FabGuys.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

British institutions

Jump to newest
 

By *eterpiper OP   Man
6 weeks ago

fife

Why the sudden rise in attack on British institutions, the BBC the monarchy and the government are all being targeted at the moment. Not a coincidence. People outside and within our shores are intent on causing trouble

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *anchester34Man
6 weeks ago

Manchester

Don’t really care tbh I just want someone to bend me over and group fuck me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wladMan
6 weeks ago

high wycombe

Well it's a combination of the institutions making some mistakes, but being attacked by those who fit to benefit from their downfall. Sky and The Telegraph are going in hard on the BBC because they want their audience

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *issycumslut10TV/TS
6 weeks ago

Luton


"Well it's a combination of the institutions making some mistakes, but being attacked by those who fit to benefit from their downfall. Sky and The Telegraph are going in hard on the BBC because they want their audience"

And Sky bidding to buy ITV ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *issycumslut10TV/TS
6 weeks ago

Luton


"Why the sudden rise in attack on British institutions, the BBC the monarchy and the government are all being targeted at the moment. Not a coincidence. People outside and within our shores are intent on causing trouble "

To be fair, all are shooting themselves in the foot to varying degrees. BBC shouldn’t be editing footage (despite Trump clearly enjoying himself and cajhooling his hard core followers), Monarchy is mainly about AFKAP and the Govt. well where do we start ? (Current & Previous persuasions !)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enri du lacMan
6 weeks ago

Coventry

The BBC has a blatent institutional left-wing bias - despite its pathetic protestations to the contrary - so it's quite pleasing that it's been caught bang to rights.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wladMan
6 weeks ago

high wycombe


"Well it's a combination of the institutions making some mistakes, but being attacked by those who fit to benefit from their downfall. Sky and The Telegraph are going in hard on the BBC because they want their audience

And Sky bidding to buy ITV ?"

It's Sky's owners, Comcast, that are bidding for itv. Meaning of they get it, theirnnews division would be run by Americans

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *idingcockMan
6 weeks ago

Driffield


"The BBC has a blatent institutional left-wing bias - despite its pathetic protestations to the contrary - so it's quite pleasing that it's been caught bang to rights."

What’s your evidence for that?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *astDevonGuyMan
6 weeks ago

East Devon


"Don’t really care tbh I just want someone to bend me over and group fuck me "

What he said 👹

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *manMan
6 weeks ago

wiltshire near stapleford


"The BBC has a blatent institutional left-wing bias - despite its pathetic protestations to the contrary - so it's quite pleasing that it's been caught bang to rights.

What’s your evidence for that? "

exactly, another case of no evidence but it fits an agenda

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hePerkyPumpkinTV/TS
6 weeks ago

Bristol

Government = Will always be subject to considerable criticism. Compound this with a wholly unpopular PM...

Monarchy = Andrew is a paedophile, simple. Doesn't exactly help the monarchy look good, does it?

BBC = Got caught lying (think of all the times they don't get caught)

I would say these are contributing factors as to why most members of the public are not happy or trusting of these institutions.

If you feel like you want to align yourself with these things regardless of the obvious flaws... Out of what? loyalty?

Well who am I to say you're wrong.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hePerkyPumpkinTV/TS
6 weeks ago

Bristol


"The BBC has a blatent institutional left-wing bias - despite its pathetic protestations to the contrary - so it's quite pleasing that it's been caught bang to rights."

Hasn't the coverage of Gaza been strongly condemned by many people on the left?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rancd2TV/TS
6 weeks ago

Wolverhampton


"Government = Will always be subject to considerable criticism. Compound this with a wholly unpopular PM...

Monarchy = Andrew is a paedophile, simple. Doesn't exactly help the monarchy look good, does it?

BBC = Got caught lying (think of all the times they don't get caught)

I would say these are contributing factors as to why most members of the public are not happy or trusting of these institutions.

If you feel like you want to align yourself with these things regardless of the obvious flaws... Out of what? loyalty?

Well who am I to say you're wrong.

"

I agree about the government, they are always in for trouble these days whoever is in charge.

As for the royals, if every family that had a criminal as a member got thrown out of their home and jobs, there would be millions of vacancies and empty homes about.

And as for the BBC, they didn’t lie. That was down to October Productions. But BBCs due diligence was very negligent.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aggonerMan
6 weeks ago

Malvern


"

As for the royals, if every family that had a criminal as a member got thrown out of their home and jobs, there would be millions of vacancies and empty homes about."

The royals are in a different position to every other family.

Their sole purpose is to act as exemplars, they can’t do anything else. It’s what they are paid for. They are showing that they haven’t fulfilled their part of the contract, over Andrew, their conduct in general and in their financial dealings.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hePerkyPumpkinTV/TS
6 weeks ago

Bristol


"

As for the royals, if every family that had a criminal as a member got thrown out of their home and jobs, there would be millions of vacancies and empty homes about.

The royals are in a different position to every other family.

Their sole purpose is to act as exemplars, they can’t do anything else. It’s what they are paid for. They are showing that they haven’t fulfilled their part of the contract, over Andrew, their conduct in general and in their financial dealings. "

Exactly...

These people are born in to some of finest and most unattainable privileges in the world.

Comparing a Prince of England (former) Who is a paedophile, to a member of the public is just asinine.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hePerkyPumpkinTV/TS
6 weeks ago

Bristol


" And as for the BBC, they didn’t lie. That was down to October Productions. But BBCs due diligence was very negligent."

I haven't been following this story closely. All I'll say it's convenient the BBC was able to shift responsibility to another production company...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *dstefiMan
6 weeks ago

Solihull


"The BBC has a blatent institutional left-wing bias - despite its pathetic protestations to the contrary - so it's quite pleasing that it's been caught bang to rights."

That's why they have Laura K hosting one of their leading political interview shows, bending over backwards to accommodate every feckin Tory and Farage, to prove the Beeb isn't left-biased.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ildwestheroMan
6 weeks ago

Llandrindod Wells


"

As for the royals, if every family that had a criminal as a member got thrown out of their home and jobs, there would be millions of vacancies and empty homes about.

The royals are in a different position to every other family.

Their sole purpose is to act as exemplars, they can’t do anything else. It’s what they are paid for. They are showing that they haven’t fulfilled their part of the contract, over Andrew, their conduct in general and in their financial dealings.

Exactly...

These people are born in to some of finest and most unattainable privileges in the world.

Comparing a Prince of England (former) Who is a paedophile, to a member of the public is just asinine."

Quite funny. Plenty of ordinary members of the public really are paedophiles or the most disgusting kind unfortunately. It is highly debatable as to whether Mr A. Mountbatten-Windsor is one. Not defending him but his foolish misdemeanour was with a 17yo not a 7yo, so would have been legal in this country, a good many other counties and even some other states of the USA.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lue555Man
6 weeks ago

harrow

A don’t think any of those attacks are new.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ildwestheroMan
6 weeks ago

Llandrindod Wells


"The BBC has a blatent institutional left-wing bias - despite its pathetic protestations to the contrary - so it's quite pleasing that it's been caught bang to rights.

That's why they have Laura K hosting one of their leading political interview shows, bending over backwards to accommodate every feckin Tory and Farage, to prove the Beeb isn't left-biased."

Realy? She must have changed her tune. Pointedly avoided watching her for years since she used to be so rude to Boris Johnson and his ministers [all well known hard left-wingers] yet used to fall over backwards to be nice to that far-right-winger Jeremy Corbyn. As for her and the Farage I would have thought it might be a case of the two trying to shout each other down as they are a right pair of egotists who love the sound of their own voices.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *q oralistMan
6 weeks ago

Torquay


"Why the sudden rise in attack on British institutions, the BBC the monarchy and the government are all being targeted at the moment. Not a coincidence. People outside and within our shores are intent on causing trouble "

Attacks on the BBC were inevitable at some point. If you look back over the large number of disgraceful things that the BBC have been responsible for. Just so happens that the latest one involved a very high profile international figure so their misdemeanors are subject to more scrutiny now.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hiteroseMan
6 weeks ago

Neverwhere


"

As for the royals, if every family that had a criminal as a member got thrown out of their home and jobs, there would be millions of vacancies and empty homes about.

The royals are in a different position to every other family.

Their sole purpose is to act as exemplars, they can’t do anything else. It’s what they are paid for. They are showing that they haven’t fulfilled their part of the contract, over Andrew, their conduct in general and in their financial dealings.

Exactly...

These people are born in to some of finest and most unattainable privileges in the world.

Comparing a Prince of England (former) Who is a paedophile, to a member of the public is just asinine."

There are such things as libel, so you might just want to rephrase that statement.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isubbiMan
6 weeks ago

Swaffham

My concern is that Trump wins his £billion and bankrupt the BBC, then in an act of "generosity", offers to take it over

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *leepflowerMan
6 weeks ago

Leek


"The BBC has a blatent institutional left-wing bias - despite its pathetic protestations to the contrary - so it's quite pleasing that it's been caught bang to rights.

That's why they have Laura K hosting one of their leading political interview shows, bending over backwards to accommodate every feckin Tory and Farage, to prove the Beeb isn't left-biased."

Her predecessor as Auntie's political editor, Nick Robinson was leagues better at the impartiality thing, even though he's an actual, card-carrying Tory.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *astDevonGuyMan
6 weeks ago

East Devon


"

As for the royals, if every family that had a criminal as a member got thrown out of their home and jobs, there would be millions of vacancies and empty homes about.

The royals are in a different position to every other family.

Their sole purpose is to act as exemplars, they can’t do anything else. It’s what they are paid for. They are showing that they haven’t fulfilled their part of the contract, over Andrew, their conduct in general and in their financial dealings.

Exactly...

These people are born in to some of finest and most unattainable privileges in the world.

Comparing a Prince of England (former) Who is a paedophile, to a member of the public is just asinine.

Quite funny. Plenty of ordinary members of the public really are paedophiles or the most disgusting kind unfortunately. It is highly debatable as to whether Mr A. Mountbatten-Windsor is one. Not defending him but his foolish misdemeanour was with a 17yo not a 7yo, so would have been legal in this country, a good many other counties and even some other states of the USA."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enri du lacMan
6 weeks ago

Coventry


"The BBC has a blatent institutional left-wing bias - despite its pathetic protestations to the contrary - so it's quite pleasing that it's been caught bang to rights.

What’s your evidence for that? exactly, another case of no evidence but it fits an agenda "

- the BBC back in February broadcast a documentary called "How To Survive A Warzone", narrated by the son of a Hamas official. This fact was conveniently not mentioned at the time. OFCOM gave the BBC a ticking off and the DG apologised.

- the BBC did not halt its 2025 Glastonbury livefeed of Bob Vylan's lead singer leading the leftie crowd in chants of "Death, death to the IDF" and "fucking Zionists". The DG apologised and the clip was removed from iPlayer. The BBC was found by its Executive Complaints Unit to have breached editorial guidelines.

- for years Gary Lineker (the BBC's highest paid presenter) was allowed to tweet leftist comments on Twitter, including in 2023 a criticism of the government's asylum policy, and earlier this year he shared an anti-Semitic Instagram post - after which he ceased broadcasting for the BBC.

- former BBC diplomatic editor Mark Urban claimed that BBC staff tried to prevent an interview with JK Rowling from taking place because they didn't like her views on trans rights.

- a leaked BBC report on impartiality stated that there was "effective censorship" in the newsroom by LGBT staff.

All of the above is in addition to the latest distortion of Donald Trump's speech.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enri du lacMan
6 weeks ago

Coventry


"The BBC has a blatent institutional left-wing bias - despite its pathetic protestations to the contrary - so it's quite pleasing that it's been caught bang to rights.

That's why they have Laura K hosting one of their leading political interview shows, bending over backwards to accommodate every feckin Tory and Farage, to prove the Beeb isn't left-biased.

Her predecessor as Auntie's political editor, Nick Robinson was leagues better at the impartiality thing, even though he's an actual, card-carrying Tory."

Nick Robinson's involvement with the Tories ceased long before he became a BBC journalist. In his role he would not be permitted to be a member of any political party.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andomguy321Man
6 weeks ago

reading


"Why the sudden rise in attack on British institutions, the BBC the monarchy and the government are all being targeted at the moment. Not a coincidence. People outside and within our shores are intent on causing trouble "

It could be argued that the BBC as an institution, has become institutionally hostile towards Great Britain.

We also would do well to rid ourselves of the various predatory parasitic entities that are damaging this country's long-term survival.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *laireKTV/TS
6 weeks ago

Manchester

Maybe all this is a result of us living in the information space.

You could argue that in the past the big institutions were able to control the narrative. The public relied on limited news outlets for their info.

Now you can find a hundred amateur observers on social media, on any given topic. Many with their own agenda.

Words have become the battleground. Institutions don't always adapt quickly.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
6 weeks ago

i haven’t watched the bbc for a few years now. i don’t like their left wing propaganda. i don’t listen to any bbc radio, i dont use any bbc apps and i dont go on any bbc websites. yet, i still have to pay for a service that i absolutely do not want. id love to see it as a subscription service, allowing those that want it to pay for it, and those who can’t stand it dont have to.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *dstefiMan
6 weeks ago

Solihull

The bizarre thing for all the complainers about the leftie BBC is that it's been forced to be more "balanced" in the last decade or so and made to give airtime to the kind of rightwing views that would have been shut down or at least roundly mocked in its heyday.

The very fact they even give space for viewpoints that are regressive and aggressively conservative actually pisses me off, like when they had one of Trump's MAGA mouthpieces Sebastian Gorka talking the most arrant shite on Radio 4 a while back. Proper spat out my Earl Grey I did, even though the interviewers were pretending to take him seriously while tearing him a new one with logic and reason. But that they even have to take an arsewipe like that seriously is an indication of what's happened to it.

I maintain that this whole thing is a stitchup, possibly with the connivance of Tim Davie (he certainly jumped remarkably quickly don't you think?)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *dstefiMan
6 weeks ago

Solihull


"Nick Robinson's involvement with the Tories ceased long before he became a BBC journalist. In his role he would not be permitted to be a member of any political party."

I have a lot of respect for Nick Robinson, he may have been a Tory but a proper old school one for whom truth mattered more than spin or being leaned on. That he's one of the voices saying stitchup speaks volumes.

There's nothing wrong with journalists having Conservative (or leftist) affiliations as long as they speak the truth. Max Hastings is the absolute exemplar, a brilliant journalist (and author) who I always trusted implicitly because he used reason.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *leepflowerMan
6 weeks ago

Leek


"The BBC has a blatent institutional left-wing bias - despite its pathetic protestations to the contrary - so it's quite pleasing that it's been caught bang to rights.

That's why they have Laura K hosting one of their leading political interview shows, bending over backwards to accommodate every feckin Tory and Farage, to prove the Beeb isn't left-biased.

Her predecessor as Auntie's political editor, Nick Robinson was leagues better at the impartiality thing, even though he's an actual, card-carrying Tory.

Nick Robinson's involvement with the Tories ceased long before he became a BBC journalist. In his role he would not be permitted to be a member of any political party."

Card-carrying was probably a poor choice of phrasing on my part.

My point was that he has far more journalistic integrity than Kuenssberg.

I do think he's very good at what he does.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *q oralistMan
6 weeks ago

Torquay


"The BBC has a blatent institutional left-wing bias - despite its pathetic protestations to the contrary - so it's quite pleasing that it's been caught bang to rights.

That's why they have Laura K hosting one of their leading political interview shows, bending over backwards to accommodate every feckin Tory and Farage, to prove the Beeb isn't left-biased.

Her predecessor as Auntie's political editor, Nick Robinson was leagues better at the impartiality thing, even though he's an actual, card-carrying Tory.

Nick Robinson's involvement with the Tories ceased long before he became a BBC journalist. In his role he would not be permitted to be a member of any political party."

Nick Robinson interviews Tories much more aggressively than he does other parties. Mind you so do other BBC so called unbiased presenters.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ichey6Man
6 weeks ago

aberdeen

Those who denigrate the Beeb at least have Gb News for unbiased, innovative journalism.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucksitupMan
6 weeks ago

Shrewsbury


"Why the sudden rise in attack on British institutions, the BBC the monarchy and the government are all being targeted at the moment. Not a coincidence. People outside and within our shores are intent on causing trouble "

The BBC broke its own basic rule on impartiality and got caught.

The Monarchy has never been squeaky clean

Parliament and Democracy are the Institutions not the Government. Governments of all parties have rightly been targeted when they fucked up.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ichey6Man
6 weeks ago

aberdeen

I see no aprons flying round my way. Britishness is deid on it's feet.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top