 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. " Yes but enough of the ayatollah, well done US & Israel | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"WW3 just around the corner….. And god help us with Starmer as leader he’s weak as piss " Maybe this time Starmer will do a Coalition Of The Willies instead & lots of cock fun can be had. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. Yes but enough of the ayatollah, well done US & Israel"  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"WW3 just around the corner….. And god help us with Starmer as leader he’s weak as piss Maybe this time Starmer will do a Coalition Of The Willies instead & lots of cock fun can be had." Pmsl 🤣 he’ll be the first one to run and hide mate he’s a weak spineless sorry excuse of a man In war you need a strong leader and Starmer is definitely not that person | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. Yes but enough of the ayatollah, well done US & Israel" Grow up, the whole world despises Israel and geriatric 13yo pedophile criminal leading America. Everyone wants to see the ayatollah’s deposed, but these self serving butchers are certainly not the way. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Good to see the brave people of Iran that have began to protest against their brutal authoritarian regime are being given the support they need. " I fully agree…it’s gone on far too long for those people | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. Yes but enough of the ayatollah, well done US & Israel" Worked so well in Iraq, Afghanistan, Lybia or Tunisia | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Regime change UK next please Donald! 👍" To what? The Gilead fans of reform? The uselessness of Kemi? The greens with dreams of no military? No nuclear to defend ourselves? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Good to see the brave people of Iran that have began to protest against their brutal authoritarian regime are being given the support they need. I fully agree…it’s gone on far too long for those people " Where was the support when the Shah was in charge? Could it be because he was in the pockets of the Americans? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. Yes but enough of the ayatollah, well done US & Israel" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Good to see the brave people of Iran that have began to protest against their brutal authoritarian regime are being given the support they need. I fully agree…it’s gone on far too long for those people Where was the support when the Shah was in charge? Could it be because he was in the pockets of the Americans?" The people who could remember this are dead | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Good to see the brave people of Iran that have began to protest against their brutal authoritarian regime are being given the support they need. I fully agree…it’s gone on far too long for those people Where was the support when the Shah was in charge? Could it be because he was in the pockets of the Americans? The people who could remember this are dead " 1978, well within living memory. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Good to see the brave people of Iran that have began to protest against their brutal authoritarian regime are being given the support they need. I fully agree…it’s gone on far too long for those people Where was the support when the Shah was in charge? Could it be because he was in the pockets of the Americans? The people who could remember this are dead 1978, well within living memory." The political killing under the Shah pales int insignificance compared to the current lot and I’m not aware of the Shah’s involvement in islamic terrorism and support for such as Hamas, Houthis and Hezbollah. Your point is ridiculous | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Good to see the brave people of Iran that have began to protest against their brutal authoritarian regime are being given the support they need. I fully agree…it’s gone on far too long for those people Where was the support when the Shah was in charge? Could it be because he was in the pockets of the Americans? The people who could remember this are dead 1978, well within living memory. The political killing under the Shah pales int insignificance compared to the current lot and I’m not aware of the Shah’s involvement in islamic terrorism and support for such as Hamas, Houthis and Hezbollah. Your point is ridiculous " So support for a despot is acceptable just because fewer people suffer? Blimey. Besides, designating organisations as terrorist in entirely subjective. You should know this. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Good to see the brave people of Iran that have began to protest against their brutal authoritarian regime are being given the support they need. I fully agree…it’s gone on far too long for those people Where was the support when the Shah was in charge? Could it be because he was in the pockets of the Americans? The people who could remember this are dead 1978, well within living memory." Not really if you were a kid. You need people to be socially aware. Probably 20! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Make excuses as much as you like. Britain has no business in this war. Let Trump do whatever the fuck he wants, but don't drag us into it " I doubt it'll happen. As much of a douche cannon as Geedubya Bush was and as much of an idiot as Blair was for sucking his war dick, they still maintained a veneer of this is the right thing to do. Nobody in their right mind can possibly believe Trump's thinking that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Make excuses as much as you like. Britain has no business in this war. Let Trump do whatever the fuck he wants, but don't drag us into it " Starmer will do whatever his boss the wanted war criminal Netanyahu orders him to do, totally disgraceful. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The President of peace!" He haa stopped many wars to be fair. I hope they can find a way toet him serve a third Term as President | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The President of peace! He haa stopped many wars to be fair. I hope they can find a way toet him serve a third Term as President" Crazy much? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The President of peace!" There is no ends to which he will not stoop to divert the public from his forcing himself on two 12yo children. A filthy criminal who belongs in jail. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The President of peace! There is no ends to which he will not stoop to divert the public from his forcing himself on two 12yo children. A filthy criminal who belongs in jail." Reform fans? Want to comment? Not Pakistani paedos? You know billionaire white paedo!? Jeff Epstein | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This will all distract people of the Jewish peado elites like Jeff Epstein, Zionism is a cancer to the world " Zionism is certainly a horrible plague and these gangsters care about no one accept their personal bank balances.🤮🤮🤮 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The moral crusaders. When are they going into Afghanistan, where the Taliban treats women worse than pigs?" Did you not hear that the big brave yanks were kicked out of Afghanistan by the uneducated goat herders. ICE has demonstrated that the American military are only good at murdering there own citizens on the there own streets and then lying to the public that all the video evidence is not to be believed lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The President of peace! There is no ends to which he will not stoop to divert the public from his forcing himself on two 12yo children. A filthy criminal who belongs in jail. Reform fans? Want to comment? Not Pakistani paedos? You know billionaire white paedo!? Jeff Epstein " Where the Reform fans at? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This will all distract people of the Jewish peado elites like Jeff Epstein, Zionism is a cancer to the world " Speaking as an atheist, there appears to be more evidence of Mohammed being a paedophile than Geoffrey Epstein. With that in mind, why are there so many people in the world who revere Mohammed, something you can't say about Epstein? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This will all distract people of the Jewish peado elites like Jeff Epstein, Zionism is a cancer to the world Speaking as an atheist, there appears to be more evidence of Mohammed being a paedophile than Geoffrey Epstein. With that in mind, why are there so many people in the world who revere Mohammed, something you can't say about Epstein?" Blimey!! A defender of Jeffrey Epstein!! Have kiddies under the bed? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This will all distract people of the Jewish peado elites like Jeff Epstein, Zionism is a cancer to the world Speaking as an atheist, there appears to be more evidence of Mohammed being a paedophile than Geoffrey Epstein. With that in mind, why are there so many people in the world who revere Mohammed, something you can't say about Epstein?" I too am atheist and like you I find it totally mystifying why anyone is taken in by any religion, but enormous numbers of people are, or at least claim to be. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. " I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated." Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain " Do not be concerned about the boats. Iranians will certainly not arrive in Britain with the inadequate support from Mr. Starmer, who has remained silent after the deaths of 40,000 individuals in the streets of Iran. It would be wiser for Britain to refrain from exploiting Iran's oil and gas resources before focusing on the issue of the boats. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Good to see the brave people of Iran that have began to protest against their brutal authoritarian regime are being given the support they need. I fully agree…it’s gone on far too long for those people Where was the support when the Shah was in charge? Could it be because he was in the pockets of the Americans? The people who could remember this are dead 1978, well within living memory. The political killing under the Shah pales int insignificance compared to the current lot and I’m not aware of the Shah’s involvement in islamic terrorism and support for such as Hamas, Houthis and Hezbollah. Your point is ridiculous " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Just a question ? If the pope dies a new one is appointed. Is it not the same when an Ayatollah passes away ? " Indeed, it does, but the problem lies in the fact that the Iranian people have chosen to completely overhaul their regime. They no longer wish to have any ayatollahs in their nation. They refuse to allow the emergence of another fascist Islamic figure into a position of authority. I would wager that many of them will seek refuge with their compatriots in Russia. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This will all distract people of the Jewish peado elites like Jeff Epstein, Zionism is a cancer to the world " Why do you say that | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain " Stop the Boats | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Just a question ? If the pope dies a new one is appointed. Is it not the same when an Ayatollah passes away ? Indeed, it does, but the problem lies in the fact that the Iranian people have chosen to completely overhaul their regime. They no longer wish to have any ayatollahs in their nation. They refuse to allow the emergence of another fascist Islamic figure into a position of authority. I would wager that many of them will seek refuge with their compatriots in Russia. " Make it make sense, so trump bombs Iran, Iran goes to Russia and trump wabks over Putin? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Totally mystifying why people believe in thick book and defend paedos. Tell all why does do you defend Jeff Epstein and disbelieve the women?" Can we have that in English | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Totally mystifying why people believe in thick book and defend paedos. Tell all why does do you defend Jeff Epstein and disbelieve the women? Can we have that in English" Loving the fact it's the grammar that upsets you not the fact that women have been abused | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Totally mystifying why people believe in thick book and defend paedos. Tell all why does do you defend Jeff Epstein and disbelieve the women? Can we have that in English Loving the fact it's the grammar that upsets you not the fact that women have been abused " It wasn't clear what you were trying to say .... Who's defending Jeffry Epstein & disbelieving his victims? You're just flinging shit like a pissed-off chimp in the hope that something sticks. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Totally mystifying why people believe in thick book and defend paedos. Tell all why does do you defend Jeff Epstein and disbelieve the women? Can we have that in English Loving the fact it's the grammar that upsets you not the fact that women have been abused It wasn't clear what you were trying to say .... Who's defending Jeffry Epstein & disbelieving his victims? You're just flinging shit like a pissed-off chimp in the hope that something sticks. " Lol!! Yet here you are making it about anything but the abused women | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Totally mystifying why people believe in thick book and defend paedos. Tell all why does do you defend Jeff Epstein and disbelieve the women? Can we have that in English Loving the fact it's the grammar that upsets you not the fact that women have been abused It wasn't clear what you were trying to say .... Who's defending Jeffry Epstein & disbelieving his victims? You're just flinging shit like a pissed-off chimp in the hope that something sticks. Lol!! Yet here you are making it about anything but the abused women " Is this a Jeffrey Epstein thread? You seem to have got confused... Try and stay focused on the actual subject. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Totally mystifying why people believe in thick book and defend paedos. Tell all why does do you defend Jeff Epstein and disbelieve the women? Can we have that in English Loving the fact it's the grammar that upsets you not the fact that women have been abused It wasn't clear what you were trying to say .... Who's defending Jeffry Epstein & disbelieving his victims? You're just flinging shit like a pissed-off chimp in the hope that something sticks. Lol!! Yet here you are making it about anything but the abused women Is this a Jeffrey Epstein thread? You seem to have got confused... Try and stay focused on the actual subject. " Isn't everything about deflecting from Epstein? The bombing in Iran the changing of subjects? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Just a question ? If the pope dies a new one is appointed. Is it not the same when an Ayatollah passes away ? Indeed, it does, but the problem lies in the fact that the Iranian people have chosen to completely overhaul their regime. They no longer wish to have any ayatollahs in their nation. They refuse to allow the emergence of another fascist Islamic figure into a position of authority. I would wager that many of them will seek refuge with their compatriots in Russia. Make it make sense, so trump bombs Iran, Iran goes to Russia and trump wabks over Putin?" I truly do not comprehend what you are saying ??? What is the meaning of Iran going to Russia?? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This will all distract people of the Jewish peado elites like Jeff Epstein, Zionism is a cancer to the world Speaking as an atheist, there appears to be more evidence of Mohammed being a paedophile than Geoffrey Epstein. With that in mind, why are there so many people in the world who revere Mohammed, something you can't say about Epstein?" Applying 21st century morals and laws to something that happened 1300 years ago doesn’t make sense. It’s the same way in the bible where it states Mary was either 3 or 12. Also I’m not Muslim so I don’t care to defend Mohammed. There is a lot of evidence that Jeff Epstein was a Jewish peado working for Mossad, yet here you are defending him | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Regime change UK next please Donald! 👍" Traitor | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. Yes but enough of the ayatollah, well done US & Israel Grow up, the whole world despises Israel and geriatric 13yo pedophile criminal leading America. Everyone wants to see the ayatollah’s deposed, but these self serving butchers are certainly not the way. " Another anti semitic dildo to block! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I bet he considers himself a patriot " No doubt, totally twisted | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The whole world despises Israel? I beg to differ " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This will all distract people of the Jewish peado elites like Jeff Epstein, Zionism is a cancer to the world Speaking as an atheist, there appears to be more evidence of Mohammed being a paedophile than Geoffrey Epstein. With that in mind, why are there so many people in the world who revere Mohammed, something you can't say about Epstein? Blimey!! A defender of Jeffrey Epstein!! Have kiddies under the bed?" ...And Cathy Newman has entered the chat... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The whole world despises Israel? I beg to differ " ....he may be confusing Israelis with zionists... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No. Some opinions on here are fucked. The jack booted left are on the rise" Classic rightwing deflection. Try to turn the accusation round. It doesn't work on people with a brain mate. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The cry baby bed wetting lefty used wet wipes are the reason this country and the world is so fucked up." Nothing to do with insecure man baby right wing wannabe alpha fascists then (take your pick: ayatollahs, terrorists, US presidents etc) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Stopping Iran having nuclear weapons isn’t a bad thing " Yet strangely, being bombed to fuck by Israel is unlikely to reduce the hatred of Israel is it? Iran's desire for nukes was probably in large part driven by a need to have a credible mutually assured deterrence guarantee against the one nuclear power in the Middle East. You know, just like the same MAD guarantee that kept the Cold War cold in Europe. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Stopping Iran having nuclear weapons isn’t a bad thing " 100% agree. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I have no hatred of Israel But irans regime has plenty of hatred of people like us " 100% agree xx | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Japan attacked while negotiations where on going, a day so where told will live in infamy. Trump the glove puppet of the Jewish state has now proved he hasn’t learned anything from history . Terrorism will now be the wind we in the west can look forward too " We’ve been living with terrorism for the last 50 years | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Not a Trump fan but heard some english politician on telly this morning on about negotiating not bombing. Talking sometimes doesn't work, you might remember a British PM trying it with Adolf!? China has just announced a new super dooper aircraft carrier sinking missile it's selling to Iran, that may or may not be true. Couple that with Iran then possessing nuclear weapons!!! It was time to act before it's too late. And that cunt Putins input is fuckin laughable!!" It's worth that alone to see that cunt Putin lose even more influence Syria, Venezuela and now Iran sure the most important thing should be freedom for the Iranian people especially women and girls but seeing Putin lose so much influence is a good thing | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain " What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh… | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh…" How would you like it to end ... What would be acceptable, in your view? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh… How would you like it to end ... What would be acceptable, in your view? " I have no idea what would be best outcome for the nations involved, surrounding nations and globally, obviously no single outcome will please everyone, but I didn’t start the fight. My main point was does the US actually have one , after Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc you would think they might but it doesn’t look as if they have any strategy beyond bomb & kill first ask questions later. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh… How would you like it to end ... What would be acceptable, in your view? I have no idea what would be best outcome for the nations involved, surrounding nations and globally, obviously no single outcome will please everyone, but I didn’t start the fight. My main point was does the US actually have one , after Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc you would think they might but it doesn’t look as if they have any strategy beyond bomb & kill first ask questions later." It is not a matter of whether I initiated the conflict; rather, it is crucial to open your eyes and recognize the actions of the enemy lurking behind you, waiting to ensnare you. Starmer and his associates resemble characters from the Sleeping Beauty cartoon, naively believing that these ayatollahs pose no threat and that negotiations are the answer. They fail to acknowledge the missiles that have been developed over the years, particularly following discussions with the UK and other European nations, and remain oblivious to the metaphorical knife held by the ayatollahs at their throats. The ideology of the ayatollahs is to eradicate Western civilization. Europeans have fallen into their trap, akin to a child lured by chocolate, allowing them to enhance their missile capabilities. The disastrous agreements made by Biden and Obama have significantly empowered them, enabling the construction of nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States do not intervene, you could very well find yourself in a similar position as Israel is . It is challenging to instill this understanding in european minds. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh… How would you like it to end ... What would be acceptable, in your view? I have no idea what would be best outcome for the nations involved, surrounding nations and globally, obviously no single outcome will please everyone, but I didn’t start the fight. My main point was does the US actually have one , after Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc you would think they might but it doesn’t look as if they have any strategy beyond bomb & kill first ask questions later. It is not a matter of whether I initiated the conflict; rather, it is crucial to open your eyes and recognize the actions of the enemy lurking behind you, waiting to ensnare you. Starmer and his associates resemble characters from the Sleeping Beauty cartoon, naively believing that these ayatollahs pose no threat and that negotiations are the answer. They fail to acknowledge the missiles that have been developed over the years, particularly following discussions with the UK and other European nations, and remain oblivious to the metaphorical knife held by the ayatollahs at their throats. The ideology of the ayatollahs is to eradicate Western civilization. Europeans have fallen into their trap, akin to a child lured by chocolate, allowing them to enhance their missile capabilities. The disastrous agreements made by Biden and Obama have significantly empowered them, enabling the construction of nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States do not intervene, you could very well find yourself in a similar position as Israel is . It is challenging to instill this understanding in european minds. " Indeed, but like I said….whats the plan? Seems to be…we killed those leaders, now it’s up to you. The opposition who seemingly have no leader, no weapons, vs the revolutionary guard and the next batch of leadership | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh… How would you like it to end ... What would be acceptable, in your view? I have no idea what would be best outcome for the nations involved, surrounding nations and globally, obviously no single outcome will please everyone, but I didn’t start the fight. My main point was does the US actually have one , after Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc you would think they might but it doesn’t look as if they have any strategy beyond bomb & kill first ask questions later. It is not a matter of whether I initiated the conflict; rather, it is crucial to open your eyes and recognize the actions of the enemy lurking behind you, waiting to ensnare you. Starmer and his associates resemble characters from the Sleeping Beauty cartoon, naively believing that these ayatollahs pose no threat and that negotiations are the answer. They fail to acknowledge the missiles that have been developed over the years, particularly following discussions with the UK and other European nations, and remain oblivious to the metaphorical knife held by the ayatollahs at their throats. The ideology of the ayatollahs is to eradicate Western civilization. Europeans have fallen into their trap, akin to a child lured by chocolate, allowing them to enhance their missile capabilities. The disastrous agreements made by Biden and Obama have significantly empowered them, enabling the construction of nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States do not intervene, you could very well find yourself in a similar position as Israel is . It is challenging to instill this understanding in european minds. " ...the Iranians were adhering to the " disastrous deal" you're describing....until trump pulled out of it.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh… How would you like it to end ... What would be acceptable, in your view? I have no idea what would be best outcome for the nations involved, surrounding nations and globally, obviously no single outcome will please everyone, but I didn’t start the fight. My main point was does the US actually have one , after Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc you would think they might but it doesn’t look as if they have any strategy beyond bomb & kill first ask questions later. It is not a matter of whether I initiated the conflict; rather, it is crucial to open your eyes and recognize the actions of the enemy lurking behind you, waiting to ensnare you. Starmer and his associates resemble characters from the Sleeping Beauty cartoon, naively believing that these ayatollahs pose no threat and that negotiations are the answer. They fail to acknowledge the missiles that have been developed over the years, particularly following discussions with the UK and other European nations, and remain oblivious to the metaphorical knife held by the ayatollahs at their throats. The ideology of the ayatollahs is to eradicate Western civilization. Europeans have fallen into their trap, akin to a child lured by chocolate, allowing them to enhance their missile capabilities. The disastrous agreements made by Biden and Obama have significantly empowered them, enabling the construction of nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States do not intervene, you could very well find yourself in a similar position as Israel is . It is challenging to instill this understanding in european minds. Indeed, but like I said….whats the plan? Seems to be…we killed those leaders, now it’s up to you. The opposition who seemingly have no leader, no weapons, vs the revolutionary guard and the next batch of leadership " The alternative to this regime is Raza Pahlavi. The majority of Iranians desire his return to power. How can you claim there is no opposition? Iranians have chanted his name during the massive protests, both within Iran and abroad. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh… How would you like it to end ... What would be acceptable, in your view? I have no idea what would be best outcome for the nations involved, surrounding nations and globally, obviously no single outcome will please everyone, but I didn’t start the fight. My main point was does the US actually have one , after Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc you would think they might but it doesn’t look as if they have any strategy beyond bomb & kill first ask questions later. It is not a matter of whether I initiated the conflict; rather, it is crucial to open your eyes and recognize the actions of the enemy lurking behind you, waiting to ensnare you. Starmer and his associates resemble characters from the Sleeping Beauty cartoon, naively believing that these ayatollahs pose no threat and that negotiations are the answer. They fail to acknowledge the missiles that have been developed over the years, particularly following discussions with the UK and other European nations, and remain oblivious to the metaphorical knife held by the ayatollahs at their throats. The ideology of the ayatollahs is to eradicate Western civilization. Europeans have fallen into their trap, akin to a child lured by chocolate, allowing them to enhance their missile capabilities. The disastrous agreements made by Biden and Obama have significantly empowered them, enabling the construction of nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States do not intervene, you could very well find yourself in a similar position as Israel is . It is challenging to instill this understanding in european minds. ...the Iranians were adhering to the " disastrous deal" you're describing....until trump pulled out of it...." They provided the chocolate to Biden, Obama, and Europeans to continue their pursuit of atomic bombs; thankfully, Trump put an end to it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh… How would you like it to end ... What would be acceptable, in your view? I have no idea what would be best outcome for the nations involved, surrounding nations and globally, obviously no single outcome will please everyone, but I didn’t start the fight. My main point was does the US actually have one , after Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc you would think they might but it doesn’t look as if they have any strategy beyond bomb & kill first ask questions later. It is not a matter of whether I initiated the conflict; rather, it is crucial to open your eyes and recognize the actions of the enemy lurking behind you, waiting to ensnare you. Starmer and his associates resemble characters from the Sleeping Beauty cartoon, naively believing that these ayatollahs pose no threat and that negotiations are the answer. They fail to acknowledge the missiles that have been developed over the years, particularly following discussions with the UK and other European nations, and remain oblivious to the metaphorical knife held by the ayatollahs at their throats. The ideology of the ayatollahs is to eradicate Western civilization. Europeans have fallen into their trap, akin to a child lured by chocolate, allowing them to enhance their missile capabilities. The disastrous agreements made by Biden and Obama have significantly empowered them, enabling the construction of nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States do not intervene, you could very well find yourself in a similar position as Israel is . It is challenging to instill this understanding in european minds. " Excellent post | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh… How would you like it to end ... What would be acceptable, in your view? I have no idea what would be best outcome for the nations involved, surrounding nations and globally, obviously no single outcome will please everyone, but I didn’t start the fight. My main point was does the US actually have one , after Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc you would think they might but it doesn’t look as if they have any strategy beyond bomb & kill first ask questions later. It is not a matter of whether I initiated the conflict; rather, it is crucial to open your eyes and recognize the actions of the enemy lurking behind you, waiting to ensnare you. Starmer and his associates resemble characters from the Sleeping Beauty cartoon, naively believing that these ayatollahs pose no threat and that negotiations are the answer. They fail to acknowledge the missiles that have been developed over the years, particularly following discussions with the UK and other European nations, and remain oblivious to the metaphorical knife held by the ayatollahs at their throats. The ideology of the ayatollahs is to eradicate Western civilization. Europeans have fallen into their trap, akin to a child lured by chocolate, allowing them to enhance their missile capabilities. The disastrous agreements made by Biden and Obama have significantly empowered them, enabling the construction of nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States do not intervene, you could very well find yourself in a similar position as Israel is . It is challenging to instill this understanding in european minds. Indeed, but like I said….whats the plan? Seems to be…we killed those leaders, now it’s up to you. The opposition who seemingly have no leader, no weapons, vs the revolutionary guard and the next batch of leadership The alternative to this regime is Raza Pahlavi. The majority of Iranians desire his return to power. How can you claim there is no opposition? Iranians have chanted his name during the massive protests, both within Iran and abroad." I didn’t say no support, clearly there is but without some sort of firepower, just chanting won’t depose the regime. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh… How would you like it to end ... What would be acceptable, in your view? I have no idea what would be best outcome for the nations involved, surrounding nations and globally, obviously no single outcome will please everyone, but I didn’t start the fight. My main point was does the US actually have one , after Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc you would think they might but it doesn’t look as if they have any strategy beyond bomb & kill first ask questions later. It is not a matter of whether I initiated the conflict; rather, it is crucial to open your eyes and recognize the actions of the enemy lurking behind you, waiting to ensnare you. Starmer and his associates resemble characters from the Sleeping Beauty cartoon, naively believing that these ayatollahs pose no threat and that negotiations are the answer. They fail to acknowledge the missiles that have been developed over the years, particularly following discussions with the UK and other European nations, and remain oblivious to the metaphorical knife held by the ayatollahs at their throats. The ideology of the ayatollahs is to eradicate Western civilization. Europeans have fallen into their trap, akin to a child lured by chocolate, allowing them to enhance their missile capabilities. The disastrous agreements made by Biden and Obama have significantly empowered them, enabling the construction of nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States do not intervene, you could very well find yourself in a similar position as Israel is . It is challenging to instill this understanding in european minds. ...the Iranians were adhering to the " disastrous deal" you're describing....until trump pulled out of it.... They provided the chocolate to Biden, Obama, and Europeans to continue their pursuit of atomic bombs; thankfully, Trump put an end to it." total bullshit...look it up....the Iranians were in total compliance until trump pulled out...don't lie to prove your point....the only people who want the Shah's son are the Israelis...he's mossads guy... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh… How would you like it to end ... What would be acceptable, in your view? I have no idea what would be best outcome for the nations involved, surrounding nations and globally, obviously no single outcome will please everyone, but I didn’t start the fight. My main point was does the US actually have one , after Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc you would think they might but it doesn’t look as if they have any strategy beyond bomb & kill first ask questions later. It is not a matter of whether I initiated the conflict; rather, it is crucial to open your eyes and recognize the actions of the enemy lurking behind you, waiting to ensnare you. Starmer and his associates resemble characters from the Sleeping Beauty cartoon, naively believing that these ayatollahs pose no threat and that negotiations are the answer. They fail to acknowledge the missiles that have been developed over the years, particularly following discussions with the UK and other European nations, and remain oblivious to the metaphorical knife held by the ayatollahs at their throats. The ideology of the ayatollahs is to eradicate Western civilization. Europeans have fallen into their trap, akin to a child lured by chocolate, allowing them to enhance their missile capabilities. The disastrous agreements made by Biden and Obama have significantly empowered them, enabling the construction of nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States do not intervene, you could very well find yourself in a similar position as Israel is . It is challenging to instill this understanding in european minds. Indeed, but like I said….whats the plan? Seems to be…we killed those leaders, now it’s up to you. The opposition who seemingly have no leader, no weapons, vs the revolutionary guard and the next batch of leadership The alternative to this regime is Raza Pahlavi. The majority of Iranians desire his return to power. How can you claim there is no opposition? Iranians have chanted his name during the massive protests, both within Iran and abroad. I didn’t say no support, clearly there is but without some sort of firepower, just chanting won’t depose the regime." It's amusing that you previously stated there was no opposition, yet now you're claiming it doesn't function. Please explain how it operates, as I'm waiting for your clarification. How do you expect the opposition to present themselves in front of tanks and machine guns, aside from chanting? Should they resort to armed conflict like in Syria? Let's engage in a discussion that makes sense. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh… How would you like it to end ... What would be acceptable, in your view? I have no idea what would be best outcome for the nations involved, surrounding nations and globally, obviously no single outcome will please everyone, but I didn’t start the fight. My main point was does the US actually have one , after Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc you would think they might but it doesn’t look as if they have any strategy beyond bomb & kill first ask questions later. It is not a matter of whether I initiated the conflict; rather, it is crucial to open your eyes and recognize the actions of the enemy lurking behind you, waiting to ensnare you. Starmer and his associates resemble characters from the Sleeping Beauty cartoon, naively believing that these ayatollahs pose no threat and that negotiations are the answer. They fail to acknowledge the missiles that have been developed over the years, particularly following discussions with the UK and other European nations, and remain oblivious to the metaphorical knife held by the ayatollahs at their throats. The ideology of the ayatollahs is to eradicate Western civilization. Europeans have fallen into their trap, akin to a child lured by chocolate, allowing them to enhance their missile capabilities. The disastrous agreements made by Biden and Obama have significantly empowered them, enabling the construction of nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States do not intervene, you could very well find yourself in a similar position as Israel is . It is challenging to instill this understanding in european minds. ...the Iranians were adhering to the " disastrous deal" you're describing....until trump pulled out of it.... They provided the chocolate to Biden, Obama, and Europeans to continue their pursuit of atomic bombs; thankfully, Trump put an end to it.total bullshit...look it up....the Iranians were in total compliance until trump pulled out...don't lie to prove your point....the only people who want the Shah's son are the Israelis...he's mossads guy..." Absolutely correct. Iran was a signed up member of both the IAEA and the NPT and completely transparent in their dealings with them and their investigators. There is no evidence whatsoever in supprt of Iran's drive for a nuclear arsenal. This is Iraq all over again and nothing more than another smoke screen to justify regime change. The only threat Iran poses is to Israel, quite frankly a fascist state whose repeated war crimes and acts of ethnic cleansing have only served to heighten this attitude. The Shah was returned to power by the machinations of the British and American secret services following a coup initiated by the CIA to overthrow the moderate and democratically elected Mossadegh in their quest for oil. Don't be fooled into thinking that this is about peace. Netanyahu whistles and Israel's attack dog comes running. The only way to achive real peace in the region is to bring Israel to heel. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh… How would you like it to end ... What would be acceptable, in your view? I have no idea what would be best outcome for the nations involved, surrounding nations and globally, obviously no single outcome will please everyone, but I didn’t start the fight. My main point was does the US actually have one , after Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc you would think they might but it doesn’t look as if they have any strategy beyond bomb & kill first ask questions later. It is not a matter of whether I initiated the conflict; rather, it is crucial to open your eyes and recognize the actions of the enemy lurking behind you, waiting to ensnare you. Starmer and his associates resemble characters from the Sleeping Beauty cartoon, naively believing that these ayatollahs pose no threat and that negotiations are the answer. They fail to acknowledge the missiles that have been developed over the years, particularly following discussions with the UK and other European nations, and remain oblivious to the metaphorical knife held by the ayatollahs at their throats. The ideology of the ayatollahs is to eradicate Western civilization. Europeans have fallen into their trap, akin to a child lured by chocolate, allowing them to enhance their missile capabilities. The disastrous agreements made by Biden and Obama have significantly empowered them, enabling the construction of nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States do not intervene, you could very well find yourself in a similar position as Israel is . It is challenging to instill this understanding in european minds. ...the Iranians were adhering to the " disastrous deal" you're describing....until trump pulled out of it.... They provided the chocolate to Biden, Obama, and Europeans to continue their pursuit of atomic bombs; thankfully, Trump put an end to it.total bullshit...look it up....the Iranians were in total compliance until trump pulled out...don't lie to prove your point....the only people who want the Shah's son are the Israelis...he's mossads guy..." The individuals you are referring to are not Iranians; rather, those present during the negotiations were representatives of the terrorist ayatollahs. It is advisable to educate yourself about Iran or consult a few Iranians who can provide you with the truth. Do not become ensnared in the propaganda of the ayatollahs. Aligning yourself with Brother Starmer and China diverts you from the path of democracy. My friends are not Israelis liar and I know Iranians very well better than you . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh… How would you like it to end ... What would be acceptable, in your view? I have no idea what would be best outcome for the nations involved, surrounding nations and globally, obviously no single outcome will please everyone, but I didn’t start the fight. My main point was does the US actually have one , after Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc you would think they might but it doesn’t look as if they have any strategy beyond bomb & kill first ask questions later. It is not a matter of whether I initiated the conflict; rather, it is crucial to open your eyes and recognize the actions of the enemy lurking behind you, waiting to ensnare you. Starmer and his associates resemble characters from the Sleeping Beauty cartoon, naively believing that these ayatollahs pose no threat and that negotiations are the answer. They fail to acknowledge the missiles that have been developed over the years, particularly following discussions with the UK and other European nations, and remain oblivious to the metaphorical knife held by the ayatollahs at their throats. The ideology of the ayatollahs is to eradicate Western civilization. Europeans have fallen into their trap, akin to a child lured by chocolate, allowing them to enhance their missile capabilities. The disastrous agreements made by Biden and Obama have significantly empowered them, enabling the construction of nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States do not intervene, you could very well find yourself in a similar position as Israel is . It is challenging to instill this understanding in european minds. ...the Iranians were adhering to the " disastrous deal" you're describing....until trump pulled out of it.... They provided the chocolate to Biden, Obama, and Europeans to continue their pursuit of atomic bombs; thankfully, Trump put an end to it.total bullshit...look it up....the Iranians were in total compliance until trump pulled out...don't lie to prove your point....the only people who want the Shah's son are the Israelis...he's mossads guy... Absolutely correct. Iran was a signed up member of both the IAEA and the NPT and completely transparent in their dealings with them and their investigators. There is no evidence whatsoever in supprt of Iran's drive for a nuclear arsenal. This is Iraq all over again and nothing more than another smoke screen to justify regime change. The only threat Iran poses is to Israel, quite frankly a fascist state whose repeated war crimes and acts of ethnic cleansing have only served to heighten this attitude. The Shah was returned to power by the machinations of the British and American secret services following a coup initiated by the CIA to overthrow the moderate and democratically elected Mossadegh in their quest for oil. Don't be fooled into thinking that this is about peace. Netanyahu whistles and Israel's attack dog comes running. The only way to achive real peace in the region is to bring Israel to heel." Excellent post. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh… How would you like it to end ... What would be acceptable, in your view? I have no idea what would be best outcome for the nations involved, surrounding nations and globally, obviously no single outcome will please everyone, but I didn’t start the fight. My main point was does the US actually have one , after Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc you would think they might but it doesn’t look as if they have any strategy beyond bomb & kill first ask questions later. It is not a matter of whether I initiated the conflict; rather, it is crucial to open your eyes and recognize the actions of the enemy lurking behind you, waiting to ensnare you. Starmer and his associates resemble characters from the Sleeping Beauty cartoon, naively believing that these ayatollahs pose no threat and that negotiations are the answer. They fail to acknowledge the missiles that have been developed over the years, particularly following discussions with the UK and other European nations, and remain oblivious to the metaphorical knife held by the ayatollahs at their throats. The ideology of the ayatollahs is to eradicate Western civilization. Europeans have fallen into their trap, akin to a child lured by chocolate, allowing them to enhance their missile capabilities. The disastrous agreements made by Biden and Obama have significantly empowered them, enabling the construction of nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States do not intervene, you could very well find yourself in a similar position as Israel is . It is challenging to instill this understanding in european minds. ...the Iranians were adhering to the " disastrous deal" you're describing....until trump pulled out of it.... They provided the chocolate to Biden, Obama, and Europeans to continue their pursuit of atomic bombs; thankfully, Trump put an end to it.total bullshit...look it up....the Iranians were in total compliance until trump pulled out...don't lie to prove your point....the only people who want the Shah's son are the Israelis...he's mossads guy... Absolutely correct. Iran was a signed up member of both the IAEA and the NPT and completely transparent in their dealings with them and their investigators. There is no evidence whatsoever in supprt of Iran's drive for a nuclear arsenal. This is Iraq all over again and nothing more than another smoke screen to justify regime change. The only threat Iran poses is to Israel, quite frankly a fascist state whose repeated war crimes and acts of ethnic cleansing have only served to heighten this attitude. The Shah was returned to power by the machinations of the British and American secret services following a coup initiated by the CIA to overthrow the moderate and democratically elected Mossadegh in their quest for oil. Don't be fooled into thinking that this is about peace. Netanyahu whistles and Israel's attack dog comes running. The only way to achive real peace in the region is to bring Israel to heel." Individuals who are supporting Reza Pahlavi are not Israelis. How did you come to that conclusion? Where does that idea originate? Frankly, I am not disturbed by the trivial and nonsensical remarks from the lefties . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I learned from my Iranian friends that the BBC Persian newsreader began to cry while reporting the death of Ayatollah Khamenei, who had ordered the killing of 40,000 young protesters in the streets in just 10 hours . Who is truly funding her salary? It is us, the taxpayers in the UK. Starmer and his associates are promoting Ayatollahs and terrorists, and we are the ones footing the bill. I can no longer tolerate the leftists, especially their aggressive behaviour in discussions and their use of profanity instead of making rational arguments. Really they are " The Iranian state TV presenter broke down on air. Perhaps your friend is confused, but I’m sure you could check for yourself on the BBC Persian website. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh… How would you like it to end ... What would be acceptable, in your view? I have no idea what would be best outcome for the nations involved, surrounding nations and globally, obviously no single outcome will please everyone, but I didn’t start the fight. My main point was does the US actually have one , after Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc you would think they might but it doesn’t look as if they have any strategy beyond bomb & kill first ask questions later. It is not a matter of whether I initiated the conflict; rather, it is crucial to open your eyes and recognize the actions of the enemy lurking behind you, waiting to ensnare you. Starmer and his associates resemble characters from the Sleeping Beauty cartoon, naively believing that these ayatollahs pose no threat and that negotiations are the answer. They fail to acknowledge the missiles that have been developed over the years, particularly following discussions with the UK and other European nations, and remain oblivious to the metaphorical knife held by the ayatollahs at their throats. The ideology of the ayatollahs is to eradicate Western civilization. Europeans have fallen into their trap, akin to a child lured by chocolate, allowing them to enhance their missile capabilities. The disastrous agreements made by Biden and Obama have significantly empowered them, enabling the construction of nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States do not intervene, you could very well find yourself in a similar position as Israel is . It is challenging to instill this understanding in european minds. ...the Iranians were adhering to the " disastrous deal" you're describing....until trump pulled out of it.... They provided the chocolate to Biden, Obama, and Europeans to continue their pursuit of atomic bombs; thankfully, Trump put an end to it.total bullshit...look it up....the Iranians were in total compliance until trump pulled out...don't lie to prove your point....the only people who want the Shah's son are the Israelis...he's mossads guy... The individuals you are referring to are not Iranians; rather, those present during the negotiations were representatives of the terrorist ayatollahs. It is advisable to educate yourself about Iran or consult a few Iranians who can provide you with the truth. Do not become ensnared in the propaganda of the ayatollahs. Aligning yourself with Brother Starmer and China diverts you from the path of democracy. My friends are not Israelis liar and I know Iranians very well better than you . " ... Trump pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal....that's a fact The Iranians were complaint...another fact. Iran signed up to the NPT...Israel didn't...another fact. Iran allowed inspection of their nuclear sites...Israel didn't....are you seeing a pattern here....? Also, you sound ill informed on what's happening in Iran | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I learned from my Iranian friends that the BBC Persian newsreader began to cry while reporting the death of Ayatollah Khamenei, who had ordered the killing of 40,000 young protesters in the streets in just 10 hours . Who is truly funding her salary? It is us, the taxpayers in the UK. Starmer and his associates are promoting Ayatollahs and terrorists, and we are the ones footing the bill. I can no longer tolerate the leftists, especially their aggressive behaviour in discussions and their use of profanity instead of making rational arguments. Really they are The Iranian state TV presenter broke down on air. Perhaps your friend is confused, but I’m sure you could check for yourself on the BBC Persian website." That just proves that not every Iranian hates their regime, something perfectly normal i believe. I can understand why some would wish to see an end to the Ayatollahs but this is an internal issue to be dealt with by the Iranian people without interference from the west, particularly Israel. The only reason America is involved is that they seek to ensure exactly who takes over, effectively another western puppet and in doing so only exchanges one dictatorship for another. Iran can only truly benefit from a return to a democratically elected leadership. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I learned from my Iranian friends that the BBC Persian newsreader began to cry while reporting the death of Ayatollah Khamenei, who had ordered the killing of 40,000 young protesters in the streets in just 10 hours . Who is truly funding her salary? It is us, the taxpayers in the UK. Starmer and his associates are promoting Ayatollahs and terrorists, and we are the ones footing the bill. I can no longer tolerate the leftists, especially their aggressive behaviour in discussions and their use of profanity instead of making rational arguments. Really they are The Iranian state TV presenter broke down on air. Perhaps your friend is confused, but I’m sure you could check for yourself on the BBC Persian website." No you are talking about state tv presenter and I am talking about the bbc Persian news reader . If you didn’t find it I send you the link | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I learned from my Iranian friends that the BBC Persian newsreader began to cry while reporting the death of Ayatollah Khamenei, who had ordered the killing of 40,000 young protesters in the streets in just 10 hours . Who is truly funding her salary? It is us, the taxpayers in the UK. Starmer and his associates are promoting Ayatollahs and terrorists, and we are the ones footing the bill. I can no longer tolerate the leftists, especially their aggressive behaviour in discussions and their use of profanity instead of making rational arguments. Really they are The Iranian state TV presenter broke down on air. Perhaps your friend is confused, but I’m sure you could check for yourself on the BBC Persian website. That just proves that not every Iranian hates their regime, something perfectly normal i believe. I can understand why some would wish to see an end to the Ayatollahs but this is an internal issue to be dealt with by the Iranian people without interference from the west, particularly Israel. The only reason America is involved is that they seek to ensure exactly who takes over, effectively another western puppet and in doing so only exchanges one dictatorship for another. Iran can only truly benefit from a return to a democratically elected leadership." Engage in a sensible conversation so that I can discuss matters with you. If a BBC newsreader expresses sorrow for Bin Laden, it indicates that not everyone opposes him. Why is it so difficult for you to acknowledge that the Ayatollahs are murderer? He gave orders to shoot 40,000 young people in the streets just because they were protesting against him . Is it really so challenging for you to agree that he was a terrorist? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I learned from my Iranian friends that the BBC Persian newsreader began to cry while reporting the death of Ayatollah Khamenei, who had ordered the killing of 40,000 young protesters in the streets in just 10 hours . Who is truly funding her salary? It is us, the taxpayers in the UK. Starmer and his associates are promoting Ayatollahs and terrorists, and we are the ones footing the bill. I can no longer tolerate the leftists, especially their aggressive behaviour in discussions and their use of profanity instead of making rational arguments. Really they are The Iranian state TV presenter broke down on air. Perhaps your friend is confused, but I’m sure you could check for yourself on the BBC Persian website. That just proves that not every Iranian hates their regime, something perfectly normal i believe. I can understand why some would wish to see an end to the Ayatollahs but this is an internal issue to be dealt with by the Iranian people without interference from the west, particularly Israel. The only reason America is involved is that they seek to ensure exactly who takes over, effectively another western puppet and in doing so only exchanges one dictatorship for another. Iran can only truly benefit from a return to a democratically elected leadership. Engage in a sensible conversation so that I can discuss matters with you. If a BBC newsreader expresses sorrow for Bin Laden, it indicates that not everyone opposes him. Why is it so difficult for you to acknowledge that the Ayatollahs are murderer? He gave orders to shoot 40,000 young people in the streets just because they were protesting against him . Is it really so challenging for you to agree that he was a terrorist?" ...putin and Xi are terrorists too....when is Israel and America going to liberate the poor Russians and Chinese from their brutal regimes....? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I learned from my Iranian friends that the BBC Persian newsreader began to cry while reporting the death of Ayatollah Khamenei, who had ordered the killing of 40,000 young protesters in the streets in just 10 hours . Who is truly funding her salary? It is us, the taxpayers in the UK. Starmer and his associates are promoting Ayatollahs and terrorists, and we are the ones footing the bill. I can no longer tolerate the leftists, especially their aggressive behaviour in discussions and their use of profanity instead of making rational arguments. Really they are The Iranian state TV presenter broke down on air. Perhaps your friend is confused, but I’m sure you could check for yourself on the BBC Persian website. That just proves that not every Iranian hates their regime, something perfectly normal i believe. I can understand why some would wish to see an end to the Ayatollahs but this is an internal issue to be dealt with by the Iranian people without interference from the west, particularly Israel. The only reason America is involved is that they seek to ensure exactly who takes over, effectively another western puppet and in doing so only exchanges one dictatorship for another. Iran can only truly benefit from a return to a democratically elected leadership. Engage in a sensible conversation so that I can discuss matters with you. If a BBC newsreader expresses sorrow for Bin Laden, it indicates that not everyone opposes him. Why is it so difficult for you to acknowledge that the Ayatollahs are murderer? He gave orders to shoot 40,000 young people in the streets just because they were protesting against him . Is it really so challenging for you to agree that he was a terrorist?" Whether someone can be considered a terrorist is entirely subjective, very much dependent on which side of the fence one chooses to sit. If Iran is a terrorist state, and nowhere have i stated that it isn't, then their actions pale beside the terrorist acts of Israel and America. You don't get to choose simply because propaganda suggests justification. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I learned from my Iranian friends that the BBC Persian newsreader began to cry while reporting the death of Ayatollah Khamenei, who had ordered the killing of 40,000 young protesters in the streets in just 10 hours . Who is truly funding her salary? It is us, the taxpayers in the UK. Starmer and his associates are promoting Ayatollahs and terrorists, and we are the ones footing the bill. I can no longer tolerate the leftists, especially their aggressive behaviour in discussions and their use of profanity instead of making rational arguments. Really they are The Iranian state TV presenter broke down on air. Perhaps your friend is confused, but I’m sure you could check for yourself on the BBC Persian website. That just proves that not every Iranian hates their regime, something perfectly normal i believe. I can understand why some would wish to see an end to the Ayatollahs but this is an internal issue to be dealt with by the Iranian people without interference from the west, particularly Israel. The only reason America is involved is that they seek to ensure exactly who takes over, effectively another western puppet and in doing so only exchanges one dictatorship for another. Iran can only truly benefit from a return to a democratically elected leadership. Engage in a sensible conversation so that I can discuss matters with you. If a BBC newsreader expresses sorrow for Bin Laden, it indicates that not everyone opposes him. Why is it so difficult for you to acknowledge that the Ayatollahs are murderer? He gave orders to shoot 40,000 young people in the streets just because they were protesting against him . Is it really so challenging for you to agree that he was a terrorist?...putin and Xi are terrorists too....when is Israel and America going to liberate the poor Russians and Chinese from their brutal regimes....?" It's not about protecting Iranians, it's about protecting Israel. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I'm just glad I sold all my Stocks & Shares ISAs last week. This will only exacerbate the inevitable crash." Sold... You obviously haven't invested in BAE systems and other weapons suppliers then as manufacturing is going through the roof. Plus for those of us holding Oil & Gas shares, life is good. Fine time to sell Gold and Rolex's Hold onto those shares and keep investing. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I learned from my Iranian friends that the BBC Persian newsreader began to cry while reporting the death of Ayatollah Khamenei, who had ordered the killing of 40,000 young protesters in the streets in just 10 hours . Who is truly funding her salary? It is us, the taxpayers in the UK. Starmer and his associates are promoting Ayatollahs and terrorists, and we are the ones footing the bill. I can no longer tolerate the leftists, especially their aggressive behaviour in discussions and their use of profanity instead of making rational arguments. Really they are The Iranian state TV presenter broke down on air. Perhaps your friend is confused, but I’m sure you could check for yourself on the BBC Persian website. That just proves that not every Iranian hates their regime, something perfectly normal i believe. I can understand why some would wish to see an end to the Ayatollahs but this is an internal issue to be dealt with by the Iranian people without interference from the west, particularly Israel. The only reason America is involved is that they seek to ensure exactly who takes over, effectively another western puppet and in doing so only exchanges one dictatorship for another. Iran can only truly benefit from a return to a democratically elected leadership. Engage in a sensible conversation so that I can discuss matters with you. If a BBC newsreader expresses sorrow for Bin Laden, it indicates that not everyone opposes him. Why is it so difficult for you to acknowledge that the Ayatollahs are murderer? He gave orders to shoot 40,000 young people in the streets just because they were protesting against him . Is it really so challenging for you to agree that he was a terrorist? Whether someone can be considered a terrorist is entirely subjective, very much dependent on which side of the fence one chooses to sit. If Iran is a terrorist state, and nowhere have i stated that it isn't, then their actions pale beside the terrorist acts of Israel and America. You don't get to choose simply because propaganda suggests justification." Are you genuinely suggesting that they are not terrorists for killing 40,000 protesters who were merely chanting against them? Are you serious? What makes you believe that people should heed your words? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. Yes but enough of the ayatollah, well done US & Israel" So you think that the actions of a deranged lunatic and paedophile aided by the coward Netanyahu who is now hiding in Germany deserves congratulations? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I learned from my Iranian friends that the BBC Persian newsreader began to cry while reporting the death of Ayatollah Khamenei, who had ordered the killing of 40,000 young protesters in the streets in just 10 hours . Who is truly funding her salary? It is us, the taxpayers in the UK. Starmer and his associates are promoting Ayatollahs and terrorists, and we are the ones footing the bill. I can no longer tolerate the leftists, especially their aggressive behaviour in discussions and their use of profanity instead of making rational arguments. Really they are The Iranian state TV presenter broke down on air. Perhaps your friend is confused, but I’m sure you could check for yourself on the BBC Persian website. That just proves that not every Iranian hates their regime, something perfectly normal i believe. I can understand why some would wish to see an end to the Ayatollahs but this is an internal issue to be dealt with by the Iranian people without interference from the west, particularly Israel. The only reason America is involved is that they seek to ensure exactly who takes over, effectively another western puppet and in doing so only exchanges one dictatorship for another. Iran can only truly benefit from a return to a democratically elected leadership. Engage in a sensible conversation so that I can discuss matters with you. If a BBC newsreader expresses sorrow for Bin Laden, it indicates that not everyone opposes him. Why is it so difficult for you to acknowledge that the Ayatollahs are murderer? He gave orders to shoot 40,000 young people in the streets just because they were protesting against him . Is it really so challenging for you to agree that he was a terrorist? Whether someone can be considered a terrorist is entirely subjective, very much dependent on which side of the fence one chooses to sit. If Iran is a terrorist state, and nowhere have i stated that it isn't, then their actions pale beside the terrorist acts of Israel and America. You don't get to choose simply because propaganda suggests justification. Are you genuinely suggesting that they are not terrorists for killing 40,000 protesters who were merely chanting against them? Are you serious? What makes you believe that people should heed your words?" I didn't and never have suggested that these aren't acts of terror. Allow me to rephrase this in a simpler way in the hope that you might understand: If Iran fires rockets at Israel it's an act of terror. If Israel fires rockets at Iran it's an act of self defense yet the two acts are identical. The only difference is is in perceived justification. Such perceived justification comes solely from propaganda and indoctrination. If you truly believe that Israel is justified and refuse to view their actions as acts of terrorism then that only goes to show that you are a victim of propaganda and indoctrination. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Put simply, if the Zionists had never been allowed to sieze and illegally colonise Palestine none of this would be happening. That's the fault of the west, by the way. The fact that we think we can fix this by continuing down that road just goes to show how ignorant and stupid we are and how we still refuse to learn the most fundamental of lessons." 👍👍👍👏👏👏 Absolutely so. I understand that Netanyahu is now hiding in Germany in fear of meeting an Iranian missile at close quarters, while his American Head of State lol carries on telling wall to wall lies. They are a disgrace to humanity. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Put simply, if the Zionists had never been allowed to sieze and illegally colonise Palestine none of this would be happening. That's the fault of the west, by the way. The fact that we think we can fix this by continuing down that road just goes to show how ignorant and stupid we are and how we still refuse to learn the most fundamental of lessons. 👍👍👍👏👏👏 Absolutely so. I understand that Netanyahu is now hiding in Germany in fear of meeting an Iranian missile at close quarters, while his American Head of State lol carries on telling wall to wall lies. They are a disgrace to humanity." We all know the real cause of the problems faced in the Middle East. Some are able to acknowledge that, some wish to keep their heads buried firmly in the dirt. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh… How would you like it to end ... What would be acceptable, in your view? I have no idea what would be best outcome for the nations involved, surrounding nations and globally, obviously no single outcome will please everyone, but I didn’t start the fight. My main point was does the US actually have one , after Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc you would think they might but it doesn’t look as if they have any strategy beyond bomb & kill first ask questions later. It is not a matter of whether I initiated the conflict; rather, it is crucial to open your eyes and recognize the actions of the enemy lurking behind you, waiting to ensnare you. Starmer and his associates resemble characters from the Sleeping Beauty cartoon, naively believing that these ayatollahs pose no threat and that negotiations are the answer. They fail to acknowledge the missiles that have been developed over the years, particularly following discussions with the UK and other European nations, and remain oblivious to the metaphorical knife held by the ayatollahs at their throats. The ideology of the ayatollahs is to eradicate Western civilization. Europeans have fallen into their trap, akin to a child lured by chocolate, allowing them to enhance their missile capabilities. The disastrous agreements made by Biden and Obama have significantly empowered them, enabling the construction of nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States do not intervene, you could very well find yourself in a similar position as Israel is . It is challenging to instill this understanding in european minds. Indeed, but like I said….whats the plan? Seems to be…we killed those leaders, now it’s up to you. The opposition who seemingly have no leader, no weapons, vs the revolutionary guard and the next batch of leadership The alternative to this regime is Raza Pahlavi. The majority of Iranians desire his return to power. How can you claim there is no opposition? Iranians have chanted his name during the massive protests, both within Iran and abroad. I didn’t say no support, clearly there is but without some sort of firepower, just chanting won’t depose the regime. It's amusing that you previously stated there was no opposition, yet now you're claiming it doesn't function. Please explain how it operates, as I'm waiting for your clarification. How do you expect the opposition to present themselves in front of tanks and machine guns, aside from chanting? Should they resort to armed conflict like in Syria? Let's engage in a discussion that makes sense." I don’t know where the no opposition statement has come from, not me. Clearly there is from the bodies that piled up previously, what I said there is no leader to organize, mobilize and maybe get arms etc, or if there is they are very quiet and not giving anyone something tangible to rally around. You actually have made my point it does seem to operate merely as protest, which is akin to how the negotiations have been likened….nothing moving, little progress just words. I am sure armed conflict would at least give the revolutionary guard some opposition, but where is it? After all the powers that be are unlikely to throw down their weapons and say ‘you have a point, you win’ they are loyal to the regime and I cannot see how that can be overcome by local opposition. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh… How would you like it to end ... What would be acceptable, in your view? I have no idea what would be best outcome for the nations involved, surrounding nations and globally, obviously no single outcome will please everyone, but I didn’t start the fight. My main point was does the US actually have one , after Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc you would think they might but it doesn’t look as if they have any strategy beyond bomb & kill first ask questions later. It is not a matter of whether I initiated the conflict; rather, it is crucial to open your eyes and recognize the actions of the enemy lurking behind you, waiting to ensnare you. Starmer and his associates resemble characters from the Sleeping Beauty cartoon, naively believing that these ayatollahs pose no threat and that negotiations are the answer. They fail to acknowledge the missiles that have been developed over the years, particularly following discussions with the UK and other European nations, and remain oblivious to the metaphorical knife held by the ayatollahs at their throats. The ideology of the ayatollahs is to eradicate Western civilization. Europeans have fallen into their trap, akin to a child lured by chocolate, allowing them to enhance their missile capabilities. The disastrous agreements made by Biden and Obama have significantly empowered them, enabling the construction of nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States do not intervene, you could very well find yourself in a similar position as Israel is . It is challenging to instill this understanding in european minds. " And welcoming the enemy within. Stop the Boats | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh… How would you like it to end ... What would be acceptable, in your view? I have no idea what would be best outcome for the nations involved, surrounding nations and globally, obviously no single outcome will please everyone, but I didn’t start the fight. My main point was does the US actually have one , after Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc you would think they might but it doesn’t look as if they have any strategy beyond bomb & kill first ask questions later. It is not a matter of whether I initiated the conflict; rather, it is crucial to open your eyes and recognize the actions of the enemy lurking behind you, waiting to ensnare you. Starmer and his associates resemble characters from the Sleeping Beauty cartoon, naively believing that these ayatollahs pose no threat and that negotiations are the answer. They fail to acknowledge the missiles that have been developed over the years, particularly following discussions with the UK and other European nations, and remain oblivious to the metaphorical knife held by the ayatollahs at their throats. The ideology of the ayatollahs is to eradicate Western civilization. Europeans have fallen into their trap, akin to a child lured by chocolate, allowing them to enhance their missile capabilities. The disastrous agreements made by Biden and Obama have significantly empowered them, enabling the construction of nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States do not intervene, you could very well find yourself in a similar position as Israel is . It is challenging to instill this understanding in european minds. And welcoming the enemy within. Stop the Boats" ..stop the yachts...  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Have we got any air raid sirens in this country! Genuine question! " ...Where's gracie fields when you need her..... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Have we got any air raid sirens in this country! Genuine question! " No ... But if every radio station is playing Two-Tribes on rotation, ..... Then hide under the table with a bottle of water and some wet wipes | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Regime change UK next please Donald! 👍" Traitor. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Acting like the war lords they are. Man’s a lunatic listening to him just now on the tv. I won't be overly concerned about the ayatollahs. Iranians are pleased to see missiles directed at the ayatollahs. We should simply celebrate the demise of these individuals and focus on the positive aspect, which is the impending peace in the Middle East once these mullahs and their fascist ideologies are eliminated. Sure but then what?? They need a stable government otherwise I bet you hate the small boats to Britain What is your exit strategy Don? Don? Donny? Anything? Oh… How would you like it to end ... What would be acceptable, in your view? I have no idea what would be best outcome for the nations involved, surrounding nations and globally, obviously no single outcome will please everyone, but I didn’t start the fight. My main point was does the US actually have one , after Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc you would think they might but it doesn’t look as if they have any strategy beyond bomb & kill first ask questions later. It is not a matter of whether I initiated the conflict; rather, it is crucial to open your eyes and recognize the actions of the enemy lurking behind you, waiting to ensnare you. Starmer and his associates resemble characters from the Sleeping Beauty cartoon, naively believing that these ayatollahs pose no threat and that negotiations are the answer. They fail to acknowledge the missiles that have been developed over the years, particularly following discussions with the UK and other European nations, and remain oblivious to the metaphorical knife held by the ayatollahs at their throats. The ideology of the ayatollahs is to eradicate Western civilization. Europeans have fallen into their trap, akin to a child lured by chocolate, allowing them to enhance their missile capabilities. The disastrous agreements made by Biden and Obama have significantly empowered them, enabling the construction of nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States do not intervene, you could very well find yourself in a similar position as Israel is . It is challenging to instill this understanding in european minds. Indeed, but like I said….whats the plan? Seems to be…we killed those leaders, now it’s up to you. The opposition who seemingly have no leader, no weapons, vs the revolutionary guard and the next batch of leadership The alternative to this regime is Raza Pahlavi. The majority of Iranians desire his return to power. How can you claim there is no opposition? Iranians have chanted his name during the massive protests, both within Iran and abroad. I didn’t say no support, clearly there is but without some sort of firepower, just chanting won’t depose the regime. It's amusing that you previously stated there was no opposition, yet now you're claiming it doesn't function. Please explain how it operates, as I'm waiting for your clarification. How do you expect the opposition to present themselves in front of tanks and machine guns, aside from chanting? Should they resort to armed conflict like in Syria? Let's engage in a discussion that makes sense. I don’t know where the no opposition statement has come from, not me. Clearly there is from the bodies that piled up previously, what I said there is no leader to organize, mobilize and maybe get arms etc, or if there is they are very quiet and not giving anyone something tangible to rally around. You actually have made my point it does seem to operate merely as protest, which is akin to how the negotiations have been likened….nothing moving, little progress just words. I am sure armed conflict would at least give the revolutionary guard some opposition, but where is it? After all the powers that be are unlikely to throw down their weapons and say ‘you have a point, you win’ they are loyal to the regime and I cannot see how that can be overcome by local opposition." Fighting against a fascist regime is not an easy task; it is a lengthy process, but it is possible to dismantle them. It’s not as simple as them dropping their weapons and fleeing in just two days; they continue to kill until their very end. Contrary to your statement, there have been numerous calls from Reza Pahlavi that have garnered significant responses from both the nation in iran and abroad. When all EU countries designated the IRGC as a terrorist organisation, it marked a significant advancement towards victory. calls and protests are progressing, and they will be brought down. Their message has reached the rest of the world, and now the Nazi regime is constrained by foreign forces and Iranians from within. Their time is running out; not many days remain. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I learned from my Iranian friends that the BBC Persian newsreader began to cry while reporting the death of Ayatollah Khamenei, who had ordered the killing of 40,000 young protesters in the streets in just 10 hours . Who is truly funding her salary? It is us, the taxpayers in the UK. Starmer and his associates are promoting Ayatollahs and terrorists, and we are the ones footing the bill. I can no longer tolerate the leftists, especially their aggressive behaviour in discussions and their use of profanity instead of making rational arguments. Really they are The Iranian state TV presenter broke down on air. Perhaps your friend is confused, but I’m sure you could check for yourself on the BBC Persian website. That just proves that not every Iranian hates their regime, something perfectly normal i believe. I can understand why some would wish to see an end to the Ayatollahs but this is an internal issue to be dealt with by the Iranian people without interference from the west, particularly Israel. The only reason America is involved is that they seek to ensure exactly who takes over, effectively another western puppet and in doing so only exchanges one dictatorship for another. Iran can only truly benefit from a return to a democratically elected leadership. Engage in a sensible conversation so that I can discuss matters with you. If a BBC newsreader expresses sorrow for Bin Laden, it indicates that not everyone opposes him. Why is it so difficult for you to acknowledge that the Ayatollahs are murderer? He gave orders to shoot 40,000 young people in the streets just because they were protesting against him . Is it really so challenging for you to agree that he was a terrorist? Whether someone can be considered a terrorist is entirely subjective, very much dependent on which side of the fence one chooses to sit. If Iran is a terrorist state, and nowhere have i stated that it isn't, then their actions pale beside the terrorist acts of Israel and America. You don't get to choose simply because propaganda suggests justification. Are you genuinely suggesting that they are not terrorists for killing 40,000 protesters who were merely chanting against them? Are you serious? What makes you believe that people should heed your words? I didn't and never have suggested that these aren't acts of terror. Allow me to rephrase this in a simpler way in the hope that you might understand: If Iran fires rockets at Israel it's an act of terror. If Israel fires rockets at Iran it's an act of self defense yet the two acts are identical. The only difference is is in perceived justification. Such perceived justification comes solely from propaganda and indoctrination. If you truly believe that Israel is justified and refuse to view their actions as acts of terrorism then that only goes to show that you are a victim of propaganda and indoctrination." Allow me to rephrase this in a simpler way in the hope that you might understand: No, it is not the same; you clearly do not have a deep understanding of Iran. The Iranian regime has consistently declared to the world its intention to erase Israel from existence. How, then, can they be considered identical? Israel has overlooked this for many years until the events of October 7th unfolded. Israel has never harmed its own citizens. In contrast, Iran has repeatedly done so over the past 47 years, having killed 40,000 Iranians in just 10 hours. Such actions in this modern era are extraordinary; even the Nazis would be unsettled by this. This illustrates how immature and childish your comparison was. Please attempt again. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I learned from my Iranian friends that the BBC Persian newsreader began to cry while reporting the death of Ayatollah Khamenei, who had ordered the killing of 40,000 young protesters in the streets in just 10 hours . Who is truly funding her salary? It is us, the taxpayers in the UK. Starmer and his associates are promoting Ayatollahs and terrorists, and we are the ones footing the bill. I can no longer tolerate the leftists, especially their aggressive behaviour in discussions and their use of profanity instead of making rational arguments. Really they are The Iranian state TV presenter broke down on air. Perhaps your friend is confused, but I’m sure you could check for yourself on the BBC Persian website. That just proves that not every Iranian hates their regime, something perfectly normal i believe. I can understand why some would wish to see an end to the Ayatollahs but this is an internal issue to be dealt with by the Iranian people without interference from the west, particularly Israel. The only reason America is involved is that they seek to ensure exactly who takes over, effectively another western puppet and in doing so only exchanges one dictatorship for another. Iran can only truly benefit from a return to a democratically elected leadership. Engage in a sensible conversation so that I can discuss matters with you. If a BBC newsreader expresses sorrow for Bin Laden, it indicates that not everyone opposes him. Why is it so difficult for you to acknowledge that the Ayatollahs are murderer? He gave orders to shoot 40,000 young people in the streets just because they were protesting against him . Is it really so challenging for you to agree that he was a terrorist? Whether someone can be considered a terrorist is entirely subjective, very much dependent on which side of the fence one chooses to sit. If Iran is a terrorist state, and nowhere have i stated that it isn't, then their actions pale beside the terrorist acts of Israel and America. You don't get to choose simply because propaganda suggests justification. Are you genuinely suggesting that they are not terrorists for killing 40,000 protesters who were merely chanting against them? Are you serious? What makes you believe that people should heed your words? I didn't and never have suggested that these aren't acts of terror. Allow me to rephrase this in a simpler way in the hope that you might understand: If Iran fires rockets at Israel it's an act of terror. If Israel fires rockets at Iran it's an act of self defense yet the two acts are identical. The only difference is is in perceived justification. Such perceived justification comes solely from propaganda and indoctrination. If you truly believe that Israel is justified and refuse to view their actions as acts of terrorism then that only goes to show that you are a victim of propaganda and indoctrination. Allow me to rephrase this in a simpler way in the hope that you might understand: No, it is not the same; you clearly do not have a deep understanding of Iran. The Iranian regime has consistently declared to the world its intention to erase Israel from existence. How, then, can they be considered identical? Israel has overlooked this for many years until the events of October 7th unfolded. Israel has never harmed its own citizens. In contrast, Iran has repeatedly done so over the past 47 years, having killed 40,000 Iranians in just 10 hours. Such actions in this modern era are extraordinary; even the Nazis would be unsettled by this. This illustrates how immature and childish your comparison was. Please attempt again. " So true | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Good to see all the Iranians out in the streets celebrating. Hair uncovered, dancing, listening to Village People and doing what has become known as the "trump dance"." And that’s just the mullahs 🕺 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Good to see all the Iranians out in the streets celebrating. Hair uncovered, dancing, listening to Village People and doing what has become known as the "trump dance". And that’s just the mullahs 🕺 " The politics of dancing.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Please attempt again." You are correct in part, there is a slight difference. Israel fires on it's neighbours in defence of itself. Let's first look at why it needs to defend itself: A bunch of eastern Europeans are promised a significant parcel of land thousands of miles from their own homeland and to the extreme detriment of the indigenous population who have existed there in an unbroken line for thousands of years. Not only that but such land is acquired through acts of terror, consolidated through acts of terror and further expanded through acts of terror. Do you really expect such actions to pass unresisted? The fact that there is resistance seems to come as some surprise to you, 'how dare they'. If Johnny Foreigner rocked up on my doorstep i would fight, and use every means at my disposal to resist, moral or otherwise and allow no foreign meddlers to tell me otherwise. Iran, on the other hand, fires on Israel in defence of it's oppressed friends not of itself, there is the difference. It does this knowing full well that it will inevitably incur the wrath of the most powerful and aggressive nation in the world. I would have thought Iran worthy of a modicum of respect and kudos for such bravery. Or is it that loyalty, integrity and friendship have become meaningless concepts in this modern age? I would add that Iran has repeatedly stated that it would go along with any peace deal the Palestinians accepted, the fact that there is no peace deal is down to the continual vetoing of both Israel and America. It's long been the intention of Israel to wipe out the Palestinians. See 'The Zionist Plan for Israel 1919', the land they originally demanded is huge and has no room for Palestine. Don't allow yourself to be fooled, Israel is the aggressor here and it's continued existence is an extension of that aggression. I put it to you that it is, in fact, the Arab nations that are the ones defending themselves. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Please attempt again. You are correct in part, there is a slight difference. Israel fires on it's neighbours in defence of itself. Let's first look at why it needs to defend itself: A bunch of eastern Europeans are promised a significant parcel of land thousands of miles from their own homeland and to the extreme detriment of the indigenous population who have existed there in an unbroken line for thousands of years. Not only that but such land is acquired through acts of terror, consolidated through acts of terror and further expanded through acts of terror. Do you really expect such actions to pass unresisted? The fact that there is resistance seems to come as some surprise to you, 'how dare they'. If Johnny Foreigner rocked up on my doorstep i would fight, and use every means at my disposal to resist, moral or otherwise and allow no foreign meddlers to tell me otherwise. Iran, on the other hand, fires on Israel in defence of it's oppressed friends not of itself, there is the difference. It does this knowing full well that it will inevitably incur the wrath of the most powerful and aggressive nation in the world. I would have thought Iran worthy of a modicum of respect and kudos for such bravery. Or is it that loyalty, integrity and friendship have become meaningless concepts in this modern age? I would add that Iran has repeatedly stated that it would go along with any peace deal the Palestinians accepted, the fact that there is no peace deal is down to the continual vetoing of both Israel and America. It's long been the intention of Israel to wipe out the Palestinians. See 'The Zionist Plan for Israel 1919', the land they originally demanded is huge and has no room for Palestine. Don't allow yourself to be fooled, Israel is the aggressor here and it's continued existence is an extension of that aggression. I put it to you that it is, in fact, the Arab nations that are the ones defending themselves." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Please attempt again. You are correct in part, there is a slight difference. Israel fires on it's neighbours in defence of itself. Let's first look at why it needs to defend itself: A bunch of eastern Europeans are promised a significant parcel of land thousands of miles from their own homeland and to the extreme detriment of the indigenous population who have existed there in an unbroken line for thousands of years. Not only that but such land is acquired through acts of terror, consolidated through acts of terror and further expanded through acts of terror. Do you really expect such actions to pass unresisted? The fact that there is resistance seems to come as some surprise to you, 'how dare they'. If Johnny Foreigner rocked up on my doorstep i would fight, and use every means at my disposal to resist, moral or otherwise and allow no foreign meddlers to tell me otherwise. Iran, on the other hand, fires on Israel in defence of it's oppressed friends not of itself, there is the difference. It does this knowing full well that it will inevitably incur the wrath of the most powerful and aggressive nation in the world. I would have thought Iran worthy of a modicum of respect and kudos for such bravery. Or is it that loyalty, integrity and friendship have become meaningless concepts in this modern age? I would add that Iran has repeatedly stated that it would go along with any peace deal the Palestinians accepted, the fact that there is no peace deal is down to the continual vetoing of both Israel and America. It's long been the intention of Israel to wipe out the Palestinians. See 'The Zionist Plan for Israel 1919', the land they originally demanded is huge and has no room for Palestine. Don't allow yourself to be fooled, Israel is the aggressor here and it's continued existence is an extension of that aggression. I put it to you that it is, in fact, the Arab nations that are the ones defending themselves." 😂 😂 😂 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" A bunch of eastern Europeans are promised a significant parcel of land thousands of miles from their own homeland and to the extreme detriment of the indigenous population who have existed there in an unbroken line for thousands of years. " 🤣 Someone didn’t pay attention at school obviously! 🤭 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If Johnny Foreigner rocked up on my doorstep i would fight, and use every means at my disposal to resist, moral or otherwise and allow no foreign meddlers to tell me otherwise. " Get your arse to Dover then fella. 👍 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Bullys do not understand meek negotiation, they only understand force. I see the Iranian people finally riding themselves of the boot they’re under with the help of the US and Israel. The UK had to do the same in WW2. " Because the last attempt by the west to force regime change in Iran worked out so well for the Iranian people. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Israel is the aggressor here and it's continued existence is an extension of that aggression. " Spoken just like the late, not so great, unlamented ayatollah. 🙄 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Please attempt again. You are correct in part, there is a slight difference. Israel fires on it's neighbours in defence of itself. Let's first look at why it needs to defend itself: A bunch of eastern Europeans are promised a significant parcel of land thousands of miles from their own homeland and to the extreme detriment of the indigenous population who have existed there in an unbroken line for thousands of years. Not only that but such land is acquired through acts of terror, consolidated through acts of terror and further expanded through acts of terror. Do you really expect such actions to pass unresisted? The fact that there is resistance seems to come as some surprise to you, 'how dare they'. If Johnny Foreigner rocked up on my doorstep i would fight, and use every means at my disposal to resist, moral or otherwise and allow no foreign meddlers to tell me otherwise. Iran, on the other hand, fires on Israel in defence of it's oppressed friends not of itself, there is the difference. It does this knowing full well that it will inevitably incur the wrath of the most powerful and aggressive nation in the world. I would have thought Iran worthy of a modicum of respect and kudos for such bravery. Or is it that loyalty, integrity and friendship have become meaningless concepts in this modern age? I would add that Iran has repeatedly stated that it would go along with any peace deal the Palestinians accepted, the fact that there is no peace deal is down to the continual vetoing of both Israel and America. It's long been the intention of Israel to wipe out the Palestinians. See 'The Zionist Plan for Israel 1919', the land they originally demanded is huge and has no room for Palestine. Don't allow yourself to be fooled, Israel is the aggressor here and it's continued existence is an extension of that aggression. I put it to you that it is, in fact, the Arab nations that are the ones defending themselves." Oh my, I have heard the Iranian foreign minister speak numerous times before he retreats to his hideaway, and his address was not significantly different from what you said. Before I expend any more energy, I would like to inquire about who the oppressed allies of Iran are. Is it Hezbollah? Hamas? shabool baasi? The Houthis? Who are these allies that you seem so concerned about? It truly feels rather cheap; I can hardly believe anyone would appreciate your statement.well someone did | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Please attempt again. You are correct in part, there is a slight difference. Israel fires on it's neighbours in defence of itself. Let's first look at why it needs to defend itself: A bunch of eastern Europeans are promised a significant parcel of land thousands of miles from their own homeland and to the extreme detriment of the indigenous population who have existed there in an unbroken line for thousands of years. Not only that but such land is acquired through acts of terror, consolidated through acts of terror and further expanded through acts of terror. Do you really expect such actions to pass unresisted? The fact that there is resistance seems to come as some surprise to you, 'how dare they'. If Johnny Foreigner rocked up on my doorstep i would fight, and use every means at my disposal to resist, moral or otherwise and allow no foreign meddlers to tell me otherwise. Iran, on the other hand, fires on Israel in defence of it's oppressed friends not of itself, there is the difference. It does this knowing full well that it will inevitably incur the wrath of the most powerful and aggressive nation in the world. I would have thought Iran worthy of a modicum of respect and kudos for such bravery. Or is it that loyalty, integrity and friendship have become meaningless concepts in this modern age? I would add that Iran has repeatedly stated that it would go along with any peace deal the Palestinians accepted, the fact that there is no peace deal is down to the continual vetoing of both Israel and America. It's long been the intention of Israel to wipe out the Palestinians. See 'The Zionist Plan for Israel 1919', the land they originally demanded is huge and has no room for Palestine. Don't allow yourself to be fooled, Israel is the aggressor here and it's continued existence is an extension of that aggression. I put it to you that it is, in fact, the Arab nations that are the ones defending themselves. 😂 😂 😂" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Please attempt again. You are correct in part, there is a slight difference. Israel fires on it's neighbours in defence of itself. Let's first look at why it needs to defend itself: A bunch of eastern Europeans are promised a significant parcel of land thousands of miles from their own homeland and to the extreme detriment of the indigenous population who have existed there in an unbroken line for thousands of years. Not only that but such land is acquired through acts of terror, consolidated through acts of terror and further expanded through acts of terror. Do you really expect such actions to pass unresisted? The fact that there is resistance seems to come as some surprise to you, 'how dare they'. If Johnny Foreigner rocked up on my doorstep i would fight, and use every means at my disposal to resist, moral or otherwise and allow no foreign meddlers to tell me otherwise. Iran, on the other hand, fires on Israel in defence of it's oppressed friends not of itself, there is the difference. It does this knowing full well that it will inevitably incur the wrath of the most powerful and aggressive nation in the world. I would have thought Iran worthy of a modicum of respect and kudos for such bravery. Or is it that loyalty, integrity and friendship have become meaningless concepts in this modern age? I would add that Iran has repeatedly stated that it would go along with any peace deal the Palestinians accepted, the fact that there is no peace deal is down to the continual vetoing of both Israel and America. It's long been the intention of Israel to wipe out the Palestinians. See 'The Zionist Plan for Israel 1919', the land they originally demanded is huge and has no room for Palestine. Don't allow yourself to be fooled, Israel is the aggressor here and it's continued existence is an extension of that aggression. I put it to you that it is, in fact, the Arab nations that are the ones defending themselves. Oh my, I have heard the Iranian foreign minister speak numerous times before he retreats to his hideaway, and his address was not significantly different from what you said. Before I expend any more energy, I would like to inquire about who the oppressed allies of Iran are. Is it Hezbollah? Hamas? shabool baasi? The Houthis? Who are these allies that you seem so concerned about? It truly feels rather cheap; I can hardly believe anyone would appreciate your statement.well someone did" Who the fuck are shabool baasi? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Who the fuck are shabool baasi?" An Arab Shirley Bassey? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Please attempt again. You are correct in part, there is a slight difference. Israel fires on it's neighbours in defence of itself. Let's first look at why it needs to defend itself: A bunch of eastern Europeans are promised a significant parcel of land thousands of miles from their own homeland and to the extreme detriment of the indigenous population who have existed there in an unbroken line for thousands of years. Not only that but such land is acquired through acts of terror, consolidated through acts of terror and further expanded through acts of terror. Do you really expect such actions to pass unresisted? The fact that there is resistance seems to come as some surprise to you, 'how dare they'. If Johnny Foreigner rocked up on my doorstep i would fight, and use every means at my disposal to resist, moral or otherwise and allow no foreign meddlers to tell me otherwise. Iran, on the other hand, fires on Israel in defence of it's oppressed friends not of itself, there is the difference. It does this knowing full well that it will inevitably incur the wrath of the most powerful and aggressive nation in the world. I would have thought Iran worthy of a modicum of respect and kudos for such bravery. Or is it that loyalty, integrity and friendship have become meaningless concepts in this modern age? I would add that Iran has repeatedly stated that it would go along with any peace deal the Palestinians accepted, the fact that there is no peace deal is down to the continual vetoing of both Israel and America. It's long been the intention of Israel to wipe out the Palestinians. See 'The Zionist Plan for Israel 1919', the land they originally demanded is huge and has no room for Palestine. Don't allow yourself to be fooled, Israel is the aggressor here and it's continued existence is an extension of that aggression. I put it to you that it is, in fact, the Arab nations that are the ones defending themselves. Oh my, I have heard the Iranian foreign minister speak numerous times before he retreats to his hideaway, and his address was not significantly different from what you said. Before I expend any more energy, I would like to inquire about who the oppressed allies of Iran are. Is it Hezbollah? Hamas? shabool baasi? The Houthis? Who are these allies that you seem so concerned about? It truly feels rather cheap; I can hardly believe anyone would appreciate your statement.well someone did Who the fuck are shabool baasi?" Sorry for misspelling their name. I blame autocorrection on fab guys lol .. the right name is hash dol shaabi. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| back to top |  |
