| Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see there's a possible loophole for the doomed peers to stay in the H O L. What a farce" Vote against the amendment | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We need two elected houses" We are shit at picking one elected house, if we had to have two, we are double fucked. Now in some instances that would be great, but not in this case. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We need two elected houses" Can you think of a reason anyone suitable would bother to stand for election? Most will have better things to do. And how many would bother to vote? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We need two elected houses" I would suggest abolishing the House of Lords, and replacing it with an elected second chamber. I would also suggest they use the system used for the Scottish Parliament. Which is designed to disallow or at the very least inhibit an overall majority for one party. The second chamber would then become a proper reviewing chamber. Not a care home for failed politicians, political donors, or hangers on. It could be elected on a seven year cycle and replacements in case of death or incapacity of members could be coopted from the non elected candidates from their losing lists. So no costly bye elections | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |