
| Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Seems no end to the mire coming to light about Andrew. What are the chances he will be prosecuted for breaking the official secrets act? Or soliciting minors for sex?" 0% chance | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"All those American celebs will be loving this. All the focus is on Andrew and not on them." ...celebs and presidents.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"All those American celebs will be loving this. All the focus is on Andrew and not on them." That's true to a point because if they can go for someone as high up as Andrew then they can look into people just as big. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
"A few hundred years back he be headless" A few hundred years back he would have done as he pleased and got away with it. Anyone questioning his actions would have ended up headless. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"A few hundred years back he be headless A few hundred years back he would have done as he pleased and got away with it. Anyone questioning his actions would have ended up headless. " Or he'd have raised the West Country or Scotland and overthrown his brother. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"They could lock him up in the Tower of London if found guilty of treason." One of HM King Charles's predecessors would have just dunked his head in a vat of Malmsey wine. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Seems no end to the mire coming to light about Andrew. What are the chances he will be prosecuted for breaking the official secrets act? Or soliciting minors for sex?" Isn't that the whole point of being royalty - being above the law | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I wouldn't be at all surprised if he's 'disappeared' some time soon." Well he was evicted in the dead night from the Windsor estate and hasn’t been officially seen since ! It will probably appear on the news he committed his own final act on this earth when in fact he has been shipped over to turkey for some new clown teeth and hair with a bit of cosmetic facial surgery and will be living as he has been his entire life whilst posing as an estate gardener | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Seems no end to the mire coming to light about Andrew. What are the chances he will be prosecuted for breaking the official secrets act? Or soliciting minors for sex? Isn't that the whole point of being royalty - being above the law" No. The whole point of royalty, in a constitutional monarchy, is to uphold the law and see it is enacted. King Charles has already stripped his wayward brother of his dukedom, his princely title and his lavish home. Basically Mr AM-W is no longer really a royal as such. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If nothing else Andrew is filling the news in the tabloids and taking attention away from the real issues around the state this country is in " or maybe he *exemplifies* the state the country is in? As we slide down the corruption league table and sell our assets to foreigners? I see the former duchess formerly known as that greedy sponger has fucked off to Dubai.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"whatever keeps the attention away from hollywood 👍🏻" Paul's involved as well | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Scripted distractions are easy when human emotions are easily predicted and manipulated through repetitive cycles " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Seems no end to the mire coming to light about Andrew. What are the chances he will be prosecuted for breaking the official secrets act? Or soliciting minors for sex?" The square root of fuck all chance. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The plot thickens. On second thoughts will he be allowed his teddies in stir? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15553447/Mystery-woman-floor-Andrew-Mountbatten-Windsor-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-trafficking-victim.html" The plot sickens... lel | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"A few hundred years back he be headless A few hundred years back he would have done as he pleased and got away with it. Anyone questioning his actions would have ended up headless. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No chance, he first met the girl in a nightclub in London, as I understand it the age limit was 18 or over to get in so she would have been old enough to have sex with him " Because that’s proof of age. It certainly doesn’t prove she was of legal age, and if she wasn’t then him thinking she was for whatever reason wouldn’t wash. But… Chance of him facing any kind of prosecution? Nil. Get cancelled? Absolutely. Banished is what it used to be called. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Now the clingon Sarah is winding up six of her companies. Wonder how much they owe" Five of them have been dormant since they were founded: capital between £1 and £100. The sixth, PLanet Partners Productions, ended 2025 with £145,615 and credit of £2,424 - with no evidence of previous activity. Unfortunately it owes £148,471...net balance -£385. Buddy can you spare a dime? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"A few hundred years back he be headless" Not really, he'd have married a 12yo and nobody would've said anything! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"A few hundred years back he be headless Not really, he'd have married a 12yo and nobody would've said anything! " agreed | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If anyone likes trawling through Companies House, there are at least a dozen Fergie-containing companies, and some very, very funny accounts. These would fit a picture of tax avoidance...to say the least..." Well she is finally up the creek without a paddle. Not before time. Her and Andy equally repugnant specimens | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"They could lock him up in the Tower of London if found guilty of treason." Now there is a ‘Royal’ residence I would be happy to see him occupy. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"A few hundred years back he be headless" Or king | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No chance, he first met the girl in a nightclub in London, as I understand it the age limit was 18 or over to get in so she would have been old enough to have sex with him " Ah yes bacause no one under 18 ever got into a nightclub . M’lud. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If anyone likes trawling through Companies House, there are at least a dozen Fergie-containing companies, and some very, very funny accounts. These would fit a picture of tax avoidance...to say the least... Well she is finally up the creek without a paddle. Not before time. Her and Andy equally repugnant specimens " She's about £0.3M underwater - and that was the easy stuff to find. Meanwhile Ponce Andrew's Pitch@Palace managed to disappear nearly £0.5M from its books before he got it struck off. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"A few hundred years back he be headless A few hundred years back he would have done as he pleased and got away with it. Anyone questioning his actions would have ended up headless. " Not necessarily. George, Duke Of Clarence was brother to Edward IV. He overstepped his bounds too often & was drowned upside down in a vat of Malmsey wine. This was allegedly overseen by his other brother, Richard of Gloucester (Richard III) and was seen as an amusing end due to his known public drinking. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I'm still confused about which of the women he had sex with where underage, there's so many names" None of them obviously, no recollection, no sweat, no sex, just pizza | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Seems no end to the mire coming to light about Andrew. What are the chances he will be prosecuted for breaking the official secrets act? Or soliciting minors for sex?" When has the suggestion been made, or evidence provided, that he has solicited minors for sex? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I'm still confused about which of the women he had sex with where underage, there's so many names None of them obviously, no recollection, no sweat, no sex, just pizza " "Pizza" seems to be a recurring theme. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't see what Andrew did that was exceptional for a royal. They are and always have been serial fornicators. It was a common thing for them to get very young girls into bed. Henry V111 being an obvious one. He's accused but not charged. Innocent until proven guilty? Most 17 year old girls would be only too pleased to get fucked by a prince, made for life!" Ok thats alright then, let him off because it isn’t too bad and Henry the 8th did it in Tudor times. Now get back to your hovel, eat up your gruel quickly … those turnips won’t plant themselves and make sure you tug your forelock. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't see what Andrew did that was exceptional for a royal. They are and always have been serial fornicators. It was a common thing for them to get very young girls into bed. Henry V111 being an obvious one. He's accused but not charged. Innocent until proven guilty? Most 17 year old girls would be only too pleased to get fucked by a prince, made for life! Ok thats alright then, let him off because it isn’t too bad and Henry the 8th did it in Tudor times. Now get back to your hovel, eat up your gruel quickly … those turnips won’t plant themselves and make sure you tug your forelock." No mate, they all do it and get away with it. It isn't proven that he did anything wrong, yet. No dear I don't live in a hovel and grow turnips. I expect you are ok in bed though xx | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't see what Andrew did that was exceptional for a royal. They are and always have been serial fornicators. It was a common thing for them to get very young girls into bed. Henry V111 being an obvious one. He's accused but not charged. Innocent until proven guilty? Most 17 year old girls would be only too pleased to get fucked by a prince, made for life! Ok thats alright then, let him off because it isn’t too bad and Henry the 8th did it in Tudor times. Now get back to your hovel, eat up your gruel quickly … those turnips won’t plant themselves and make sure you tug your forelock. No mate, they all do it and get away with it. It isn't proven that he did anything wrong, yet. No dear I don't live in a hovel and grow turnips. I expect you are ok in bed though xx" Not for me to say good or not…I didn’t mean to imply you were a genuflecting royalist…apologies if that came across. We agree entitlement is a dreadful thing. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Clearly, he's in this right up to his grubby little neck, " Too right. Forgot to mention that David Stern, Andrew's German associate, reporting to Epstein with or without Andrew's knowledge, was actually a director of Pitch@Palace.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Much as I dislike Sarah Ferguson, a shameless, entitled grifter ever since she first came on the scene in the late '80s, there's one thing she could do that would allow her to pay off the reported £6M debt, and leave plenty more for her to do as she likes. Yes. A lot of very worried people about now! Probably bung her some cash to shut her up. Now that they've lost the property in Windsor, and she has very little to lose, a tell-all autobiography would make her an absolute mint. She must know a hell of a lot of secrets." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Official Secrets act, probably not. Underage stuff, not a chance, not in the UK anyway." I wonder how many official secrets mandelson gave away | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Oh dear, Andrew arrested for misconduct in a public office. Quite a momentous moment." There's been increasing pressure on his former Protection Officers to provide statements detailing 'what they know', of late. Whether or not they're obliged to cooperate is another matter, but I'd imagine it's a very large can of worms. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Agreed. The whole concept of monarchy, aristocracy, titles, privilege, etc. is medieval and has no place in the modern world. " The entire thing needs doing away with. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Oh dear, Andrew arrested for misconduct in a public office. Quite a momentous moment." Can Mandelson be far behind? Whatever the sensitivity of what Andrew was allegedly telling Epstein, Mandy was probably even better value for the Epstein nexus. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Agreed. The whole concept of monarchy, aristocracy, titles, privilege, etc. is medieval and has no place in the modern world. The entire thing needs doing away with. " Or people be like Bowie who repeatedly refused gongs saying they’re ridiculous | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Agreed. The whole concept of monarchy, aristocracy, titles, privilege, etc. is medieval and has no place in the modern world. The entire thing needs doing away with. Or people be like Bowie who repeatedly refused gongs saying they’re ridiculous " Unfortunately, I don't think the odd public figure criticising them is going to change things, though. It never has before. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I do hope his former protection officers don't have a word with the custody sergeant. Most will be long retired by now, I would suspect. In any case, they wouldn't carry any sway with a Custody Officer. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I reckon Fergie must of been a dirty bitch in the bedroom to satisfy his sexuall desires kinky wants and needs." I dont think he’s got a fvck in him, couple of pumps and done | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Agreed. The whole concept of monarchy, aristocracy, titles, privilege, etc. is medieval and has no place in the modern world. The entire thing needs doing away with. " Agree. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Don’t forget, Andy is still 8th in line to the throne. In theory, however unlikely, he could be in a police cell today but on the throne tomorrow. This must be the next thing to be looked at by Charlie." Well Trump should be in a cell yet he's running the world funny no Americans being mentioned | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I do hope his former protection officers don't have a word with the custody sergeant. I think he had protection officers at least until recently, but in any case, that will teach me not to try to be funny. It doesn't go down well with the police, does it? 😉 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Complete over reaction...is it to deflect the spot light off the adulter King Charles and his ugly wife ...as well as the anti monarchists ??? " Yep. Showing the great unwashed that they've acted... regardless of whether he is actually prosecuted or has no case to answer. They can point to this and show how they complied with the law and due process. He will walk free and his brother will hope that him being arrested in the first place is enough for the peasants stop heckling him in public from now on. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Complete over reaction...is it to deflect the spot light off the adulter King Charles and his ugly wife ...as well as the anti monarchists ??? " The vast majority on this site are adulterers so we have no room to accuse others. At least HM The King only committed adultery with one lady, unlike his ex and late wife who had numerous lovers. And who are you to call HM Queen Consort Camilla 'ugly'? Bet you're a stunner | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Yep. Showing the great unwashed that they've acted... regardless of whether he is actually prosecuted or has no case to answer. They can point to this and show how they complied with the law and due process. He will walk free and his brother will hope that him being arrested in the first place is enough for the peasants stop heckling him in public from now on." This could be the case. He would have handed himself in if told to to avoid the spectacle of being ‘arrested’. The fact he was arrested at his home- all for show? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"And who are you to call HM Queen Consort Camilla 'ugly'? Bet you're a stunner I agree, unkind and unnecessary. I’m sure the poster is better than this really. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Charlie's biggest problem I think here is that this whole debacle has got people thinking, and that the spirit of Savile, who the Royals had thought banished is now waiting in the wings, and he doesnt want this shadow a to step back on the stage, when some really big questions could be asked about the elite connections to PDF.files " Sadiq Khan looks likely to be the next in line from the elite and their cover ups with his constant denials of grooming gangs in London with drip drips of official documents allied proving he did know and for years. The net appears to be closing on the ghastly ignorance of victims by the elite. Andrew is just the tip of the iceberg. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"All those American celebs will be loving this. All the focus is on Andrew and not on them." Maybe he can grass them to get off. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The fact he was arrested at his home- all for show? " I’d doubt very much if it was all for show… I think it is a very significant development. When was the last time a member of the Royal Family, a brother of a serving Monarch, was held in a police cell for questioning? We’re going back to before a police service was even a thing surely? I also think that given his high profile status and former position that the decision to arrest him won’t have been taken casually, and will have been run by the highest decision makers possible, after scrutinising whatever evidence and allegations they already have. He wasn’t invited in for questioning. They went to him and arrested him. That’s a bit more than having a chat. A bail condition could be removing his passport. As for him being charged, or convicted, that becomes a matter for the CPS and the Courts. I suspect that when this debacle is over, the arsehole formerly known as Prince will be living abroad, in the Middle East no doubt, never to return to the UK again. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I do hope his former protection officers don't have a word with the custody sergeant. Given his personal charm, and the degree of loyalty he has inspired in anyone who has ever worked for him, i would imagine their words - if any - are far more likely to be along the lines of "Lock the fucker up in the darkest, dampest, nastiest cell you've got and throw away the key." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Won't the court case be- Andrew Windsor v The King Off with his head! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I'd best cancel that reservation at Pizza Express " Don’t sweat it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Complete over reaction...is it to deflect the spot light off the adulter King Charles and his ugly wife ...as well as the anti monarchists ??? " How is this an over reaction? To something that happened over 40yrs ago? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"And let's not forget that Thatcher was a close personal friend of Jimmy S the abuser, hosting him at Chequers for Christmas on more than one occasion. This is a matter of historical record." A lot of people from all walks of life thought Savile was wonderful. Let's face it he got away with being a TV personality and a household name for several decades. After Savile sat and talked to him, by his Stoke Manderville Hospital bed, my stepfather though he was absolutely marvelous. If only people had known the truth. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I do hope his former protection officers don't have a word with the custody sergeant. Spot on | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Agreed. The whole concept of monarchy, aristocracy, titles, privilege, etc. is medieval and has no place in the modern world. The entire thing needs doing away with. Agree." Disagree | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Agreed. The whole concept of monarchy, aristocracy, titles, privilege, etc. is medieval and has no place in the modern world. The entire thing needs doing away with. Agree. Disagree " Me also | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Just when Camilla's bunion problems seem to be over...now this. " 🤣 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I do hope his former protection officers don't have a word with the custody sergeant. Ffs former being the appropriate title for them ! It’s not like they were very good at their jobs as they didn’t exactly protect him from himself now ! Did they ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Don’t forget, Andy is still 8th in line to the throne. In theory, however unlikely, he could be in a police cell today but on the throne tomorrow. This must be the next thing to be looked at by Charlie." I don’t think he is anymore Since he was stripped of his titles I think the claim to the throne goes along with it Edward will be next in line now | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Don’t forget, Andy is still 8th in line to the throne. In theory, however unlikely, he could be in a police cell today but on the throne tomorrow. This must be the next thing to be looked at by Charlie. I don’t think he is anymore Since he was stripped of his titles I think the claim to the throne goes along with it Edward will be next in line now " Whilst HM King Charles had the right to strip him of his title of Prince, his dukedom and all his other titles, it would require an act of parliament to remove him from the line of succession unless he renounced it voluntarily. That would be the honourable thing to do but he is probably too stupid and arrogant. Technically it would not affect Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie other than to move them up a place. In all this scandal I feel very sorry for those two ladies who seem decent enough. Not their fault they have such appalling parents | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I do hope his former protection officers don't have a word with the custody sergeant. External threats..not internal | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What do that guy, the black eyed peas and Manchester United have in common? They all went to shit after Fergie left!" 😂😂😂😂😂 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Seems no end to the mire coming to light about Andrew. What are the chances he will be prosecuted for breaking the official secrets act? Or soliciting minors for sex? 0% chance" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Apart from giving away a few state secrets, bit like the Windsors, I can't see what he's done wrong. So called state secrets have always been a form of currency, that's how shits like Epstein get on in life. Fucking a 17 year old is not a crime, is it? Inapropriate, but many are keen, especially with a 'prince'. My first gf was 17 and she even propositioned my father. Never fucked with me though. The public hypocrisy is sickening. Had my rants, now for coffee!! I think you need to look at exactly on what grounds he was arrested. Nothing to do with 17 year old, nothing to do with state secrets. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Agreed. The whole concept of monarchy, aristocracy, titles, privilege, etc. is medieval and has no place in the modern world. The entire thing needs doing away with. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Apart from giving away a few state secrets, bit like the Windsors, I can't see what he's done wrong. So called state secrets have always been a form of currency, that's how shits like Epstein get on in life. Fucking a 17 year old is not a crime, is it? Inapropriate, but many are keen, especially with a 'prince'. My first gf was 17 and she even propositioned my father. Never fucked with me though. The public hypocrisy is sickening. Had my rants, now for coffee!! Yes, if I was concerned about his arrest. I was making a general comment about the whole issue of his unpopularity. Its questionable about the misbehaviour in high office. I think he wasn't an office holder and the business about the official secrets act involves restricted documents. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The process is the punishment. He has been publicly humiliated. Even if there are no charges, his life as he knew it is over. I guess someone has to be destroyed to appease the baying mob." Nothing he does not deserve.hope there's plenty more to come. The guys an asshole. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The process is the punishment. He has been publicly humiliated. Even if there are no charges, his life as he knew it is over. I guess someone has to be destroyed to appease the baying mob." So in your view the people who are rightfully disgusted by this turd sending confidential information to Epstein are part of a “baying mob” I don’t agree with you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Thinking about it perhaps this is the one thing the late queen got wrong, she just let him do whatever he wanted, she seemed blind and deaf as far as Andrews misleadings were concerned. Must been turning in her grave now." Mummy goggles | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The process is the punishment. He has been publicly humiliated. Even if there are no charges, his life as he knew it is over. I guess someone has to be destroyed to appease the baying mob. So in your view the people who are rightfully disgusted by this turd sending confidential information to Epstein are part of a “baying mob” I don’t agree with you." If that's what you're concerned about then just wait until he is charged, convicted and sentenced. At present he is innocent until proven guilty. If you can't wait then you are indeed part of a baying mob. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The process is the punishment. He has been publicly humiliated. Even if there are no charges, his life as he knew it is over. I guess someone has to be destroyed to appease the baying mob. So in your view the people who are rightfully disgusted by this turd sending confidential information to Epstein are part of a “baying mob” I don’t agree with you. If that's what you're concerned about then just wait until he is charged, convicted and sentenced. At present he is innocent until proven guilty. If you can't wait then you are indeed part of a baying mob." Utter nonsense, so Adolf Hitler was innocent of any crime or more recently Nixon with a multitude of evidence of his involvement in Watergate but never brought to trial, was actually innocent. Think what you are saying before you make these ridiculous accusations. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The process is the punishment. He has been publicly humiliated. Even if there are no charges, his life as he knew it is over. I guess someone has to be destroyed to appease the baying mob. So in your view the people who are rightfully disgusted by this turd sending confidential information to Epstein are part of a “baying mob” I don’t agree with you. If that's what you're concerned about then just wait until he is charged, convicted and sentenced. At present he is innocent until proven guilty. If you can't wait then you are indeed part of a baying mob. Utter nonsense, so Adolf Hitler was innocent of any crime or more recently Nixon with a multitude of evidence of his involvement in Watergate but never brought to trial, was actually innocent. Think what you are saying before you make these ridiculous accusations." So you have decided he is guilty without hearing the evidence but you accuse me of making "ridiculous accusations". FFS... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"To be honest I don’t give a crap so what there are law enforcement agencies will get truth " I wish I had your faith in the law enforcement agencies. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The process is the punishment. He has been publicly humiliated. Even if there are no charges, his life as he knew it is over. I guess someone has to be destroyed to appease the baying mob. So in your view the people who are rightfully disgusted by this turd sending confidential information to Epstein are part of a “baying mob” I don’t agree with you. If that's what you're concerned about then just wait until he is charged, convicted and sentenced. At present he is innocent until proven guilty. If you can't wait then you are indeed part of a baying mob. Utter nonsense, so Adolf Hitler was innocent of any crime or more recently Nixon with a multitude of evidence of his involvement in Watergate but never brought to trial, was actually innocent. Think what you are saying before you make these ridiculous accusations." Technically, neither of these were convicted, and thus remain innocent in the eyes of the law. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The process is the punishment. He has been publicly humiliated. Even if there are no charges, his life as he knew it is over. I guess someone has to be destroyed to appease the baying mob. So in your view the people who are rightfully disgusted by this turd sending confidential information to Epstein are part of a “baying mob” I don’t agree with you. If that's what you're concerned about then just wait until he is charged, convicted and sentenced. At present he is innocent until proven guilty. If you can't wait then you are indeed part of a baying mob. Utter nonsense, so Adolf Hitler was innocent of any crime or more recently Nixon with a multitude of evidence of his involvement in Watergate but never brought to trial, was actually innocent. Think what you are saying before you make these ridiculous accusations. So you have decided he is guilty without hearing the evidence but you accuse me of making "ridiculous accusations". FFS... " Do you really think that your swearing adds anything to your post? Where did I ever did I ever say that he was guilty? I can read though and with the evidence which has been presented to us it doesn’t look good for him. That I believe is a fair appraisal of my opinion and in no way entitles you to accuse me of being part of a baying mob. If you are having difficulty in understanding this post then I suggest that you get an adult to explain its meaning for you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The process is the punishment. He has been publicly humiliated. Even if there are no charges, his life as he knew it is over. I guess someone has to be destroyed to appease the baying mob. So in your view the people who are rightfully disgusted by this turd sending confidential information to Epstein are part of a “baying mob” I don’t agree with you. If that's what you're concerned about then just wait until he is charged, convicted and sentenced. At present he is innocent until proven guilty. If you can't wait then you are indeed part of a baying mob. Utter nonsense, so Adolf Hitler was innocent of any crime or more recently Nixon with a multitude of evidence of his involvement in Watergate but never brought to trial, was actually innocent. Think what you are saying before you make these ridiculous accusations. Technically, neither of these were convicted, and thus remain innocent in the eyes of the law." In that you are correct and I remind you of the well known expression “The law is an ass” something with which I fully agree. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The process is the punishment. He has been publicly humiliated. Even if there are no charges, his life as he knew it is over. I guess someone has to be destroyed to appease the baying mob. So in your view the people who are rightfully disgusted by this turd sending confidential information to Epstein are part of a “baying mob” I don’t agree with you. If that's what you're concerned about then just wait until he is charged, convicted and sentenced. At present he is innocent until proven guilty. If you can't wait then you are indeed part of a baying mob. Utter nonsense, so Adolf Hitler was innocent of any crime or more recently Nixon with a multitude of evidence of his involvement in Watergate but never brought to trial, was actually innocent. Think what you are saying before you make these ridiculous accusations. Technically, neither of these were convicted, and thus remain innocent in the eyes of the law. In that you are correct and I remind you of the well known expression “The law is an ass” something with which I fully agree." But you didn’t question the law, just if these people were innocent. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The process is the punishment. He has been publicly humiliated. Even if there are no charges, his life as he knew it is over. I guess someone has to be destroyed to appease the baying mob. So in your view the people who are rightfully disgusted by this turd sending confidential information to Epstein are part of a “baying mob” I don’t agree with you. If that's what you're concerned about then just wait until he is charged, convicted and sentenced. At present he is innocent until proven guilty. If you can't wait then you are indeed part of a baying mob. Utter nonsense, so Adolf Hitler was innocent of any crime or more recently Nixon with a multitude of evidence of his involvement in Watergate but never brought to trial, was actually innocent. Think what you are saying before you make these ridiculous accusations. Technically, neither of these were convicted, and thus remain innocent in the eyes of the law. In that you are correct and I remind you of the well known expression “The law is an ass” something with which I fully agree. But you didn’t question the law, just if these people were innocent." I agreed that the law was an ass, how could I question it more. I don’t question for an instant believe that these were 2 obviously guilty people, you may hold a different opinion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"His big brother Chaz is well pissed he keeps taking the flack from hecklers for his younger brother And he had to chip in over a million towards the 12 million compensation he paid" So that's why he's thrown him under the witch hunt bus ¡ | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"His big brother Chaz is well pissed he keeps taking the flack from hecklers for his younger brother And he had to chip in over a million towards the 12 million compensation he paid So that's why he's thrown him under the witch hunt bus ¡ " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"His big brother Chaz is well pissed he keeps taking the flack from hecklers for his younger brother And he had to chip in over a million towards the 12 million compensation he paid So that's why he's thrown him under the witch hunt bus ¡ " What do you mean by referring to the witch hunt bus? the evidence would suggest that Andy has committed lots of crimes against the British people and he deserves to be punished. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This could drag on for bloody years. Operation Branchform, the Police Scotland investigation into fundraising fraud in the Scottish National Party (SNP) was launched in July 2021 ... Sturgeon's hubby, Peter Murrell, has just had his court case postponed until May this year. 5 years from the start ... and still not reached the finishing line. Don't be surprised if in Mountbatten-Windsor's case ... The wheels of Justice grind at an equally glacial pace. " Fraud is notoriously difficult to prove and requires a huge amount of diligent investigation which takes a lot of time. Apparently Andy’s alleged transgressions are equally as complex, which I didn’t know. I wouldn’t be surprised if this took at least maybe 5 years and even then with further evidence discovered even longer. Or it’s dropped very quickly. Blair & Mandelson have surely got to be pulled in for questioning or else it’s dodgy. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"His big brother Chaz is well pissed he keeps taking the flack from hecklers for his younger brother And he had to chip in over a million towards the 12 million compensation he paid" Two spoilt arrogant men.....I blame the parents | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He seems to be guilty Could have been done innocently because A, He arrogant and thinks he's above the rule of law and accepted traditions. B, He's rather thick and stupid. C, He was give a job for which he was totally untrained and clueless. D, He's totally gullible, mixed with the wrong sort who just used him for their own nefarious ends." A) That would be Andy’s fault, not innocent on that pleading. B) Andy’s fault, ignorance is not an excuse of the law, not innocent on that pleading. C) À possible pleaded mitigating factor, Blair would need to give evidence and say he knowingly gave a top job to an idiot. Highly unlikely and Tony is a trained lawyer. D) Andy’s fault, one makes and chooses our own connections with people. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Who cares, being pushed because he's royalty and will make news. He's always been a perv. He won't go to jail because it will cause to much of a stir." King Charles I, was executed for high treason .... It caused quite a stir, as was the intention. Sometimes, things are intentionally stirred up. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| back to top |