Hi boys
First up, if your profile shows bareback please scroll on by…not interested in meeting. Thanks. I'm a safety first boy. I am also far more attracted to older men in their 60a and 70s. Just far sexier IMO
Married (to a woman) but sexually only truly satisfied with men. Smooth bodied, athletic and versatile with preference for being bottom (safe and 100% STD free proven) I do top guys I really fancy especially and switch between power bottom and sub too.
After experimenting over the years I know exactly what I want and will not sway from this (so no point trying if this isn't you)
I am seeking a top or versatile top guy to become his booty call. A regular (very regular please!) lover who wants me perhaps as his exclusive lover. This is not essential but definitely a preference as it will allow us more freedom in play (leading to possible bareback and bukkake with right guy in time)
Would also love a regular hot couple (MM or MF) for regular group play. MM with one top and one bottom to front of the queue. Like being watched too and adore CMNM scenarios. Love MF 3sums with bi husband - best of both worlds and I won’t touch the wife.
I do have a strong preference for darker skin but happily meet people of all colours and nationalities assuming an attraction. I just find darker skin VERY sexy.
May consider a more serious relationship with a Tgirl as I am attracted to femininity...just not to what women have got below the waist! Like licking smelly wet lettuce! ! Love topping sexy TS ladies and have had relationships with such ladies before.
Very passionate lover and need regular cock inside me. I want to experiment is submissive, sissy play, feminisation, emasculation, cross dressing (meet Sasha, my inner girl. TVs fancy a dressing/shopping girlfriend? Sasha awaits) as well as power bottom depending on mood. Let me be the lover your wife can only dream of being and let me worship your cock how nature intended it to be!
Any takers? Pic on request, Safe only (for now...but once we become regular this is up for possible discussion).
