FabGuys.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Entering my van whilst I;m being fucked.

Jump to newest
 

By *luteus max OP   Man
4 days ago

Waterlooville at night

It's not illrgal to have sex in a van providing you can't be seen from the outside. Now that raises an interesting possibility. Just suppose I'm being fucked in my van. and a guy opens the side door and comes in to join us. I find that idea extremely erotic, especially if he fucks me as soon as the first guy has cum in me,

Now I wonder what the legal situation would be. I guess that technically he is a trespasser, but I'm happy to give him permission to stay. Am I committing any offences as long as all parties are in agreement, and over the age of 18.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *0yguyMan
4 days ago

Cumbria


"It's not illrgal to have sex in a van providing you can't be seen from the outside. Now that raises an interesting possibility. Just suppose I'm being fucked in my van. and a guy opens the side door and comes in to join us. I find that idea extremely erotic, especially if he fucks me as soon as the first guy has cum in me,

Now I wonder what the legal situation would be. I guess that technically he is a trespasser, but I'm happy to give him permission to stay. Am I committing any offences as long as all parties are in agreement, and over the age of 18."

It’s not a trespass if you invite a person in.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tar33Man
4 days ago

North London (outer)

There's no offence.

The guy who enters your van isn't trespassing because you can't trespass in a vehicle. In any case, trespassing on land isn't normally an offence, it's a civil matter.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tar33Man
4 days ago

North London (outer)


"It's not illrgal to have sex in a van providing you can't be seen from the outside. Now that raises an interesting possibility. Just suppose I'm being fucked in my van. and a guy opens the side door and comes in to join us. I find that idea extremely erotic, especially if he fucks me as soon as the first guy has cum in me,

Now I wonder what the legal situation would be. I guess that technically he is a trespasser, but I'm happy to give him permission to stay. Am I committing any offences as long as all parties are in agreement, and over the age of 18.

It’s not a trespass if you invite a person in."

It's not trespass if he doesn't invite him in.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *0yguyMan
4 days ago

Cumbria


"It's not illrgal to have sex in a van providing you can't be seen from the outside. Now that raises an interesting possibility. Just suppose I'm being fucked in my van. and a guy opens the side door and comes in to join us. I find that idea extremely erotic, especially if he fucks me as soon as the first guy has cum in me,

Now I wonder what the legal situation would be. I guess that technically he is a trespasser, but I'm happy to give him permission to stay. Am I committing any offences as long as all parties are in agreement, and over the age of 18.

It’s not a trespass if you invite a person in.

It's not trespass if he doesn't invite him in."

Could it not be trespass to chattels, also called trespass to personalty or trespass to personal property?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rancd2TV/TS
4 days ago

Wolverhampton

Surely as a civil matter, it would only be a problem if you decided to sue him for trespass. The police most likely wouldn’t get involved in a civil matter

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tar33Man
4 days ago

North London (outer)


"Surely as a civil matter, it would only be a problem if you decided to sue him for trespass. The police most likely wouldn’t get involved in a civil matter"

You couldn't sue for trespass because it isn't trespass.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *luteus max OP   Man
4 days ago

Waterlooville at night

Why are you guys focusing on trespass. I want the guy to come in and fuck me. My concern is the legality of the situation. If someone reported me to the police, would they be able to do anything if the door was shut. How about keeping a disorderly house if no money changed hands. What happens if another two guys joined in. I may not have control if I'm face down with a cock inside me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rancd2TV/TS
4 days ago

Wolverhampton


"Why are you guys focusing on trespass. I want the guy to come in and fuck me. My concern is the legality of the situation. If someone reported me to the police, would they be able to do anything if the door was shut. How about keeping a disorderly house if no money changed hands. What happens if another two guys joined in. I may not have control if I'm face down with a cock inside me."

Because that’s what you mentioned in the OP. As for anything else, if he opened the door wide enough for the public to see in and someone passing complained, them you could have trouble. Not sure where you would stand if someone complained about any noise.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ungbuddy9Man
4 days ago

york

I think you need to consider How likely is this scenario?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *luteus max OP   Man
4 days ago

Waterlooville at night

Very likely. It's happened a few times

In fact it's mentioned in one of my verifications. I've never planned or promoted it though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tar33Man
4 days ago

North London (outer)


"Why are you guys focusing on trespass. I want the guy to come in and fuck me. My concern is the legality of the situation. If someone reported me to the police, would they be able to do anything if the door was shut. How about keeping a disorderly house if no money changed hands. What happens if another two guys joined in. I may not have control if I'm face down with a cock inside me."

As others have said, you're the one who brought the question of trespass up. I hope you've ascertained from the answers that no such offence exists.

With regards to 'keeping a disorderly house', this is a 300 year old law that is no longer relevant. Seeing how you're describing an imaginary incident in a van, it still wouldn't be offence even if vans existed in 1750.

Money changing hands? Also not an offence. Two other guys joined in? Again no offence.

The only issue you're really going to have is you carry on with the doors or windows open and other people can see you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ade crossTV/TS
4 days ago

chiselhurst

I have meet the op in his van a few years ago. I think knowing him where he parks up maybe more of a concern. But by letting guys in to fuck him no crime has been committed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *luteus max OP   Man
4 days ago

Waterlooville at night

Hi jade

I was probably more interested in oral then. I've graduated to bb anal now, and I love it. I need to visit Somerset again soon, if you are around come and say hi.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *acingfanMan
4 days ago

Huddersfield

All this trespassing makes me think of The Lord's Prayer.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *luteus max OP   Man
4 days ago

Waterlooville at night

I'll forgive your trespassrs if you visit me. Just as long as there are some irregular motions of the flesh.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alm_one4Man
4 days ago

RM16

When I read the title I thought you were getting in your van as a Guy was fucking you OP. I did think ‘Now there’s a kink I’ve not heard of before’.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andomguy321Man
4 days ago

reading


"Why are you guys focusing on trespass. I want the guy to come in and fuck me. My concern is the legality of the situation. If someone reported me to the police, would they be able to do anything if the door was shut. How about keeping a disorderly house if no money changed hands. What happens if another two guys joined in. I may not have control if I'm face down with a cock inside me."

If you did get into trouble, then it would be a perfect example of Sods law

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *acingfanMan
4 days ago

Huddersfield

It would be great if David van day, Vincent van might, van morrison and a delegation from vanuatu 🇻🇺 were just passing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucksitupMan
3 days ago

Shrewsbury

It could be argued that as you are engaged in an act which may cause offence (or distress) if made public (for example by the opening of a door) then it is incumbent upon you to ensure that the door cannot be opened by a third party. In other words you are responsible for locking the door and thereby preventing any possibility of you being exposed in a compromising position.

Ensuring the door(s) are locked also negates the possibility of any trespass and thereby removes the argument as to whether trespass is a civil or criminal issue in the circumstances envisaged by the original post.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hagmenowplsMan
3 days ago

Hereford

They shouldn't be trying the door! So it's their problem

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arridMan
3 days ago

Brighton

There’s a technical difference if the door opens out or slides.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *witchMan
3 days ago

North Wales

Lock your door

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tar33Man
2 days ago

North London (outer)


"It could be argued that as you are engaged in an act which may cause offence (or distress) if made public (for example by the opening of a door) then it is incumbent upon you to ensure that the door cannot be opened by a third party. In other words you are responsible for locking the door and thereby preventing any possibility of you being exposed in a compromising position.

Ensuring the door(s) are locked also negates the possibility of any trespass and thereby removes the argument as to whether trespass is a civil or criminal issue in the circumstances envisaged by the original post. "

Classic barrack-room lawyer. If someone were to open the car door and expose guys who at it inside, it still doesn't mean the guys in the car have committed an offence. It is not up to them to lock the door.

The point regarding trespass is equally ill-informed. There is no legislation that refers to trespassing inside a car. It is neither a criminal offence or a tort.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eversayNever200Man
2 days ago

Kendal

You’re probably over-thinking the whole scenario. Just find a nice quiet spot & get railed by as many guys as you want.

X

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ildwestheroMan
2 days ago

Llandrindod Wells

Sounds like a fantasy scenario. If the van is rocking, you are moaning loudly, then he might think he's on to a good thing. But would he know you were with another man or a woman? Also it could be a policeman thinking something weird was going on. Might want to join in on the fun or might arrest you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucksitupMan
2 days ago

Shrewsbury


"It could be argued that as you are engaged in an act which may cause offence (or distress) if made public (for example by the opening of a door) then it is incumbent upon you to ensure that the door cannot be opened by a third party. In other words you are responsible for locking the door and thereby preventing any possibility of you being exposed in a compromising position.

Ensuring the door(s) are locked also negates the possibility of any trespass and thereby removes the argument as to whether trespass is a civil or criminal issue in the circumstances envisaged by the original post.

Classic barrack-room lawyer. If someone were to open the car door and expose guys who at it inside, it still doesn't mean the guys in the car have committed an offence. It is not up to them to lock the door.

The point regarding trespass is equally ill-informed. There is no legislation that refers to trespassing inside a car. It is neither a criminal offence or a tort."

If they leave the door unlocked and it is opened (by anyone) they risk being seen naked or carrying out a sexual act which may cause distress or alarm to someone outside. (Not necessarily the person opening the door) If you are naked or engaged in a sexual act it is your responsibility to not cause aforementioned alarm or distress. It is therefore your responsibility to take measures to avoid this. i. e. Lock the door

I didn’t comment on whether it was a trespass or not. I said locking the door negates the discussion.

It may not be a trespass (I never suggested it was, so my comment was not “ill informed”) but attempting to access a motor vehicle without the permission of the owner could well be deemed a criminal act.

Seems to me you are the “Barrack Room Lawyer” who didn’t actually bother reading the detail of my comment.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tar33Man
2 days ago

North London (outer)


"It could be argued that as you are engaged in an act which may cause offence (or distress) if made public (for example by the opening of a door) then it is incumbent upon you to ensure that the door cannot be opened by a third party. In other words you are responsible for locking the door and thereby preventing any possibility of you being exposed in a compromising position.

Ensuring the door(s) are locked also negates the possibility of any trespass and thereby removes the argument as to whether trespass is a civil or criminal issue in the circumstances envisaged by the original post.

Classic barrack-room lawyer. If someone were to open the car door and expose guys who at it inside, it still doesn't mean the guys in the car have committed an offence. It is not up to them to lock the door.

The point regarding trespass is equally ill-informed. There is no legislation that refers to trespassing inside a car. It is neither a criminal offence or a tort.

If they leave the door unlocked and it is opened (by anyone) they risk being seen naked or carrying out a sexual act which may cause distress or alarm to someone outside. (Not necessarily the person opening the door) If you are naked or engaged in a sexual act it is your responsibility to not cause aforementioned alarm or distress. It is therefore your responsibility to take measures to avoid this. i. e. Lock the door

I didn’t comment on whether it was a trespass or not. I said locking the door negates the discussion.

It may not be a trespass (I never suggested it was, so my comment was not “ill informed”) but attempting to access a motor vehicle without the permission of the owner could well be deemed a criminal act.

Seems to me you are the “Barrack Room Lawyer” who didn’t actually bother reading the detail of my comment.

"

I've practiced law for over 40 years, you're talking shite.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ick ZuckerMan
2 days ago

sheffield

If the van is parked somewhere in Qatar it might be a problem

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *luteus max OP   Man
2 days ago

Waterlooville at night

Just a bit of clarification. Entering a car without permission may be considered a trespass to chattels.But it unfortunate that I mentioned it as ot is not of 5he essence of this thread.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tar33Man
2 days ago

North London (outer)


"Just a bit of clarification. Entering a car without permission may be considered a trespass to chattels......."

It would only be considered as such by people who don't understand the law, of which there are several on this thread:

Key Elements of Trespass to Chattels

Intentional Act: The defendant intended to interfere with the chattel, even if they were mistaken about ownership.

Unauthorized Interference: The act was done without permission or legal justification.

Actual Damage or Deprivation: The interference must result in damage to the property, impairment of its quality/value, or substantial deprivation of its use.

Chattel Definition: Any tangible, movable personal property (not land or buildings).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *luteus max OP   Man
1 day ago

Waterlooville at night

That's why I said may. The entry could be to deprive the owner of property, or with the inte tion of interference ( I dhould be so lucky )

I thought this was a sex site and not a legal forum.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucksitupMan
1 day ago

Shrewsbury


"That's why I said may. The entry could be to deprive the owner of property, or with the inte tion of interference ( I dhould be so lucky )

I thought this was a sex site and not a legal forum."

Then why did you ask in the original post

“Now I wonder what the legal situation would be”?

Make your mind up.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *luteus max OP   Man
1 day ago

Waterlooville at night

Because I'm concerned about the police taking an interest if I've got a couple of naked guys in the van with me.

There was a situation in a picnic area that I use sometimes. % naked guys were at it in a transit with the side door open. A dog walker looked in and reported them to the cafe manager, who called the police. They had gone by the time the police got there. I think they were stupid and irresponsible, and just made it difficult for those of us who ware more discrete.

I do like the idea of a sex party with five guys though. Maybe I should try to arrange one.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top