FabGuys.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Has Labour NEC Just shot themselves in the foot?

Jump to newest
 

By *lassman OP   Man
1 week ago

notts

Andy Burnham prevented to return as MP.

Bye bye Labour?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ildwestheroMan
1 week ago

Llandrindod Wells

Biggest winner to this decision will be the odious Farage and the Faragite cult aka the Reform Party. A mediocre Labour candidate in this forthcoming by-election might well increase Reform's chance of winning or at least coming a close second. Also it increases the chances of the uncharismatic Starmer staying as PM until the next general election unless someone on the Labour benches emerges as a worth rival and vote winner.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ewBrumBiMan
1 week ago

Birmingham

Burnham chose the Amelia options in the Pathways game...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icemarriedguy2025Man
1 week ago

Motherwell

He should have not have thought of returning, in three years time yes but the timing was bad

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eo PublicMan
1 week ago

Lincoln

Difficult one, if Burnham stood down as Mayor they risk losing Manchester, they obviously think they can put up a suitable candidate for MP who stands a chance of winning. I know if I lived in the area I'd want to retain Burnham as mayor.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ildwestheroMan
1 week ago

Llandrindod Wells

Evidently Burnham had suggested his replacement as Mayor of Manchester could be Gary Neville! Might have shot himself in the foot with such a crazy suggestion.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *athCDTV/TS
1 week ago

Morpeth

Burnham should never have stood down as an MP. He should have stayed and fought Corbanism as many did, and eventually Jezza had his arse kicked out. I wasn't a fan of Kinnock but he fought Militant and won, Burnham should have stayed and fought against Momentum, I would have respected him, now I see him as a bolter. When the going got tough, Andy got going

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atchmo_Jizz!Man
1 week ago

Wolverhampton

Starmer was on the committee that voted against Burnham, cronyism is alive and well and is at the very heart of our government.

Surely this decision should have been taken at a local level? It’s not a matter for the NEC, any by taking that decision they have made their chances in this by-election that bit harder.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *usan jonesTV/TS
1 week ago

Wolverhampton

I’m sure Starmer will do a u turn he seems awfully good at it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orchlightMan
1 week ago

Chippenham

Wouldn’t surprise me if this decision is revisited after a bit of backlash from Labour MPs. Starmer is frit!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *horts GuyMan
1 week ago

Hove

At least Starmer stood up to the Manc thunderbirds puppet. Labour need strong leadership or we’ll end up with Farage and then we’re f@cked

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atureTransTV/TS
1 week ago

Waterlooville

The last thing Labour need is civil war. When will political parties learn that infighting puts the public off. It also reinforces the belief that politicians are more interested in themselves than serving the country.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *yleLMan
1 week ago

Burnley


"Andy Burnham prevented to return as MP.

Bye bye Labour? "

We can but hope. Sooner these scumbags go the way of the dinosaurs the better.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lassman OP   Man
1 week ago

notts

Labour Moto? Save our skins, not the country?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ameshertsMan
1 week ago

Hertford

Of course not! It's obvious what Andy Burnham's intentions are, so why on earth would you instigate a divisive battle which would split the governing party. Have we not learned anything? The last lot did that all the time and look how it ended up for them!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aremanMan
1 week ago

Norwich area

Anyone any idea what Burnham's got to offer on defence?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ildwestheroMan
1 week ago

Llandrindod Wells


"At least Starmer stood up to the Manc thunderbirds puppet. Labour need strong leadership or we’ll end up with Farage and then we’re f@cked"

I think there might have been a better chance of defeating the odious Farage with Burnham than there ever will be with Starmer who has proved himself to be a weak, indecisive and unpopular PM

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ameshertsMan
1 week ago

Hertford

I'm no fan of Starmer, but I do recognise that it's going to take more than 18 months to repair the damage done by years and years of mismanagement; surely everyone sees this. Although it doesn't help with Rachel Reeves flip-flopping every 5 minutes - does not instill confidence and this is what the markets need

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ndy457Man
1 week ago

Gosport


"Anyone any idea what Burnham's got to offer on defence?"

like much of the Labour Party he probably prefers not to think about it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ary1066Man
1 week ago

Preston

They justify their decision to block Andy as a cost saving and that he stood for mayor only two year into a four year term.

I hope they rethink the abolishment of local councils and the money spent on this farce with little or no public consultation if they are really concerned with saving the taxpayer money.

But hey they won’t , they will just cancel voting for a couple of years .

Democracy my left swinger

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxleyMan
1 week ago

Wetherby

Liebour have screwed themselves this time !

Keir Stoma bottled and refused Andy Burnham because he is frit !!!!

I so hope that Reform take Denton 😇

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ildwestheroMan
1 week ago

Llandrindod Wells


"Anyone any idea what Burnham's got to offer on defence?

like much of the Labour Party he probably prefers not to think about it"

I think it is all about personality. Starmer has none. He won an election by default i.e. the country wanted change, people had lost faith in the Conservatives after their last 2 or 3 years of wrangling and stalemate, the opposition vote was split. Not sure that Burnham has an agenda, any real policies. Yes he's to the left of Starmer but not far-left. He's seen as a fresh face and hasn't got a sleep provoking monotonous voice like Starmer. The Farage has tried to turn politics into a personality cult rather than one of definite well-thought-out policies. In a lot of peoples eyes Burnham would be a better match against the Farage than a dullard like Starmer. Policies or no policies.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *einmeMan
1 week ago

Comber

Kier STALIN - get rid of opposition any possible way, and it's still the russian way !!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andomguy321Man
1 week ago

reading

The left ... eating itself as usual

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *dstefiMan
1 week ago

Solihull

If Labour were as good at fighting Reform as they are at fighting themselves, Farage would be dead and buried.

I can see why they nixed Burnham, he is obviously jockeying for a shot at PM which isn't helpful, but it also looks a bit pathetic.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orthernsole66Man
1 week ago

Lancaster

Well they shoot themselves in the other foot if he leaves his current role. So which foot shall we shoot ourselves in.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ammy39Man
1 week ago

Glenrothes


"Kier STALIN - get rid of opposition any possible way, and it's still the russian way !!"

I'm not a labour voter but it's one of those devil and the deep blue sea moments in my opinion, but I think the toolmakers son has indeed just shot himself in the foot. In my party (irrelevant what party) potential candidates are chosen at local branch level.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *espectdueMan
1 week ago

Stratford-Upon-Avon


"The left ... eating itself as usual "

How many tory pm's did we have in one year?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *airyDivDadMan
1 week ago

Whiston


"The left ... eating itself as usual

How many tory pm's did we have in one year? "

Very restrained.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *NON1986Man
1 week ago

Gosport

Absolutely we have spent ages and rightly criticising Vladimir Putin for not allowing his opponents on the ballot box,and now starmer is being a dictator,as someone who voted labour all their voting lives this is very disappointing,this is the United Kingdom for god's sake we are supposed to be a democracy.

Whichever party you are for is someone should have a fundamental right to put themselves forward for office if they haven't broken any laws, starmer is way out of line here and abusing his powers.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *airyDivDadMan
1 week ago

Whiston

Well mayors and PCCs are barred from standing. A rejection merely upholds the rules (sadly).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ildwestheroMan
1 week ago

Llandrindod Wells

Perhaps Starmer should have let him stand as there could have been two outcome:

1, Burnham failed to get elected. Not such a safe seat plus some tactical voting.

2, Welcome him as an MP. Have a cabinet reshuffle. Give Burnham a difficult ministry and hope his 'popularity' evaporates

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aremanMan
1 week ago

Norwich area


"Perhaps Starmer should have let him stand as there could have been two outcome:

1, Burnham failed to get elected. Not such a safe seat plus some tactical voting.

2, Welcome him as an MP. Have a cabinet reshuffle. Give Burnham a difficult ministry and hope his 'popularity' evaporates"

Just so. Starmer's a mediocre politician, but his PR is flat-out terrible. By vetoing Burnham, he's showing fear; almost as good as saying Burnham's the better man. Saying "fine, this is a democacy, go ahead" should have been his only option.

Burnham 1: foot 0.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *dstefiMan
1 week ago

Solihull


"Welcome him as an MP. Have a cabinet reshuffle. Give Burnham a difficult ministry and hope his 'popularity' evaporates"

Health, education, foreign and home secretary seem to be where ideals go to die. Poisoned chalices for sure.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ndy457Man
1 week ago

Gosport

I don’t see the issue. The NEC has to sign off all candidates and they didn’t sign him off. Burnham stays as mayor in Manchester, which keeps him away from Westminster. If they lose the seat to Reform it’s no biggie in the long term. Reform will be cock a hoop for a few days, but it hardly dents the Labour majority.

Any potential nominee for the leadership, including Burnham, is going to do even more damage to the country than Starmer has already done.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ammy39Man
1 week ago

Glenrothes


"I don’t see the issue. The NEC has to sign off all candidates and they didn’t sign him off. Burnham stays as mayor in Manchester, which keeps him away from Westminster. If they lose the seat to Reform it’s no biggie in the long term. Reform will be cock a hoop for a few days, but it hardly dents the Labour majority.

Any potential nominee for the leadership, including Burnham, is going to do even more damage to the country than Starmer has already done. "

I don't think you understand politics if you think Reform winning will be no big deal and it won't be relevant for just"a few days". It should worry you a great deal that they are gaining seats

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *DAnnetteTV/TS
1 week ago

Brighton

It will be interesting to see how the by election pans out in a seat that Burnham probably would have won. Weak excuse re the cost of the election of a new mayor. Starner doesn't want any rivals to his leadership. I'm surprised that Wes Streeting is still in the cabinet.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tmguylookingMan
1 week ago

Chesterfield

I think it was a catch 22 situation, had the nec given the go ahead, all the people commenting on how they think Starmer is weak and doesn't want competition would be commenting on how he's just cost however many millions it is to stage an early Mayoral election. Buggered if you do, and buggered if you don't.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orchlightMan
1 week ago

Chippenham

I think Chris Mason in his BBC report sums it up pretty well.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *airythighs61Man
1 week ago

North Norfolk

Starmer ,Badenock ,Farage...what a depressing choice !!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lexieMan
1 week ago

Just north of Southampton


"The last thing Labour need is civil war. When will political parties learn that infighting puts the public off. It also reinforces the belief that politicians are more interested in themselves than serving the country."

Well, Starmer and co have been in power for eighteen months and nothing has been done. Immigration worse, no gangs smashed, NHS still in crisis with people queued up in corridors! Private health care surging ahead! Energy prices still sky high! Working class people still struggling to make ends meet! Getting involved in wars that don't concern us when we are broke! We need 'Change', if Burnham can swing that then he should be given his chance! Starmer is a busted, u-turn flush, time to pull his chain!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *astguy7Man
1 week ago

Ross on Wye

Damned if they did, damned if they didn't. Now Starmer will face criticism that he's running scared. Either way there will be a leadership challenge sometime this year, probably after the predicted woeful local and nation elections in May.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *leepflowerMan
1 week ago

Leek


"I think Chris Mason in his BBC report sums it up pretty well. "

I wasn't paying a great deal of attention to it but I did clock him getting in his customary cheerleading for Reform at the end.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *2468Man
1 week ago

horsham


"At least Starmer stood up to the Manc thunderbirds puppet. Labour need strong leadership or we’ll end up with Farage and then we’re f@cked"

Too say we are fcked under Farage is an understatement.

We may need those boats for return trips ourselves.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erasusMan
1 week ago

Glasgow


"The last thing Labour need is civil war. When will political parties learn that infighting puts the public off. It also reinforces the belief that politicians are more interested in themselves than serving the country.

Well, Starmer and co have been in power for eighteen months and nothing has been done. Immigration worse, no gangs smashed, NHS still in crisis with people queued up in corridors! Private health care surging ahead! Energy prices still sky high! Working class people still struggling to make ends meet! Getting involved in wars that don't concern us when we are broke! We need 'Change', if Burnham can swing that then he should be given his chance! Starmer is a busted, u-turn flush, time to pull his chain!"

Yeah 18 months to sort out 14 years of total mismanagement and chaos.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *izzeekMan
1 week ago

Out & about


"The last thing Labour need is civil war. When will political parties learn that infighting puts the public off. It also reinforces the belief that politicians are more interested in themselves than serving the country.

Well, Starmer and co have been in power for eighteen months and nothing has been done. Immigration worse, no gangs smashed, NHS still in crisis with people queued up in corridors! Private health care surging ahead! Energy prices still sky high! Working class people still struggling to make ends meet! Getting involved in wars that don't concern us when we are broke! We need 'Change', if Burnham can swing that then he should be given his chance! Starmer is a busted, u-turn flush, time to pull his chain!

Yeah 18 months to sort out 14 years of total mismanagement and chaos. "

And 14years to have come up with some sensible, practical policies to make peoples lives better... Party before Country.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *espectdueMan
1 week ago

Stratford-Upon-Avon


"The last thing Labour need is civil war. When will political parties learn that infighting puts the public off. It also reinforces the belief that politicians are more interested in themselves than serving the country.

Well, Starmer and co have been in power for eighteen months and nothing has been done. Immigration worse, no gangs smashed, NHS still in crisis with people queued up in corridors! Private health care surging ahead! Energy prices still sky high! Working class people still struggling to make ends meet! Getting involved in wars that don't concern us when we are broke! We need 'Change', if Burnham can swing that then he should be given his chance! Starmer is a busted, u-turn flush, time to pull his chain!

Yeah 18 months to sort out 14 years of total mismanagement and chaos.

And 14years to have come up with some sensible, practical policies to make peoples lives better... Party before Country."

And everyone they have tried so far has had everyone up in arms.

Its not as easy as you think.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ildwestheroMan
1 week ago

Llandrindod Wells


"Welcome him as an MP. Have a cabinet reshuffle. Give Burnham a difficult ministry and hope his 'popularity' evaporates

Health, education, foreign and home secretary seem to be where ideals go to die. Poisoned chalices for sure."

Or even chancellor. That seems to be the ultimate poisoned chalice these days

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *u2usemeMan
1 week ago

hyde


"Difficult one, if Burnham stood down as Mayor they risk losing Manchester, they obviously think they can put up a suitable candidate for MP who stands a chance of winning. I know if I lived in the area I'd want to retain Burnham as mayor."
Labour would never lose manchester irrespective of who they put up.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *izzeekMan
1 week ago

Out & about


"The last thing Labour need is civil war. When will political parties learn that infighting puts the public off. It also reinforces the belief that politicians are more interested in themselves than serving the country.

Well, Starmer and co have been in power for eighteen months and nothing has been done. Immigration worse, no gangs smashed, NHS still in crisis with people queued up in corridors! Private health care surging ahead! Energy prices still sky high! Working class people still struggling to make ends meet! Getting involved in wars that don't concern us when we are broke! We need 'Change', if Burnham can swing that then he should be given his chance! Starmer is a busted, u-turn flush, time to pull his chain!

Yeah 18 months to sort out 14 years of total mismanagement and chaos.

And 14years to have come up with some sensible, practical policies to make peoples lives better... Party before Country.

And everyone they have tried so far has had everyone up in arms.

Its not as easy as you think."

Correction... Labour have found out its not as easy as they thought...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andomguy321Man
7 days ago

reading

Andy Burnham's strength is that he's not Kier Starmer.

Andy Burnham's weakness is that he's Andy Burnham.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *leepflowerMan
7 days ago

Leek

And Deform's candidate in Denton is... A Gbeebies presenter!

I'm shocked!

Shocked!

Well, not that shocked.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ildwestheroMan
7 days ago

Llandrindod Wells


"And Deform's candidate in Denton is... A Gbeebies presenter!

I'm shocked!

Shocked!

Well, not that shocked."

Is that what he is? Some Reformee on facebook described him as a 'hard-hitting intellectual'! I thought he looked more like a gormless buffoon.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aremanMan
7 days ago

Norwich area


"And Deform's candidate in Denton is... A Gbeebies presenter!

I'm shocked!

Shocked!

Well, not that shocked.

Is that what he is? Some Reformee on facebook described him as a 'hard-hitting intellectual'! I thought he looked more like a gormless buffoon."

What he looks like is, or ought to be, completely irrelevant. As a former senior academic, he makes many politicians look gormless. A dangerous addition to the bandwagon who has been on both sides of the populist divide. Like Bill Kristol, he appears to have been "mugged by reality". Unlike the selfservative defectors, he'll be an asset to Reform. He has levers, and he'll pull them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arridMan
7 days ago

Brighton

I’m a Labour voter, one of those so called ‘champagne socialists’ I shouldn’t wonder but I am a tad wry at how many times Labour do indeed appear to shoot themselves in the foot. It all seems so obvious from an outsiders point if view.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *leepflowerMan
6 days ago

Leek

Working on the assumption that Fagash will turn up during campaigning, I wonder if the people of Gorton will give the same warm welcome to the pound shop Moseley that they did to the original one? 🤔 ✊

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top