many people, including myself, have pointed this out to you, but it seems like you're not picking up on the message. So, this topic is not okay but inane threads about Trump and word games and lego are okay? Also, is not the growing rate of obesity in this country a concern? Feel free to discuss Trump and STARMER as much as you want since it's your political opinion and it doesn't hurt anyone. However, when you mention specific individuals here, you need to be mindful of your words and their implications. This is just how social media works, and it's not a new concept. Specific being a category, not actually a specific people? So, we can't talk about the fact that some people are fat and the number of fat people is growing? " This once again demonstrates your disdain for overweight individuals. Otherwise, you would not resort to using the term 'fat' repeatedly. If you truly cared about them, you would choose more appropriate language that would make them feel as though a little Mickey is considering their feelings. Please make a greater effort. You have received your answer numerous times, but to be honest, I cannot alter the intelligence levels of individuals. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It looks like you're having a hard time responding logically, shifting the conversation all over the place. I don't mind addressing that... just to clarify... when I mentioned that any smart person was a general quote, I didn't mean to exclude those with below-average IQs. Or is that just your own interpretation? Absolutely, this is definitely not the right spot to share those words for a certain group of folks who are just here to have a good time and nothing more. It's completely unnecessary, and no one sees it that way that he is concerned about chubby guys . Many people, including myself, have pointed this out to you, but it seems like you're not picking up on the message. So, this topic is not okay but inane threads about Trump and word games and lego are okay? Also, is not the growing rate of obesity in this country a concern? Feel free to discuss Trump and STARMER as much as you want since it's your political opinion and it doesn't hurt anyone. However, when you mention specific individuals here, you need to be mindful of your words and their implications. This is just how social media works, and it's not a new concept. Specific being a category, not actually a specific people? So, we can't talk about the fact that some people are fat and the number of fat people is growing? This once again demonstrates your disdain for overweight individuals. Otherwise, you would not resort to using the term 'fat' repeatedly. If you truly cared about them, you would choose more appropriate language that would make them feel as though a little Mickey is considering their feelings. Please make a greater effort. You have received your answer numerous times, but to be honest, I cannot alter the intelligence levels of individuals." Are you actually being serious?! We can't call fat people fat anymore, because....wait for it...they're fat. But you can imply that I'm stupid. Can I imply that fat people are fat instead? How do you suggest I do that. Maybe I'll start a thread on it, to make sure that I'm not being insensitive, my first words will be "I'm not fat shaming". | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Are you actually being serious?! We can't call fat people fat anymore, because....wait for it...they're fat. But you can imply that I'm stupid. Can I imply that fat people are fat instead? How do you suggest I do that. Maybe I'll start a thread on it, to make sure that I'm not being insensitive, my first words will be "I'm not fat shaming"." You missed… “I’m not fat shaming BUT…” Sounds pretty much like what’s often said re race, homophobes etc | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It’s not called Flabguys for nothing. " Boom, well played. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It looks like you're having a hard time responding logically, shifting the conversation all over the place. I don't mind addressing that... just to clarify... when I mentioned that any smart person was a general quote, I didn't mean to exclude those with below-average IQs. Or is that just your own interpretation? Absolutely, this is definitely not the right spot to share those words for a certain group of folks who are just here to have a good time and nothing more. It's completely unnecessary, and no one sees it that way that he is concerned about chubby guys . Many people, including myself, have pointed this out to you, but it seems like you're not picking up on the message. So, this topic is not okay but inane threads about Trump and word games and lego are okay? Also, is not the growing rate of obesity in this country a concern? Feel free to discuss Trump and STARMER as much as you want since it's your political opinion and it doesn't hurt anyone. However, when you mention specific individuals here, you need to be mindful of your words and their implications. This is just how social media works, and it's not a new concept. Specific being a category, not actually a specific people? So, we can't talk about the fact that some people are fat and the number of fat people is growing? This once again demonstrates your disdain for overweight individuals. Otherwise, you would not resort to using the term 'fat' repeatedly. If you truly cared about them, you would choose more appropriate language that would make them feel as though a little Mickey is considering their feelings. Please make a greater effort. You have received your answer numerous times, but to be honest, I cannot alter the intelligence levels of individuals. Are you actually being serious?! We can't call fat people fat anymore, because....wait for it...they're fat. But you can imply that I'm stupid. Can I imply that fat people are fat instead? How do you suggest I do that. Maybe I'll start a thread on it, to make sure that I'm not being insensitive, my first words will be "I'm not fat shaming"." You have demonstrated through several of your statements that you are, you merely need to search for that word on Google to understand the differences between overweight and fat, which would enhance your language proficiency. As many have pointed out in this thread, including myself, to conclude this rather unproductive discussion, numerous overweight individuals are in that condition due to an underactive thyroid, or perhaps certain medications contribute to weight gain. Additionally, stress and difficulties in personal life play a role, and they are aware of this themselves. Some larger individuals, such as wrestlers weighing over 250 pounds, can lift a ton of a car without assistance, despite being chubby. Many people prefer to remain slightly overweight as they feel comfortable with their weight, blood pressure, and overall health. Therefore, your participation in a thread where many have indirectly addressed you is unwarranted, and it was inappropriate for the original poster to make such a statement. Yet, you continue to label individuals as fat, which is entirely disrespectful | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It looks like you're having a hard time responding logically, shifting the conversation all over the place. I don't mind addressing that... just to clarify... when I mentioned that any smart person was a general quote, I didn't mean to exclude those with below-average IQs. Or is that just your own interpretation? Absolutely, this is definitely not the right spot to share those words for a certain group of folks who are just here to have a good time and nothing more. It's completely unnecessary, and no one sees it that way that he is concerned about chubby guys . Many people, including myself, have pointed this out to you, but it seems like you're not picking up on the message. So, this topic is not okay but inane threads about Trump and word games and lego are okay? Also, is not the growing rate of obesity in this country a concern? Feel free to discuss Trump and STARMER as much as you want since it's your political opinion and it doesn't hurt anyone. However, when you mention specific individuals here, you need to be mindful of your words and their implications. This is just how social media works, and it's not a new concept. Specific being a category, not actually a specific people? So, we can't talk about the fact that some people are fat and the number of fat people is growing? This once again demonstrates your disdain for overweight individuals. Otherwise, you would not resort to using the term 'fat' repeatedly. If you truly cared about them, you would choose more appropriate language that would make them feel as though a little Mickey is considering their feelings. Please make a greater effort. You have received your answer numerous times, but to be honest, I cannot alter the intelligence levels of individuals. Are you actually being serious?! We can't call fat people fat anymore, because....wait for it...they're fat. But you can imply that I'm stupid. Can I imply that fat people are fat instead? How do you suggest I do that. Maybe I'll start a thread on it, to make sure that I'm not being insensitive, my first words will be "I'm not fat shaming". You have demonstrated through several of your statements that you are, you merely need to search for that word on Google to understand the differences between overweight and fat, which would enhance your language proficiency. As many have pointed out in this thread, including myself, to conclude this rather unproductive discussion, numerous overweight individuals are in that condition due to an underactive thyroid, or perhaps certain medications contribute to weight gain. Additionally, stress and difficulties in personal life play a role, and they are aware of this themselves. Some larger individuals, such as wrestlers weighing over 250 pounds, can lift a ton of a car without assistance, despite being chubby. Many people prefer to remain slightly overweight as they feel comfortable with their weight, blood pressure, and overall health. Therefore, your participation in a thread where many have indirectly addressed you is unwarranted, and it was inappropriate for the original poster to make such a statement. Yet, you continue to label individuals as fat, which is entirely disrespectful" Would 'chubby' be better than fat? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" ... Fact check .. anyone can share whatever they want as long as it follows the rules, but if it's nonsense and totally illogical, they'll get hit with 170 mean responses too, so it's their choice.. you could kick off a thread saying the sky is blue.. but seriously, what's your point with that thread? Do you think nobody knows it's blue and you’re the first to point it out? Any smart person can see the negativity behind those words, so don’t bother trying to interpret what he means. That sure says something about the average IQ of site users. Sad times. " Someone of low IQ would not be able to infer the true intention implied in the original post.  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" ... Fact check .. anyone can share whatever they want as long as it follows the rules, but if it's nonsense and totally illogical, they'll get hit with 170 mean responses too, so it's their choice.. you could kick off a thread saying the sky is blue.. but seriously, what's your point with that thread? Do you think nobody knows it's blue and you’re the first to point it out? Any smart person can see the negativity behind those words, so don’t bother trying to interpret what he means. That sure says something about the average IQ of site users. Sad times. Someone of low IQ would not be able to infer the true intention implied in the original post. "Nice, so not only are they fat, but you're saying they're stupid now too. Way to go. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" ... Fact check .. anyone can share whatever they want as long as it follows the rules, but if it's nonsense and totally illogical, they'll get hit with 170 mean responses too, so it's their choice.. you could kick off a thread saying the sky is blue.. but seriously, what's your point with that thread? Do you think nobody knows it's blue and you’re the first to point it out? Any smart person can see the negativity behind those words, so don’t bother trying to interpret what he means. That sure says something about the average IQ of site users. Sad times. Someone of low IQ would not be able to infer the true intention implied in the original post.
Nice, so not only are they fat, but you're saying they're stupid now too. Way to go. "You are not fat, but you seem to have difficulty interpreting the true intentions of some posts. Perhaps you should use mindfulness to improve your IQ. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" ... Fact check .. anyone can share whatever they want as long as it follows the rules, but if it's nonsense and totally illogical, they'll get hit with 170 mean responses too, so it's their choice.. you could kick off a thread saying the sky is blue.. but seriously, what's your point with that thread? Do you think nobody knows it's blue and you’re the first to point it out? Any smart person can see the negativity behind those words, so don’t bother trying to interpret what he means. That sure says something about the average IQ of site users. Sad times. Someone of low IQ would not be able to infer the true intention implied in the original post.
Nice, so not only are they fat, but you're saying they're stupid now too. Way to go.
You are not fat, but you seem to have difficulty interpreting the true intentions of some posts. Perhaps you should use mindfulness to improve your IQ. "You're not allowed to use the term 'fat', it's offensive. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" ... Fact check .. anyone can share whatever they want as long as it follows the rules, but if it's nonsense and totally illogical, they'll get hit with 170 mean responses too, so it's their choice.. you could kick off a thread saying the sky is blue.. but seriously, what's your point with that thread? Do you think nobody knows it's blue and you’re the first to point it out? Any smart person can see the negativity behind those words, so don’t bother trying to interpret what he means. That sure says something about the average IQ of site users. Sad times. Someone of low IQ would not be able to infer the true intention implied in the original post.
Nice, so not only are they fat, but you're saying they're stupid now too. Way to go.
You are not fat, but you seem to have difficulty interpreting the true intentions of some posts. Perhaps you should use mindfulness to improve your IQ.
You're not allowed to use the term 'fat', it's offensive. "This you? : "so not only are they fat" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" ... Fact check .. anyone can share whatever they want as long as it follows the rules, but if it's nonsense and totally illogical, they'll get hit with 170 mean responses too, so it's their choice.. you could kick off a thread saying the sky is blue.. but seriously, what's your point with that thread? Do you think nobody knows it's blue and you’re the first to point it out? Any smart person can see the negativity behind those words, so don’t bother trying to interpret what he means. That sure says something about the average IQ of site users. Sad times. Someone of low IQ would not be able to infer the true intention implied in the original post.
Nice, so not only are they fat, but you're saying they're stupid now too. Way to go.
You are not fat, but you seem to have difficulty interpreting the true intentions of some posts. Perhaps you should use mindfulness to improve your IQ.
You're not allowed to use the term 'fat', it's offensive.
This you? : "so not only are they fat" "Yep, I dont use the term any more though, even I find it offensive now. Chubby is also a no go. I will report anyone using these terms. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" ... Fact check .. anyone can share whatever they want as long as it follows the rules, but if it's nonsense and totally illogical, they'll get hit with 170 mean responses too, so it's their choice.. you could kick off a thread saying the sky is blue.. but seriously, what's your point with that thread? Do you think nobody knows it's blue and you’re the first to point it out? Any smart person can see the negativity behind those words, so don’t bother trying to interpret what he means. That sure says something about the average IQ of site users. Sad times. Someone of low IQ would not be able to infer the true intention implied in the original post.
Nice, so not only are they fat, but you're saying they're stupid now too. Way to go.
You are not fat, but you seem to have difficulty interpreting the true intentions of some posts. Perhaps you should use mindfulness to improve your IQ.
You're not allowed to use the term 'fat', it's offensive.
This you? : "so not only are they fat"
Yep, I dont use the term any more though, even I find it offensive now. Chubby is also a no go. I will report anyone using these terms. "consigned to the history of 36 minutes previously. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" ... Fact check .. anyone can share whatever they want as long as it follows the rules, but if it's nonsense and totally illogical, they'll get hit with 170 mean responses too, so it's their choice.. you could kick off a thread saying the sky is blue.. but seriously, what's your point with that thread? Do you think nobody knows it's blue and you’re the first to point it out? Any smart person can see the negativity behind those words, so don’t bother trying to interpret what he means. That sure says something about the average IQ of site users. Sad times. Someone of low IQ would not be able to infer the true intention implied in the original post.
Nice, so not only are they fat, but you're saying they're stupid now too. Way to go.
You are not fat, but you seem to have difficulty interpreting the true intentions of some posts. Perhaps you should use mindfulness to improve your IQ.
You're not allowed to use the term 'fat', it's offensive.
This you? : "so not only are they fat"
Yep, I dont use the term any more though, even I find it offensive now. Chubby is also a no go. I will report anyone using these terms.
consigned to the history of 36 minutes previously. "I move with the times. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" ... Fact check .. anyone can share whatever they want as long as it follows the rules, but if it's nonsense and totally illogical, they'll get hit with 170 mean responses too, so it's their choice.. you could kick off a thread saying the sky is blue.. but seriously, what's your point with that thread? Do you think nobody knows it's blue and you’re the first to point it out? Any smart person can see the negativity behind those words, so don’t bother trying to interpret what he means. That sure says something about the average IQ of site users. Sad times. Someone of low IQ would not be able to infer the true intention implied in the original post.
Nice, so not only are they fat, but you're saying they're stupid now too. Way to go.
You are not fat, but you seem to have difficulty interpreting the true intentions of some posts. Perhaps you should use mindfulness to improve your IQ.
You're not allowed to use the term 'fat', it's offensive.
This you? : "so not only are they fat"
Yep, I dont use the term any more though, even I find it offensive now. Chubby is also a no go. I will report anyone using these terms.
consigned to the history of 36 minutes previously.
I move with the times. "Did mindfulness help you come to recognise and understand your past transgressions?  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I have no issues with a guys size. I just wish guys on the site would be honest about it. " Trouble is so many say average, but average these days is overweight so they are being honest 🤔 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I have no issues with a guys size. I just wish guys on the site would be honest about it. Trouble is so many say average, but average these days is overweight so they are being honest 🤔" Ten Ton Tess is the new Average Joe | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Let's not forget the guys who list themselves as "athletic" and their photos showing a big fat gutt or huge arse with a double chin and moobs lol" Athletic is a variable physique subject to the sport. Shot putters are massive - athlete. Marathon runners are skinny - athlete | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Let's not forget the guys who list themselves as "athletic" and their photos showing a big fat gutt or huge arse with a double chin and moobs lol Athletic is a variable physique subject to the sport. Shot putters are massive - athlete. Marathon runners are skinny - athlete " I have a coworker who hits the gym every day to call himself athlete , he has salad as his main dish with a couple of biscuits for dessert, tracks his calories on his Apple Watch, and even makes himself throw up what he ate at the end of the night. In the morning, his face looks terrible and he can hardly talk. He's been sick more than anyone else this year. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Let's not forget the guys who list themselves as "athletic" and their photos showing a big fat gutt or huge arse with a double chin and moobs lol Athletic is a variable physique subject to the sport. Shot putters are massive - athlete. Marathon runners are skinny - athlete I have a coworker who hits the gym every day to call himself athlete , he has salad as his main dish with a couple of biscuits for dessert, tracks his calories on his Apple Watch, and even makes himself throw up what he ate at the end of the night. In the morning, his face looks terrible and he can hardly talk. He's been sick more than anyone else this year. " Starvin Marvin | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Let's not forget the guys who list themselves as "athletic" and their photos showing a big fat gutt or huge arse with a double chin and moobs lol Athletic is a variable physique subject to the sport. Shot putters are massive - athlete. Marathon runners are skinny - athlete I have a coworker who hits the gym every day to call himself athlete , he has salad as his main dish with a couple of biscuits for dessert, tracks his calories on his Apple Watch, and even makes himself throw up what he ate at the end of the night. In the morning, his face looks terrible and he can hardly talk. He's been sick more than anyone else this year. Starvin Marvin" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Let's not forget the guys who list themselves as "athletic" and their photos showing a big fat gutt or huge arse with a double chin and moobs lol Athletic is a variable physique subject to the sport. Shot putters are massive - athlete. Marathon runners are skinny - athlete I have a coworker who hits the gym every day to call himself athlete , he has salad as his main dish with a couple of biscuits for dessert, tracks his calories on his Apple Watch, and even makes himself throw up what he ate at the end of the night. In the morning, his face looks terrible and he can hardly talk. He's been sick more than anyone else this year. Starvin Marvin "Under eating will kill you quicker than over eating | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is astonishing to consider the number of doctors present here, yet we were unaware of their existence. They discuss the weight of individuals and the potential suffering of society, but in other discussions, I observe a fascination with consuming bodily fluids. Dear doctors, please exercise restraint; engaging in activities such as rimming, urination, and oral sex may lead to increased hunger and affect your abdominal definition." Ive not seen any declared doctors here. Having an intelligent opinion about the much-publicised state of the nations health due to unhealthy lifestyle doesn’t qualify anyone as a doctor, it just makes them well researched and capable of critical thought. Dismissing an opinion about health because the opinion comes from someone who is NOT a doctor is very childish. Not many calories in a load of cum. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is astonishing to consider the number of doctors present here, yet we were unaware of their existence. They discuss the weight of individuals and the potential suffering of society, but in other discussions, I observe a fascination with consuming bodily fluids. Dear doctors, please exercise restraint; engaging in activities such as rimming, urination, and oral sex may lead to increased hunger and affect your abdominal definition. Ive not seen any declared doctors here. Having an intelligent opinion about the much-publicised state of the nations health due to unhealthy lifestyle doesn’t qualify anyone as a doctor, it just makes them well researched and capable of critical thought. Dismissing an opinion about health because the opinion comes from someone who is NOT a doctor is very childish. Not many calories in a load of cum." So Are they solely focused on the weight of individuals on a shag site? What about pressing social issues such as the high cost of living, housing shortages, income inequality, economic instability, rising crime rates, immigration , public distrust in institutions, environmental issues, education disparities, and the ongoing problem of in-work poverty. I do not observe many individuals engaging with these matters on a shag site, instead opting to lecture others , while heavily involved with rimming | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This discussion pertains to fat shaming. You are exerting considerable effort to fit in, but that approach is ineffective. If someone is overly concerned about an individual's weight on a hookup site, yet indifferent to the fact that numerous individuals can cum in his arse , it is essential to reconsider the implications of this situation. What does this truly signify?" Stop using the word Fat, it's offensive. Chubby is also unacceptable and your username is offensive too. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This discussion pertains to fat shaming. You are exerting considerable effort to fit in, but that approach is ineffective. If someone is overly concerned about an individual's weight on a hookup site, yet indifferent to the fact that numerous individuals can cum in his arse , it is essential to reconsider the implications of this situation. What does this truly signify? Stop using the word Fat, it's offensive. Chubby is also unacceptable and your username is offensive too. " My name is considered offensive due to the presence of the word 'love' in it. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Your understanding of 'op words' is quite peculiar, especially considering that numerous individuals have dismissed that assertion and perceived it as more of an insult than a matter of concern. Continue your efforts, but it is evident to all what the situation entails." There's nothing peculiar about my understanding of facts and words. A few have said they find the word "fat" offensive doesn't change facts. It's a shame they feel offense in a word, but that is about them, and does not change facts, and does not address the original post. You flag waving for them is quite weird, especially so now that someone has said they find the words in your profile name offensive. Beleive me when i say obese people dont need others to advocate for them, it is insulting. Ive been obese. I was a "fat cunt" and a "greedy arsed pig". My language. I've been through NHS weight management services, and I work in the NHS, funnily enough a large part in healthy style policy and promotion. Just because someone doesn't like the language does not mean we stop using it when it is not being used to cause offense. Most obese people call themselves "fat" because that is what they are. I don't like the word "faggot" but I'm not having a meltdown that it's being used, unless it is used to cause offense. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do not attempt to instruct us on the definition of the term 'fat'; you continue to use the word 'fat' in a derogatory manner towards individuals who are overweight, which is offensive. However, you seem to enjoy inserting yourself into these situations, becoming increasingly embarrassed. At the very least, take the opportunity to learn something." I'm not embarrassed pal. It's not me being told my username has caused offense. Its not me conflating obesity with bareback sex and rimming. Its not me advocating for obese people (though I quite happily would if needed but its not, having been a fat cunt myself). You carry on though, flag waving with no purpose. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Your understanding of 'op words' is quite peculiar, especially considering that numerous individuals have dismissed that assertion and perceived it as more of an insult than a matter of concern. Continue your efforts, but it is evident to all what the situation entails. There's nothing peculiar about my understanding of facts and words. A few have said they find the word "fat" offensive doesn't change facts. It's a shame they feel offense in a word, but that is about them, and does not change facts, and does not address the original post. You flag waving for them is quite weird, especially so now that someone has said they find the words in your profile name offensive. Beleive me when i say obese people dont need others to advocate for them, it is insulting. Ive been obese. I was a "fat cunt" and a "greedy arsed pig". My language. I've been through NHS weight management services, and I work in the NHS, funnily enough a large part in healthy style policy and promotion. Just because someone doesn't like the language does not mean we stop using it when it is not being used to cause offense. Most obese people call themselves "fat" because that is what they are. I don't like the word "faggot" but I'm not having a meltdown that it's being used, unless it is used to cause offense. " It does alter the reality, and in fact, it is quite offensive. Therefore, I am astonished that you continue without consulting another dictionary of yours. It is commendable that you have taken care of yourself, but you are still not permitted to use that derogatory term towards any overweight individual. I do not find it strange at all; in fact, I consider chubby men to be very attractive and I am a great admirer of them. There is nothing stranger than someone coming here and telling me that I am peculiar. Please step back and refrain from calling me 'pal' in the future | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Your understanding of 'op words' is quite peculiar, especially considering that numerous individuals have dismissed that assertion and perceived it as more of an insult than a matter of concern. Continue your efforts, but it is evident to all what the situation entails. There's nothing peculiar about my understanding of facts and words. A few have said they find the word "fat" offensive doesn't change facts. It's a shame they feel offense in a word, but that is about them, and does not change facts, and does not address the original post. You flag waving for them is quite weird, especially so now that someone has said they find the words in your profile name offensive. Beleive me when i say obese people dont need others to advocate for them, it is insulting. Ive been obese. I was a "fat cunt" and a "greedy arsed pig". My language. I've been through NHS weight management services, and I work in the NHS, funnily enough a large part in healthy style policy and promotion. Just because someone doesn't like the language does not mean we stop using it when it is not being used to cause offense. Most obese people call themselves "fat" because that is what they are. I don't like the word "faggot" but I'm not having a meltdown that it's being used, unless it is used to cause offense. It does alter the reality, and in fact, it is quite offensive. Therefore, I am astonished that you continue without consulting another dictionary of yours. It is commendable that you have taken care of yourself, but you are still not permitted to use that derogatory term towards any overweight individual. I do not find it strange at all; in fact, I consider chubby men to be very attractive and I am a great admirer of them. There is nothing stranger than someone coming here and telling me that I am peculiar. Please step back and refrain from calling me 'pal' in the future" Should we have a dummy spitting duel at dawn | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Your understanding of 'op words' is quite peculiar, especially considering that numerous individuals have dismissed that assertion and perceived it as more of an insult than a matter of concern. Continue your efforts, but it is evident to all what the situation entails. There's nothing peculiar about my understanding of facts and words. A few have said they find the word "fat" offensive doesn't change facts. It's a shame they feel offense in a word, but that is about them, and does not change facts, and does not address the original post. You flag waving for them is quite weird, especially so now that someone has said they find the words in your profile name offensive. Beleive me when i say obese people dont need others to advocate for them, it is insulting. Ive been obese. I was a "fat cunt" and a "greedy arsed pig". My language. I've been through NHS weight management services, and I work in the NHS, funnily enough a large part in healthy style policy and promotion. Just because someone doesn't like the language does not mean we stop using it when it is not being used to cause offense. Most obese people call themselves "fat" because that is what they are. I don't like the word "faggot" but I'm not having a meltdown that it's being used, unless it is used to cause offense. It does alter the reality, and in fact, it is quite offensive. Therefore, I am astonished that you continue without consulting another dictionary of yours. It is commendable that you have taken care of yourself, but you are still not permitted to use that derogatory term towards any overweight individual. I do not find it strange at all; in fact, I consider chubby men to be very attractive and I am a great admirer of them. There is nothing stranger than someone coming here and telling me that I am peculiar. Please step back and refrain from calling me 'pal' in the future Should we have a dummy spitting duel at dawn "Funny enough I looked at one of the Ai ‘s another day which can create from a tiny viny cock a big massive one . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Your understanding of 'op words' is quite peculiar, especially considering that numerous individuals have dismissed that assertion and perceived it as more of an insult than a matter of concern. Continue your efforts, but it is evident to all what the situation entails. There's nothing peculiar about my understanding of facts and words. A few have said they find the word "fat" offensive doesn't change facts. It's a shame they feel offense in a word, but that is about them, and does not change facts, and does not address the original post. You flag waving for them is quite weird, especially so now that someone has said they find the words in your profile name offensive. Beleive me when i say obese people dont need others to advocate for them, it is insulting. Ive been obese. I was a "fat cunt" and a "greedy arsed pig". My language. I've been through NHS weight management services, and I work in the NHS, funnily enough a large part in healthy style policy and promotion. Just because someone doesn't like the language does not mean we stop using it when it is not being used to cause offense. Most obese people call themselves "fat" because that is what they are. I don't like the word "faggot" but I'm not having a meltdown that it's being used, unless it is used to cause offense. It does alter the reality, and in fact, it is quite offensive. Therefore, I am astonished that you continue without consulting another dictionary of yours. It is commendable that you have taken care of yourself, but you are still not permitted to use that derogatory term towards any overweight individual. I do not find it strange at all; in fact, I consider chubby men to be very attractive and I am a great admirer of them. There is nothing stranger than someone coming here and telling me that I am peculiar. Please step back and refrain from calling me 'pal' in the future" Hold up there, I've made it very clear that I'm not using the F word anymore, it's a despicable word. As is Chubby, hence your username being offensive. Chubby is a derogatory term and I, and many others, find it offensive, degrading and insulting. You are not permitted to use that derogatory term. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Your understanding of 'op words' is quite peculiar, especially considering that numerous individuals have dismissed that assertion and perceived it as more of an insult than a matter of concern. Continue your efforts, but it is evident to all what the situation entails. There's nothing peculiar about my understanding of facts and words. A few have said they find the word "fat" offensive doesn't change facts. It's a shame they feel offense in a word, but that is about them, and does not change facts, and does not address the original post. You flag waving for them is quite weird, especially so now that someone has said they find the words in your profile name offensive. Beleive me when i say obese people dont need others to advocate for them, it is insulting. Ive been obese. I was a "fat cunt" and a "greedy arsed pig". My language. I've been through NHS weight management services, and I work in the NHS, funnily enough a large part in healthy style policy and promotion. Just because someone doesn't like the language does not mean we stop using it when it is not being used to cause offense. Most obese people call themselves "fat" because that is what they are. I don't like the word "faggot" but I'm not having a meltdown that it's being used, unless it is used to cause offense. It does alter the reality, and in fact, it is quite offensive. Therefore, I am astonished that you continue without consulting another dictionary of yours. It is commendable that you have taken care of yourself, but you are still not permitted to use that derogatory term towards any overweight individual. I do not find it strange at all; in fact, I consider chubby men to be very attractive and I am a great admirer of them. There is nothing stranger than someone coming here and telling me that I am peculiar. Please step back and refrain from calling me 'pal' in the future Hold up there, I've made it very clear that I'm not using the F word anymore, it's a despicable word. As is Chubby, hence your username being offensive. Chubby is a derogatory term and I, and many others, find it offensive, degrading and insulting. You are not permitted to use that derogatory term. " Please direct your request to the fab team, as they have designated 'chubby' as a category available for use. Kindly refrain from exacerbating the situation. I would try harder | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Your understanding of 'op words' is quite peculiar, especially considering that numerous individuals have dismissed that assertion and perceived it as more of an insult than a matter of concern. Continue your efforts, but it is evident to all what the situation entails. There's nothing peculiar about my understanding of facts and words. A few have said they find the word "fat" offensive doesn't change facts. It's a shame they feel offense in a word, but that is about them, and does not change facts, and does not address the original post. You flag waving for them is quite weird, especially so now that someone has said they find the words in your profile name offensive. Beleive me when i say obese people dont need others to advocate for them, it is insulting. Ive been obese. I was a "fat cunt" and a "greedy arsed pig". My language. I've been through NHS weight management services, and I work in the NHS, funnily enough a large part in healthy style policy and promotion. Just because someone doesn't like the language does not mean we stop using it when it is not being used to cause offense. Most obese people call themselves "fat" because that is what they are. I don't like the word "faggot" but I'm not having a meltdown that it's being used, unless it is used to cause offense. It does alter the reality, and in fact, it is quite offensive. Therefore, I am astonished that you continue without consulting another dictionary of yours. It is commendable that you have taken care of yourself, but you are still not permitted to use that derogatory term towards any overweight individual. I do not find it strange at all; in fact, I consider chubby men to be very attractive and I am a great admirer of them. There is nothing stranger than someone coming here and telling me that I am peculiar. Please step back and refrain from calling me 'pal' in the future" Mate, you dont get to tell people what to do here, or police common language. Nobody is speaking about "individuals" in this thread (you use the word several times), not once has anyone been singled out. You seem incapable of staying on topic - which was and is a generic topic about the health of some people in society. How you've interpreted that is on you, but whether the term fat, chub, obese, overweight, large is used makes no difference to the bones of the conversation. As was pointed out, someone finds your username offensive, but you cant seem to take that on board. My conclusion is that your offense receptors are selective, but none of that alters the OP that a large part of society, included on this site, are unhealthily obese. From my point of view, glorification of unhealthy, is, well, not very healthy, and really quite unhelpful. I'm sure someone with out of control eating will be encouraged to know that you want him to eat another kit kat so he meets your fetish ideal, healthy or not. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"All these flakes arguing over what words are hurty. Hilarious 😂 " Sugar frosted flakes. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Regards to word of fat no longer acceptable Can we say there’s too much fat on that bacon or chop ? " Nope, because a person who is 'full bodied' may find it offensive, and people shouldn't be subjected to anything which may be offensive. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"All these flakes arguing over what words are hurty. Hilarious 😂 " 👏 👏 👏 👏 they'll be policing our thoughts next, and then they'll want to control our sex lives so they can watch and wank. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This is not fat shaming but a genuine concern. The sheer volume of very over weight young men (40) is alarming. The dangers to their health is huge, it’s worrying. " What I think is more worrying is the number of barebackers on here with 100s of verifications who clearly shag anything indiscriminately in the nearest lay-by or hedge before scuttling back to their Barratt home and their unsuspecting wife | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This is not fat shaming but a genuine concern. The sheer volume of very over weight young men (40) is alarming. The dangers to their health is huge, it’s worrying. What I think is more worrying is the number of barebackers on here with 100s of verifications who clearly shag anything indiscriminately in the nearest lay-by or hedge before scuttling back to their Barratt home and their unsuspecting wife" Maybe start a thread about that, rather than hijacking this one? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| back to top |  |
