 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name perhaps " Maybe time for other spin-off sites: Fabtrannies or Fabdenial  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name perhaps Maybe time for other spin-off sites: Fabtrannies or Fabdenial "FabTimewasters would be useful too 😱 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name perhaps " Oh Dear 👎 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Fabmoaners would be appropiate. " Well said. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh Dear 👎 " 👎👎👎👎 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name perhaps " Noticed it some time ago, and have commented on it before. Certainly the tag “trusted by gay men” is very questionable now. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name perhaps Maybe time for other spin-off sites: Fabtrannies or Fabdenial "I did suggest that a spin off site of fabgays would be better - clean site with out any of the “cuck”, “women talk” or “gurl talk”, just men presenting as men looking for sex with men. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name perhaps Maybe time for other spin-off sites: Fabtrannies or Fabdenial
FabTimewasters would be useful too 😱
"Fab/everyone must refer to me and define their sexuality as i see fit. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What it’s become !" The irony of you (who started a moaning post) agreeing with someone stating it has become “fabmoaners” 🤦♂️ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name perhaps " ...takeover...? Was it a hostile takeover in your opinion...? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name perhaps " Are married men, trans a x dressers less “fab” than openly gay men. What a bigoted post in a place where there should be none. Hang your head. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name perhaps " I have been here ( on and off ) since the beginning and it’s never been a big issue for most people as far as I could see. All of the people on here are “ Guys” and are “ Fabulous” in their own way x So for me Fabguys works and you can certainly find totally gay guys if you want them. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a shame to hear all the negativity. I have used this site and met many wonderful guys several who have become close and regular fuckbuddies. All credit to the founders and administrators who set this up having identified a need for men to hook up with other men across a broad spectrum of sexuality " Ah the “broad spectrum of sexuality” that so many posters on this forum seem to find intolerable. If you’re not what i want, or you define yourself in a way i disagree with, or, heaven forbid, you wear clothes i don’t want to see, you shouldn’t be here. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers? Time to change the app name perhaps " The nature of Fabguys and the range of topics and interests included can only be decided by the consensus of the interests and traits of the users, a system that seems to work reasonably well so far. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh please I fuck gay guys “straight” guys and bi guys. Trans ain’t my thing but we are all here for one thing SEX. Most bi guys are exclusively man on man as it is easier and they get the connection they crave. Let’s stop being daft and selfish Fab is for everyone " Agreed we’re here for sex with guys. Let just have fun, I’ve had plenty of ‘straight’ guys. They only labels. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ah the “broad spectrum of sexuality” that so many posters on this forum seem to find intolerable. If you’re not what i want, or you define yourself in a way i disagree with, or, heaven forbid, you wear clothes i don’t want to see, you shouldn’t be here. " I wonder if these same guys go into the supermarket and complain loudly about them offering food choices that they'd never choose. Spicy Peri Peri rice? How very dare you!! Rice should be plain and undressed and never offered in any other way... What next? Reggae Reggae sauce on frozen chicken? Where will it end? Look at this ridiculousness too - Bread with added seeds! Really?? WTF! It's easy to scroll on by. And if you can't, maybe you should say 'bye' and release yourself from your suffering | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ah the “broad spectrum of sexuality” that so many posters on this forum seem to find intolerable. If you’re not what i want, or you define yourself in a way i disagree with, or, heaven forbid, you wear clothes i don’t want to see, you shouldn’t be here. I wonder if these same guys go into the supermarket and complain loudly about them offering food choices that they'd never choose. Spicy Peri Peri rice? How very dare you!! Rice should be plain and undressed and never offered in any other way... What next? Reggae Reggae sauce on frozen chicken? Where will it end? Look at this ridiculousness too - Bread with added seeds! Really?? WTF! It's easy to scroll on by. And if you can't, maybe you should say 'bye' and release yourself from your suffering " What happens when you find salmon in the steak counter? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ah the “broad spectrum of sexuality” that so many posters on this forum seem to find intolerable. If you’re not what i want, or you define yourself in a way i disagree with, or, heaven forbid, you wear clothes i don’t want to see, you shouldn’t be here. I wonder if these same guys go into the supermarket and complain loudly about them offering food choices that they'd never choose. Spicy Peri Peri rice? How very dare you!! Rice should be plain and undressed and never offered in any other way... What next? Reggae Reggae sauce on frozen chicken? Where will it end? Look at this ridiculousness too - Bread with added seeds! Really?? WTF! It's easy to scroll on by. And if you can't, maybe you should say 'bye' and release yourself from your suffering " ....are you excluding pizza with pineapple?......how very dare YOU...bah humbug..(wanders off muttering to himself).... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am glad Fabguys is a safe space for all sorts of users. It's difficult enough to find your kin online, let alone in real life. If there were a site for only gay men, there would still be discrimination and sub-cultures: - masc for masc - straight-acting - non-scene - fembois - "no fat, no fems, no xyz" Once we start hating on one group, we'll move on hating another group. Fabguys is a broad church and everybody is welcome. Use your filters and communicate your preferences without judging others." Well said  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"At what point does it just become fabswingers 2.0." When biological female members become significant group. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"At what point does it just become fabswingers 2.0. When biological female members become significant group." The disgruntled wives demographic. Might be worth the site owners putting ads on Mumsnet | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"At what point does it just become fabswingers 2.0. When biological female members become significant group. The disgruntled wives demographic. Might be worth the site owners putting ads on Mumsnet " Might be interesting to see the reaction if some of the Bi’s Wife/gf talk (which has nothing to do to do with man on man hookup) was posted on mumsnet. 🤣 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"At what point does it just become fabswingers 2.0. When biological female members become significant group. The disgruntled wives demographic. Might be worth the site owners putting ads on Mumsnet Might be interesting to see the reaction if some of the Bi’s Wife/gf talk (which has nothing to do to do with man on man hookup) was posted on mumsnet. 🤣" ....you don't actually have to read it....didn't you know...? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What makes it worse is when people paint say, all crossdressers with the same brush. I'm masculine, speak and present masculine, am open to other dressers and completely masculine guys if I see something I like. Lingerie is just a fetish for me, not a personality or gender. I don't expect everyone to like it but I'd rather not get pigeonholed with femme-acting dressers when the phobic insults start flying. " Fair enough and I would not wish to insult you. However your user name and your pictures suggest you are a crossdresser and not just as a 'behind closed doors' fetish. My one criticism of this site has been that they lump cd/tv/ts together when they are mostly three quite distinctive areas. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name perhaps " Time for you to set up your own site maybe? Then you can moderate it and only allow "real gay men" on it! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What makes it worse is when people paint say, all crossdressers with the same brush. I'm masculine, speak and present masculine, am open to other dressers and completely masculine guys if I see something I like. Lingerie is just a fetish for me, not a personality or gender. I don't expect everyone to like it but I'd rather not get pigeonholed with femme-acting dressers when the phobic insults start flying. Fair enough and I would not wish to insult you. However your user name and your pictures suggest you are a crossdresser and not just as a 'behind closed doors' fetish. My one criticism of this site has been that they lump cd/tv/ts together when they are mostly three quite distinctive areas." Actually they don’t- they only lump TV and TS - there is no setting for CD’s. While you can filter out TV/TS in specific searches, there is no way to filter out the women’s underwear crowd (who are mostly Bi) from any searches. The available filters on searches is something that has been raised many times on the feedback forum. The best option would be to be able to have an option to either exclude or include Bi in your search results, but some of the Bi’s don’t like that suggestion (not that the site has taken up any suggestion made as far as I can see). | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"At what point does it just become fabswingers 2.0. When biological female members become significant group. The disgruntled wives demographic. Might be worth the site owners putting ads on Mumsnet Might be interesting to see the reaction if some of the Bi’s Wife/gf talk (which has nothing to do to do with man on man hookup) was posted on mumsnet. 🤣" Just remind us all. Is there a requirement that every thread on the forum has to be about man on man hook ups ? What about the endless word game threads ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" My one criticism of this site has been that they lump cd/tv/ts together when they are mostly three quite distinctive areas. Actually they don’t- they only lump TV and TS - there is no setting for CD’s. While you can filter out TV/TS in specific searches, there is no way to filter out the women’s underwear crowd (who are mostly Bi) from any searches. The available filters on searches is something that has been raised many times on the feedback forum. The best option would be to be able to have an option to either exclude or include Bi in your search results, but some of the Bi’s don’t like that suggestion (not that the site has taken up any suggestion made as far as I can see)." True. If you go to PHOTOS it gives you three choices:- Everyone, Men or TV/TS. Probably why sometimes when scrolling through Men+Men+ you get the odd picture of a bloke in bra, panties and stockings amongst the blokes in ordinary menswear. I might add that although a fully gay man I am not a 'gay fascist' as one poster said. I'm all for live-and-let-live. No interest in cd/tv/ts but certainly not against them. My only 'gay fascism' is against discussions about sex with women an women's parts. Fine if the thread headline announces this but not so good if the headline is vague so you start reading it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" My one criticism of this site has been that they lump cd/tv/ts together when they are mostly three quite distinctive areas. Actually they don’t- they only lump TV and TS - there is no setting for CD’s. While you can filter out TV/TS in specific searches, there is no way to filter out the women’s underwear crowd (who are mostly Bi) from any searches. The available filters on searches is something that has been raised many times on the feedback forum. The best option would be to be able to have an option to either exclude or include Bi in your search results, but some of the Bi’s don’t like that suggestion (not that the site has taken up any suggestion made as far as I can see). True. If you go to PHOTOS it gives you three choices:- Everyone, Men or TV/TS. Probably why sometimes when scrolling through Men+Men+ you get the odd picture of a bloke in bra, panties and stockings amongst the blokes in ordinary menswear. I might add that although a fully gay man I am not a 'gay fascist' as one poster said. I'm all for live-and-let-live. No interest in cd/tv/ts but certainly not against them. My only 'gay fascism' is against discussions about sex with women a women's parts. Fine if the thread headline announces this but not so good if the headline is vague so you start reading it." Well the “idea” of a separate site would be men on men, but only those who present as men on the site. If you want to present as “dressed” to whatever level then you remain here. Same for chat about women, dressing in women’s clothes etc. Nothing to stop you being on both sites so long as you use the site for its intended target audience. A big part of the problem with this site now is that there seem to be a number of Bi’s who use it to post content that is appropriate to the swingers site, not this site, and they don’t seem to be capable of taking the hint when mods take down “inappropriate” forum threads, they seem to just start up a new “inappropriate” thread to replace it. As with the discussion about cruising areas and Police monitoring - it ends up with a few who can’t exercise better judgment spoiling things for everyone else. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"At what point does it just become fabswingers 2.0. When biological female members become significant group. The disgruntled wives demographic. Might be worth the site owners putting ads on Mumsnet Might be interesting to see the reaction if some of the Bi’s Wife/gf talk (which has nothing to do to do with man on man hookup) was posted on mumsnet. 🤣 Just remind us all. Is there a requirement that every thread on the forum has to be about man on man hook ups ? What about the endless word game threads ? " No, but man on woman hookup has no place on here, nor wanking over pictures of others wives/gf’s etc. the big difference between those and the word games is anyone can join in with the word games (if they want to), the others are exclusive to Bi’s. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name perhaps " Well it's not called gay guys, it's called fab guys and I guess whether you're by gay straight curious trans or married or single it's all the same thing isn't it it's guys and they can be fab | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If you go to PHOTOS it gives you three choices:- Everyone, Men or TV/TS. Probably why sometimes when scrolling through Men+Men+ you get the odd picture of a bloke in bra, panties and stockings amongst the blokes in ordinary menswear." And I'll totally hold my hand up to being one of those. I did actually start this profile as TV/TS and requested admin change it to man after a while because I really don't identify feminine in any way at all other than that I find a man's body in lingerie a turn on (my own included ) and got sick of being addressed as hunny/babe etc.
I'm totally with everyone who thinks wife chat/knicker swaps etc have no place on here. I'm bi and equally capable of being turned on by either sex, but if I wanted to chat with women or about them I'd go to the other site. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name perhaps " I've been on this site over 10 years and bisexual men who are Married or partnered to women have made up the bulk of the members closely followed by the Trans and crossdressers, many of them being married or partnered to women, it's nothing new and like it or not they have the same right as us gay men to be on here. The only thing that I can see has changed is the amount of female related treads that get posted in the forums. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name perhaps I've been on this site over 10 years and bisexual men who are Married or partnered to women have made up the bulk of the members closely followed by the Trans and crossdressers, many of them being married or partnered to women, it's nothing new and like it or not they have the same right as us gay men to be on here. ..The only thing that I can see has changed is the amount of female related treads that get posted in the forums." ..that you can ignore if it doesn't interest you.... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name perhaps I've been on this site over 10 years and bisexual men who are Married or partnered to women have made up the bulk of the members closely followed by the Trans and crossdressers, many of them being married or partnered to women, it's nothing new and like it or not they have the same right as us gay men to be on here. ..The only thing that I can see has changed is the amount of female related treads that get posted in the forums...that you can ignore if it doesn't interest you...." you can ignore any threads that not of interest, that's not the point, female related posts are not allowed and mods do remove them though some slip through the net. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name perhaps I've been on this site over 10 years and bisexual men who are Married or partnered to women have made up the bulk of the members closely followed by the Trans and crossdressers, many of them being married or partnered to women, it's nothing new and like it or not they have the same right as us gay men to be on here. ..The only thing that I can see has changed is the amount of female related treads that get posted in the forums...that you can ignore if it doesn't interest you.... you can ignore any threads that not of interest, that's not the point, female related posts are not allowed and mods do remove them though some slip through the net." It's easy enough to report them and use the reason "wife chat". If enough people did it every time they spot one the perpetrators would probably get the hint when threads get deep-sixed quickly. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It's easy enough to report them and use the reason "wife chat". If enough people did it every time they spot one the perpetrators would probably get the hint when threads get deep-sixed quickly." Indeed it's easy to report them, the point I was making is that they are against the forum rules and far too many members either don't know or do know but choose to ignore the forum rules. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It's easy enough to report them and use the reason "wife chat". If enough people did it every time they spot one the perpetrators would probably get the hint when threads get deep-sixed quickly. Indeed it's easy to report them, the point I was making is that they are against the forum rules and far too many members either don't know or do know but choose to ignore the forum rules." Actually ”the rules” are mostly unwritten, if you check the terms and conditions and the FAQ’s there is little in the way of explicit rules, even though the Mods have posted in the past that these subjects shouldn’t be engaged in and delete the threads. But as I pointed out there are certain people who either don’t get the hint or just don’t care when these threads get deleted, then there are those who just say if the system doesn’t stop me from posting it I’ll post what I want - they just don’t seem capable of exercising better judgment and the more they get away with it the more entitled they seem to feel to continue. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name perhaps " They are still guys. Its not my scene at all, but each to their own. Its all part of the gay scene. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name perhaps They are still guys. Its not my scene at all, but each to their own. Its all part of the gay scene." Exactly Mr R ... And It's not like effeminate hom_sexual x-dressers have suddenly gate-crashed the present-day gay scene out of nowhere, is it. We live in a sexual-consumerist age ..., and like everything else that serves our individual desires & needs, we have never been more spoilt for choice. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name perhaps I've been on this site over 10 years and bisexual men who are Married or partnered to women have made up the bulk of the members closely followed by the Trans and crossdressers, many of them being married or partnered to women, it's nothing new and like it or not they have the same right as us gay men to be on here. ..The only thing that I can see has changed is the amount of female related treads that get posted in the forums...that you can ignore if it doesn't interest you.... you can ignore any threads that not of interest, that's not the point, female related posts are not allowed and mods do remove them though some slip through the net." ...I never seem to find the time to read all the "rules " ,but if you say it's a rule breaker..I'll take your word for it...I'll just keep ignoring the threads that don't interest me. There's actually a female related thread up now. .I'll leave you hall monitors to deal with it....  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name, perhaps? " Totally agree. I thought gay men were supposed to be into and after masculinity, not femininity. Maybe Fab should make a Fabtrans site. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name, perhaps? Totally agree. I thought gay men were supposed to be into and after masculinity, not femininity. Maybe Fab should make a Fabtrans site. " ...its not an exclusively gay site...? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name, perhaps? Totally agree. I thought gay men were supposed to be into and after masculinity, not femininity. Maybe Fab should make a Fabtrans site. ...its not an exclusively gay site...?" Did I say it was? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name, perhaps? Totally agree. I thought gay men were supposed to be into and after masculinity, not femininity. Maybe Fab should make a Fabtrans site. ...its not an exclusively gay site...? Did I say it was?" ..."I thought gay men"....that's your exact quote | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" My one criticism of this site has been that they lump cd/tv/ts together when they are mostly three quite distinctive areas. Actually they don’t- they only lump TV and TS - there is no setting for CD’s. While you can filter out TV/TS in specific searches, there is no way to filter out the women’s underwear crowd (who are mostly Bi) from any searches. The available filters on searches is something that has been raised many times on the feedback forum. The best option would be to be able to have an option to either exclude or include Bi in your search results, but some of the Bi’s don’t like that suggestion (not that the site has taken up any suggestion made as far as I can see). True. If you go to PHOTOS it gives you three choices:- Everyone, Men or TV/TS. Probably why sometimes when scrolling through Men+Men+ you get the odd picture of a bloke in bra, panties and stockings amongst the blokes in ordinary menswear. I might add that although a fully gay man I am not a 'gay fascist' as one poster said. I'm all for live-and-let-live. No interest in cd/tv/ts but certainly not against them. My only 'gay fascism' is against discussions about sex with women a women's parts. Fine if the thread headline announces this but not so good if the headline is vague so you start reading it. Well the “idea” of a separate site would be men on men, but only those who present as men on the site. If you want to present as “dressed” to whatever level then you remain here. Same for chat about women, dressing in women’s clothes etc. Nothing to stop you being on both sites so long as you use the site for its intended target audience. A big part of the problem with this site now is that there seem to be a number of Bi’s who use it to post content that is appropriate to the swingers site, not this site, and they don’t seem to be capable of taking the hint when mods take down “inappropriate” forum threads, they seem to just start up a new “inappropriate” thread to replace it. As with the discussion about cruising areas and Police monitoring - it ends up with a few who can’t exercise better judgment spoiling things for everyone else." Intolerance again. This idea that no one should post about subjects that you don’t want to see. Why don’t some of you f**k off and actually start your own site where you can monitor and police 24/7 so only what you want is allowed. This site has basically always been as it is. The idea that some of you have joined and decided you don’t want others to post or even be here is arrogance and self importance beyond acceptable. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" My one criticism of this site has been that they lump cd/tv/ts together when they are mostly three quite distinctive areas. Actually they don’t- they only lump TV and TS - there is no setting for CD’s. While you can filter out TV/TS in specific searches, there is no way to filter out the women’s underwear crowd (who are mostly Bi) from any searches. The available filters on searches is something that has been raised many times on the feedback forum. The best option would be to be able to have an option to either exclude or include Bi in your search results, but some of the Bi’s don’t like that suggestion (not that the site has taken up any suggestion made as far as I can see). True. If you go to PHOTOS it gives you three choices:- Everyone, Men or TV/TS. Probably why sometimes when scrolling through Men+Men+ you get the odd picture of a bloke in bra, panties and stockings amongst the blokes in ordinary menswear. I might add that although a fully gay man I am not a 'gay fascist' as one poster said. I'm all for live-and-let-live. No interest in cd/tv/ts but certainly not against them. My only 'gay fascism' is against discussions about sex with women a women's parts. Fine if the thread headline announces this but not so good if the headline is vague so you start reading it. Well the “idea” of a separate site would be men on men, but only those who present as men on the site. If you want to present as “dressed” to whatever level then you remain here. Same for chat about women, dressing in women’s clothes etc. Nothing to stop you being on both sites so long as you use the site for its intended target audience. A big part of the problem with this site now is that there seem to be a number of Bi’s who use it to post content that is appropriate to the swingers site, not this site, and they don’t seem to be capable of taking the hint when mods take down “inappropriate” forum threads, they seem to just start up a new “inappropriate” thread to replace it. As with the discussion about cruising areas and Police monitoring - it ends up with a few who can’t exercise better judgment spoiling things for everyone else. Intolerance again. This idea that no one should post about subjects that you don’t want to see. Why don’t some of you f**k off and actually start your own site where you can monitor and police 24/7 so only what you want is allowed. This site has basically always been as it is. The idea that some of you have joined and decided you don’t want others to post or even be here is arrogance and self importance beyond acceptable. " ...  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" My one criticism of this site has been that they lump cd/tv/ts together when they are mostly three quite distinctive areas. Actually they don’t- they only lump TV and TS - there is no setting for CD’s. While you can filter out TV/TS in specific searches, there is no way to filter out the women’s underwear crowd (who are mostly Bi) from any searches. The available filters on searches is something that has been raised many times on the feedback forum. The best option would be to be able to have an option to either exclude or include Bi in your search results, but some of the Bi’s don’t like that suggestion (not that the site has taken up any suggestion made as far as I can see). True. If you go to PHOTOS it gives you three choices:- Everyone, Men or TV/TS. Probably why sometimes when scrolling through Men+Men+ you get the odd picture of a bloke in bra, panties and stockings amongst the blokes in ordinary menswear. I might add that although a fully gay man I am not a 'gay fascist' as one poster said. I'm all for live-and-let-live. No interest in cd/tv/ts but certainly not against them. My only 'gay fascism' is against discussions about sex with women a women's parts. Fine if the thread headline announces this but not so good if the headline is vague so you start reading it. Well the “idea” of a separate site would be men on men, but only those who present as men on the site. If you want to present as “dressed” to whatever level then you remain here. Same for chat about women, dressing in women’s clothes etc. Nothing to stop you being on both sites so long as you use the site for its intended target audience. A big part of the problem with this site now is that there seem to be a number of Bi’s who use it to post content that is appropriate to the swingers site, not this site, and they don’t seem to be capable of taking the hint when mods take down “inappropriate” forum threads, they seem to just start up a new “inappropriate” thread to replace it. As with the discussion about cruising areas and Police monitoring - it ends up with a few who can’t exercise better judgment spoiling things for everyone else. Intolerance again. This idea that no one should post about subjects that you don’t want to see. Why don’t some of you f**k off and actually start your own site where you can monitor and police 24/7 so only what you want is allowed. This site has basically always been as it is. The idea that some of you have joined and decided you don’t want others to post or even be here is arrogance and self importance beyond acceptable. " "Why don’t some of you f**k off" - the irony | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why?" Yes, why. Room for everyone. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name perhaps " Live and let live can't you ? We are all men. Don't be a gay fascist. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A lot of it smacks of insecurity. Guys looking for cock but not willing to accept that they aren't straight; so come here and do some performative "look at how straight I am! Can't stop thinking about pussy and I need everyone to know." " ...you're reading too much into it....some guys like different things than you.... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The best filter on here is the one in your head. Seems some have forgotten how to use. I wonder how they cope in supermarkets when given so much choice?" .....but ..but...but...forum rules....the mods...admin....hahaha | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The best filter on here is the one in your head. Seems some have forgotten how to use. I wonder how they cope in supermarkets when given so much choice?" It's not supposed to be a supermarket it's supposed to be a butchers. I come here looking for meat. Disappointed if it's hard to find behind all the tampons, lipstick, fish and scatter cushions. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The best filter on here is the one in your head. Seems some have forgotten how to use. I wonder how they cope in supermarkets when given so much choice? It's not supposed to be a supermarket it's supposed to be a butchers. I come here looking for meat. Disappointed if it's hard to find behind all the tampons, lipstick, fish and scatter cushions. " Good answer | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The best filter on here is the one in your head. Seems some have forgotten how to use. I wonder how they cope in supermarkets when given so much choice? It's not supposed to be a supermarket it's supposed to be a butchers. I come here looking for meat. Disappointed if it's hard to find behind all the tampons, lipstick, fish and scatter cushions. " 😆 🤣 😂 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The best filter on here is the one in your head. Seems some have forgotten how to use. I wonder how they cope in supermarkets when given so much choice? It's not supposed to be a supermarket it's supposed to be a butchers. I come here looking for meat. Disappointed if it's hard to find behind all the tampons, lipstick, fish and scatter cushions. " Without question one of the best responses I've ever seen  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The best filter on here is the one in your head. Seems some have forgotten how to use. I wonder how they cope in supermarkets when given so much choice? It's not supposed to be a supermarket it's supposed to be a butchers. I come here looking for meat. Disappointed if it's hard to find behind all the tampons, lipstick, fish and scatter cushions. " ....it's really on you,if you can't get laid...no one else's fault | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The best filter on here is the one in your head. Seems some have forgotten how to use. I wonder how they cope in supermarkets when given so much choice? It's not supposed to be a supermarket it's supposed to be a butchers. I come here looking for meat. Disappointed if it's hard to find behind all the tampons, lipstick, fish and scatter cushions. " More of a delicatessen these days ... Tastes have broadened & refined over the decades since rationing was lifted. There's still plenty of basic pork pies with a dollop of brown sauce for those with basic needs though. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The best filter on here is the one in your head. Seems some have forgotten how to use. I wonder how they cope in supermarkets when given so much choice? It's not supposed to be a supermarket it's supposed to be a butchers. I come here looking for meat. Disappointed if it's hard to find behind all the tampons, lipstick, fish and scatter cushions. ....it's really on you,if you can't get laid...no one else's fault "Says the guy with zero verifications. hahaha! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The best filter on here is the one in your head. Seems some have forgotten how to use. I wonder how they cope in supermarkets when given so much choice? It's not supposed to be a supermarket it's supposed to be a butchers. I come here looking for meat. Disappointed if it's hard to find behind all the tampons, lipstick, fish and scatter cushions. " It’s more of a department store really, and if you’re looking for meat in the fish department you won’t find it. Go to search and put in man seeking men and then you will be directed to the department you need, it’s pretty simple. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone noticed the takeover on here of closeted “married men “ trans and x dressers ? Time to change the app name perhaps " Fab Guys, seems pretty a pretty ambiguous name to me, not committed to any preferences | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The best filter on here is the one in your head. Seems some have forgotten how to use. I wonder how they cope in supermarkets when given so much choice? It's not supposed to be a supermarket it's supposed to be a butchers. I come here looking for meat. Disappointed if it's hard to find behind all the tampons, lipstick, fish and scatter cushions. " 👍👍👍👍👍 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The best filter on here is the one in your head. Seems some have forgotten how to use. I wonder how they cope in supermarkets when given so much choice? It's not supposed to be a supermarket it's supposed to be a butchers. I come here looking for meat. Disappointed if it's hard to find behind all the tampons, lipstick, fish and scatter cushions. ....it's really on you,if you can't get laid...no one else's fault
Says the guy with zero verifications. hahaha!"...I see your problem....you can't read profiles....hahaha | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Says the guy with zero verifications. hahaha!" To be fair, they've chosen to hide verifications (as I have), the green circle with the tick in it means they have been verified by other users. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh Dear 👎 👎👎👎👎" Ohhh dear lol 👎👎👎👎 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
