FabGuys.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Look but don't speak

Jump to newest
 

By *eedsbearman OP   Man
4 weeks ago

Leeds

Why are there so many peeping toms on here who look but never speak?

What are you scared of?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ichey6Man
4 weeks ago

aberdeen

Bisexuality?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arriedbiMan
4 weeks ago

Aldershot

I happy speak especially know now my true sexuality

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ammi TrashTV/TS
4 weeks ago

Totton/Southampton

"Voyuer voyeur are ya hot tonight?..dance dance dance till it makes yu feel good"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ichey6Man
4 weeks ago

aberdeen

The Snapdragon walking in?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mallNchubbyMan
4 weeks ago

hadleigh

Maybe they look, and either donk like what they see or find other incompatibility, so no need to speak...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ichey6Man
4 weeks ago

aberdeen

Could be having one off the wrist before a couple of slices of battenburg?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oodpeckerMan
3 weeks ago

Falkirk


"Why are there so many peeping toms on here who look but never speak?

What are you scared of?"

An unwarranted, suppositional confection of an assertion followed by a misdirected question will shed no light on such fiction 🤷🏼‍♂️

"An unwarranted, suppositional confection of an assertion…" Is there a simpler way of putting it?

🤔

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ubtitsMan
3 weeks ago

hyde

Doesn't bother me love being perved over love posing for guys whether they cam or not and just want to watch.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *usan jonesTV/TS
3 weeks ago

Wolverhampton

Doesn’t bother me x I don’t think you can expect everyone who looks at you to send a message

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *upertedMan
3 weeks ago

Nelson,, Caerphilly

Cmon...this is very much a shopfront.

Most are just browsing with no intention to buy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ockFunUpmMan
3 weeks ago

Upminster

Not everyone who looks at a profile is going to message the person, plenty of reasons why, incompatible, just didn't like what they saw, then there are the pic pervs just wanking over pics and vids.

Better get used to it on a site like this.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ighway expressMan
3 weeks ago

Campbeltown


"Why are there so many peeping toms on here who look but never speak?

What are you scared of?

"

It's possibly because you've posted often on here about how not replying to people's messages isn't rude ....

Kinda waved your own red flag perhaps ..?...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ayhartMan
3 weeks ago

chesterfield

I need to see if they’re compatible. If they’re not then I don’t bother them. Your profile is a window onto you.

Xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ildwestheroMan
3 weeks ago

Llandrindod Wells

Curiosity. Especially if they are a regular contributor to the forums.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *G602Man
3 weeks ago

South Hants

An unwarranted, suppositional confection of an assertion followed by a misdirected question will shed no light on such fiction 🤷🏼‍♂️

"An unwarranted, suppositional confection of an assertion…" Is there a simpler way of putting it?"

Bit of a brain teaser that. Surely makes more sense as 'unwarranted supposition' The subject is the supposition. Suppositional' is an adjective and here being used to describe the word supposition. . There must be some grammatical term for the error of using the same word for the thing it describes - e.g. a teapotty teapot.

Other pontifical pontifications may occur

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *amplighter1Man
3 weeks ago

ryde

Perhaps a they just don't know what to say....... or perhaps not

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
3 weeks ago


"Why are there so many peeping toms on here who look but never speak?

What are you scared of?

"

Tell us you're angry because you can't get a meet without telling us you're angry because you can't get a meet

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oodpeckerMan
3 weeks ago

Falkirk


"Why are there so many peeping toms on here who look but never speak?

What are you scared of?

An unwarranted, suppositional confection of an assertion followed by a misdirected question will shed no light on such fiction 🤷🏼‍♂️

"An unwarranted, suppositional confection of an assertion…" Is there a simpler way of putting it?"

Bit of a brain teaser that. Surely makes more sense as 'unwarranted supposition' The subject is the supposition. Suppositional' is an adjective and here being used to describe the word supposition. . There must be some grammatical term for the error of using the same word for the thing it describes - e.g. a teapotty teapot.

Other pontifical pontifications may occur"

Thank you for considering the mess that popped out of my skull on the spur of the moment, but it seems you've sunk a little whilst wading in: suppositional is indeed an adjective, but it was being used to describe the confection. Additionally, in my befuddled mind at least, unwarranted was more aimed at the OP's 'supposition' that there are so many peeping toms 😉

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oodpeckerMan
3 weeks ago

Falkirk

[Removed by poster at 21/06/26 19:05:05]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oodpeckerMan
3 weeks ago

Falkirk

⬆️ "wading in" may sound a little critical but it wasn't meant to be 😳

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *evanianMan
3 weeks ago

Gogledd Ddwyrain Cymru


""An unwarranted, suppositional confection of an assertion…" Is there a simpler way of putting it?"

Bit of a brain teaser that. Surely makes more sense as 'unwarranted supposition' The subject is the supposition. Suppositional' is an adjective and here being used to describe the word supposition. . There must be some grammatical term for the error of using the same word for the thing it describes - e.g. a teapotty teapot.

Other pontifical pontifications may occur"

It’s legalese or debating-society expression for:- “you just made that up!”. All the syllables are there to make it sound clever, but it boils down to:- no facts, no proof, no leg to stand on! 😆

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oodpeckerMan
3 weeks ago

Falkirk


""An unwarranted, suppositional confection of an assertion…" Is there a simpler way of putting it?"

Bit of a brain teaser that. Surely makes more sense as 'unwarranted supposition' The subject is the supposition. Suppositional' is an adjective and here being used to describe the word supposition. . There must be some grammatical term for the error of using the same word for the thing it describes - e.g. a teapotty teapot.

Other pontifical pontifications may occur

It’s legalese or debating-society expression for:- “you just made that up!”. All the syllables are there to make it sound clever, but it boils down to:- no facts, no proof, no leg to stand on! 😆

"

Lol, it sounds anything but clever 😳😂… or considered: it just spewed onto the 'page!'

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
3 weeks ago

I reply to any message I get I think it’s rude not to , must be the way I was brought up

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
3 weeks ago


"Why are there so many peeping toms on here who look but never speak?

What are you scared of?

"

Or alternatively you dont match preferences, your too far away, your too old/ young fat/thin big/small in the trouser department they're just curious or browsing, ir maybe just maybe, and as difficult as it is to believe, they don't fancy you!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top