
| Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does anyone use talc nowadays? Can you still get it? I recall the wife ordering fragranced mens talc from Avon years ago. I used to enjoy smothering my private parts in talc. It made me feel really clean and fresh down there after a shower. Anyone else use it still? " On the dance floor . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Johnsons and others have switched to cornstarch based products. They are totally safe " Indeed. Love the clean, fresh and dry feeling. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Johnsons and others have switched to cornstarch based products. They are totally safe " Breathing in corn starch is not safe. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Johnsons and others have switched to cornstarch based products. They are totally safe Breathing in corn starch is not safe. " Yeah. Stick to the safe marching powder to preserve your health. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Talc may have had asbestos contamination issues Talc and asbestos deposits are often close to each other hence possible contamination Corn starch products are used now " No proven link between talcum powder and cancer. Just because talcum and asbestos are mined near each other doesn’t mean they are the same thing or are cross-contaminated. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Johnsons and others have switched to cornstarch based products. They are totally safe " You can also use it to thicken your custard stews and sauces | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"... But you're more likely to get cancer from your asbestos shed roof than Johnson's...seal it NOW." No. This is completely incorrect. Asbestos cement which used to be used for shed roofs typically contains white asbestos. This, is a much less harmful form of asbestos (classed as a serpentine) and is far less carcinogenic than the other types of asbestos. In addition, being encapsulated in cement makes it difficult to release fibres unless it is cut, drilled or abraded. Also, being outdoors (good ventilation) and wet for much of the year reduces the risk still further. The best thing to do with asbestos cement ... is to leave it alone. Talc is different. It can potentially contain two of the rarer types of asbestos (tremolite and anthophylite). These resemble the more well known blue and brown asbestos types (classed as amphiboles), and have a similar level of carcinogenicity ... which is at least an order of magnitude greater than for white asbestos. The fibres in talc are short, thin and needle-like. Once deposited in the lung they are of such a shape that the lungs defence mechanisms can't remove them. Also, talc will typically be sprinkled in the confines of a bedroom or bathroom, and it is inevitable that some of the airborne powder will be inhaled. So the risk of developing cancer from talc is very much higher than from asbestos cement. Incidentally Johnson & Johnson were aware of asbestos contamination of talc as far back as the 1950s. But it's not the only example of industry turning a blind eye to the effects of asbestos in their products. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"... But you're more likely to get cancer from your asbestos shed roof than Johnson's...seal it NOW. No. This is completely incorrect. Asbestos cement which used to be used for shed roofs typically contains white asbestos. This, is a much less harmful form of asbestos (classed as a serpentine) and is far less carcinogenic than the other types of asbestos. In addition, being encapsulated in cement makes it difficult to release fibres unless it is cut, drilled or abraded. Also, being outdoors (good ventilation) and wet for much of the year reduces the risk still further. The best thing to do with asbestos cement ... is to leave it alone. Talc is different. It can potentially contain two of the rarer types of asbestos (tremolite and anthophylite). These resemble the more well known blue and brown asbestos types (classed as amphiboles), and have a similar level of carcinogenicity ... which is at least an order of magnitude greater than for white asbestos. The fibres in talc are short, thin and needle-like. Once deposited in the lung they are of such a shape that the lungs defence mechanisms can't remove them. Also, talc will typically be sprinkled in the confines of a bedroom or bathroom, and it is inevitable that some of the airborne powder will be inhaled. So the risk of developing cancer from talc is very much higher than from asbestos cement. Incidentally Johnson & Johnson were aware of asbestos contamination of talc as far back as the 1950s. But it's not the only example of industry turning a blind eye to the effects of asbestos in their products. " Wow. When are you publishing your review? Seriously, the link between asbestos contamination of talc products and mesothelioma is not strong, although inhaling any asbestos carries a risk. Given that chrysotile ("white" asbestos) is pretty well the only variety in commercial use, that does not affect the relative danger from asbestos roofs and talcum powder. It's the same mineral in both. Chrysotile is associated with talc in nature. In a new corrugated asbestos roof, sure, the fibres are pretty well fixed and you're ok around them. There aren't many new roofs these days. All asbestos was banned in the UK in 1999. Old, weathered roofs, not so. The surface breaks down and the fibres are released. Drill or cut the material without serious protective gear and the risk is even higher. Even cleaning it is problematic. The dust is essentially pure asbestos fibre. Not asbestos very heavily diluted by talc. So I'm sticking with my statement. Seal it, or get it professionally removed. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Johnson’s new cornstarch formulation smells disgusting. I use Cuticura " Thats the one Mr Methane uses when he performs in front of a tv audience | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My friend uses it and dusts her inner thighs with it Shes 30 stone and she says its stops chafing when shes walking" Must get through a fair bit of the stuff | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |