 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Neither probably. But more constructively where do you suggest they have an embassy? " They apparently have "a few" offices within London an one of the arguments for the new embassy is that they would be situated in one place. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ?" he is kissing up to the chinese coz he thinks his orange faced boyfriend is going to slap him with tariffs,,,  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I fail to see what the fuck it's got to do with fabguys, keep your social media tittle tittle to the likes of X and Facebook " You have been here long enough to know it's an open forum where people can chat about anything within site rules. If your not into politics or world affairs just move on. I don't see the need for your remarks. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I fail to see what the fuck it's got to do with fabguys, keep your social media tittle tittle to the likes of X and Facebook " Very strange that you thought this thread interesting enough to reply to. Well done by the OP. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The way things are going China is a better trade partner than the Americans.keep your friends close and you enemies even closer" Inclined to agree. Xi may not be very nice, but he is (a) sane and (b) clever. We really need to increase our scrutiny of the US Embassy - recently purpose built on a new site, just like the Chinese proposal. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I fail to see what the fuck it's got to do with fabguys, keep your social media tittle tittle to the likes of X and Facebook " Suggest you just look at threads with CP in the title and leave us to get our thrills from world politics  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I fail to see what the fuck it's got to do with fabguys, keep your social media tittle tittle to the likes of X and Facebook Very strange that you thought this thread interesting enough to reply to. Well done by the OP." Indeed, someone apparently fails to grasp the concept of a forum, the colourful lingo used in his response, would seem to highlight an unfortunate lack of both basic good manners and intelligence. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The way things are going China is a better trade partner than the Americans.keep your friends close and you enemies even closer" They make some really good motorbikes now. Remember how the Japanese took over from British bikes? Tbh .. it's really difficult not to buy Chinese goods now. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ?" See paul Midler's book: Poorly Made in China. Recommended reading. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I fail to see what the fuck it's got to do with fabguys, keep your social media tittle tittle to the likes of X and Facebook " Your failure to comprehend is no reason for those who do see the glaringly obvious to hold their tongues. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The way things are going China is a better trade partner than the Americans.keep your friends close and you enemies even closer Inclined to agree. Xi may not be very nice, but he is (a) sane and (b) clever. We really need to increase our scrutiny of the US Embassy - recently purpose built on a new site, just like the Chinese proposal." I fully agree with you, or better still expel the yanks and tell them to come back when they have a felon free head of state. The American’s won’t admit our x cons so why are we allowing this convict to come here when it pleases him? This gangster is openly murdering his own citizens on the streets and thinks his lies will fool the world into ignoring what is clear from the tapes. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I fail to see what the fuck it's got to do with fabguys, keep your social media tittle tittle to the likes of X and Facebook " “Tittle tittle” seems curiously apt for your contribution. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That place will be bugged to the rafters!" It’s an Embassy, what else would anyone expect, that observation could be directed at any Embassy in the world. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Communisn thru the back door" Crikey! Plans just approved and they have the direction signage sorted already. Damn clever these Chinese | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Communisn thru the back door Crikey! Plans just approved and they have the direction signage sorted already. Damn clever these Chinese "Aliexpress -comes via Speedpak from Shenzhen! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ?" The biggest tool ever to sit in number 10 and the biggest threat to this country since World War II. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ? The biggest tool ever to sit in number 10 and the biggest threat to this country since World War II." I tend to agree  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ? The biggest tool ever to sit in number 10 and the biggest threat to this country since World War II. I tend to agree "He's certainly a liability | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ? The biggest tool ever to sit in number 10 and the biggest threat to this country since World War II. I tend to agree
Glad I'm not alone with my concerns!!
He's certainly a liability " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This prime minister is a complete danger to this country " Maybe he's just accepting who owns the country now. So much of our industry is in foreign ownership now. It's not a position of strength. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the sports fans sing, Kier Starmers a wanker "What did they sing about BoJo and Truss? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the sports fans sing, Kier Starmers a wanker
What did they sing about BoJo and Truss? "Didn't hear the sports stadiums sing about them lmao, only Starmer seems to be the unpopular one, unless your a lefty trotsky. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Beats an American embassy" do you jocks HAVE am American Embassy  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Beats an American embassy do you jocks HAVE am American Embassy "There's the Trump International Golf Links near Aberdeen (featuring the championship Old Course and newer courses) and Trump Turnberry in Ayrshire | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"WTF. Do you suggest the Chinese shouldn't have an embassy then?" Not one that is a very real threat to this country's interests. The tail shouldn't wag the dog .... and if the tail is covered in fleas, then doc it and thoroughly sanitize the thing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the sports fans sing, Kier Starmers a wanker
What did they sing about BoJo and Truss?
Didn't hear the sports stadiums sing about them lmao, only Starmer seems to be the unpopular one, unless your a lefty trotsky."Maybe footie fans aren't the best judge. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I fail to see what the fuck it's got to do with fabguys, keep your social media tittle tittle to the likes of X and Facebook " Why not? Or do you just want to chat inanely about cock? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I fail to see what the fuck it's got to do with fabguys, keep your social media tittle tittle to the likes of X and Facebook Why not? Or do you just want to chat inanely about cock?" Lol we are talking about a cock, well a knob in Starmer aren't we? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think its now been cleared by the security services." Exactly this I’m 100% sure Starmer didn’t just look at some building plans and thought yeah that will do. MI5 GCHQ MI6 would have all been involved in the planning approval isn’t it better to have it all in one place rather than scattered in probably antiquated offices around London | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes can’t believe my boring gf is a big supporter of that guy " Her taste in men does seem rather suspect | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" "The drawings for the embassy show that a single concealed chamber will sit directly alongside fibre-optic cables transmitting financial data to the City of London, as well as email and messaging traffic for millions of internet users. The same hidden room is fitted with hot-air extraction systems, possibly suggesting the installation of heat-generating equipment such as advanced computers used for espionage. The plans also show that China intends to demolish and rebuild the outer basement wall of the chamber, directly beside the fibre-optic cables." Starmer couldn't run a bath" I despise Starmer totally, but not because of the Chinese embassy but because he keeps GB complicit in the genocide being carried out by Israel, and for that he is a disgrace to our country. The gov has had the plans examined by experts and they are happy to accept them, so what are people complaining about? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"any other country attacked by hamas that retaliated in order to defend what was clearly intended to be an open declaration of war would be left to do what that country needed to do to make itself safe Of course when there's Jewish people involved the world and his wife feels they can tell Israel how to conduct itself it's just anti semitism" Yes, yes, everything's fucking antisemitism and Netanyahu's an honest man. Do you have an opinion on the Chinese embassy? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"any other country attacked by hamas that retaliated in order to defend what was clearly intended to be an open declaration of war would be left to do what that country needed to do to make itself safe Of course when there's Jewish people involved the world and his wife feels they can tell Israel how to conduct itself it's just anti semitism" Where are you getting anti antisemitism from. I pointed out that that Israel has murdered in the region of 100,000 mostly women and children and starved the entire population of Palestin. I am sure most civilised people agree that that is not acceptable. When a 3yo child is blown to bits, do I care if the person who committed that crime is a Baptist a Catholic or any other religion? If that’s how your mind works then carry on with that nonsense if it amuses you. But have a care how you throw about these silly accusations. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"any other country attacked by hamas that retaliated in order to defend what was clearly intended to be an open declaration of war would be left to do what that country needed to do to make itself safe Of course when there's Jewish people involved the world and his wife feels they can tell Israel how to conduct itself it's just anti semitism" An occupying power is never capable of self defence. Israel is run by irreligious sociopathic politicos on behalf of the USA Get with reality | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"any other country attacked by hamas that retaliated in order to defend what was clearly intended to be an open declaration of war would be left to do what that country needed to do to make itself safe Of course when there's Jewish people involved the world and his wife feels they can tell Israel how to conduct itself it's just anti semitism" An occupying power is never capable of self defence. Israel is run by irreligious sociopathic politicos on behalf of the USA Get with reality | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ? The biggest tool ever to sit in number 10 and the biggest threat to this country since World War II." So it wasn't Boris Johnson who met with a ex KGB agent at his house in Italy for a weekend long party without any officials. Then gives the ex KGB agents son a peerage, despite concerns of the security services. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"any other country attacked by hamas that retaliated in order to defend what was clearly intended to be an open declaration of war would be left to do what that country needed to do to make itself safe Of course when there's Jewish people involved the world and his wife feels they can tell Israel how to conduct itself it's just anti semitism An occupying power is never capable of self defence. Israel is run by irreligious sociopathic politicos on behalf of the USA Get with reality " This is perfectly true 👍👍👍 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Communisn thru the back door" Sounds kinky.. hope they at least lube up? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ? The biggest tool ever to sit in number 10 and the biggest threat to this country since World War II. So it wasn't Boris Johnson who met with a ex KGB agent at his house in Italy for a weekend long party without any officials. Then gives the ex KGB agents son a peerage, despite concerns of the security services." Exactly.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"hopefully change his mind like everything else he planned,mans a muppet." What trump? Just backed down on all his bollox over the last 3 days. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sooner Starmer goes the better, useless waste of air. " Yawn... So you prefer who? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"hopefully change his mind like everything else he planned,mans a muppet. What trump? Just backed down on all his bollox over the last 3 days." TACO trump always chickens out | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" "The drawings for the embassy show that a single concealed chamber will sit directly alongside fibre-optic cables transmitting financial data to the City of London, as well as email and messaging traffic for millions of internet users. The same hidden room is fitted with hot-air extraction systems, possibly suggesting the installation of heat-generating equipment such as advanced computers used for espionage. The plans also show that China intends to demolish and rebuild the outer basement wall of the chamber, directly beside the fibre-optic cables." Starmer couldn't run a bath I despise Starmer totally, but not because of the Chinese embassy but because he keeps GB complicit in the genocide being carried out by Israel, and for that he is a disgrace to our country. The gov has had the plans examined by experts and they are happy to accept them, so what are people complaining about?" Experts? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"... The gov has had the plans examined by experts and they are happy to accept them, so what are people complaining about? Experts? ..."They have top men working on it now. TOP MEN.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does that mean more Chinese bottoms " No ... but a massive increase in Chinese whispers | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A move charged with symbolism given current geopolitics. A message that I'm sure won't go unnoticed. It almost sounds like 'my enemy's enemy is my friend', as it's increasingly difficult to discern nowadays who's your friend and who's your enemy😒" I see the Tony Blair Institute for Tony's Wallet has recently recommended we get closer to China. Despite that, not a bad idea. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"China aren’t interested in the UK for anything other than business. They’ve basically said so. Apparently we are not that important on the world stage to them. Makes sense. They have bigger fish to fry. x" The sly Chinese hold a strong grudge against the British ... Never forgiven us for the opium wars. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"China aren’t interested in the UK for anything other than business. They’ve basically said so. Apparently we are not that important on the world stage to them. Makes sense. They have bigger fish to fry. x" why the very strategic location? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the sports fans sing, Kier Starmers a wanker
What did they sing about BoJo and Truss?
Didn't hear the sports stadiums sing about them lmao, only Starmer seems to be the unpopular one, unless your a lefty trotsky.
Maybe footie fans aren't the best judge."We did warn you. Reap what you sow | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Every day, Starmer is proving where his allegiance lies, and it's not us! " But he's very loyal to Lord [Waheed] Alli | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never smoked Chinese embassy Do they give coupons with those ?" Free bag of prawn crackers | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Was everyone moaning this much when Boris sold the Royal Mint to China? " No!! Because this is utter nonsense!! The Royal Mint wasn't sold to China. It's owned by HM Treasury as The Royal Mint Trading Fund, so part of the UK Government - effectively owned by the population!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Will they do takeaways? " lol that made me snort ha ha will they do deliveries too lol | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sooner Starmer goes the better, useless waste of air. Yawn... So you prefer who? " Let’s give nige a go lol I’ll await the hate x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Was everyone moaning this much when Boris sold the Royal Mint to China? No!! Because this is utter nonsense!! The Royal Mint wasn't sold to China. It's owned by HM Treasury as The Royal Mint Trading Fund, so part of the UK Government - effectively owned by the population!! " Ok, it would seem I have to be more accurate Royal Mint Court. The building which was the production site for the Royal mint coins, is now owned by China and is the proposed site for the new embassy. Happy to clear that up for you. Jeez. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Was everyone moaning this much when Boris sold the Royal Mint to China? No!! Because this is utter nonsense!! The Royal Mint wasn't sold to China. It's owned by HM Treasury as The Royal Mint Trading Fund, so part of the UK Government - effectively owned by the population!! Ok, it would seem I have to be more accurate Royal Mint Court. The building which was the production site for the Royal mint coins, is now owned by China and is the proposed site for the new embassy. Happy to clear that up for you. Jeez." Yes indeed, 'More accurate' as opposed to spreading complete fabricated and unsubstantiated, misinformation, '_espectdue'! The Royal Mint building in London ceased minting coins over 50 years ago - in 1975! It subsequently became part of the portfolio of the London-based property investment companies Delancey and LRC, who sold it eight years ago to the PRC - entirely unrelated to Boris Johnson's tenure as PM as you previously claimed! Accuracy is indeed paramount! I suggest next time you attempt to concoct a political critique, a bit of fact-checking beforehand would prevent such unfortunate embarrassing self-parody! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmah will bow down kneel or tongue any nationalities starfish to secure a few more votes Hes desperately seeking every vote thats out there with all his U turns Like the tories the labour party is sinking fast and starma knows it " His surname is actually Starmer, not Starmah or starma. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmah will bow down kneel or tongue any nationalities starfish to secure a few more votes Hes desperately seeking every vote thats out there with all his U turns Like the tories the labour party is sinking fast and starma knows it His surname is actually Starmer, not Starmah or starma. " Whichever version you use it still spells out 'Incapable'! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Was everyone moaning this much when Boris sold the Royal Mint to China? No!! Because this is utter nonsense!! The Royal Mint wasn't sold to China. It's owned by HM Treasury as The Royal Mint Trading Fund, so part of the UK Government - effectively owned by the population!! Ok, it would seem I have to be more accurate Royal Mint Court. The building which was the production site for the Royal mint coins, is now owned by China and is the proposed site for the new embassy. Happy to clear that up for you. Jeez. Yes indeed, 'More accurate' as opposed to spreading complete fabricated and unsubstantiated, misinformation, '_espectdue'! The Royal Mint building in London ceased minting coins over 50 years ago - in 1975! It subsequently became part of the portfolio of the London-based property investment companies Delancey and LRC, who sold it eight years ago to the PRC - entirely unrelated to Boris Johnson's tenure as PM as you previously claimed! Accuracy is indeed paramount! I suggest next time you attempt to concoct a political critique, a bit of fact-checking beforehand would prevent such unfortunate embarrassing self-parody! Well, I could have copy and pasted too if I wished. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Was everyone moaning this much when Boris sold the Royal Mint to China? No!! Because this is utter nonsense!! The Royal Mint wasn't sold to China. It's owned by HM Treasury as The Royal Mint Trading Fund, so part of the UK Government - effectively owned by the population!! Ok, it would seem I have to be more accurate Royal Mint Court. The building which was the production site for the Royal mint coins, is now owned by China and is the proposed site for the new embassy. Happy to clear that up for you. Jeez. Yes indeed, 'More accurate' as opposed to spreading complete fabricated and unsubstantiated, misinformation, '_espectdue'! The Royal Mint building in London ceased minting coins over 50 years ago - in 1975! It subsequently became part of the portfolio of the London-based property investment companies Delancey and LRC, who sold it eight years ago to the PRC - entirely unrelated to Boris Johnson's tenure as PM as you previously claimed! Accuracy is indeed paramount! I suggest next time you attempt to concoct a political critique, a bit of fact-checking beforehand would prevent such unfortunate embarrassing self-parody! " If you really need me to break it down for you, yes I was wrong to say he sold it, but the council and local people and many from both parties were against the sale, but Johnson gave the go ahead for them to use the building. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Was everyone moaning this much when Boris sold the Royal Mint to China? No!! Because this is utter nonsense!! The Royal Mint wasn't sold to China. It's owned by HM Treasury as The Royal Mint Trading Fund, so part of the UK Government - effectively owned by the population!! Ok, it would seem I have to be more accurate Royal Mint Court. The building which was the production site for the Royal mint coins, is now owned by China and is the proposed site for the new embassy. Happy to clear that up for you. Jeez. Yes indeed, 'More accurate' as opposed to spreading complete fabricated and unsubstantiated, misinformation, '_espectdue'! The Royal Mint building in London ceased minting coins over 50 years ago - in 1975! It subsequently became part of the portfolio of the London-based property investment companies Delancey and LRC, who sold it eight years ago to the PRC - entirely unrelated to Boris Johnson's tenure as PM as you previously claimed! Accuracy is indeed paramount! I suggest next time you attempt to concoct a political critique, a bit of fact-checking beforehand would prevent such unfortunate embarrassing self-parody! If you really need me to break it down for you, yes I was wrong to say he sold it, but the council and local people and many from both parties were against the sale, but Johnson gave the go ahead for them to use the building. " Boris Johnson was Foreign Secretary in 2018 when the PRC bought the site, and he indeed approved the embassy plans - a subsequent parliamentary investigation found no breach of the Ministerial Code. That's the extent of his involvement. No evidence suggests he 'gave the go-ahead' for the sale itself by Delancey and LRC to the PRC. Hope that sufficiently clarifies the situation without further ado. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the sports fans sing, Kier Starmers a wanker
What did they sing about BoJo and Truss?
Didn't hear the sports stadiums sing about them lmao, only Starmer seems to be the unpopular one, unless your a lefty trotsky."Spot On. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ?" He didn't have a choice ... He has very little real power or influence, and even less conviction in anything other than his own self-interests. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ? He didn't have a choice ... He has very little real power or influence, and even less conviction in anything other than his own self-interests. " Whereas you.... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Communisn thru the back door" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ? He didn't have a choice ... He has very little real power or influence, and even less conviction in anything other than his own self-interests. " If self interest was a significant influence , why didnt he ignore politics and accumulate filthy lucre talking in circles in a courtroom? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ? He didn't have a choice ... He has very little real power or influence, and even less conviction in anything other than his own self-interests. Whereas you...." Are you comparing me to the PM? How does that work then? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ? He didn't have a choice ... He has very little real power or influence, and even less conviction in anything other than his own self-interests. If self interest was a significant influence , why didnt he ignore politics and accumulate filthy lucre talking in circles in a courtroom?" Because, in the long run, he will end up far wealthier and gain much greater status by making U-turns in parliament and cozying up to globalists and other megalomaniacs. Politics was his passport to success ... The measure of that success isn't how effective he is at improving the lives of British people .... But how high he can climb and burnish his credentials. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ? He didn't have a choice ... He has very little real power or influence, and even less conviction in anything other than his own self-interests. If self interest was a significant influence , why didnt he ignore politics and accumulate filthy lucre talking in circles in a courtroom? Because, in the long run, he will end up far wealthier and gain much greater status by making U-turns in parliament and cozying up to globalists and other megalomaniacs. Politics was his passport to success ... The measure of that success isn't how effective he is at improving the lives of British people .... But how high he can climb and burnish his credentials. " Or, its the ultimate in public service. He's not Boris the liar Johnson you know. Well,.you don't, but heyho. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ? He didn't have a choice ... He has very little real power or influence, and even less conviction in anything other than his own self-interests. If self interest was a significant influence , why didnt he ignore politics and accumulate filthy lucre talking in circles in a courtroom? Because, in the long run, he will end up far wealthier and gain much greater status by making U-turns in parliament and cozying up to globalists and other megalomaniacs. Politics was his passport to success ... The measure of that success isn't how effective he is at improving the lives of British people .... But how high he can climb and burnish his credentials. Or, its the ultimate in public service. He's not Boris the liar Johnson you know. Well,.you don't, but heyho. " Oh, the irony! '_espectdue', Starmer, the pinnacle of consistency and trustworthiness! 😅 It's crystal clear to everyone except the wilfully blind that Kier the Deceiver Starmer is the Master of U-Turns, Destroyer of Democracy, Enemy of State! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ?" Good idea ! Any relations improvement with China is good. They are the world super power now eco locally a d there is no point in ignoring it. Also better the devil you know 👌👌 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ? He didn't have a choice ... He has very little real power or influence, and even less conviction in anything other than his own self-interests. If self interest was a significant influence , why didnt he ignore politics and accumulate filthy lucre talking in circles in a courtroom? Because, in the long run, he will end up far wealthier and gain much greater status by making U-turns in parliament and cozying up to globalists and other megalomaniacs. Politics was his passport to success ... The measure of that success isn't how effective he is at improving the lives of British people .... But how high he can climb and burnish his credentials. Or, its the ultimate in public service. He's not Boris the liar Johnson you know. Well,.you don't, but heyho. Oh, the irony! '_espectdue', Starmer, the pinnacle of consistency and trustworthiness! 😅 It's crystal clear to everyone except the wilfully blind that Kier the Deceiver Starmer is the Master of U-Turns, Destroyer of Democracy, Enemy of State! " Well it isn't. But you keep on being you. Good lad. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ? He didn't have a choice ... He has very little real power or influence, and even less conviction in anything other than his own self-interests. If self interest was a significant influence , why didnt he ignore politics and accumulate filthy lucre talking in circles in a courtroom? Because, in the long run, he will end up far wealthier and gain much greater status by making U-turns in parliament and cozying up to globalists and other megalomaniacs. Politics was his passport to success ... The measure of that success isn't how effective he is at improving the lives of British people .... But how high he can climb and burnish his credentials. Or, its the ultimate in public service. He's not Boris the liar Johnson you know. Well,.you don't, but heyho. Oh, the irony! '_espectdue', Starmer, the pinnacle of consistency and trustworthiness! 😅 It's crystal clear to everyone except the wilfully blind that Kier the Deceiver Starmer is the Master of U-Turns, Destroyer of Democracy, Enemy of State! " Total Starmer Derangement Syndrome, seek help | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ? He didn't have a choice ... He has very little real power or influence, and even less conviction in anything other than his own self-interests. If self interest was a significant influence , why didnt he ignore politics and accumulate filthy lucre talking in circles in a courtroom? Because, in the long run, he will end up far wealthier and gain much greater status by making U-turns in parliament and cozying up to globalists and other megalomaniacs. Politics was his passport to success ... The measure of that success isn't how effective he is at improving the lives of British people .... But how high he can climb and burnish his credentials. " And you accuse people of TDS when suffering from acute SDS. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ? He didn't have a choice ... He has very little real power or influence, and even less conviction in anything other than his own self-interests. If self interest was a significant influence , why didnt he ignore politics and accumulate filthy lucre talking in circles in a courtroom? Because, in the long run, he will end up far wealthier and gain much greater status by making U-turns in parliament and cozying up to globalists and other megalomaniacs. Politics was his passport to success ... The measure of that success isn't how effective he is at improving the lives of British people .... But how high he can climb and burnish his credentials. Or, its the ultimate in public service. He's not Boris the liar Johnson you know. Well,.you don't, but heyho. Oh, the irony! '_espectdue', Starmer, the pinnacle of consistency and trustworthiness! 😅 It's crystal clear to everyone except the wilfully blind that Kier the Deceiver Starmer is the Master of U-Turns, Destroyer of Democracy, Enemy of State! Well it isn't. But you keep on being you. Good lad." Well, of course, '_espectdue', you are not seeing the full panorama - with your unfortunate tunnel vision. So perhaps it's easier for you to stick with the comfy familiarity of Starmerite narratives, rather than confront the rather more complex reality of the UK's heavy challenges. Carry on regardless, but maybe reflect on whether engaging with fellow users via pm's in such a white-feathered manner is entirely helpful? Have a fulfilling weekend, but certainly wrap up well if venturing out! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ? He didn't have a choice ... He has very little real power or influence, and even less conviction in anything other than his own self-interests. If self interest was a significant influence , why didnt he ignore politics and accumulate filthy lucre talking in circles in a courtroom? Because, in the long run, he will end up far wealthier and gain much greater status by making U-turns in parliament and cozying up to globalists and other megalomaniacs. Politics was his passport to success ... The measure of that success isn't how effective he is at improving the lives of British people .... But how high he can climb and burnish his credentials. And you accuse people of TDS when suffering from acute SDS. " You really do need to work on your comebacks sweetheart ... That one barely dribbled out. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ? He didn't have a choice ... He has very little real power or influence, and even less conviction in anything other than his own self-interests. If self interest was a significant influence , why didnt he ignore politics and accumulate filthy lucre talking in circles in a courtroom? Because, in the long run, he will end up far wealthier and gain much greater status by making U-turns in parliament and cozying up to globalists and other megalomaniacs. Politics was his passport to success ... The measure of that success isn't how effective he is at improving the lives of British people .... But how high he can climb and burnish his credentials. Or, its the ultimate in public service. He's not Boris the liar Johnson you know. Well,.you don't, but heyho. Oh, the irony! '_espectdue', Starmer, the pinnacle of consistency and trustworthiness! 😅 It's crystal clear to everyone except the wilfully blind that Kier the Deceiver Starmer is the Master of U-Turns, Destroyer of Democracy, Enemy of State! Well it isn't. But you keep on being you. Good lad. Well, of course, '_espectdue', you are not seeing the full panorama - with your unfortunate tunnel vision. So perhaps it's easier for you to stick with the comfy familiarity of Starmerite narratives, rather than confront the rather more complex reality of the UK's heavy challenges. Carry on regardless, but maybe reflect on whether engaging with fellow users via pm's in such a white-feathered manner is entirely helpful? Have a fulfilling weekend, but certainly wrap up well if venturing out! " Its only because you and I see things differently, read differently things, so will never agree. Which im fine with, as i'm sure are you. As far as writing pm's, you wrote me asking why your your posts had disappeared, which I answered and I thought was fine from both of us. If your referring to the guy who said I sent him an abusive message, he named me in a post that I hadn't even seen, against site rules abusing me. So I wrote to him. As have many to me for being a so called lefty. Except they always block me or report me. None of which I have done to this fella. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer has now approved the Chinese super embassy in London despite the opinions of others. Another sell out or a good idea ? He didn't have a choice ... He has very little real power or influence, and even less conviction in anything other than his own self-interests. If self interest was a significant influence , why didnt he ignore politics and accumulate filthy lucre talking in circles in a courtroom? Because, in the long run, he will end up far wealthier and gain much greater status by making U-turns in parliament and cozying up to globalists and other megalomaniacs. Politics was his passport to success ... The measure of that success isn't how effective he is at improving the lives of British people .... But how high he can climb and burnish his credentials. Or, its the ultimate in public service. He's not Boris the liar Johnson you know. Well,.you don't, but heyho. Oh, the irony! '_espectdue', Starmer, the pinnacle of consistency and trustworthiness! 😅 It's crystal clear to everyone except the wilfully blind that Kier the Deceiver Starmer is the Master of U-Turns, Destroyer of Democracy, Enemy of State! Well it isn't. But you keep on being you. Good lad. Well, of course, '_espectdue', you are not seeing the full panorama - with your unfortunate tunnel vision. So perhaps it's easier for you to stick with the comfy familiarity of Starmerite narratives, rather than confront the rather more complex reality of the UK's heavy challenges. Carry on regardless, but maybe reflect on whether engaging with fellow users via pm's in such a white-feathered manner is entirely helpful? Have a fulfilling weekend, but certainly wrap up well if venturing out! Its only because you and I see things differently, read differently things, so will never agree. Which im fine with, as i'm sure are you. As far as writing pm's, you wrote me asking why your your posts had disappeared, which I answered and I thought was fine from both of us. If your referring to the guy who said I sent him an abusive message, he named me in a post that I hadn't even seen, against site rules abusing me. So I wrote to him. As have many to me for being a so called lefty. Except they always block me or report me. None of which I have done to this fella. " Yes, of course I agree that differing and spectral views are a natural part of complex human nature, and respecting those differences is key, even though the twain shall n'er meet. Regarding the PM issue, it seems we've both expressed our points and I'm content to let the matter settle without further ado, as I would hope that you feel likewise. Enjoy the day ahead. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
