FabGuys.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Government served with legal papers

Jump to newest
 

By *achaelH OP   TV/TS
2 weeks ago

Bosworth

Councils Delaying Elections

Reforms Judicial Review will be heard on the 19th and 20th of February.

The judge gave the government until the 16th of February to file their defence.

We have also served legal papers to all 63 councils in question.

Only question is can Reform make sure a liebour woke judge doesn't get appointed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *achaelH OP   TV/TS
2 weeks ago

Bosworth

Errrm makes no difference whether they applied to government or not many areas are up in arms because a council has made this decision against what the electorate want.

The councils are meant to represent the constituents not their own opinion or political allegiance.

Thats where the legal argument starts.

The speaker also advised against delaying the elections.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ubfordom-travellingMan
2 weeks ago

south wales and south west


"Errrm makes no difference whether they applied to government or not many areas are up in arms because a council has made this decision against what the electorate want.

The councils are meant to represent the constituents not their own opinion or political allegiance.

Thats where the legal argument starts.

The speaker also advised against delaying the elections."

And all that waffle is irrelevant. Why do you sycophants want to cost the authorities so much money? Why do you want double elections? Why can't you use the 1 brain cell you share amongst yourselves to understand THEY ARE DELAYED BECAUSE THE ELECTORAL MAPS ARE BEING REDRAWN.

Wasting government resources, vital funds, time and energy fighting yet another made up boogey man by that charlatan frog faced fuckwomble.

It's degenerate, sickening, wasteful and downright pathetic that anyone would be in support of the new tory party let alone someone who'd strip you of your right to be a homosexual as quickly as he has a wank in the morning.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iPantiesMan
2 weeks ago

Louth

Charlatan frog faced fuckwomble is the best description ive heard of snake oil salesman and grifter in chief ever

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ubfordom-travellingMan
2 weeks ago

south wales and south west


"Charlatan frog faced fuckwomble is the best description ive heard of snake oil salesman and grifter in chief ever "

Thanks

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rancd2TV/TS
2 weeks ago

Wolverhampton

Local councils are as bad as government. Put reform in instead of who you have now. They will just cut services and line their own pockets with the proceeds, just like the councillors before them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ubfordom-travellingMan
2 weeks ago

south wales and south west


"Local councils are as bad as government. Put reform in instead of who you have now. They will just cut services and line their own pockets with the proceeds, just like the councillors before them."

Exactly. Let reform come in and hike your council tax to the highest level possible (despite promising cuts) and then cut all your services. Though the one brain cell shared amongst the retory supporters doesn't recognise how badly they're doing in the councils they already run

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aremanMan
2 weeks ago

Norwich area

It's absurd that a delay is required, and it seems not to have been required by most authorities, including the largest. It's just a matter of deep regret that the situation was not effectively prevented from arising before it got to the point where a Labour government decided to suspend local democracy for a year.

It was an open goal, enabling Reform to assert its public (but false) claim to democratic values. Who needs a stick to beat Labour when it so reliably provides its own?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ildwestheroMan
2 weeks ago

Llandrindod Wells


"Charlatan frog faced fuckwomble is the best description ive heard of snake oil salesman and grifter in chief ever "

Excellent description of the vile creature

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nimaAnimusMan
2 weeks ago

I am NOT in

So 'cost cutting' Reform believe wasting money on holding elections for small District/Borough/City Councils that are not going to exist when merged into more cost effective Unitary Authorities is wrong, so have initiated action that will be costly to the government and local taxpayer !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ubfordom-travellingMan
2 weeks ago

south wales and south west


" It's absurd that a delay is required, and it seems not to have been required by most authorities, including the largest. It's just a matter of deep regret that the situation was not effectively prevented from arising before it got to the point where a Labour government decided to suspend local democracy for a year.

It was an open goal, enabling Reform to assert its public (but false) claim to democratic values. Who needs a stick to beat Labour when it so reliably provides its own?"

And here arrives the one sharing the singular brain cell.

Why are you sycophants so determined to waste such vast sums of money?!?!?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aremanMan
2 weeks ago

Norwich area


"So 'cost cutting' Reform believe wasting money on holding elections for small District/Borough/City Councils that are not going to exist when merged into more cost effective Unitary Authorities is wrong, so have initiated action that will be costly to the government and local taxpayer !"

But will they be more cost-effective?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj9wxnlnrxdo

Looks like Rayner's back-of-fag-packet calculations don't hold up...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ubfordom-travellingMan
2 weeks ago

south wales and south west


"So 'cost cutting' Reform believe wasting money on holding elections for small District/Borough/City Councils that are not going to exist when merged into more cost effective Unitary Authorities is wrong, so have initiated action that will be costly to the government and local taxpayer !

But will they be more cost-effective?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj9wxnlnrxdo

Looks like Rayner's back-of-fag-packet calculations don't hold up..."

More cost effective that some frivolous attempt at creating yet another boogey man for the knuckle draggers to get over excited about

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hyna HutchMan
2 weeks ago

valleys

Ghaaaaaah 😠 ..... Muffin me!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aremanMan
2 weeks ago

Norwich area


"

And here arrives the one sharing the singular brain cell.

Why are you sycophants so determined to waste such vast sums of money?!?!?"

Sycophant? To whom? Explain yourself. What vast sums of money? The cost savings claimed for this measure are more than debatable.

Issues, please, not inaccurately perceived personalities. Thank you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *yleLMan
2 weeks ago

Burnley


"Errrm makes no difference whether they applied to government or not many areas are up in arms because a council has made this decision against what the electorate want.

The councils are meant to represent the constituents not their own opinion or political allegiance.

Thats where the legal argument starts.

The speaker also advised against delaying the elections.

And all that waffle is irrelevant. Why do you sycophants want to cost the authorities so much money? Why do you want double elections? Why can't you use the 1 brain cell you share amongst yourselves to understand THEY ARE DELAYED BECAUSE THE ELECTORAL MAPS ARE BEING REDRAWN.

Wasting government resources, vital funds, time and energy fighting yet another made up boogey man by that charlatan frog faced fuckwomble.

It's degenerate, sickening, wasteful and downright pathetic that anyone would be in support of the new tory party let alone someone who'd strip you of your right to be a homosexual as quickly as he has a wank in the morning. "

Keep on spouting the party line like the good little liebour sycophant you clearly are.

There is no, absolutely no excuse for denying democracy its due process, except in time of war, and even then it gets a fair crack of the whip.

The only "sycophant" in your posts is clearly you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ildwestheroMan
2 weeks ago

Llandrindod Wells


"So 'cost cutting' Reform believe wasting money on holding elections for small District/Borough/City Councils that are not going to exist when merged into more cost effective Unitary Authorities is wrong, so have initiated action that will be costly to the government and local taxpayer !"

Quite interesting that council areas run by 'cost cutting' Reform are all facing higher council tax increases than other areas. Must be to pay for the solid gold larger than life sized statues of Nigel Farage they are going to erect in every town square.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ubfordom-travellingMan
2 weeks ago

south wales and south west


"

And here arrives the one sharing the singular brain cell.

Why are you sycophants so determined to waste such vast sums of money?!?!?

Sycophant? To whom? Explain yourself. What vast sums of money? The cost savings claimed for this measure are more than debatable.

Issues, please, not inaccurately perceived personalities. Thank you."

You especially are a sycophant to Nigey boy, as proven by your hundreds of posts defending his ridiculous tactics.

In regards to this particular issue, the local authorities have made a decision. It has nothing to do with central government. It is the elected officials in those areas carrying out a redrawing of electoral maps which they, as the servers of the population have decided is best for the constituents they serve as a majority. That is democratically elected officials, carrying out the role that they were voted to do.

The frogfaced fuckwomble should not be interfering in or making a national issue out of something that is locally administered. This pathetic, trump trumpeting frivolous "legal serving" is nothing more than another distraction technique.

It will have zero effect on the nation other than additional and increased costs paying lawyers and barristers to represent both sides. That is where the cost is unimaginable in times where cuts and austerity is still happening.

There is zero justification, zero adverse effect on democracy and zero legal reasoning to challenge the government of the day on a decision that only affects local authorities.

There is no debate other than why in the world people are falling for such ridiculousness in such droves.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ubfordom-travellingMan
2 weeks ago

south wales and south west


"Errrm makes no difference whether they applied to government or not many areas are up in arms because a council has made this decision against what the electorate want.

The councils are meant to represent the constituents not their own opinion or political allegiance.

Thats where the legal argument starts.

The speaker also advised against delaying the elections.

And all that waffle is irrelevant. Why do you sycophants want to cost the authorities so much money? Why do you want double elections? Why can't you use the 1 brain cell you share amongst yourselves to understand THEY ARE DELAYED BECAUSE THE ELECTORAL MAPS ARE BEING REDRAWN.

Wasting government resources, vital funds, time and energy fighting yet another made up boogey man by that charlatan frog faced fuckwomble.

It's degenerate, sickening, wasteful and downright pathetic that anyone would be in support of the new tory party let alone someone who'd strip you of your right to be a homosexual as quickly as he has a wank in the morning.

Keep on spouting the party line like the good little liebour sycophant you clearly are.

There is no, absolutely no excuse for denying democracy its due process, except in time of war, and even then it gets a fair crack of the whip.

The only "sycophant" in your posts is clearly you."

Keep using your little buzzwords, your frog faced fuckwomble loves to see it. Nobody is being denied democracy and the fact you think it is, clearly shows how the one brain cell shared amongst your sycophantic types is used so poorly.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eedfeedingMan
2 weeks ago

Taunton

And all because the lady likes Milk tray

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *egetiusMan
2 weeks ago

Yorkshire


"Errrm makes no difference whether they applied to government or not many areas are up in arms because a council has made this decision against what the electorate want.

The councils are meant to represent the constituents not their own opinion or political allegiance.

Thats where the legal argument starts.

The speaker also advised against delaying the elections.

And all that waffle is irrelevant. Why do you sycophants want to cost the authorities so much money? Why do you want double elections? Why can't you use the 1 brain cell you share amongst yourselves to understand THEY ARE DELAYED BECAUSE THE ELECTORAL MAPS ARE BEING REDRAWN.

Wasting government resources, vital funds, time and energy fighting yet another made up boogey man by that charlatan frog faced fuckwomble.

It's degenerate, sickening, wasteful and downright pathetic that anyone would be in support of the new tory party let alone someone who'd strip you of your right to be a homosexual as quickly as he has a wank in the morning. "

/\ This

There is a legitimate reason to delay (not ‘cancel’) the affected local elections. Going ahead before the changes come into force would be a massive waste of our money.

Those complaining should maybe ask why the government and Electoral Commission haven’t got this sorted sooner.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ubfordom-travellingMan
2 weeks ago

south wales and south west


"Errrm makes no difference whether they applied to government or not many areas are up in arms because a council has made this decision against what the electorate want.

The councils are meant to represent the constituents not their own opinion or political allegiance.

Thats where the legal argument starts.

The speaker also advised against delaying the elections.

And all that waffle is irrelevant. Why do you sycophants want to cost the authorities so much money? Why do you want double elections? Why can't you use the 1 brain cell you share amongst yourselves to understand THEY ARE DELAYED BECAUSE THE ELECTORAL MAPS ARE BEING REDRAWN.

Wasting government resources, vital funds, time and energy fighting yet another made up boogey man by that charlatan frog faced fuckwomble.

It's degenerate, sickening, wasteful and downright pathetic that anyone would be in support of the new tory party let alone someone who'd strip you of your right to be a homosexual as quickly as he has a wank in the morning.

/\ This

There is a legitimate reason to delay (not ‘cancel’) the affected local elections. Going ahead before the changes come into force would be a massive waste of our money.

Those complaining should maybe ask why the government and Electoral Commission haven’t got this sorted sooner."

Absolutely. The simple fact is this process takes a while, because it's a democracy. They make sure that everyone is represented as best as possible which is subject to hundreds of objections which each needs to be investigated and corrected or removed. It's not a heres a map, happy days situation.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *espectdueMan
2 weeks ago

Stratford-Upon-Avon


"

And here arrives the one sharing the singular brain cell.

Why are you sycophants so determined to waste such vast sums of money?!?!?

Sycophant? To whom? Explain yourself. What vast sums of money? The cost savings claimed for this measure are more than debatable.

Issues, please, not inaccurately perceived personalities. Thank you."

That guy is giving you all the facts, its not his fault you don't understand because you believe what farage and his happy band of loosers claim.

As far as farage and democracy, he was calling for a general election within a year of the last one, only to keep his horrid face in the headlines.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *trongbumMan
2 weeks ago

Norwich

Another example of people who are factually part of a minority group (by virtue of being on this site, and especially so if you’re TV/TS/CD) who are anti-woke?? Until not long ago everyone on this site would have had fewer rights than straight people and faced far more social stigma. As a result, loads of people kept their sexuality a secret or were in denial and let’s face it, a good number ended their own lives.

Social justice (or woke if you want to use the rubbish word for it) is being pro equal rights, equal opportunity and equal entitlements regardless of characteristics out of your control. Being anti-woke is literally being pro-discrimination and as a minority, you’ll be in the crosshairs.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ubfordom-travellingMan
2 weeks ago

south wales and south west


"Another example of people who are factually part of a minority group (by virtue of being on this site, and especially so if you’re TV/TS/CD) who are anti-woke?? Until not long ago everyone on this site would have had fewer rights than straight people and faced far more social stigma. As a result, loads of people kept their sexuality a secret or were in denial and let’s face it, a good number ended their own lives.

Social justice (or woke if you want to use the rubbish word for it) is being pro equal rights, equal opportunity and equal entitlements regardless of characteristics out of your control. Being anti-woke is literally being pro-discrimination and as a minority, you’ll be in the crosshairs."

Exactly this. Woke is just a buzzword used by those who manipulate and try to control those who are weak minded and lack critical thinking skills. Sadly it appears to have worked well.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *astersteve906Man
2 weeks ago

Near Lutterworth


"😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Ya'll will fall fall anything, the defence will be "the local authorities requested a delay and were granted a delay"

The fact you sycophantic lunatics can't understand basic facts is not unexpected but deeply disappointing"

Well said

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onywants2Man
2 weeks ago

bispham

Don’t pay council tax, I’ve not paid for three years, it’s a scam , no contract as been signed,bills of exchange act 1862, if there is no contract there is no bill to pay

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ubfordom-travellingMan
2 weeks ago

south wales and south west


"Don’t pay council tax, I’ve not paid for three years, it’s a scam , no contract as been signed,bills of exchange act 1862, if there is no contract there is no bill to pay"

You're gonna end up in prison still claiming this ridiculousness.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ildwestheroMan
2 weeks ago

Llandrindod Wells

As usual Herr Farage is being very sparing with the truth. He overlooks the reason why these elections are being delayed and just makes out that the government--whom I an loathe to defend--are running scared of his tawdry party or trying to abolish democracy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aremanMan
2 weeks ago

Norwich area


"

And here arrives the one sharing the singular brain cell.

Why are you sycophants so determined to waste such vast sums of money?!?!?

Sycophant? To whom? Explain yourself. What vast sums of money? The cost savings claimed for this measure are more than debatable.

Issues, please, not inaccurately perceived personalities. Thank you.

That guy is giving you all the facts, its not his fault you don't understand because you believe what farage and his happy band of loosers claim.

As far as farage and democracy, he was calling for a general election within a year of the last one, only to keep his horrid face in the headlines."

You again? What facts? I cited a BBC report suggesting with sources that the local government rearrangement would not be cost effective as claimed.

And in an earlier post I acknowledged that Reform's claim to democracy was , in my words, "false". You didn't read it, did you? Never assume, check!

You're a troll. A real Labour supporter wouldn't be trying, and succeeding, in alienating a potential voter.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *espectdueMan
2 weeks ago

Stratford-Upon-Avon


"

And here arrives the one sharing the singular brain cell.

Why are you sycophants so determined to waste such vast sums of money?!?!?

Sycophant? To whom? Explain yourself. What vast sums of money? The cost savings claimed for this measure are more than debatable.

Issues, please, not inaccurately perceived personalities. Thank you.

That guy is giving you all the facts, its not his fault you don't understand because you believe what farage and his happy band of loosers claim.

As far as farage and democracy, he was calling for a general election within a year of the last one, only to keep his horrid face in the headlines.

You again? What facts? I cited a BBC report suggesting with sources that the local government rearrangement would not be cost effective as claimed.

And in an earlier post I acknowledged that Reform's claim to democracy was , in my words, "false". You didn't read it, did you? Never assume, check!

You're a troll. A real Labour supporter wouldn't be trying, and succeeding, in alienating a potential voter.

"

I have an opinion, just the same as you do in a public forum.

Its your choice who you vote for, nothing to do with me.

Be a bit weird if you choose who to vote for because of a random bloke on a forum.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andomguy321Man
2 weeks ago

reading

Cancelled elections, proposed cancellation of jury trials, increased taxation, arrest and prison for making comments on social media, all under the watch of Comrade Starmer and his Labour stormtroopers.

On the plus side, our steadfastly unyielding PM is about to roll out free school breakfasts for all Ukrainian rent boys.

Swings & roundabaouts eh.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aremanMan
2 weeks ago

Norwich area


"...I have an opinion, just the same as you do in a public forum.

Its your choice who you vote for, nothing to do with me.

Be a bit weird if you choose who to vote for because of a random bloke on a forum. "

There is a difference between opinion and stating that a poster supports something he doesn't support.

Yes, it's my choice. And you are attacking me for holding it. No use backing off now: you've established your troll status.

And, of course, I wouldn't allow a troll to influence my vote, so go and bark at someone else.

Troll.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *awihMan
2 weeks ago

Aldershot


"Errrm makes no difference whether they applied to government or not many areas are up in arms because a council has made this decision against what the electorate want.

The councils are meant to represent the constituents not their own opinion or political allegiance.

Thats where the legal argument starts.

The speaker also advised against delaying the elections.

And all that waffle is irrelevant. Why do you sycophants want to cost the authorities so much money? Why do you want double elections? Why can't you use the 1 brain cell you share amongst yourselves to understand THEY ARE DELAYED BECAUSE THE ELECTORAL MAPS ARE BEING REDRAWN.

Wasting government resources, vital funds, time and energy fighting yet another made up boogey man by that charlatan frog faced fuckwomble.

It's degenerate, sickening, wasteful and downright pathetic that anyone would be in support of the new tory party let alone someone who'd strip you of your right to be a homosexual as quickly as he has a wank in the morning. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *awihMan
2 weeks ago

Aldershot


"Councils Delaying Elections

Reforms Judicial Review will be heard on the 19th and 20th of February.

The judge gave the government until the 16th of February to file their defence.

We have also served legal papers to all 63 councils in question.

Only question is can Reform make sure a liebour woke judge doesn't get appointed.

"

👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atureTransTV/TS
2 weeks ago

Waterlooville

Only 29 of the 63 councils have asked for a postponement.

There is a Technical issue, the councilors are voted in as representatives of thier wards. Ward boundaries are also been changed, I doubt if it will be all wards but those that will be changed may be enough to make an election null and void.

And as many have said it would e a waste of money.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arridMan
2 weeks ago

Brighton

I’m surprised at some on the forums whom I thought were aggressively right wing conservatives are not Reform supporters. I may have been wrong about them. I thought they would have welcomed the even more extreme views. I’m glad there’s a strong middle ground. Reform haven’t reformed anything, just absorbed conservative MPs.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arridMan
2 weeks ago

Brighton


"Cancelled elections, proposed cancellation of jury trials, increased taxation, arrest and prison for making comments on social media, all under the watch of Comrade Starmer and his Labour stormtroopers.

On the plus side, our steadfastly unyielding PM is about to roll out free school breakfasts for all Ukrainian rent boys.

Swings & roundabaouts eh. "

If the conservatives hadn’t been so shit at the job, Labour wouldn’t have been voted in with a huge majority. Why shouldn’t all kids get free school breakfasts? Maslows Hierarchy of Need clearly shows kids learn better when they are not hungry.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *espectdueMan
2 weeks ago

Stratford-Upon-Avon


"...I have an opinion, just the same as you do in a public forum.

Its your choice who you vote for, nothing to do with me.

Be a bit weird if you choose who to vote for because of a random bloke on a forum.

There is a difference between opinion and stating that a poster supports something he doesn't support.

Yes, it's my choice. And you are attacking me for holding it. No use backing off now: you've established your troll status.

And, of course, I wouldn't allow a troll to influence my vote, so go and bark at someone else.

Troll.

Oh bless.

I disagree. With you and many others, its called a discussion.

Don't want other opinios, don't give yours. Simple.

If you are not a farage supporter, good for you (in my view). You could have simply said I'm not one of his supporters rather than throwing your toys around..

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aremanMan
2 weeks ago

Norwich area


"I’m surprised at some on the forums whom I thought were aggressively right wing conservatives are not Reform supporters. I may have been wrong about them. I thought they would have welcomed the even more extreme views. I’m glad there’s a strong middle ground. Reform haven’t reformed anything, just absorbed conservative MPs. "

At last, someone is able to triumph over blind prejudice and the need of some to propagandise. Thank you.

For the record, and in agreement with your post, I am (according to the prejudice of the beholder)

1. Far right because I want to stop illegal immigration.

1a This apparently makes me a racist, because colonial oppression, BLM etc.

2. Far left because I agree the Palestinians have been treated abominably by Israel, and continue to be.

2b This apparently makes me an antisemite because holocaust, and by association of ideas, a N@z1 (see 1 above). Paradoxical, eh?

3. In favour of radical reform of the country's governance and institutions

4. Not in favour of Nigel Farage.

Hope that clarifies the matter.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arridMan
2 weeks ago

Brighton


" It's absurd that a delay is required, and it seems not to have been required by most authorities, including the largest. It's just a matter of deep regret that the situation was not effectively prevented from arising before it got to the point where a Labour government decided to suspend local democracy for a year.

It was an open goal, enabling Reform to assert its public (but false) claim to democratic values. Who needs a stick to beat Labour when it so reliably provides its own?"

You’re not entirely correct. It wasn’t the Labour government who decided to suspend local democracy for a year, they gave local authorities the option, and some have taken up the offer, of which some are conservative led, to make the decision.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arridMan
2 weeks ago

Brighton


"Don’t pay council tax, I’ve not paid for three years, it’s a scam , no contract as been signed,bills of exchange act 1862, if there is no contract there is no bill to pay"

Here you go….

Council Tax must be paid because Parliament enacted laws (Local Government Finance Act 1992 and associated regulations) that make it compulsory. 

You cannot avoid paying it by citing the Bills of Exchange Act (whether 1862 or 1882) — that law governs negotiable financial instruments, not statutory taxes. 

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andomguy321Man
2 weeks ago

reading


"Cancelled elections, proposed cancellation of jury trials, increased taxation, arrest and prison for making comments on social media, all under the watch of Comrade Starmer and his Labour stormtroopers.

On the plus side, our steadfastly unyielding PM is about to roll out free school breakfasts for all Ukrainian rent boys.

Swings & roundabaouts eh.

If the conservatives hadn’t been so shit at the job, Labour wouldn’t have been voted in with a huge majority. Why shouldn’t all kids get free school breakfasts? Maslows Hierarchy of Need clearly shows kids learn better when they are not hungry. "

But why should hard-working UK taxpayers pay for free school breakfasts for Ukrainian rentboys? Starmer needs to do another U-turn on this one.

And Abraham Maslow wasn't a scientist or an economist... His stance on the dietary requirements of Ukrainian rentboys has sadly been lost in the mists of time.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hiny jacket loverMan
2 weeks ago

Carlisle

sounds like another labour voter that is happy our country being taken over by a dictator, what is wasting our money like most of the councils, im so glad you can afford to live, not like the rest of us, we all know its cos he knows they will all be voted out by Reform, stop talking about 2 elections,

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *b_slutMan
2 weeks ago

Nortwich Sauna


"Another example of people who are factually part of a minority group (by virtue of being on this site, and especially so if you’re TV/TS/CD) who are anti-woke?? Until not long ago everyone on this site would have had fewer rights than straight people and faced far more social stigma. As a result, loads of people kept their sexuality a secret or were in denial and let’s face it, a good number ended their own lives.

Social justice (or woke if you want to use the rubbish word for it) is being pro equal rights, equal opportunity and equal entitlements regardless of characteristics out of your control. Being anti-woke is literally being pro-discrimination and as a minority, you’ll be in the crosshairs."

but they're hiding in heterosexual marriages, joining in all the bigoted 'banter' as cover for their craven life, so they"ll be alright jack

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *espectdueMan
2 weeks ago

Stratford-Upon-Avon


"I’m surprised at some on the forums whom I thought were aggressively right wing conservatives are not Reform supporters. I may have been wrong about them. I thought they would have welcomed the even more extreme views. I’m glad there’s a strong middle ground. Reform haven’t reformed anything, just absorbed conservative MPs.

At last, someone is able to triumph over blind prejudice and the need of some to propagandise. Thank you.

For the record, and in agreement with your post, I am (according to the prejudice of the beholder)

1. Far right because I want to stop illegal immigration.

1a This apparently makes me a racist, because colonial oppression, BLM etc.

2. Far left because I agree the Palestinians have been treated abominably by Israel, and continue to be.

2b This apparently makes me an antisemite because holocaust, and by association of ideas, a N@z1 (see 1 above). Paradoxical, eh?

3. In favour of radical reform of the country's governance and institutions

4. Not in favour of Nigel Farage.

Hope that clarifies the matter.

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *idingcockMan
2 weeks ago

Driffield

Why all this opprobrium for Ukrainian sex workers? And if they’re eligible for free school meals then it’s child abuse anyway!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *om_essexMan
2 weeks ago

Chelmsford


"

And here arrives the one sharing the singular brain cell.

Why are you sycophants so determined to waste such vast sums of money?!?!?

Sycophant? To whom? Explain yourself. What vast sums of money? The cost savings claimed for this measure are more than debatable.

Issues, please, not inaccurately perceived personalities. Thank you.

That guy is giving you all the facts, its not his fault you don't understand because you believe what farage and his happy band of loosers claim.

As far as farage and democracy, he was calling for a general election within a year of the last one, only to keep his horrid face in the headlines.

You again? What facts? I cited a BBC report suggesting with sources that the local government rearrangement would not be cost effective as claimed.

And in an earlier post I acknowledged that Reform's claim to democracy was , in my words, "false". You didn't read it, did you? Never assume, check!

You're a troll. A real Labour supporter wouldn't be trying, and succeeding, in alienating a potential voter.

I have an opinion, just the same as you do in a public forum.

Its your choice who you vote for, nothing to do with me.

Be a bit weird if you choose who to vote for because of a random bloke on a forum. "

Wwll I am voting Reform just to piss you off

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *xtraoneMan
2 weeks ago

Gloucester

If Reform loose the court case will they appeal it to the ECHR.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aughty7Man
2 weeks ago

Halesowen


"Errrm makes no difference whether they applied to government or not many areas are up in arms because a council has made this decision against what the electorate want.

The councils are meant to represent the constituents not their own opinion or political allegiance.

Thats where the legal argument starts.

The speaker also advised against delaying the elections.

And all that waffle is irrelevant. Why do you sycophants want to cost the authorities so much money? Why do you want double elections? Why can't you use the 1 brain cell you share amongst yourselves to understand THEY ARE DELAYED BECAUSE THE ELECTORAL MAPS ARE BEING REDRAWN.

Wasting government resources, vital funds, time and energy fighting yet another made up boogey man by that charlatan frog faced fuckwomble.

It's degenerate, sickening, wasteful and downright pathetic that anyone would be in support of the new tory party let alone someone who'd strip you of your right to be a homosexual as quickly as he has a wank in the morning. "

God that’s attractive

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iFun76Man
2 weeks ago

Wallingford

🍿🍿🍿.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucksitupMan
2 weeks ago

Shrewsbury


"Errrm makes no difference whether they applied to government or not many areas are up in arms because a council has made this decision against what the electorate want.

The councils are meant to represent the constituents not their own opinion or political allegiance.

Thats where the legal argument starts.

The speaker also advised against delaying the elections.

And all that waffle is irrelevant. Why do you sycophants want to cost the authorities so much money? Why do you want double elections? Why can't you use the 1 brain cell you share amongst yourselves to understand THEY ARE DELAYED BECAUSE THE ELECTORAL MAPS ARE BEING REDRAWN.

Wasting government resources, vital funds, time and energy fighting yet another made up boogey man by that charlatan frog faced fuckwomble.

It's degenerate, sickening, wasteful and downright pathetic that anyone would be in support of the new tory party let alone someone who'd strip you of your right to be a homosexual as quickly as he has a wank in the morning. "

Nothing like a good sensible unbiased opinion. 🤣

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *om_essexMan
2 weeks ago

Chelmsford

This liebour pack are behaving like goons. First they come for the elections, then they will come for you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *om_essexMan
2 weeks ago

Chelmsford

They want to Stop the Votes

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *idingcockMan
2 weeks ago

Driffield


"They want to Stop the Votes"

For a year ! To councils that won’t exist 12 months later.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *om_essexMan
2 weeks ago

Chelmsford

Basically they are blocking democracy and scared to lose.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ildwestheroMan
2 weeks ago

Llandrindod Wells


"I’m surprised at some on the forums whom I thought were aggressively right wing conservatives are not Reform supporters. I may have been wrong about them. I thought they would have welcomed the even more extreme views. I’m glad there’s a strong middle ground. Reform haven’t reformed anything, just absorbed conservative MPs.

At last, someone is able to triumph over blind prejudice and the need of some to propagandise. Thank you.

For the record, and in agreement with your post, I am (according to the prejudice of the beholder)

1. Far right because I want to stop illegal immigration.

1a This apparently makes me a racist, because colonial oppression, BLM etc.

2. Far left because I agree the Palestinians have been treated abominably by Israel, and continue to be.

2b This apparently makes me an antisemite because holocaust, and by association of ideas, a N@z1 (see 1 above). Paradoxical, eh?

3. In favour of radical reform of the country's governance and institutions

4. Not in favour of Nigel Farage.

Hope that clarifies the matter.

"

Similar apart from 2. A bit sympathetic towards Israel and very anti Hamas. However I am against Israel settling the West Bank which should be an independent, or at least autonomous, Palestinian state.

My views on many things tend to be right-wing but not far-right. I look on Farage as being a total charlatan and a lot of the recent 'converts' to his cultish party as nothing more that self-serving, bandwagon jumping oportunists.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *exy_bottomTV/TS
2 weeks ago

Flitwick


"Errrm makes no difference whether they applied to government or not many areas are up in arms because a council has made this decision against what the electorate want.

The councils are meant to represent the constituents not their own opinion or political allegiance.

Thats where the legal argument starts.

The speaker also advised against delaying the elections.

And all that waffle is irrelevant. Why do you sycophants want to cost the authorities so much money? Why do you want double elections? Why can't you use the 1 brain cell you share amongst yourselves to understand THEY ARE DELAYED BECAUSE THE ELECTORAL MAPS ARE BEING REDRAWN.

Wasting government resources, vital funds, time and energy fighting yet another made up boogey man by that charlatan frog faced fuckwomble.

It's degenerate, sickening, wasteful and downright pathetic that anyone would be in support of the new tory party let alone someone who'd strip you of your right to be a homosexual as quickly as he has a wank in the morning. "

Hear hear!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andomguy321Man
2 weeks ago

reading

Labour ... Cooking the books again

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ildwestheroMan
2 weeks ago

Llandrindod Wells


"

And all that waffle is irrelevant. Why do you sycophants want to cost the authorities so much money? Why do you want double elections? Why can't you use the 1 brain cell you share amongst yourselves to understand THEY ARE DELAYED BECAUSE THE ELECTORAL MAPS ARE BEING REDRAWN.

Wasting government resources, vital funds, time and energy fighting yet another made up boogey man by that charlatan frog faced fuckwomble.

It's degenerate, sickening, wasteful and downright pathetic that anyone would be in support of the new tory party let alone someone who'd strip you of your right to be a homosexual as quickly as he has a wank in the morning"

Farage and his cronies are being very conservative [dare I use that word] with the truth. Elections are being delayed not abolished. Council by elections take place every week and they cost money. One argument I would make is why haven't these council ward boundaries been sorted out sooner? Councils and boundary commissions to blame for dragging their feet.

In response to the last sense of the quote I just had an amusing if somewhat revolting thought. The actor Domenic West obviously bases his odious Nationwide ad character on Farage. So you can just imagine Farage ordering his lackey to 'Wank me'

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *b_slutMan
2 weeks ago

Nortwich Sauna


"This liebour pack are behaving like goons. First they come for the elections, then they will come for you. "
rabid right wokery

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top