 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More and more guys wearing or writing about lingerie on here. Where are all the guys who are looking for guys that look like guys? Hard to avoid so many pictures of 'Men' all dressed up" Most still look like guys, just that they're wearing badly fitting (wife's) knickers | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The irony being in the 2 lounge pages the only lingerie/panty thread is this one." And not a single mention of a favourite weather girl | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More and more guys wearing or writing about lingerie on here. Where are all the guys who are looking for guys that look like guys? Hard to avoid so many pictures of 'Men' all dressed up" if it doesn't interest you why let it bother you it would be a boring old world if everyone liked the same thing | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The irony being in the 2 lounge pages the only lingerie/panty thread is this one." The real irony is the OP asking where the non-dressers are, and dressers commenting. Its almost like non-dressers arent allowed to discuss thier preference for not dressing without upsetting dressers who probably don't dress much of the time anyway. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
My choice and I have to say that non of my gentleman friends complain and even enjoy sliding a hand up my stockings under the hem of my dress past my suspender clips so they can start to stroke / massage my panties.
If that's not your thing I am sorry BUT I Love being a 'Girlie' and love being Fucked. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
They are all FABulous - what ever shall we do?
Instead of complaining - represent!
BE the change you want to see in the Forums.
Or make the choice to scroll past stuff you don't like and ignore it. Its really not very difficult at all. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh no!
They are all FABulous - what ever shall we do?
Instead of complaining - represent!
BE the change you want to see in the Forums.
Or make the choice to scroll past stuff you don't like and ignore it. Its really not very difficult at all. ""Represent" is precisely what the OP was doing with his shout-out for non-dressers, but as is typical on here, dressers see that kind of talk as an invite to bitch. Nobody was challenging their preference to do whatever it is they want to do. Its really quite pathetic. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The irony being in the 2 lounge pages the only lingerie/panty thread is this one." live a guy in lingerie it makes it that much more perfect | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The irony being in the 2 lounge pages the only lingerie/panty thread is this one. The real irony is the OP asking where the non-dressers are, and dressers commenting. Its almost like non-dressers arent allowed to discuss thier preference for not dressing without upsetting dressers who probably don't dress much of the time anyway. " I get that but he labelled the thread Lingerie, Lingerie, Lingerie and sort of insinuated that there was too much men wearing knickers type threads and complained about not being able to avoid pictures of men wearing knickers when in fact over the last 2 pages of the Lounge forum his is the only one that mentions female oriented underwear. I am in favour of having a separate forum board for those of us that dress and admirers and the Lounge being for more general subjects but it doesn't look like it'll happen so in the mean time subjects involving TV/CD and TS type stuff are legitimate on this forum. If people feel so strongly about the subject why not start conversations which are predominately aimed at men who like men dressed as men? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The irony being in the 2 lounge pages the only lingerie/panty thread is this one. The real irony is the OP asking where the non-dressers are, and dressers commenting. Its almost like non-dressers arent allowed to discuss thier preference for not dressing without upsetting dressers who probably don't dress much of the time anyway. I get that but he labelled the thread Lingerie, Lingerie, Lingerie and sort of insinuated that there was too much men wearing knickers type threads and complained about not being able to avoid pictures of men wearing knickers when in fact over the last 2 pages of the Lounge forum his is the only one that mentions female oriented underwear. I am in favour of having a separate forum board for those of us that dress and admirers and the Lounge being for more general subjects but it doesn't look like it'll happen so in the mean time subjects involving TV/CD and TS type stuff are legitimate on this forum. If people feel so strongly about the subject why not start conversations which are predominately aimed at men who like men dressed as men? " Granted, the thread title is misleading, but assuming folks can read, the thread isn’t, and starting a thread for non-dressers is exactly what he was doing. It would easier to have a Board for non-dressers and those not interested in dressing, as we are the minority on here. It's fair enough to simply say scroll on, or look away, but its kinda difficult when it's wall to wall. Surprised the developers haven't twigged that there would be money to make in a masculine only version of Fab. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More and more guys wearing or writing about lingerie on here. Where are all the guys who are looking for guys that look like guys? Hard to avoid so many pictures of 'Men' all dressed up Most still look like guys, just that they're wearing badly fitting (wife's) knickers" I resemble that remark! Mine is all my own and most of it fits me very well as I've worked out my sizes now. Also, I like looking like a guy in it and make no pretence at femininity: no wigs or makeup. I don't think anybody I've been with has been in any doubt they're with a man and I actively avoid the kind of tranny-chaser admirers who want a GFE because I am not the one to give it them | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A thread that exemplifies the inability to stay on the OPS topic. " The topic that literally says lingerie, three times. Hint, if it had said moustaches and jocks and hairy arses, the same level of interest may not have happened. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A thread that exemplifies the inability to stay on the OPS topic. The topic that literally says lingerie, three times. Hint, if it had said moustaches and jocks and hairy arses, the same level of interest may not have happened." It would have. You know it would have. If you're telling me folks cant read a topic title, and then the post, and then decide if its for them, i've seriously overestimated the intelligence here. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A thread that exemplifies the inability to stay on the OPS topic. The topic that literally says lingerie, three times. Hint, if it had said moustaches and jocks and hairy arses, the same level of interest may not have happened. It would have. You know it would have. If you're telling me folks cant read a topic title, and then the post, and then decide if its for them, i've seriously overestimated the intelligence here." Nope. I haven't done a serious statistical analysis of this but I believe when the males for males threads come up, put in a positive light of "this is what I like" and inviting responses from others who like the same, they do not tend to get bombarded by CD/TVs whingeing about being excluded from their hairy masculine conversation and inserting their lingerie agenda. Doesn't happen. But if it's a whiny post complaining about CD/TVs and literally titled lingerie lingerie lingerie, do you seriously think people are going to stay out of it? Sorry but the OP literally hoist himself on his own petard there. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A thread that exemplifies the inability to stay on the OPS topic. The topic that literally says lingerie, three times. Hint, if it had said moustaches and jocks and hairy arses, the same level of interest may not have happened. It would have. You know it would have. If you're telling me folks cant read a topic title, and then the post, and then decide if its for them, i've seriously overestimated the intelligence here. Nope. I haven't done a serious statistical analysis of this but I believe when the males for males threads come up, put in a positive light of "this is what I like" and inviting responses from others who like the same, they do not tend to get bombarded by CD/TVs whingeing about being excluded from their hairy masculine conversation and inserting their lingerie agenda. Doesn't happen. But if it's a whiny post complaining about CD/TVs and literally titled lingerie lingerie lingerie, do you seriously think people are going to stay out of it? Sorry but the OP literally hoist himself on his own petard there." Thos entire post is literally a "this is what I like and this is what I dont like", also literally asks where are the masc guys, was not "whiny" in the slightest, was not negatively referencing anyone, yet has been jumped on by men extolling how they love to dress up, the exact opposite of what the original post is about. It seems.some.posters havent even read the original post. It happens over and over. You know as well as I do that if there was a thread, or forum, solely directed at masc men who like masc men, it would be jumped on in moments. I dont care, I can scroll, a strangers opinion means little to me anyway and Block is my friend, but I can appreciate how some might find it grinding. I'm quite content to be in a non-dressing minority here for the sake of everyone feeling welcome. I get plenty of what i like after all 😉 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A thread that exemplifies the inability to stay on the OPS topic. The topic that literally says lingerie, three times. Hint, if it had said moustaches and jocks and hairy arses, the same level of interest may not have happened. It would have. You know it would have. If you're telling me folks cant read a topic title, and then the post, and then decide if its for them, i've seriously overestimated the intelligence here. Nope. I haven't done a serious statistical analysis of this but I believe when the males for males threads come up, put in a positive light of "this is what I like" and inviting responses from others who like the same, they do not tend to get bombarded by CD/TVs whingeing about being excluded from their hairy masculine conversation and inserting their lingerie agenda. Doesn't happen. But if it's a whiny post complaining about CD/TVs and literally titled lingerie lingerie lingerie, do you seriously think people are going to stay out of it? Sorry but the OP literally hoist himself on his own petard there. Thos entire post is literally a "this is what I like and this is what I dont like", also literally asks where are the masc guys, was not "whiny" in the slightest, was not negatively referencing anyone, yet has been jumped on by men extolling how they love to dress up, the exact opposite of what the original post is about. It seems.some.posters havent even read the original post. It happens over and over. You know as well as I do that if there was a thread, or forum, solely directed at masc men who like masc men, it would be jumped on in moments. I dont care, I can scroll, a strangers opinion means little to me anyway and Block is my friend, but I can appreciate how some might find it grinding. I'm quite content to be in a non-dressing minority here for the sake of everyone feeling welcome. I get plenty of what i like after all 😉" The OP was quite literally whiny, starting with a complaint, parenthesising "Men" in a way that leaves no doubt what he thought about it. The aggrievement is tangible, and I think his purpose would have been far better served by posting something like "I really enjoy masculine bodies and a hard cock bulge in boxers below a six pack and hairy chest, or even a gone to seed dad bod", but he chose not to focus on the positives of what he likes and just have a moan about what other people like instead. I have zero problem with men who like manly men. I have a big problem with whingers who title their posts with the very thing they're whingeing about and then whinge if others weigh in based on what they posted. The phrase grow a pair has never been more apposite. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I dont think the OP responded to (or whiged about) any comments that were made. He probably looked and thought "point proven" at the collection of off-topic nonsense and men complaining that he dared start a topic that excluded their specific brand of fun." I don't really understand the levels of paranoia about this but it is a recurrent whinge (and that is what it is no matter how many times you try to deny it). We all have our preferences. If somebody messages me using fem terms because they think I fit their idea of a tranny girlfriend experience they usually get a slapdown and block because know what? I'm a man with a fetish and if they think I'm their fetish then they failed at line one of reading the fucking profile. FWIW if a see a profile I fancy but it says "not attracted to guys in women's underwear" guess what: I don't bother messaging them, not for a come-on anyway, because I don't want to give offence. I may message to support something they've said in forums in a non-sexual way and to their credit some take that in the spirit intended and don't reach for the block button and can react like, you know, normal human beings. But some just do and a couple on this thread know who they are. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I dont think the OP responded to (or whiged about) any comments that were made. He probably looked and thought "point proven" at the collection of off-topic nonsense and men complaining that he dared start a topic that excluded their specific brand of fun. I don't really understand the levels of paranoia about this but it is a recurrent whinge (and that is what it is no matter how many times you try to deny it). We all have our preferences. If somebody messages me using fem terms because they think I fit their idea of a tranny girlfriend experience they usually get a slapdown and block because know what? I'm a man with a fetish and if they think I'm their fetish then they failed at line one of reading the fucking profile. FWIW if a see a profile I fancy but it says "not attracted to guys in women's underwear" guess what: I don't bother messaging them, not for a come-on anyway, because I don't want to give offence. I may message to support something they've said in forums in a non-sexual way and to their credit some take that in the spirit intended and don't reach for the block button and can react like, you know, normal human beings. But some just do and a couple on this thread know who they are. " The OP isn't about you, but you're making it about you. The OP is about the opposite of men who's fetish is dressing, that is very obvious. And now your whinging (after accusing all and sundry of whinging) that some have blocked you - as have I - accusing them, and so me, of not being normal human beings. Classy. I blocked you because I dont want to see dressers in my feeds, simple as that. Its not personal, its because I have zero interest in your fetish and you will certainly have less interest in me. Thats the grown up thing to do. We know that Fab will never be a place for closed door forum chats, and opinions differ, and the "whinging" for want of a better word, will always be the same. It is what it is. We can jump on every post we dont like, or we can scroll, you know, like a normal human being. Choices are made. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I dont think the OP responded to (or whiged about) any comments that were made. He probably looked and thought "point proven" at the collection of off-topic nonsense and men complaining that he dared start a topic that excluded their specific brand of fun. I don't really understand the levels of paranoia about this but it is a recurrent whinge (and that is what it is no matter how many times you try to deny it). We all have our preferences. If somebody messages me using fem terms because they think I fit their idea of a tranny girlfriend experience they usually get a slapdown and block because know what? I'm a man with a fetish and if they think I'm their fetish then they failed at line one of reading the fucking profile. FWIW if a see a profile I fancy but it says "not attracted to guys in women's underwear" guess what: I don't bother messaging them, not for a come-on anyway, because I don't want to give offence. I may message to support something they've said in forums in a non-sexual way and to their credit some take that in the spirit intended and don't reach for the block button and can react like, you know, normal human beings. But some just do and a couple on this thread know who they are. The OP isn't about you, but you're making it about you. The OP is about the opposite of men who's fetish is dressing, that is very obvious. And now your whinging (after accusing all and sundry of whinging) that some have blocked you - as have I - accusing them, and so me, of not being normal human beings. Classy. I blocked you because I dont want to see dressers in my feeds, simple as that. Its not personal, its because I have zero interest in your fetish and you will certainly have less interest in me. Thats the grown up thing to do. We know that Fab will never be a place for closed door forum chats, and opinions differ, and the "whinging" for want of a better word, will always be the same. It is what it is. We can jump on every post we dont like, or we can scroll, you know, like a normal human being. Choices are made." I do actually agree with most of that. I think we've reached the agree to differ because we're never going to agree and just move on stage. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" But if it's a whiny post complaining about CD/TVs and literally titled lingerie lingerie lingerie, do you seriously think people are going to stay out of it? Sorry but the OP literally hoist himself on his own petard there." IIRC the OP likes to moan about CD/TV and TS, he absolutely is having a bit of a whinge, also isn't it interesting the the OP has had no further input to the thread? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More and more guys wearing or writing about lingerie on here. Where are all the guys who are looking for guys that look like guys? Hard to avoid so many pictures of 'Men' all dressed up" It’s quite an easy one don’t knock it until you’ve tried it , just maybe the results will put a different spin on it , you just never know . A better question might have been to ask why people wear lingerie and stockings etc . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As the OP I simply asked where are all the men that like to meet who present as men. Interesting to note how few people have actually commented, the same few who get wound up whenever anyone says anything against dressers. Enough said!" Well maybe you really are a dying breed, the hairy and hoary old guard about to be swept aside by a tsunami of Bis and CDs and TVs. Maybe you'd have done better to make it a positively-toned post, with a title e.g. "Shout out to all the masculine men here!" instead of making it a complaint post about the ones who don't float your boat or put a tingle in your scrote. Honestly if it was framed like that, I'd have felt zero need to weigh in because I do respect the differences in desire. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
