 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The Epstein files were getting a bit close for comfort, but no one talking about them now." ...wait until the midterms.....hahaha | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Yes they are. They are still asking where they are. The man is a c*nt." 👍👍👍 I fully agree 👏👏👏 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"You think there is going to be midterms? " ....he'll do his best to invoke the insurrection act....but that may be a bridge too far for senate republicans | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Yes they are. They are still asking where they are. The man is a c*nt." You can say that again. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Yes they are. They are still asking where they are. The man is a c*nt." As is Starmer and Khameini The world is full of rotten leaders. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people " Spelling checks out | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people " He might do something about education and literacy. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Yes they are. They are still asking where they are. The man is a c*nt." Notjing more entertaining than woke lefties spitting feathers at Trumpy.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people " totally agree. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people " Fetal Alcohol Syndrome is a terrible thing.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people totally agree." I'm amazed you could read it 😂 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people He might do something about education and literacy. " ...Linda mc mahon is the education secretary....that's hardly going to happen... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Yes they are. They are still asking where they are. The man is a c*nt. You can say that again." The man is a c*unt. Hope that satisfied you 🤣 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Yes they are. They are still asking where they are. The man is a c*nt. You can say that again. The man is a c*unt. Hope that satisfied you 🤣" And still more useful at world peace than you  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people Fetal Alcohol Syndrome is a terrible thing.." Savage. 🤣 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people " no thanks keep the chaos over there, in fact a better idea is for all you trump supporters to move to America | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The Epstein files were getting a bit close for comfort, but no one talking about them now." In the interests of national security - The Epstein files have been placed on a witness protection program .... Currently in a politically Polyamorous safehouse, somewhere in Akron Ohio, with the Hunter Biden laptop and Monica Lewinsky's dress (which now self-identifies as a tablecloth) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people no thanks keep the chaos over there, in fact a better idea is for all you trump supporters to move to America "  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Yes they are. They are still asking where they are. The man is a c*nt. You can say that again. The man is a c*unt. Hope that satisfied you 🤣 And still more useful at world peace than you "Well at least I haven’t sent troops into another country to abduct their head of state. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people " I'm happy to start a go fund me page to help you get over there. Take his lover with you too, old frog 🐸 faced farrage. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people I'm happy to start a go fund me page to help you get over there. Take his lover with you too, old frog 🐸 faced farrage. " I’ve read Nige is going to Davos so he can take it up the ass from Trump BB as per usual | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"They are renaming Greenland Epstein Land so he won’t talk about it anymore." Lol. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Yes they are. They are still asking where they are. The man is a c*nt. Notjing more entertaining than woke lefties spitting feathers at Trumpy.. " Nothing of any interest to contribute as usual I see. Bless. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people I'm happy to start a go fund me page to help you get over there. Take his lover with you too, old frog 🐸 faced farrage. " start one for me I love trump. Ya can keep Farage the weasel. Starmer needs to get a backbone the spineless runt.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"You think there is going to be midterms? " Or any. But I'll bet he finds a way to overturn the 2 term law. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people I'm happy to start a go fund me page to help you get over there. Take his lover with you too, old frog 🐸 faced farrage. start one for me I love trump. Ya can keep Farage the weasel. Starmer needs to get a backbone the spineless runt...." ...I find it a little strange that you "love" a sexual predator who's been convicted of r#pe,and possibly a pedophile if the files ever get released..... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Yes they are. They are still asking where they are. The man is a c*nt. Notjing more entertaining than woke lefties spitting feathers at Trumpy.. Nothing of any interest to contribute as usual I see. Bless. " Even though he stayed up all night to come up with it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people no thanks keep the chaos over there, in fact a better idea is for all you trump supporters to move to America " The " if you don't like this country, you can leave line" played back to the people who used it at every opportunity, is gold. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"You think there is going to be midterms? Or any. But I'll bet he finds a way to overturn the 2 term law. " He will create a state of emergency, then no elections will be allowed under that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people Spelling checks out " So then, you are so perfect that you have never done a typo -Grow up | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is a genius because he's a disrupter and he's got full global attention which is key to his success. Boris and Nige have been out nearest equivalent of disrupters who are capable of grabbing attention. Our lame duck Starmer could vanish tomorrow and nobody would miss him or even care. The qualities of Trump and Musk etc to constantly remain in the public eye is a key ingredient for success. " Success for who? Successful for themselves possibly. That's not the job of a leader. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people " This post makes the Orange Turd's utterings look almost coherent. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Yes they are. They are still asking where they are. The man is a c*nt. Notjing more entertaining than woke lefties spitting feathers at Trumpy.. " Totally agree. Lefty pearl clutching is my favourite daily entertainment!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people no thanks keep the chaos over there, in fact a better idea is for all you trump supporters to move to America " Just move to America huh? Just rock up and say "here I am" and they just give yoh a green card huh? If it was that simple the UK population would reduce by three quarters. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people no thanks keep the chaos over there, in fact a better idea is for all you trump supporters to move to America Just move to America huh? Just rock up and say "here I am" and they just give yoh a green card huh? If it was that simple the UK population would reduce by three quarters. " ...only one stipulation....you would have to be white | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Yes they are. They are still asking where they are. The man is a c*nt. Notjing more entertaining than woke lefties spitting feathers at Trumpy.. Totally agree. Lefty pearl clutching is my favourite daily entertainment!!" I know the weather is crap right not. But why don't you boys just log off The Daily Mail and switch GB News off for at least and hour and go for a walk? Take a brolly. Get some fresh air. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The Epstein files were getting a bit close for comfort, but no one talking about them now....wait until the midterms.....hahaha " Trump is now saying its ridiculous to have mid term elections. So he's taking a leaf out of Starmers playbook and wants to cancel the midterms. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people Fetal Alcohol Syndrome is a terrible thing.." Same could be said for TV’s and TS’s but that’s none of my business. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people Fetal Alcohol Syndrome is a terrible thing.. Same could be said for TV’s and TS’s but that’s none of my business. " We all play a role in this theatre of life, just have fun playing you | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people Fetal Alcohol Syndrome is a terrible thing.. Same could be said for TV’s and TS’s but that’s none of my business. We all play a role in this theatre of life, just have fun playing you "I agree. Didn’t sound like previous comments heed your thoughts. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people " Gibberish | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I do find it weird how people can be anti-social justice on this site when you are part of a minority who until relatively recently, didn’t have equal rights to straight people, and until even more recently, were regularly regarded as disgusting, pedo-adjacent, not “masculine” and would be the butt of jokes openly on mainstream media. The whole point of “wokeness” or social justice is ensure everyone has equal access to opportunity, rights and entitlements and are treated equally despite our inherent differences. Any other definition is a strawman. To be anti-woke is literally to support people’s ability to discriminate based on things like sexual orientation and if you’re on this site, you will be in their crosshairs at some point Trump’s a dick, rant over" Agreed. As well as being a dick, Trump has a small one, according to Stormy Daniels. Also "yeti pubes". | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's an idiot. For decades the US has been the protector of Europe. It suited the US ego and the European laziness. Now, Europe is finally waking up. It will take a long time to build up armed forces and institutions but, evenually, Europe will not need the US. The orange guy's legacy will have been to make the USA less relevant and have less influence than it currently has." That's a very clever way of putting it. Same response with a slightly different semantic is that the US military has been Europe's bitch since the 50s and finally they have a leader who says "Why?? Bollocks to that". Can you tell us why the US should be protecting Europe? Other than going for the grandfather clause? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's an idiot. For decades the US has been the protector of Europe. It suited the US ego and the European laziness. Now, Europe is finally waking up. It will take a long time to build up armed forces and institutions but, evenually, Europe will not need the US. The orange guy's legacy will have been to make the USA less relevant and have less influence than it currently has. That's a very clever way of putting it. Same response with a slightly different semantic is that the US military has been Europe's bitch since the 50s and finally they have a leader who says "Why?? Bollocks to that". Can you tell us why the US should be protecting Europe? Other than going for the grandfather clause?" Yeah because mutual alliances benefit everyone and contribute to better security. If the USA breaks its alliance with Europe then they’ve lost 500k soldiers from Poland, an absurd amount of artillery from Scandinavia, arguable the worlds best Special Forces from the UK and a nuclear deterrent from France who can look out for US interests. Now to balance that, yes Europe needs to pull its own weight a lot more than it has and is one of the few things I agree with the oversized Wotzit on | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Not sure he’s a genius, but he was voted in by the majority of American voters to do the best job he could for America, not Europe, not the rest of the world. Now he’s manage to gain Venezuelan oil, given the USA a stronger grip in the Middle East. He’s chasing Greenland minerals etc. He wants to make the USA even bigger with a border with Russia, so I’d say hes doing his job pretty well. He’s pissing the rest of the world of, no doubt, and he probably sees that as a bit of a bonus to go along with it." Agreed with your main point but need to point out: Greenland is not really about minerals. It's about being on the great circle route for ICBMs from Russia and/or China headed towards the US. It's a perfect place to site ICBM defenses. Also - the mercator projection doesn't show this but look on a round globe - it pretty much gives complete access to Russias northern coastline. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Not sure he’s a genius, but he was voted in by the majority of American voters to do the best job he could for America, not Europe, not the rest of the world. Now he’s manage to gain Venezuelan oil, given the USA a stronger grip in the Middle East. He’s chasing Greenland minerals etc. He wants to make the USA even bigger with a border with Russia, so I’d say hes doing his job pretty well. He’s pissing the rest of the world of, no doubt, and he probably sees that as a bit of a bonus to go along with it. Agreed with your main point but need to point out: Greenland is not really about minerals. It's about being on the great circle route for ICBMs from Russia and/or China headed towards the US. It's a perfect place to site ICBM defenses. Also - the mercator projection doesn't show this but look on a round globe - it pretty much gives complete access to Russias northern coastline. " Why isn’t taking Russia in the USA’s national security interest then? Given that’s where the ICBMs would come from, or China? Strategic ends doesn’t justify authoritarian means. It would be great if there was some sort of treaty organisation for security of the North Atlantic… | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Not sure he’s a genius, but he was voted in by the majority of American voters to do the best job he could for America, not Europe, not the rest of the world. Now he’s manage to gain Venezuelan oil, given the USA a stronger grip in the Middle East. He’s chasing Greenland minerals etc. He wants to make the USA even bigger with a border with Russia, so I’d say hes doing his job pretty well. He’s pissing the rest of the world of, no doubt, and he probably sees that as a bit of a bonus to go along with it. Agreed with your main point but need to point out: Greenland is not really about minerals. It's about being on the great circle route for ICBMs from Russia and/or China headed towards the US. It's a perfect place to site ICBM defenses. Also - the mercator projection doesn't show this but look on a round globe - it pretty much gives complete access to Russias northern coastline. " But even those reasons make it a good move for America, precisely his job | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I do find it weird how people can be anti-social justice on this site when you are part of a minority who until relatively recently, didn’t have equal rights to straight people, and until even more recently, were regularly regarded as disgusting, pedo-adjacent, not “masculine” and would be the butt of jokes openly on mainstream media. The whole point of “wokeness” or social justice is ensure everyone has equal access to opportunity, rights and entitlements and are treated equally despite our inherent differences. Any other definition is a strawman. To be anti-woke is literally to support people’s ability to discriminate based on things like sexual orientation and if you’re on this site, you will be in their crosshairs at some point Trump’s a dick, rant over" Unfortunately it seems being a minority oneself doesn't preclude some people from being anti social justice for other minorities. What is apparent is that if one challenges an agenda that infringes upon others rights you are accused of being a seditious leftist. No middle ground allowed, you cannot be centrist or even right leaning if you have compassion, any hint of socialism and you are a subversive communist. The preference of ad hominem tactics reflects their intellectual inability to engage in debate. The paradox that their claims to cultural erasure is their version of being woke is lost on them. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"All I got from this thread was that misusing the word 'woke' reeeally shows how fucking ancient a person is. Older than fucking dust. " Rather than those that over use it all the time being more insane than an asylum? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Not sure he’s a genius, but he was voted in by the majority of American voters to do the best job he could for America, not Europe, not the rest of the world. Now he’s manage to gain Venezuelan oil, given the USA a stronger grip in the Middle East. He’s chasing Greenland minerals etc. He wants to make the USA even bigger with a border with Russia, so I’d say hes doing his job pretty well. He’s pissing the rest of the world of, no doubt, and he probably sees that as a bit of a bonus to go along with it." ...I may be nit picking...but he wasn't voted in by the majority of voters...but don't take my word for it....look for yourself | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"All I got from this thread was that misusing the word 'woke' reeeally shows how fucking ancient a person is. Older than fucking dust. " And what their reading and watching habits are. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people " Exactly | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people " Agreed, at least the man is a patriot and acting to strengthen his country. What have we got ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump IS a genius....at being a prat. " Id have him over starmer any day of the week | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"You think there is going to be midterms? Or any. But I'll bet he finds a way to overturn the 2 term law. " Why not,its been done before | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people Agreed, at least the man is a patriot and acting to strengthen his country. What have we got ?" Ok, genuine question - how has Trump strengthened his country and made US citizens better? Without taking the cowards way out and telling me to 'do my own research', give me one example how American's lives have improved since he's been in power? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump IS a genius....at being a prat. Id have him over starmer any day of the week" Would you like gun shops on every high street ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is a genius because he's a disrupter and he's got full global attention which is key to his success. Boris and Nige have been out nearest equivalent of disrupters who are capable of grabbing attention. Our lame duck Starmer could vanish tomorrow and nobody would miss him or even care. The qualities of Trump and Musk etc to constantly remain in the public eye is a key ingredient for success. " A bit like Myra Hindley and Ian Brady - they’ve been in the public eye for years. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is a genius because he's a disrupter and he's got full global attention which is key to his success. Boris and Nige have been out nearest equivalent of disrupters who are capable of grabbing attention. Our lame duck Starmer could vanish tomorrow and nobody would miss him or even care. The qualities of Trump and Musk etc to constantly remain in the public eye is a key ingredient for success. A bit like Myra Hindley and Ian Brady - they’ve been in the public eye for years. " Exactly 👍👍👍 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump IS a genius....at being a prat. Id have him over starmer any day of the week" 😂 If you're "looking for nicely hung guy," tRump's micro penis would be sure to disappoint 🔍👀 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is a genius because he's a disrupter and he's got full global attention which is key to his success. Boris and Nige have been out nearest equivalent of disrupters who are capable of grabbing attention. Our lame duck Starmer could vanish tomorrow and nobody would miss him or even care. The qualities of Trump and Musk etc to constantly remain in the public eye is a key ingredient for success. A bit like Myra Hindley and Ian Brady - they’ve been in the public eye for years. Exactly 👍👍👍" Or Ant & Dec ... The similarities are uncanny. #Greenland-For-Palestinians | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Remove Musk and Trump will implode." Apparently Trump smells musky. Or fetid. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The cat is certainly among the pigeons ... and their horror at his continuing success is a constant wellspring of schadenfreude." ....his continuing success...?..please enlighten me... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people " Clown and paedophile supporter is what you are. And stupid too. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Remove Musk and Trump will implode. Apparently Trump smells musky. Or fetid. " It’s well known that this criminal is in continent and wears rubber pants so not surprising at all that he stinks. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The cat is certainly among the pigeons ... and their horror at his continuing success is a constant wellspring of schadenfreude.....his continuing success...?..please enlighten me..." Milking time again already!?!  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If as I suspect, he is continuously being provocative in order to disrupt the markets. In order for his inner circle to make massive financial gains. Then I guess you can call him a genius. Its why usually marches to the top of the hill, then marches down again. Like he withdrew the threat of military force and the markets bounced back. " If there is a logical explanation, that's it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Remove Musk and Trump will implode. Apparently Trump smells musky. Or fetid. It’s well known that this criminal is in continent and wears rubber pants so not surprising at all that he stinks." That sounds like yet another vivid figment of imagination from your wank bank shirty ... You naughty boy you!  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The cat is certainly among the pigeons ... and their horror at his continuing success is a constant wellspring of schadenfreude." Ask most americans is hes successful while they still pay more for everything and have his gun carrying morons running round their streets. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The cat is certainly among the pigeons ... and their horror at his continuing success is a constant wellspring of schadenfreude.....his continuing success...?..please enlighten me... Milking time again already!?! "....actually it's "put up,or shut up" time ...which one are you going with..?..he backed down on the Greenland/Iceland invasion...didn't you know....hahaha | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The cat is certainly among the pigeons ... and their horror at his continuing success is a constant wellspring of schadenfreude.....his continuing success...?..please enlighten me... Milking time again already!?! ....actually it's "put up,or shut up" time ...which one are you going with..?..he backed down on the Greenland/Iceland invasion...didn't you know....hahaha "Not quite James!....Trump hasn't 'backed down' on Greenland at all, he's still pushing hard. He's stated that there's 'no going back' on acquiring Greenland and he won't rule out force, just won't use it 'yet'. And yeah, of course, he's confused Greenland with Iceland, which doesn't help his case at all! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The cat is certainly among the pigeons ... and their horror at his continuing success is a constant wellspring of schadenfreude.....his continuing success...?..please enlighten me... Milking time again already!?! ....actually it's "put up,or shut up" time ...which one are you going with..?..he backed down on the Greenland/Iceland invasion...didn't you know....hahaha
Not quite James!....Trump hasn't 'backed down' on Greenland at all, he's still pushing hard. He's stated that there's 'no going back' on acquiring Greenland and he won't rule out force, just won't use it 'yet'. And yeah, of course, he's confused Greenland with Iceland, which doesn't help his case at all! "...he posted to "truth social " that he's made a "deal" over Greenland/Iceland...no such deal exists...are you familiar with the term "taco trump "? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The cat is certainly among the pigeons ... and their horror at his continuing success is a constant wellspring of schadenfreude.....his continuing success...?..please enlighten me... Milking time again already!?! ....actually it's "put up,or shut up" time ...which one are you going with..?..he backed down on the Greenland/Iceland invasion...didn't you know....hahaha
Not quite James!....Trump hasn't 'backed down' on Greenland at all, he's still pushing hard. He's stated that there's 'no going back' on acquiring Greenland and he won't rule out force, just won't use it 'yet'. And yeah, of course, he's confused Greenland with Iceland, which doesn't help his case at all! "I'm afraid you are wrong this time, he's totally backed down, as usual he wants all the world worrying about him. Except where the epstein files are concerned obviously. He's vile and yes, taco. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"TACO? A lesson in negotiation: Step 1, starting point, go for the maximum (Greenland or anything). Step 2: Obtain the counteroffer, which is likely to be significantly different from what you want. Step 3: Negotiate from positions to an agreement that satisfies both parties. You ALWAYS settle for less than your opening bid. The parrotting TACO voice boxes know nothing about trade." . Just one flaw in your plan.....there is no counter offer....hahaha...you people keep falling for his bullshit... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"TACO? A lesson in negotiation: Step 1, starting point, go for the maximum (Greenland or anything). Step 2: Obtain the counteroffer, which is likely to be significantly different from what you want. Step 3: Negotiate from positions to an agreement that satisfies both parties. You ALWAYS settle for less than your opening bid. The parrotting TACO voice boxes know nothing about trade. . Just one flaw in your plan.....there is no counter offer....hahaha...you people keep falling for his bullshit..." Keep chewing on your cud ... Milking time again in 6 hours | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"TACO? A lesson in negotiation: Step 1, starting point, go for the maximum (Greenland or anything). Step 2: Obtain the counteroffer, which is likely to be significantly different from what you want. Step 3: Negotiate from positions to an agreement that satisfies both parties. You ALWAYS settle for less than your opening bid. The parrotting TACO voice boxes know nothing about trade. . Just one flaw in your plan.....there is no counter offer....hahaha...you people keep falling for his bullshit... Keep chewing on your cud ... Milking time again in 6 hours "...so tell me about the counter offer... ?...hahaha | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"TACO? A lesson in negotiation: Step 1, starting point, go for the maximum (Greenland or anything). Step 2: Obtain the counteroffer, which is likely to be significantly different from what you want. Step 3: Negotiate from positions to an agreement that satisfies both parties. You ALWAYS settle for less than your opening bid. The parrotting TACO voice boxes know nothing about trade." Maduro spoke extensively about TACO too , particularly with his idol Putin positioned behind him. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people He might do something about education and literacy. ...Linda mc mahon is the education secretary....that's hardly going to happen..." Let’s face it trump was involved with Mchon and Epstein at the WWE people don’t seem to remember that. Where’s Mr Mcmon now under investigation | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people He might do something about education and literacy. ...Linda mc mahon is the education secretary....that's hardly going to happen... Let’s face it trump was involved with Mchon and Epstein at the WWE people don’t seem to remember that. Where’s Mr Mcmon now under investigation " ...vince mc mahons investigation seems to have been put on hold....remember Linda was also part of the investigation... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"TACO? A lesson in negotiation: Step 1, starting point, go for the maximum (Greenland or anything). Step 2: Obtain the counteroffer, which is likely to be significantly different from what you want. Step 3: Negotiate from positions to an agreement that satisfies both parties. You ALWAYS settle for less than your opening bid. The parrotting TACO voice boxes know nothing about trade. Maduro spoke extensively about TACO too , particularly with his idol Putin positioned behind him. " ....trump said putin had accepted his invitation to join the "peace board"....putin came back immediately and sid it was under consideration....another kick in the nuts for donny....hahaha | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"TACO? A lesson in negotiation: Step 1, starting point, go for the maximum (Greenland or anything). Step 2: Obtain the counteroffer, which is likely to be significantly different from what you want. Step 3: Negotiate from positions to an agreement that satisfies both parties. You ALWAYS settle for less than your opening bid. The parrotting TACO voice boxes know nothing about trade. Maduro spoke extensively about TACO too , particularly with his idol Putin positioned behind him. " Ohhh also The Ayatollahs enjoyed sharing about TACO, and one evening, their underwear were down and no one was present. HA HA Ha | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The cat is certainly among the pigeons ... and their horror at his continuing success is a constant wellspring of schadenfreude.....his continuing success...?..please enlighten me... Milking time again already!?! ....actually it's "put up,or shut up" time ...which one are you going with..?..he backed down on the Greenland/Iceland invasion...didn't you know....hahaha
Not quite James!....Trump hasn't 'backed down' on Greenland at all, he's still pushing hard. He's stated that there's 'no going back' on acquiring Greenland and he won't rule out force, just won't use it 'yet'. And yeah, of course, he's confused Greenland with Iceland, which doesn't help his case at all!
I'm afraid you are wrong this time, he's totally backed down, as usual he wants all the world worrying about him. Except where the epstein files are concerned obviously.
He's vile and yes, taco."As far as I am aware, Trump's stance on Greenland hasn't changed - he's still keen on acquiring it, citing national strategic security concerns and wanting to prevent Russia and China from gaining influence in the region. He's seeking immediate talks with Denmark and has now ruled out using military force, focusing instead on a framework for a future deal with NATO, the deal reportedly involves access to mineral rights for the US and its European allies despite there being huge geological issues involved according to US-based scientists. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The cat is certainly among the pigeons ... and their horror at his continuing success is a constant wellspring of schadenfreude.....his continuing success...?..please enlighten me... Milking time again already!?! ....actually it's "put up,or shut up" time ...which one are you going with..?..he backed down on the Greenland/Iceland invasion...didn't you know....hahaha
Not quite James!....Trump hasn't 'backed down' on Greenland at all, he's still pushing hard. He's stated that there's 'no going back' on acquiring Greenland and he won't rule out force, just won't use it 'yet'. And yeah, of course, he's confused Greenland with Iceland, which doesn't help his case at all!
I'm afraid you are wrong this time, he's totally backed down, as usual he wants all the world worrying about him. Except where the epstein files are concerned obviously.
He's vile and yes, taco.
As far as I am aware, Trump's stance on Greenland hasn't changed - he's still keen on acquiring it, citing national strategic security concerns and wanting to prevent Russia and China from gaining influence in the region. He's seeking immediate talks with Denmark and has now ruled out using military force, focusing instead on a framework for a future deal with NATO, the deal reportedly involves access to mineral rights for the US and its European allies despite there being huge geological issues involved according to US-based scientists."...so basically what you're saying is...trump is the only one who has changed their position...he now wants to talk...?...Greenland/Iceland certainly haven't changed theirs, and there is certainly no "framework document in place. Look...stop believing everything coming out of the Whitehouse...its usually bullshit | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The cat is certainly among the pigeons ... and their horror at his continuing success is a constant wellspring of schadenfreude.....his continuing success...?..please enlighten me... Milking time again already!?! ....actually it's "put up,or shut up" time ...which one are you going with..?..he backed down on the Greenland/Iceland invasion...didn't you know....hahaha
Not quite James!....Trump hasn't 'backed down' on Greenland at all, he's still pushing hard. He's stated that there's 'no going back' on acquiring Greenland and he won't rule out force, just won't use it 'yet'. And yeah, of course, he's confused Greenland with Iceland, which doesn't help his case at all!
I'm afraid you are wrong this time, he's totally backed down, as usual he wants all the world worrying about him. Except where the epstein files are concerned obviously.
He's vile and yes, taco.
As far as I am aware, Trump's stance on Greenland hasn't changed - he's still keen on acquiring it, citing national strategic security concerns and wanting to prevent Russia and China from gaining influence in the region. He's seeking immediate talks with Denmark and has now ruled out using military force, focusing instead on a framework for a future deal with NATO, the deal reportedly involves access to mineral rights for the US and its European allies despite there being huge geological issues involved according to US-based scientists....so basically what you're saying is...trump is the only one who has changed their position...he now wants to talk...?...Greenland/Iceland certainly haven't changed theirs, and there is certainly no "framework document in place.
Look...stop believing everything coming out of the Whitehouse...its usually bullshit "To reiterate what's already been said, Trump's administration has shifted towards seeking a diplomatic solution, ruling out military force and exploring a framework deal with NATO, focusing on mineral rights and national security concerns. This isn't about who's changed position, it's about adapting strategies. The framework deal is reportedly in place, with talks ongoing between the US, Denmark, and Greenland. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The cat is certainly among the pigeons ... and their horror at his continuing success is a constant wellspring of schadenfreude.....his continuing success...?..please enlighten me... Milking time again already!?! ....actually it's "put up,or shut up" time ...which one are you going with..?..he backed down on the Greenland/Iceland invasion...didn't you know....hahaha
Not quite James!....Trump hasn't 'backed down' on Greenland at all, he's still pushing hard. He's stated that there's 'no going back' on acquiring Greenland and he won't rule out force, just won't use it 'yet'. And yeah, of course, he's confused Greenland with Iceland, which doesn't help his case at all!
I'm afraid you are wrong this time, he's totally backed down, as usual he wants all the world worrying about him. Except where the epstein files are concerned obviously.
He's vile and yes, taco.
As far as I am aware, Trump's stance on Greenland hasn't changed - he's still keen on acquiring it, citing national strategic security concerns and wanting to prevent Russia and China from gaining influence in the region. He's seeking immediate talks with Denmark and has now ruled out using military force, focusing instead on a framework for a future deal with NATO, the deal reportedly involves access to mineral rights for the US and its European allies despite there being huge geological issues involved according to US-based scientists....so basically what you're saying is...trump is the only one who has changed their position...he now wants to talk...?...Greenland/Iceland certainly haven't changed theirs, and there is certainly no "framework document in place.
Look...stop believing everything coming out of the Whitehouse...its usually bullshit
To reiterate what's already been said, Trump's administration has shifted towards seeking a diplomatic solution, ruling out military force and exploring a framework deal with NATO, focusing on mineral rights and national security concerns. This isn't about who's changed position, it's about adapting strategies. The framework deal is reportedly in place, with talks ongoing between the US, Denmark, and Greenland."....what's your scource for the framework deal being in place...? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I wish some would ban the fraze "what's your source" from the forum. Or the people that keep using it." ..that's the problem you see...if you come on here..or any public forum, and make a spurious claim..you want to ban people from calling them out on it..?...the phrase is fairly secure in my opinion | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The cat is certainly among the pigeons ... and their horror at his continuing success is a constant wellspring of schadenfreude.....his continuing success...?..please enlighten me... Milking time again already!?! ....actually it's "put up,or shut up" time ...which one are you going with..?..he backed down on the Greenland/Iceland invasion...didn't you know....hahaha
Not quite James!....Trump hasn't 'backed down' on Greenland at all, he's still pushing hard. He's stated that there's 'no going back' on acquiring Greenland and he won't rule out force, just won't use it 'yet'. And yeah, of course, he's confused Greenland with Iceland, which doesn't help his case at all!
I'm afraid you are wrong this time, he's totally backed down, as usual he wants all the world worrying about him. Except where the epstein files are concerned obviously.
He's vile and yes, taco.
As far as I am aware, Trump's stance on Greenland hasn't changed - he's still keen on acquiring it, citing national strategic security concerns and wanting to prevent Russia and China from gaining influence in the region. He's seeking immediate talks with Denmark and has now ruled out using military force, focusing instead on a framework for a future deal with NATO, the deal reportedly involves access to mineral rights for the US and its European allies despite there being huge geological issues involved according to US-based scientists....so basically what you're saying is...trump is the only one who has changed their position...he now wants to talk...?...Greenland/Iceland certainly haven't changed theirs, and there is certainly no "framework document in place.
Look...stop believing everything coming out of the Whitehouse...its usually bullshit
To reiterate what's already been said, Trump's administration has shifted towards seeking a diplomatic solution, ruling out military force and exploring a framework deal with NATO, focusing on mineral rights and national security concerns. This isn't about who's changed position, it's about adapting strategies. The framework deal is reportedly in place, with talks ongoing between the US, Denmark, and Greenland.....what's your scource for the framework deal being in place...?"Presumably you mean 'source'? The information is available from reputable international news agencies, including Bloomberg and Reuters, reporting on the framework deal. If you want more details, I would suggest that you check their reports online. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The cat is certainly among the pigeons ... and their horror at his continuing success is a constant wellspring of schadenfreude.....his continuing success...?..please enlighten me... Milking time again already!?! ....actually it's "put up,or shut up" time ...which one are you going with..?..he backed down on the Greenland/Iceland invasion...didn't you know....hahaha
Not quite James!....Trump hasn't 'backed down' on Greenland at all, he's still pushing hard. He's stated that there's 'no going back' on acquiring Greenland and he won't rule out force, just won't use it 'yet'. And yeah, of course, he's confused Greenland with Iceland, which doesn't help his case at all!
I'm afraid you are wrong this time, he's totally backed down, as usual he wants all the world worrying about him. Except where the epstein files are concerned obviously.
He's vile and yes, taco.
As far as I am aware, Trump's stance on Greenland hasn't changed - he's still keen on acquiring it, citing national strategic security concerns and wanting to prevent Russia and China from gaining influence in the region. He's seeking immediate talks with Denmark and has now ruled out using military force, focusing instead on a framework for a future deal with NATO, the deal reportedly involves access to mineral rights for the US and its European allies despite there being huge geological issues involved according to US-based scientists....so basically what you're saying is...trump is the only one who has changed their position...he now wants to talk...?...Greenland/Iceland certainly haven't changed theirs, and there is certainly no "framework document in place.
Look...stop believing everything coming out of the Whitehouse...its usually bullshit
To reiterate what's already been said, Trump's administration has shifted towards seeking a diplomatic solution, ruling out military force and exploring a framework deal with NATO, focusing on mineral rights and national security concerns. This isn't about who's changed position, it's about adapting strategies. The framework deal is reportedly in place, with talks ongoing between the US, Denmark, and Greenland.....what's your scource for the framework deal being in place...?
Presumably you mean 'source'? The information is available from reputable international news agencies, including Bloomberg and Reuters, reporting on the framework deal. If you want more details, I would suggest that you check their reports online.
"...I did actually...they reported on trump saying its in place....no actual details of the deal itself...they also reported that Greenland have reiterated that Greenland's sovereignty is non negotiable .... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The cat is certainly among the pigeons ... and their horror at his continuing success is a constant wellspring of schadenfreude.....his continuing success...?..please enlighten me... Milking time again already!?! ....actually it's "put up,or shut up" time ...which one are you going with..?..he backed down on the Greenland/Iceland invasion...didn't you know....hahaha
Not quite James!....Trump hasn't 'backed down' on Greenland at all, he's still pushing hard. He's stated that there's 'no going back' on acquiring Greenland and he won't rule out force, just won't use it 'yet'. And yeah, of course, he's confused Greenland with Iceland, which doesn't help his case at all!
I'm afraid you are wrong this time, he's totally backed down, as usual he wants all the world worrying about him. Except where the epstein files are concerned obviously.
He's vile and yes, taco.
As far as I am aware, Trump's stance on Greenland hasn't changed - he's still keen on acquiring it, citing national strategic security concerns and wanting to prevent Russia and China from gaining influence in the region. He's seeking immediate talks with Denmark and has now ruled out using military force, focusing instead on a framework for a future deal with NATO, the deal reportedly involves access to mineral rights for the US and its European allies despite there being huge geological issues involved according to US-based scientists....so basically what you're saying is...trump is the only one who has changed their position...he now wants to talk...?...Greenland/Iceland certainly haven't changed theirs, and there is certainly no "framework document in place.
Look...stop believing everything coming out of the Whitehouse...its usually bullshit
To reiterate what's already been said, Trump's administration has shifted towards seeking a diplomatic solution, ruling out military force and exploring a framework deal with NATO, focusing on mineral rights and national security concerns. This isn't about who's changed position, it's about adapting strategies. The framework deal is reportedly in place, with talks ongoing between the US, Denmark, and Greenland.....what's your scource for the framework deal being in place...?
Presumably you mean 'source'? The information is available from reputable international news agencies, including Bloomberg and Reuters, reporting on the framework deal. If you want more details, I would suggest that you check their reports online.
...I did actually...they reported on trump saying its in place....no actual details of the deal itself...they also reported that Greenland have reiterated that Greenland's sovereignty is non negotiable ...."Fair enough, obviously the precise details are still in negotiations, but the reports are based on Trump's statement about a framework deal. Greenland's stance on sovereignty is well established, but we'll have to wait for more info on where talks are headed. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The cat is certainly among the pigeons ... and their horror at his continuing success is a constant wellspring of schadenfreude.....his continuing success...?..please enlighten me... Milking time again already!?! ....actually it's "put up,or shut up" time ...which one are you going with..?..he backed down on the Greenland/Iceland invasion...didn't you know....hahaha
Not quite James!....Trump hasn't 'backed down' on Greenland at all, he's still pushing hard. He's stated that there's 'no going back' on acquiring Greenland and he won't rule out force, just won't use it 'yet'. And yeah, of course, he's confused Greenland with Iceland, which doesn't help his case at all!
I'm afraid you are wrong this time, he's totally backed down, as usual he wants all the world worrying about him. Except where the epstein files are concerned obviously.
He's vile and yes, taco.
As far as I am aware, Trump's stance on Greenland hasn't changed - he's still keen on acquiring it, citing national strategic security concerns and wanting to prevent Russia and China from gaining influence in the region. He's seeking immediate talks with Denmark and has now ruled out using military force, focusing instead on a framework for a future deal with NATO, the deal reportedly involves access to mineral rights for the US and its European allies despite there being huge geological issues involved according to US-based scientists....so basically what you're saying is...trump is the only one who has changed their position...he now wants to talk...?...Greenland/Iceland certainly haven't changed theirs, and there is certainly no "framework document in place.
Look...stop believing everything coming out of the Whitehouse...its usually bullshit
To reiterate what's already been said, Trump's administration has shifted towards seeking a diplomatic solution, ruling out military force and exploring a framework deal with NATO, focusing on mineral rights and national security concerns. This isn't about who's changed position, it's about adapting strategies. The framework deal is reportedly in place, with talks ongoing between the US, Denmark, and Greenland.....what's your scource for the framework deal being in place...?
Presumably you mean 'source'? The information is available from reputable international news agencies, including Bloomberg and Reuters, reporting on the framework deal. If you want more details, I would suggest that you check their reports online.
...I did actually...they reported on trump saying its in place....no actual details of the deal itself...they also reported that Greenland have reiterated that Greenland's sovereignty is non negotiable ....
Fair enough, obviously the precise details are still in negotiations, but the reports are based on Trump's statement about a framework deal. Greenland's stance on sovereignty is well established, but we'll have to wait for more info on where talks are headed.".....you still don't get it....there is no framework deal...there are no talks...just trump making stuff up...as I've already said, stop listening to the Whitehouse,including trump...its mostly bullshit | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I wish some would ban the fraze "what's your source" from the forum. Or the people that keep using it...that's the problem you see...if you come on here..or any public forum, and make a spurious claim..you want to ban people from calling them out on it..?...the phrase is fairly secure in my opinion " What your source? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I wish some would ban the fraze "what's your source" from the forum. Or the people that keep using it...that's the problem you see...if you come on here..or any public forum, and make a spurious claim..you want to ban people from calling them out on it..?...the phrase is fairly secure in my opinion What your source? " ...I said "in my opinion "....?....surely you can do better than that....? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I wish some would ban the fraze "what's your source" from the forum. Or the people that keep using it...that's the problem you see...if you come on here..or any public forum, and make a spurious claim..you want to ban people from calling them out on it..?...the phrase is fairly secure in my opinion What your source? ...I said "in my opinion "....?....surely you can do better than that....?" If you don't agree with what someone gas said then write a detailed opposing argument and justify it with a sourse. Asking someone to quote their source is just lazy. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's now rabbiting on about how great he is, most if it is totally untrue. Keeps blabbing about his so called board of peace that seems to include the leaders of Russia and Isreal who are still bombing people. 11 killed in Palestinine and on the borders on Lebanon while grampa said he's stopped the isreal gaza war. Yesterday his press secretary denied he had said Iceland instead of Greenland. He said it 3 times. He's lost the plot. " They are the appropriate individuals to invite because if they are not included, it will never occur. Hand over these peace negotiations to European nations, and you will never witness peace in your lifetime. European countries primarily focus on their own interests, seeking to exploit the Middle East. Consider the current situation in Iran; they have barely spoken out because they receive substantial financial support from those in power. Have they taken the initiative to ban the IRGC? So far, they have not, as long as the money keeps flowing in, they are content to allow the regime to oppress its own citizens to maintain control. The IRGC has been designated as a terrorist organization by the USA, Canada, and recently Argentina, yet European nations remain oblivious, prioritizing financial gain. Have they ever approached China or Russia to refrain from aiding these terrorists? Never. Therefore, my argument is that Europeans are not genuinely interested in peace anywhere; they only care about receiving their money from these nasty regimes. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I wish some would ban the fraze "what's your source" from the forum. Or the people that keep using it...that's the problem you see...if you come on here..or any public forum, and make a spurious claim..you want to ban people from calling them out on it..?...the phrase is fairly secure in my opinion What your source? ...I said "in my opinion "....?....surely you can do better than that....? If you don't agree with what someone gas said then write a detailed opposing argument and justify it with a sourse. Asking someone to quote their source is just lazy." ....the reason I asked him to quote his source was because I already knew he didn't have any. The guy has since admitted as much....that's how you conduct yourself during a discussion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's now rabbiting on about how great he is, most if it is totally untrue. Keeps blabbing about his so called board of peace that seems to include the leaders of Russia and Isreal who are still bombing people. 11 killed in Palestinine and on the borders on Lebanon while grampa said he's stopped the isreal gaza war. Yesterday his press secretary denied he had said Iceland instead of Greenland. He said it 3 times. He's lost the plot. They are the appropriate individuals to invite because if they are not included, it will never occur. Hand over these peace negotiations to European nations, and you will never witness peace in your lifetime. European countries primarily focus on their own interests, seeking to exploit the Middle East. Consider the current situation in Iran; they have barely spoken out because they receive substantial financial support from those in power. Have they taken the initiative to ban the IRGC? So far, they have not, as long as the money keeps flowing in, they are content to allow the regime to oppress its own citizens to maintain control. The IRGC has been designated as a terrorist organization by the USA, Canada, and recently Argentina, yet European nations remain oblivious, prioritizing financial gain. Have they ever approached China or Russia to refrain from aiding these terrorists? Never. Therefore, my argument is that Europeans are not genuinely interested in peace anywhere; they only care about receiving their money from these nasty regimes. " And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's now rabbiting on about how great he is, most if it is totally untrue. Keeps blabbing about his so called board of peace that seems to include the leaders of Russia and Isreal who are still bombing people. 11 killed in Palestinine and on the borders on Lebanon while grampa said he's stopped the isreal gaza war. Yesterday his press secretary denied he had said Iceland instead of Greenland. He said it 3 times. He's lost the plot. They are the appropriate individuals to invite because if they are not included, it will never occur. Hand over these peace negotiations to European nations, and you will never witness peace in your lifetime. European countries primarily focus on their own interests, seeking to exploit the Middle East. Consider the current situation in Iran; they have barely spoken out because they receive substantial financial support from those in power. Have they taken the initiative to ban the IRGC? So far, they have not, as long as the money keeps flowing in, they are content to allow the regime to oppress its own citizens to maintain control. The IRGC has been designated as a terrorist organization by the USA, Canada, and recently Argentina, yet European nations remain oblivious, prioritizing financial gain. Have they ever approached China or Russia to refrain from aiding these terrorists? Never. Therefore, my argument is that Europeans are not genuinely interested in peace anywhere; they only care about receiving their money from these nasty regimes. And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace." ....not counting Israel...it's mainly Muslim countries that have agreed to join the peace board....does anyone else smell an ambush.....hahaha | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's now rabbiting on about how great he is, most if it is totally untrue. Keeps blabbing about his so called board of peace that seems to include the leaders of Russia and Isreal who are still bombing people. 11 killed in Palestinine and on the borders on Lebanon while grampa said he's stopped the isreal gaza war. Yesterday his press secretary denied he had said Iceland instead of Greenland. He said it 3 times. He's lost the plot. They are the appropriate individuals to invite because if they are not included, it will never occur. Hand over these peace negotiations to European nations, and you will never witness peace in your lifetime. European countries primarily focus on their own interests, seeking to exploit the Middle East. Consider the current situation in Iran; they have barely spoken out because they receive substantial financial support from those in power. Have they taken the initiative to ban the IRGC? So far, they have not, as long as the money keeps flowing in, they are content to allow the regime to oppress its own citizens to maintain control. The IRGC has been designated as a terrorist organization by the USA, Canada, and recently Argentina, yet European nations remain oblivious, prioritizing financial gain. Have they ever approached China or Russia to refrain from aiding these terrorists? Never. Therefore, my argument is that Europeans are not genuinely interested in peace anywhere; they only care about receiving their money from these nasty regimes. And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace.....not counting Israel...it's mainly Muslim countries that have agreed to join the peace board....does anyone else smell an ambush.....hahaha " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I wish some would ban the fraze "what's your source" from the forum. Or the people that keep using it...that's the problem you see...if you come on here..or any public forum, and make a spurious claim..you want to ban people from calling them out on it..?...the phrase is fairly secure in my opinion What your source? ...I said "in my opinion "....?....surely you can do better than that....? If you don't agree with what someone gas said then write a detailed opposing argument and justify it with a sourse. Asking someone to quote their source is just lazy.....the reason I asked him to quote his source was because I already knew he didn't have any. The guy has since admitted as much....that's how you conduct yourself during a discussion. " James can, despite your erroneous allegations, I have already categorically stated that my sources are Reuters and Bloomberg, respectively, reporting on Trump's framework deal announcement. Can you therefore clarify what evidence you have to support your claim that about my sources being Reuters and Bloomberg were falsifications? Accusing me of being untruthful is a serious and libelous claim - do you have evidence to back it up? I'd appreciate it if you'd correct your assertion immediately! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I wish some would ban the fraze "what's your source" from the forum. Or the people that keep using it...that's the problem you see...if you come on here..or any public forum, and make a spurious claim..you want to ban people from calling them out on it..?...the phrase is fairly secure in my opinion What your source? ...I said "in my opinion "....?....surely you can do better than that....? If you don't agree with what someone gas said then write a detailed opposing argument and justify it with a sourse. Asking someone to quote their source is just lazy.....the reason I asked him to quote his source was because I already knew he didn't have any. The guy has since admitted as much....that's how you conduct yourself during a discussion. James can, despite your erroneous allegations, I have already categorically stated that my sources are Reuters and Bloomberg, respectively, reporting on Trump's framework deal announcement. Can you therefore clarify what evidence you have to support your claim that about my sources being Reuters and Bloomberg were falsifications? Accusing me of being untruthful is a serious and libelous claim - do you have evidence to back it up? I'd appreciate it if you'd correct your assertion immediately! " ...Bloomberg and Reuters reported on trumps "claim" that there was a framework in place...not details of an actual deal...but didn't you already concede that point? .there is no deal, or no talks about a deal. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"There is no framework, Trump later diluted it to “we have a concept of a deal” in his post DAVOS interview with CNBC. Neither matter, it was a conversation between Trump and Mark Rutte, who's position as NATO General Secretary affords him no power over a sovereign state. He is the chief civil servant of NATO, an international diplomat responsible for coordinating the workings of the alliance, chairing meetings and acting as spokesperson. Political, military and strategic decisions ultimately rest with the member states. A. There can’t be a framework without having Greenland and Denmark as part of the negotiations, neither were part of that 'conversation'. B. Trump would need a super majority vote to pass any such treaty in congress, the constitution only gives the president the power “by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur”" ....thanks for that....my shortened version of that is.....trump is full of shit. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people " A rapist and a felon? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's now rabbiting on about how great he is, most if it is totally untrue. Keeps blabbing about his so called board of peace that seems to include the leaders of Russia and Isreal who are still bombing people. 11 killed in Palestinine and on the borders on Lebanon while grampa said he's stopped the isreal gaza war. Yesterday his press secretary denied he had said Iceland instead of Greenland. He said it 3 times. He's lost the plot. They are the appropriate individuals to invite because if they are not included, it will never occur. Hand over these peace negotiations to European nations, and you will never witness peace in your lifetime. European countries primarily focus on their own interests, seeking to exploit the Middle East. Consider the current situation in Iran; they have barely spoken out because they receive substantial financial support from those in power. Have they taken the initiative to ban the IRGC? So far, they have not, as long as the money keeps flowing in, they are content to allow the regime to oppress its own citizens to maintain control. The IRGC has been designated as a terrorist organization by the USA, Canada, and recently Argentina, yet European nations remain oblivious, prioritizing financial gain. Have they ever approached China or Russia to refrain from aiding these terrorists? Never. Therefore, my argument is that Europeans are not genuinely interested in peace anywhere; they only care about receiving their money from these nasty regimes. And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace." The reason I reached out to you to clarify that your assertion regarding the invitation extended to Russia and Israel is incorrect. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's now rabbiting on about how great he is, most if it is totally untrue. Keeps blabbing about his so called board of peace that seems to include the leaders of Russia and Isreal who are still bombing people. 11 killed in Palestinine and on the borders on Lebanon while grampa said he's stopped the isreal gaza war. Yesterday his press secretary denied he had said Iceland instead of Greenland. He said it 3 times. He's lost the plot. They are the appropriate individuals to invite because if they are not included, it will never occur. Hand over these peace negotiations to European nations, and you will never witness peace in your lifetime. European countries primarily focus on their own interests, seeking to exploit the Middle East. Consider the current situation in Iran; they have barely spoken out because they receive substantial financial support from those in power. Have they taken the initiative to ban the IRGC? So far, they have not, as long as the money keeps flowing in, they are content to allow the regime to oppress its own citizens to maintain control. The IRGC has been designated as a terrorist organization by the USA, Canada, and recently Argentina, yet European nations remain oblivious, prioritizing financial gain. Have they ever approached China or Russia to refrain from aiding these terrorists? Never. Therefore, my argument is that Europeans are not genuinely interested in peace anywhere; they only care about receiving their money from these nasty regimes. And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace. The reason I reached out to you to clarify that your assertion regarding the invitation extended to Russia and Israel is incorrect. " ....trump said Russia accepted....they didn't | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's now rabbiting on about how great he is, most if it is totally untrue. Keeps blabbing about his so called board of peace that seems to include the leaders of Russia and Isreal who are still bombing people. 11 killed in Palestinine and on the borders on Lebanon while grampa said he's stopped the isreal gaza war. Yesterday his press secretary denied he had said Iceland instead of Greenland. He said it 3 times. He's lost the plot. They are the appropriate individuals to invite because if they are not included, it will never occur. Hand over these peace negotiations to European nations, and you will never witness peace in your lifetime. European countries primarily focus on their own interests, seeking to exploit the Middle East. Consider the current situation in Iran; they have barely spoken out because they receive substantial financial support from those in power. Have they taken the initiative to ban the IRGC? So far, they have not, as long as the money keeps flowing in, they are content to allow the regime to oppress its own citizens to maintain control. The IRGC has been designated as a terrorist organization by the USA, Canada, and recently Argentina, yet European nations remain oblivious, prioritizing financial gain. Have they ever approached China or Russia to refrain from aiding these terrorists? Never. Therefore, my argument is that Europeans are not genuinely interested in peace anywhere; they only care about receiving their money from these nasty regimes. And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace. The reason I reached out to you to clarify that your assertion regarding the invitation extended to Russia and Israel is incorrect. ....trump said Russia accepted....they didn't " They are arseholes they say yes and no all the time don’t be proud of them . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's now rabbiting on about how great he is, most if it is totally untrue. Keeps blabbing about his so called board of peace that seems to include the leaders of Russia and Isreal who are still bombing people. 11 killed in Palestinine and on the borders on Lebanon while grampa said he's stopped the isreal gaza war. Yesterday his press secretary denied he had said Iceland instead of Greenland. He said it 3 times. He's lost the plot. They are the appropriate individuals to invite because if they are not included, it will never occur. Hand over these peace negotiations to European nations, and you will never witness peace in your lifetime. European countries primarily focus on their own interests, seeking to exploit the Middle East. Consider the current situation in Iran; they have barely spoken out because they receive substantial financial support from those in power. Have they taken the initiative to ban the IRGC? So far, they have not, as long as the money keeps flowing in, they are content to allow the regime to oppress its own citizens to maintain control. The IRGC has been designated as a terrorist organization by the USA, Canada, and recently Argentina, yet European nations remain oblivious, prioritizing financial gain. Have they ever approached China or Russia to refrain from aiding these terrorists? Never. Therefore, my argument is that Europeans are not genuinely interested in peace anywhere; they only care about receiving their money from these nasty regimes. And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace. The reason I reached out to you to clarify that your assertion regarding the invitation extended to Russia and Israel is incorrect. ....trump said Russia accepted....they didn't They are arseholes they say yes and no all the time don’t be proud of them . " ...don't be insulting trumps buddies...they never said yes... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"You could take him to Alaska, tell him it's Greenland and now belongs to him, let him cut a ribbon and give him a wee trophy" ...or rename Greenland..epstiens island....he'd never mention it again... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's now rabbiting on about how great he is, most if it is totally untrue. Keeps blabbing about his so called board of peace that seems to include the leaders of Russia and Isreal who are still bombing people. 11 killed in Palestinine and on the borders on Lebanon while grampa said he's stopped the isreal gaza war. Yesterday his press secretary denied he had said Iceland instead of Greenland. He said it 3 times. He's lost the plot. They are the appropriate individuals to invite because if they are not included, it will never occur. Hand over these peace negotiations to European nations, and you will never witness peace in your lifetime. European countries primarily focus on their own interests, seeking to exploit the Middle East. Consider the current situation in Iran; they have barely spoken out because they receive substantial financial support from those in power. Have they taken the initiative to ban the IRGC? So far, they have not, as long as the money keeps flowing in, they are content to allow the regime to oppress its own citizens to maintain control. The IRGC has been designated as a terrorist organization by the USA, Canada, and recently Argentina, yet European nations remain oblivious, prioritizing financial gain. Have they ever approached China or Russia to refrain from aiding these terrorists? Never. Therefore, my argument is that Europeans are not genuinely interested in peace anywhere; they only care about receiving their money from these nasty regimes. And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace. The reason I reached out to you to clarify that your assertion regarding the invitation extended to Russia and Israel is incorrect. ....trump said Russia accepted....they didn't They are arseholes they say yes and no all the time don’t be proud of them . ...don't be insulting trumps buddies...they never said yes..." They did not claim that they have not accepted, as you mentioned, did they? As I previously stated, they oscillate between affirmatives and negatives, leaving everyone in a state of uncertainty. Furthermore, it served as a caution to those who are heeding Putin's words to verify their information. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's now rabbiting on about how great he is, most if it is totally untrue. Keeps blabbing about his so called board of peace that seems to include the leaders of Russia and Isreal who are still bombing people. 11 killed in Palestinine and on the borders on Lebanon while grampa said he's stopped the isreal gaza war. Yesterday his press secretary denied he had said Iceland instead of Greenland. He said it 3 times. He's lost the plot. They are the appropriate individuals to invite because if they are not included, it will never occur. Hand over these peace negotiations to European nations, and you will never witness peace in your lifetime. European countries primarily focus on their own interests, seeking to exploit the Middle East. Consider the current situation in Iran; they have barely spoken out because they receive substantial financial support from those in power. Have they taken the initiative to ban the IRGC? So far, they have not, as long as the money keeps flowing in, they are content to allow the regime to oppress its own citizens to maintain control. The IRGC has been designated as a terrorist organization by the USA, Canada, and recently Argentina, yet European nations remain oblivious, prioritizing financial gain. Have they ever approached China or Russia to refrain from aiding these terrorists? Never. Therefore, my argument is that Europeans are not genuinely interested in peace anywhere; they only care about receiving their money from these nasty regimes. And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace. The reason I reached out to you to clarify that your assertion regarding the invitation extended to Russia and Israel is incorrect. ....trump said Russia accepted....they didn't They are arseholes they say yes and no all the time don’t be proud of them . ...don't be insulting trumps buddies...they never said yes... They did not claim that they have not accepted, as you mentioned, did they? As I previously stated, they oscillate between affirmatives and negatives, leaving everyone in a state of uncertainty. Furthermore, it served as a caution to those who are heeding Putin's words to verify their information." ....trump said they did accept...the Russians said it was under consideration....hahaha...big mouth got caught again | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's now rabbiting on about how great he is, most if it is totally untrue. Keeps blabbing about his so called board of peace that seems to include the leaders of Russia and Isreal who are still bombing people. 11 killed in Palestinine and on the borders on Lebanon while grampa said he's stopped the isreal gaza war. Yesterday his press secretary denied he had said Iceland instead of Greenland. He said it 3 times. He's lost the plot. They are the appropriate individuals to invite because if they are not included, it will never occur. Hand over these peace negotiations to European nations, and you will never witness peace in your lifetime. European countries primarily focus on their own interests, seeking to exploit the Middle East. Consider the current situation in Iran; they have barely spoken out because they receive substantial financial support from those in power. Have they taken the initiative to ban the IRGC? So far, they have not, as long as the money keeps flowing in, they are content to allow the regime to oppress its own citizens to maintain control. The IRGC has been designated as a terrorist organization by the USA, Canada, and recently Argentina, yet European nations remain oblivious, prioritizing financial gain. Have they ever approached China or Russia to refrain from aiding these terrorists? Never. Therefore, my argument is that Europeans are not genuinely interested in peace anywhere; they only care about receiving their money from these nasty regimes. And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace. The reason I reached out to you to clarify that your assertion regarding the invitation extended to Russia and Israel is incorrect. ....trump said Russia accepted....they didn't They are arseholes they say yes and no all the time don’t be proud of them . ...don't be insulting trumps buddies...they never said yes... They did not claim that they have not accepted, as you mentioned, did they? As I previously stated, they oscillate between affirmatives and negatives, leaving everyone in a state of uncertainty. Furthermore, it served as a caution to those who are heeding Putin's words to verify their information.....trump said they did accept...the Russians said it was under consideration....hahaha...big mouth got caught again " You mentioned that Russia did not accept it, which was a commendable attempt. Please scroll up and review it, then inform me of your thoughts. Additionally, you were certainly not among them when they conversed with one another? Ha ha ha. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace." Well he’s started his own Peace Club so me must be. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace. Well he’s started his own Peace Club so me must be. " Haha. Just him and some other dictators, what could possibly go wrong. I do wonder if he's saying this simply because he can't control nato. He's like a school kid starting his own club because the educated kids won't let him be in charge of theirs. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's now rabbiting on about how great he is, most if it is totally untrue. Keeps blabbing about his so called board of peace that seems to include the leaders of Russia and Isreal who are still bombing people. 11 killed in Palestinine and on the borders on Lebanon while grampa said he's stopped the isreal gaza war. Yesterday his press secretary denied he had said Iceland instead of Greenland. He said it 3 times. He's lost the plot. They are the appropriate individuals to invite because if they are not included, it will never occur. Hand over these peace negotiations to European nations, and you will never witness peace in your lifetime. European countries primarily focus on their own interests, seeking to exploit the Middle East. Consider the current situation in Iran; they have barely spoken out because they receive substantial financial support from those in power. Have they taken the initiative to ban the IRGC? So far, they have not, as long as the money keeps flowing in, they are content to allow the regime to oppress its own citizens to maintain control. The IRGC has been designated as a terrorist organization by the USA, Canada, and recently Argentina, yet European nations remain oblivious, prioritizing financial gain. Have they ever approached China or Russia to refrain from aiding these terrorists? Never. Therefore, my argument is that Europeans are not genuinely interested in peace anywhere; they only care about receiving their money from these nasty regimes. And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace. The reason I reached out to you to clarify that your assertion regarding the invitation extended to Russia and Israel is incorrect. ....trump said Russia accepted....they didn't They are arseholes they say yes and no all the time don’t be proud of them . ...don't be insulting trumps buddies...they never said yes... They did not claim that they have not accepted, as you mentioned, did they? As I previously stated, they oscillate between affirmatives and negatives, leaving everyone in a state of uncertainty. Furthermore, it served as a caution to those who are heeding Putin's words to verify their information.....trump said they did accept...the Russians said it was under consideration....hahaha...big mouth got caught again You mentioned that Russia did not accept it, which was a commendable attempt. Please scroll up and review it, then inform me of your thoughts. Additionally, you were certainly not among them when they conversed with one another? Ha ha ha." ....I didn't have to be among them....both made public announcements...didn't you know...? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's now rabbiting on about how great he is, most if it is totally untrue. Keeps blabbing about his so called board of peace that seems to include the leaders of Russia and Isreal who are still bombing people. 11 killed in Palestinine and on the borders on Lebanon while grampa said he's stopped the isreal gaza war. Yesterday his press secretary denied he had said Iceland instead of Greenland. He said it 3 times. He's lost the plot. They are the appropriate individuals to invite because if they are not included, it will never occur. Hand over these peace negotiations to European nations, and you will never witness peace in your lifetime. European countries primarily focus on their own interests, seeking to exploit the Middle East. Consider the current situation in Iran; they have barely spoken out because they receive substantial financial support from those in power. Have they taken the initiative to ban the IRGC? So far, they have not, as long as the money keeps flowing in, they are content to allow the regime to oppress its own citizens to maintain control. The IRGC has been designated as a terrorist organization by the USA, Canada, and recently Argentina, yet European nations remain oblivious, prioritizing financial gain. Have they ever approached China or Russia to refrain from aiding these terrorists? Never. Therefore, my argument is that Europeans are not genuinely interested in peace anywhere; they only care about receiving their money from these nasty regimes. And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace. The reason I reached out to you to clarify that your assertion regarding the invitation extended to Russia and Israel is incorrect. ....trump said Russia accepted....they didn't They are arseholes they say yes and no all the time don’t be proud of them . ...don't be insulting trumps buddies...they never said yes... They did not claim that they have not accepted, as you mentioned, did they? As I previously stated, they oscillate between affirmatives and negatives, leaving everyone in a state of uncertainty. Furthermore, it served as a caution to those who are heeding Putin's words to verify their information.....trump said they did accept...the Russians said it was under consideration....hahaha...big mouth got caught again You mentioned that Russia did not accept it, which was a commendable attempt. Please scroll up and review it, then inform me of your thoughts. Additionally, you were certainly not among them when they conversed with one another? Ha ha ha.....I didn't have to be among them....both made public announcements...didn't you know...?" However, none of them expressed what you articulated? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's now rabbiting on about how great he is, most if it is totally untrue. Keeps blabbing about his so called board of peace that seems to include the leaders of Russia and Isreal who are still bombing people. 11 killed in Palestinine and on the borders on Lebanon while grampa said he's stopped the isreal gaza war. Yesterday his press secretary denied he had said Iceland instead of Greenland. He said it 3 times. He's lost the plot. They are the appropriate individuals to invite because if they are not included, it will never occur. Hand over these peace negotiations to European nations, and you will never witness peace in your lifetime. European countries primarily focus on their own interests, seeking to exploit the Middle East. Consider the current situation in Iran; they have barely spoken out because they receive substantial financial support from those in power. Have they taken the initiative to ban the IRGC? So far, they have not, as long as the money keeps flowing in, they are content to allow the regime to oppress its own citizens to maintain control. The IRGC has been designated as a terrorist organization by the USA, Canada, and recently Argentina, yet European nations remain oblivious, prioritizing financial gain. Have they ever approached China or Russia to refrain from aiding these terrorists? Never. Therefore, my argument is that Europeans are not genuinely interested in peace anywhere; they only care about receiving their money from these nasty regimes. And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace. The reason I reached out to you to clarify that your assertion regarding the invitation extended to Russia and Israel is incorrect. ....trump said Russia accepted....they didn't They are arseholes they say yes and no all the time don’t be proud of them . ...don't be insulting trumps buddies...they never said yes... They did not claim that they have not accepted, as you mentioned, did they? As I previously stated, they oscillate between affirmatives and negatives, leaving everyone in a state of uncertainty. Furthermore, it served as a caution to those who are heeding Putin's words to verify their information.....trump said they did accept...the Russians said it was under consideration....hahaha...big mouth got caught again You mentioned that Russia did not accept it, which was a commendable attempt. Please scroll up and review it, then inform me of your thoughts. Additionally, you were certainly not among them when they conversed with one another? Ha ha ha.....I didn't have to be among them....both made public announcements...didn't you know...? However, none of them expressed what you articulated?" ...they did....trump said putin accepted....the Russians said its under consideration...what's your take on it? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's now rabbiting on about how great he is, most if it is totally untrue. Keeps blabbing about his so called board of peace that seems to include the leaders of Russia and Isreal who are still bombing people. 11 killed in Palestinine and on the borders on Lebanon while grampa said he's stopped the isreal gaza war. Yesterday his press secretary denied he had said Iceland instead of Greenland. He said it 3 times. He's lost the plot. They are the appropriate individuals to invite because if they are not included, it will never occur. Hand over these peace negotiations to European nations, and you will never witness peace in your lifetime. European countries primarily focus on their own interests, seeking to exploit the Middle East. Consider the current situation in Iran; they have barely spoken out because they receive substantial financial support from those in power. Have they taken the initiative to ban the IRGC? So far, they have not, as long as the money keeps flowing in, they are content to allow the regime to oppress its own citizens to maintain control. The IRGC has been designated as a terrorist organization by the USA, Canada, and recently Argentina, yet European nations remain oblivious, prioritizing financial gain. Have they ever approached China or Russia to refrain from aiding these terrorists? Never. Therefore, my argument is that Europeans are not genuinely interested in peace anywhere; they only care about receiving their money from these nasty regimes. And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace. The reason I reached out to you to clarify that your assertion regarding the invitation extended to Russia and Israel is incorrect. ....trump said Russia accepted....they didn't They are arseholes they say yes and no all the time don’t be proud of them . ...don't be insulting trumps buddies...they never said yes... They did not claim that they have not accepted, as you mentioned, did they? As I previously stated, they oscillate between affirmatives and negatives, leaving everyone in a state of uncertainty. Furthermore, it served as a caution to those who are heeding Putin's words to verify their information.....trump said they did accept...the Russians said it was under consideration....hahaha...big mouth got caught again You mentioned that Russia did not accept it, which was a commendable attempt. Please scroll up and review it, then inform me of your thoughts. Additionally, you were certainly not among them when they conversed with one another? Ha ha ha.....I didn't have to be among them....both made public announcements...didn't you know...? However, none of them expressed what you articulated?...they did....trump said putin accepted....the Russians said its under consideration...what's your take on it?" That was not what you were saying . You were asserting that Putin reprimanded him, which is a significantly different statement to make. I am unaware of the details of the conversation and cannot provide you with that information. One of them is lying, and I suspect that in this instance, it was Putin, although I cannot be certain. Nonetheless, it is not a major issue; they may still attend. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's now rabbiting on about how great he is, most if it is totally untrue. Keeps blabbing about his so called board of peace that seems to include the leaders of Russia and Isreal who are still bombing people. 11 killed in Palestinine and on the borders on Lebanon while grampa said he's stopped the isreal gaza war. Yesterday his press secretary denied he had said Iceland instead of Greenland. He said it 3 times. He's lost the plot. They are the appropriate individuals to invite because if they are not included, it will never occur. Hand over these peace negotiations to European nations, and you will never witness peace in your lifetime. European countries primarily focus on their own interests, seeking to exploit the Middle East. Consider the current situation in Iran; they have barely spoken out because they receive substantial financial support from those in power. Have they taken the initiative to ban the IRGC? So far, they have not, as long as the money keeps flowing in, they are content to allow the regime to oppress its own citizens to maintain control. The IRGC has been designated as a terrorist organization by the USA, Canada, and recently Argentina, yet European nations remain oblivious, prioritizing financial gain. Have they ever approached China or Russia to refrain from aiding these terrorists? Never. Therefore, my argument is that Europeans are not genuinely interested in peace anywhere; they only care about receiving their money from these nasty regimes. And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace. The reason I reached out to you to clarify that your assertion regarding the invitation extended to Russia and Israel is incorrect. ....trump said Russia accepted....they didn't They are arseholes they say yes and no all the time don’t be proud of them . ...don't be insulting trumps buddies...they never said yes... They did not claim that they have not accepted, as you mentioned, did they? As I previously stated, they oscillate between affirmatives and negatives, leaving everyone in a state of uncertainty. Furthermore, it served as a caution to those who are heeding Putin's words to verify their information.....trump said they did accept...the Russians said it was under consideration....hahaha...big mouth got caught again You mentioned that Russia did not accept it, which was a commendable attempt. Please scroll up and review it, then inform me of your thoughts. Additionally, you were certainly not among them when they conversed with one another? Ha ha ha.....I didn't have to be among them....both made public announcements...didn't you know...? However, none of them expressed what you articulated?...they did....trump said putin accepted....the Russians said its under consideration...what's your take on it? That was not what you were saying . You were asserting that Putin reprimanded him, which is a significantly different statement to make. I am unaware of the details of the conversation and cannot provide you with that information. One of them is lying, and I suspect that in this instance, it was Putin, although I cannot be certain. Nonetheless, it is not a major issue; they may still attend. " ...that's not what I implied...putin made a liar out of trump...who still hasn't replied...which is telling in itself | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's now rabbiting on about how great he is, most if it is totally untrue. Keeps blabbing about his so called board of peace that seems to include the leaders of Russia and Isreal who are still bombing people. 11 killed in Palestinine and on the borders on Lebanon while grampa said he's stopped the isreal gaza war. Yesterday his press secretary denied he had said Iceland instead of Greenland. He said it 3 times. He's lost the plot. They are the appropriate individuals to invite because if they are not included, it will never occur. Hand over these peace negotiations to European nations, and you will never witness peace in your lifetime. European countries primarily focus on their own interests, seeking to exploit the Middle East. Consider the current situation in Iran; they have barely spoken out because they receive substantial financial support from those in power. Have they taken the initiative to ban the IRGC? So far, they have not, as long as the money keeps flowing in, they are content to allow the regime to oppress its own citizens to maintain control. The IRGC has been designated as a terrorist organization by the USA, Canada, and recently Argentina, yet European nations remain oblivious, prioritizing financial gain. Have they ever approached China or Russia to refrain from aiding these terrorists? Never. Therefore, my argument is that Europeans are not genuinely interested in peace anywhere; they only care about receiving their money from these nasty regimes. And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace. The reason I reached out to you to clarify that your assertion regarding the invitation extended to Russia and Israel is incorrect. ....trump said Russia accepted....they didn't They are arseholes they say yes and no all the time don’t be proud of them . ...don't be insulting trumps buddies...they never said yes... They did not claim that they have not accepted, as you mentioned, did they? As I previously stated, they oscillate between affirmatives and negatives, leaving everyone in a state of uncertainty. Furthermore, it served as a caution to those who are heeding Putin's words to verify their information.....trump said they did accept...the Russians said it was under consideration....hahaha...big mouth got caught again You mentioned that Russia did not accept it, which was a commendable attempt. Please scroll up and review it, then inform me of your thoughts. Additionally, you were certainly not among them when they conversed with one another? Ha ha ha.....I didn't have to be among them....both made public announcements...didn't you know...? However, none of them expressed what you articulated?...they did....trump said putin accepted....the Russians said its under consideration...what's your take on it? That was not what you were saying . You were asserting that Putin reprimanded him, which is a significantly different statement to make. I am unaware of the details of the conversation and cannot provide you with that information. One of them is lying, and I suspect that in this instance, it was Putin, although I cannot be certain. Nonetheless, it is not a major issue; they may still attend. ...that's not what I implied...putin made a liar out of trump...who still hasn't replied...which is telling in itself " Are you implying that I am unable to comprehend what you have previously written for us? 😄 If Putin does not attend, which is a possibility, it would not alter the fact that he is a significant liar. I have no trust in him whatsoever. I believe Trump was speaking the truth, although I am not entirely certain. This is my perspective. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's now rabbiting on about how great he is, most if it is totally untrue. Keeps blabbing about his so called board of peace that seems to include the leaders of Russia and Isreal who are still bombing people. 11 killed in Palestinine and on the borders on Lebanon while grampa said he's stopped the isreal gaza war. Yesterday his press secretary denied he had said Iceland instead of Greenland. He said it 3 times. He's lost the plot. They are the appropriate individuals to invite because if they are not included, it will never occur. Hand over these peace negotiations to European nations, and you will never witness peace in your lifetime. European countries primarily focus on their own interests, seeking to exploit the Middle East. Consider the current situation in Iran; they have barely spoken out because they receive substantial financial support from those in power. Have they taken the initiative to ban the IRGC? So far, they have not, as long as the money keeps flowing in, they are content to allow the regime to oppress its own citizens to maintain control. The IRGC has been designated as a terrorist organization by the USA, Canada, and recently Argentina, yet European nations remain oblivious, prioritizing financial gain. Have they ever approached China or Russia to refrain from aiding these terrorists? Never. Therefore, my argument is that Europeans are not genuinely interested in peace anywhere; they only care about receiving their money from these nasty regimes. And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace. The reason I reached out to you to clarify that your assertion regarding the invitation extended to Russia and Israel is incorrect. ....trump said Russia accepted....they didn't They are arseholes they say yes and no all the time don’t be proud of them . ...don't be insulting trumps buddies...they never said yes... They did not claim that they have not accepted, as you mentioned, did they? As I previously stated, they oscillate between affirmatives and negatives, leaving everyone in a state of uncertainty. Furthermore, it served as a caution to those who are heeding Putin's words to verify their information.....trump said they did accept...the Russians said it was under consideration....hahaha...big mouth got caught again You mentioned that Russia did not accept it, which was a commendable attempt. Please scroll up and review it, then inform me of your thoughts. Additionally, you were certainly not among them when they conversed with one another? Ha ha ha.....I didn't have to be among them....both made public announcements...didn't you know...? However, none of them expressed what you articulated?...they did....trump said putin accepted....the Russians said its under consideration...what's your take on it? That was not what you were saying . You were asserting that Putin reprimanded him, which is a significantly different statement to make. I am unaware of the details of the conversation and cannot provide you with that information. One of them is lying, and I suspect that in this instance, it was Putin, although I cannot be certain. Nonetheless, it is not a major issue; they may still attend. ...that's not what I implied...putin made a liar out of trump...who still hasn't replied...which is telling in itself Are you implying that I am unable to comprehend what you have previously written for us? 😄 If Putin does not attend, which is a possibility, it would not alter the fact that he is a significant liar. I have no trust in him whatsoever. I believe Trump was speaking the truth, although I am not entirely certain. This is my perspective." ....trump is a proven liar....I admire your slavish devotion to the dear leader....and I agree putin is a liar...but trump is streets ahead.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's now rabbiting on about how great he is, most if it is totally untrue. Keeps blabbing about his so called board of peace that seems to include the leaders of Russia and Isreal who are still bombing people. 11 killed in Palestinine and on the borders on Lebanon while grampa said he's stopped the isreal gaza war. Yesterday his press secretary denied he had said Iceland instead of Greenland. He said it 3 times. He's lost the plot. They are the appropriate individuals to invite because if they are not included, it will never occur. Hand over these peace negotiations to European nations, and you will never witness peace in your lifetime. European countries primarily focus on their own interests, seeking to exploit the Middle East. Consider the current situation in Iran; they have barely spoken out because they receive substantial financial support from those in power. Have they taken the initiative to ban the IRGC? So far, they have not, as long as the money keeps flowing in, they are content to allow the regime to oppress its own citizens to maintain control. The IRGC has been designated as a terrorist organization by the USA, Canada, and recently Argentina, yet European nations remain oblivious, prioritizing financial gain. Have they ever approached China or Russia to refrain from aiding these terrorists? Never. Therefore, my argument is that Europeans are not genuinely interested in peace anywhere; they only care about receiving their money from these nasty regimes. And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace. The reason I reached out to you to clarify that your assertion regarding the invitation extended to Russia and Israel is incorrect. ....trump said Russia accepted....they didn't They are arseholes they say yes and no all the time don’t be proud of them . ...don't be insulting trumps buddies...they never said yes... They did not claim that they have not accepted, as you mentioned, did they? As I previously stated, they oscillate between affirmatives and negatives, leaving everyone in a state of uncertainty. Furthermore, it served as a caution to those who are heeding Putin's words to verify their information.....trump said they did accept...the Russians said it was under consideration....hahaha...big mouth got caught again You mentioned that Russia did not accept it, which was a commendable attempt. Please scroll up and review it, then inform me of your thoughts. Additionally, you were certainly not among them when they conversed with one another? Ha ha ha.....I didn't have to be among them....both made public announcements...didn't you know...? However, none of them expressed what you articulated?...they did....trump said putin accepted....the Russians said its under consideration...what's your take on it? That was not what you were saying . You were asserting that Putin reprimanded him, which is a significantly different statement to make. I am unaware of the details of the conversation and cannot provide you with that information. One of them is lying, and I suspect that in this instance, it was Putin, although I cannot be certain. Nonetheless, it is not a major issue; they may still attend. ...that's not what I implied...putin made a liar out of trump...who still hasn't replied...which is telling in itself Are you implying that I am unable to comprehend what you have previously written for us? 😄 If Putin does not attend, which is a possibility, it would not alter the fact that he is a significant liar. I have no trust in him whatsoever. I believe Trump was speaking the truth, although I am not entirely certain. This is my perspective.....trump is a proven liar....I admire your slavish devotion to the dear leader....and I agree putin is a liar...but trump is streets ahead.." Ha ha ha say something different that might engage me | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I’m wondering if he will be a lame duck president after the mid term elections. " I suspect he already is, especially after his appalling performance in Davos yesterday. He has always been a deranged half-witt, but yesterday he clearly demonstrated his lunacy to the entire world. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He's now rabbiting on about how great he is, most if it is totally untrue. Keeps blabbing about his so called board of peace that seems to include the leaders of Russia and Isreal who are still bombing people. 11 killed in Palestinine and on the borders on Lebanon while grampa said he's stopped the isreal gaza war. Yesterday his press secretary denied he had said Iceland instead of Greenland. He said it 3 times. He's lost the plot. They are the appropriate individuals to invite because if they are not included, it will never occur. Hand over these peace negotiations to European nations, and you will never witness peace in your lifetime. European countries primarily focus on their own interests, seeking to exploit the Middle East. Consider the current situation in Iran; they have barely spoken out because they receive substantial financial support from those in power. Have they taken the initiative to ban the IRGC? So far, they have not, as long as the money keeps flowing in, they are content to allow the regime to oppress its own citizens to maintain control. The IRGC has been designated as a terrorist organization by the USA, Canada, and recently Argentina, yet European nations remain oblivious, prioritizing financial gain. Have they ever approached China or Russia to refrain from aiding these terrorists? Never. Therefore, my argument is that Europeans are not genuinely interested in peace anywhere; they only care about receiving their money from these nasty regimes. And trump who threatened to use force in Greenland? Is that a man who wants peace. The reason I reached out to you to clarify that your assertion regarding the invitation extended to Russia and Israel is incorrect. ....trump said Russia accepted....they didn't They are arseholes they say yes and no all the time don’t be proud of them . ...don't be insulting trumps buddies...they never said yes... They did not claim that they have not accepted, as you mentioned, did they? As I previously stated, they oscillate between affirmatives and negatives, leaving everyone in a state of uncertainty. Furthermore, it served as a caution to those who are heeding Putin's words to verify their information.....trump said they did accept...the Russians said it was under consideration....hahaha...big mouth got caught again You mentioned that Russia did not accept it, which was a commendable attempt. Please scroll up and review it, then inform me of your thoughts. Additionally, you were certainly not among them when they conversed with one another? Ha ha ha.....I didn't have to be among them....both made public announcements...didn't you know...? However, none of them expressed what you articulated?...they did....trump said putin accepted....the Russians said its under consideration...what's your take on it? That was not what you were saying . You were asserting that Putin reprimanded him, which is a significantly different statement to make. I am unaware of the details of the conversation and cannot provide you with that information. One of them is lying, and I suspect that in this instance, it was Putin, although I cannot be certain. Nonetheless, it is not a major issue; they may still attend. ...that's not what I implied...putin made a liar out of trump...who still hasn't replied...which is telling in itself Are you implying that I am unable to comprehend what you have previously written for us? 😄 If Putin does not attend, which is a possibility, it would not alter the fact that he is a significant liar. I have no trust in him whatsoever. I believe Trump was speaking the truth, although I am not entirely certain. This is my perspective.....trump is a proven liar....I admire your slavish devotion to the dear leader....and I agree putin is a liar...but trump is streets ahead.. Ha ha ha say something different that might engage me " .....he just called into question the courage of British troops...?....are you OK with that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Daddy Trump sure knows how to kick up a storm ... He's got some sensitive souls positively frothing at the mouth and screaming their lungs out. " ...is he your daddy too...?  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people " They live amongst us..fucking idiots...everywhere | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is better than that Cxxt Biden in the show with his granddaughter, widd as h we had someone like trump running this country, looking after it’s own people He might do something about education and literacy. " If he had any himself, and knew what they are. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Daddy Trump sure knows how to kick up a storm ... He's got some sensitive souls positively frothing at the mouth and screaming their lungs out. ...is he your daddy too...? "No ... But then again, I'm not the NATO Secretary-General | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Daddy Trump sure knows how to kick up a storm ... He's got some sensitive souls positively frothing at the mouth and screaming their lungs out. " I love it when the woke lefties scream with their faux outrage.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It appears to be the opinion of the vast majority responding to the OP that the criminal in question is indeed a convicted fraudster, a r-pest, draft dodger, mass murderer and almost certainly a phedophile (we await the Epsilon files), not to mention his endless string of lies. This can all be proven so can we not simply accept that this individual is a disgusting example of humanity?" #Release-The-Epsilon-Files! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Daddy Trump sure knows how to kick up a storm ... He's got some sensitive souls positively frothing at the mouth and screaming their lungs out. I love it when the woke lefties scream with their faux outrage.." Ah, the classic 'woke' slur. As if that's meant to be an insult. I'd rather be woke than a GB News watching slob. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Daddy Trump sure knows how to kick up a storm ... He's got some sensitive souls positively frothing at the mouth and screaming their lungs out. I love it when the woke lefties scream with their faux outrage.. Ah, the classic 'woke' slur. As if that's meant to be an insult. I'd rather be woke than a GB News watching slob. " What was GB News's take on the Davos drama? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| back to top |  |
