 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 lol | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When I 1st joined fabGUYS IT WAS FOR MEN seems like the X dress trans Tv and etc have flooded the site alongside married men who have to be discreet ( as opposed to dishonest) In Abundance No prejudice but noticeable absence now of hot regular gay men and add to that ones that aren’t TIMEWASTERS Researching where to transfer too Anyone else noticed?" Yes, and it seems to be killing the site off as far as the number of gay men you see on the site now. Think they need to change the site to fab Bi’s and drop the claim “trusted by gay men” because I don’t think it is anymore. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Good god The point is simple I see a site. FabGUYS I join for GUYS I also do my invade any sites for married men tv X dress trans or other pronouns apart from gay So was just writing a thought how it’s changed on here End of I’m Answering no more on here or private messages " You join for GUYS Married men are guys TVs are guys X dressers are guys Bi GUYS are guys You got what you joined for. However now it seems you also see the foolishness of the thread you created and claim you won’t answer any more 🤣🤣🤣🤣 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Good god The point is simple I see a site. FabGUYS I join for GUYS I also do my invade any sites for married men tv X dress trans or other pronouns apart from gay So was just writing a thought how it’s changed on here End of I’m Answering no more on here or private messages You join for GUYS Married men are guys TVs are guys X dressers are guys Bi GUYS are guys You got what you joined for. However now it seems you also see the foolishness of the thread you created and claim you won’t answer any more 🤣🤣🤣🤣" Lol!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are gay specific site with none of us TVs CDs and dishonest bi guys to upset you with our presence" And this site used to be one of them. Don’t have a problem with bi guys - it is all the straight baggage they are bringing here (wife/gf talk, wanting to swap pictures of them, female celebs they perv over etc.). As for TV’s/CD’s “undies wearers” most gay men just don’t want to know, we want a man that looks like a man, not like a woman, then there is all the TV/CD/woman’s undies baggage being brought here. If you came here as a man looking for a man, again not a problem. What is really needed is a separate site for Bi’s and TV’s where you can keep all the baggage that isn’t what this site was for. If you want to come as a man looking for sex without the baggage then fair enough - not a problem. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love that this site welcomes everyone, but if it bothers you, use the filters. " A lot of people have been asking for better filters, but the owners (as far as I have seen) have not taken a single one on board. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love that this site welcomes everyone, but if it bothers you, use the filters. A lot of people have been asking for better filters, but the owners (as far as I have seen) have not taken a single one on board." But you don’t have to pay to use them. Or to block people like many other sites I’m finding what I want on here using them. My world doesn’t collapse if I see a pair of frilly panties on a man. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are gay specific site with none of us TVs CDs and dishonest bi guys to upset you with our presence And this site used to be one of them. Don’t have a problem with bi guys - it is all the straight baggage they are bringing here (wife/gf talk, wanting to swap pictures of them, female celebs they perv over etc.). As for TV’s/CD’s “undies wearers” most gay men just don’t want to know, we want a man that looks like a man, not like a woman, then there is all the TV/CD/woman’s undies baggage being brought here. If you came here as a man looking for a man, again not a problem. What is really needed is a separate site for Bi’s and TV’s where you can keep all the baggage that isn’t what this site was for. If you want to come as a man looking for sex without the baggage then fair enough - not a problem." Dont read the the posts then ,i dont read posts that are obversly ,fayman on gayman . I think you just hate tv,s and useing an exscuse to cover your tracks | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Odd that there's not one in my 'Near you list', but they flood the forums, chat and Top Pics" Mmm wonder why they are in top pics,could be because theyre popular . And on near me ,ive always got tgem on ,maybe its because it trends what your looking for . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When I 1st joined fabGUYS IT WAS FOR MEN seems like the X dress trans Tv and etc have flooded the site alongside married men who have to be discreet ( as opposed to dishonest) In Abundance No prejudice but noticeable absence now of hot regular gay men and add to that ones that aren’t TIMEWASTERS Researching where to transfer too Anyone else noticed?" You talk about when you first joined Fabguys yet all your photos and verifications date back less than 18 months. I’m sure the site hasn’t really changed in that short time. I have been on here before prior to my current membership and there were plenty of bi guys and cross dressers back then. If you had been on before then you would have known this. If you rejoined after many years away then it would have been obvious when you rejoined, so why have you stayed this long? Or is this just an excuse for a bigoted rant and to get some attention? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When I 1st joined fabGUYS IT WAS FOR MEN seems like the X dress trans Tv and etc have flooded the site alongside married men who have to be discreet ( as opposed to dishonest) In Abundance No prejudice but noticeable absence now of hot regular gay men and add to that ones that aren’t TIMEWASTERS Researching where to transfer too Anyone else noticed? You talk about when you first joined Fabguys yet all your photos and verifications date back less than 18 months. I’m sure the site hasn’t really changed in that short time. I have been on here before prior to my current membership and there were plenty of bi guys and cross dressers back then. If you had been on before then you would have known this. If you rejoined after many years away then it would have been obvious when you rejoined, so why have you stayed this long? Or is this just an excuse for a bigoted rant and to get some attention? " Well I've been here since 2011 and he's right! Can I add all this talk you get from men about wearing "Panties" and nylons is sickening. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Guys = anyone with a cock surely. There are filters available, including the very powerful one in our head." Well said | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When I 1st joined fabGUYS IT WAS FOR MEN seems like the X dress trans Tv and etc have flooded the site alongside married men who have to be discreet ( as opposed to dishonest) In Abundance No prejudice but noticeable absence now of hot regular gay men and add to that ones that aren’t TIMEWASTERS Researching where to transfer too Anyone else noticed? You talk about when you first joined Fabguys yet all your photos and verifications date back less than 18 months. I’m sure the site hasn’t really changed in that short time. I have been on here before prior to my current membership and there were plenty of bi guys and cross dressers back then. If you had been on before then you would have known this. If you rejoined after many years away then it would have been obvious when you rejoined, so why have you stayed this long? Or is this just an excuse for a bigoted rant and to get some attention? Well I've been here since 2011 and he's right! Can I add all this talk you get from men about wearing "Panties" and nylons is sickening."  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Good god The point is simple I see a site. FabGUYS I join for GUYS I also do my invade any sites for married men tv X dress trans or other pronouns apart from gay So was just writing a thought how it’s changed on here End of I’m Answering no more on here or private messages " 👍 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I take it fab guys is for all the LGBTQ+ community. If it wasn't suited for trans, they wouldn't have trans filters on them. 🤷♀️" Not quite true. L-Lesbians are not catered for here and heavens alone knows what the Q+ plus alphabet soup stands for. Basically this is a site for gay and bi men irrespective of whether they wear ordinary clothes, look like a member of the Village people or choose to look like Widow Twanky. Trans is a bit of a grey area. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am aware that throughout history, trans men and women have been vital to the formation of the gay/homosexual identity, time and time again trans individuals have played key roles that we have all benefitted from. We are meant to stand on the shoulders of giants." Tend to disagree. Most gay men seem quite happy with the gender they were born with. Even some of the more effeminate ones. Crossdressers seem more likely to be gay rather than bi. Trans people are not necessarily gay or bi. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I take it fab guys is for all the LGBTQ+ community. If it wasn't suited for trans, they wouldn't have trans filters on them. 🤷♀️" Deffo not, its not for lesbians. Also most of you forget this is ment to be a SEX site for meeting. Not a safe space for you to talk rotten family crap that would get you locked up. Thats the problem with all this. The bar has gotten so low with all of you. Talking about finding use condoms to drink or wanting to fuck some young cousin or step kid. Most of you are freaks and make me want to get sick. Also have of you cant even get it up. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are gay specific site with none of us TVs CDs and dishonest bi guys to upset you with our presence And this site used to be one of them. Don’t have a problem with bi guys - it is all the straight baggage they are bringing here (wife/gf talk, wanting to swap pictures of them, female celebs they perv over etc.). As for TV’s/CD’s “undies wearers” most gay men just don’t want to know, we want a man that looks like a man, not like a woman, then there is all the TV/CD/woman’s undies baggage being brought here. If you came here as a man looking for a man, again not a problem. What is really needed is a separate site for Bi’s and TV’s where you can keep all the baggage that isn’t what this site was for. If you want to come as a man looking for sex without the baggage then fair enough - not a problem. Dont read the the posts then ,i dont read posts that are obversly ,fayman on gayman . I think you just hate tv,s and useing an exscuse to cover your tracks " You're saying he souldnt be reading the posts about trans, isnt that you been prejudice towards another group and saying they are not welcome? 
Also you cant even follow your own rules....cause he you are on this post given your 2 cents....but why didnt you stay quiet and move on? Hmmm?
Or do you only use these "rules" to shut people up. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I take it fab guys is for all the LGBTQ+ community. If it wasn't suited for trans, they wouldn't have trans filters on them. 🤷♀️ Deffo not, its not for lesbians. Also most of you forget this is ment to be a SEX site for meeting. Not a safe space for you to talk rotten family crap that would get you locked up. Thats the problem with all this. The bar has gotten so low with all of you. Talking about finding use condoms to drink or wanting to fuck some young cousin or step kid. Most of you are freaks and make me want to get sick. Also have of you cant even get it up. " I broadly agree with much of that. Certainly the family crap...what happens in the family should stay in the family. But you don't have to read it or agree with it. Also, some of the practises here nauseate me...but I am fully aware that my preferences may well be objectionable to others, so live and, where legal, let live. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When I 1st joined fabGUYS IT WAS FOR MEN seems like the X dress trans Tv and etc have flooded the site alongside married men who have to be discreet ( as opposed to dishonest) In Abundance No prejudice but noticeable absence now of hot regular gay men and add to that ones that aren’t TIMEWASTERS Researching where to transfer too Anyone else noticed?" May I pose a question to you: do you require individuals to wear a label on their chest indicating they are bisexual or gay before you remove their clothing? I would rather have a lively environment than one that is solely comprised of gay individuals. It would be quite dull. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Agree it is FABGUYS. Am quite good with the block button for those that don't interest me. What does annoy is those who identify as 'Man' but every photo shows them in lingerie. If you dress, convincing or not, you should define yourself as TV/CD. That way all of us guys who aren't remotely interested can use the picture filters properly" I tend to agree with you. Nothing against cd/tv/ts but don't think they should be lumped together as not all the same thing. If you crossdress, and have pictures of yourself in women's clothing, even if not full time you shouldn't be under the Man category. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Agree it is FABGUYS. Am quite good with the block button for those that don't interest me. What does annoy is those who identify as 'Man' but every photo shows them in lingerie. If you dress, convincing or not, you should define yourself as TV/CD. That way all of us guys who aren't remotely interested can use the picture filters properly I tend to agree with you. Nothing against cd/tv/ts but don't think they should be lumped together as not all the same thing. If you crossdress, and have pictures of yourself in women's clothing, even if not full time you shouldn't be under the Man category." Thats fine ,i agree. I think some guys who joined like me as a guy and started dressing ,are either too lazy to email the controllers of the site to change there idenity to tv etc ,or dont know how to . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Agree it is FABGUYS. Am quite good with the block button for those that don't interest me. What does annoy is those who identify as 'Man' but every photo shows them in lingerie. If you dress, convincing or not, you should define yourself as TV/CD. That way all of us guys who aren't remotely interested can use the picture filters properly I tend to agree with you. Nothing against cd/tv/ts but don't think they should be lumped together as not all the same thing. If you crossdress, and have pictures of yourself in women's clothing, even if not full time you shouldn't be under the Man category." Except that male crossdressers are neither tranvestite (in the full sense of wanting to present as fully female) nor transsexual (wishing to gender-identify as female). Speaking only for myself, yes I have a powerful lingerie fetish, but no desire either to present as or identify as a woman. It's just a kink that turns me on hard. When I've had meets, the other guy has been in no doubt that it's gay sex with a man, not some ersatz girlfriend experience. In light of this I asked admin to change my identity from the TV/TS that I joined as, to Man, as it just seemed more honest and fitting. If lingerie isn't for others that's fine, but as somebody posted above fabs and messages don't lie; plenty of gay men do like it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Agree it is FABGUYS. Am quite good with the block button for those that don't interest me. What does annoy is those who identify as 'Man' but every photo shows them in lingerie. If you dress, convincing or not, you should define yourself as TV/CD. That way all of us guys who aren't remotely interested can use the picture filters properly I tend to agree with you. Nothing against cd/tv/ts but don't think they should be lumped together as not all the same thing. If you crossdress, and have pictures of yourself in women's clothing, even if not full time you shouldn't be under the Man category. Except that male crossdressers are neither tranvestite (in the full sense of wanting to present as fully female) nor transsexual (wishing to gender-identify as female). Speaking only for myself, yes I have a powerful lingerie fetish, but no desire either to present as or identify as a woman. It's just a kink that turns me on hard. When I've had meets, the other guy has been in no doubt that it's gay sex with a man, not some ersatz girlfriend experience. In light of this I asked admin to change my identity from the TV/TS that I joined as, to Man, as it just seemed more honest and fitting. If lingerie isn't for others that's fine, but as somebody posted above fabs and messages don't lie; plenty of gay men do like it. " There needs to be a HPW category | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When I joined the site more than a dozen years ago I was a man looking for sex with men. No interest in CDs at that time. Fully bisexual, not gay, but this seemed to be an appropriate place to be looking. Have in the past year experimented with dressing, at the request of some contacts, and because my physique is more feminine than manly. Because of the way the site works all my recent pics are therefore dressed ones. Changing from man to cd/tv is not a tick box option but requires contacting admin. It's quite a big change in identity and one I don't feel ready to make yet. So I'm sorry if some of you have to inadvertently look at me in silly clothes, although judging by the fabs, and much to my surprise, dozens seem very happy to do so." you look good | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Agree it is FABGUYS. Am quite good with the block button for those that don't interest me. What does annoy is those who identify as 'Man' but every photo shows them in lingerie. If you dress, convincing or not, you should define yourself as TV/CD. That way all of us guys who aren't remotely interested can use the picture filters properly I tend to agree with you. Nothing against cd/tv/ts but don't think they should be lumped together as not all the same thing. If you crossdress, and have pictures of yourself in women's clothing, even if not full time you shouldn't be under the Man category. Except that male crossdressers are neither tranvestite (in the full sense of wanting to present as fully female) nor transsexual (wishing to gender-identify as female). Speaking only for myself, yes I have a powerful lingerie fetish, but no desire either to present as or identify as a woman. It's just a kink that turns me on hard. " That was basically what I was saying. Crossdressers e.g. men who do not identify as transvestites or transsexuals but still like to wear women's clothing, are basically in limbo. They don't really fit into either of the two options available. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Agree it is FABGUYS. Am quite good with the block button for those that don't interest me. What does annoy is those who identify as 'Man' but every photo shows them in lingerie. If you dress, convincing or not, you should define yourself as TV/CD. That way all of us guys who aren't remotely interested can use the picture filters properly I tend to agree with you. Nothing against cd/tv/ts but don't think they should be lumped together as not all the same thing. If you crossdress, and have pictures of yourself in women's clothing, even if not full time you shouldn't be under the Man category. Except that male crossdressers are neither tranvestite (in the full sense of wanting to present as fully female) nor transsexual (wishing to gender-identify as female). Speaking only for myself, yes I have a powerful lingerie fetish, but no desire either to present as or identify as a woman. It's just a kink that turns me on hard. That was basically what I was saying. Crossdressers e.g. men who do not identify as transvestites or transsexuals but still like to wear women's clothing, are basically in limbo. They don't really fit into either of the two options available." So don’t try to pigeonhole hole them. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There needs to be a HPW category" But that would exclude those of us who are still fully male but like to shave smooth! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That was basically what I was saying. Crossdressers e.g. men who do not identify as transvestites or transsexuals but still like to wear women's clothing, are basically in limbo. They don't really fit into either of the two options available" I guess you mean in a fabguys classification limbo rather than in a "not knowing what we are" limbo. I'd agree with the former, but I'm completely at ease with what I like regarding the latter. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Except that male crossdressers are neither tranvestite (in the full sense of wanting to present as fully female) nor transsexual (wishing to gender-identify as female). Speaking only for myself, yes I have a powerful lingerie fetish, but no desire either to present as or identify as a woman. It's just a kink that turns me on hard. That was basically what I was saying. Crossdressers e.g. men who do not identify as transvestites or transsexuals but still like to wear women's clothing, are basically in limbo. They don't really fit into either of the two options available. So don’t try to pigeonhole hole them. " Not trying to pigeonhole you. Just suggesting that there ought to be more options available. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When I 1st joined fabGUYS IT WAS FOR MEN seems like the X dress trans Tv and etc have flooded the site alongside married men who have to be discreet ( as opposed to dishonest) In Abundance No prejudice but noticeable absence now of hot regular gay men and add to that ones that aren’t TIMEWASTERS Researching where to transfer too Anyone else noticed?" I e noticed this post is predudiced. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This site is for my exclusive use, and anyone who doesn't match my exact preferences and inclinations, should leave, because I can't be arsed filtering them out using the site controls. Infringement of this instruction will be prosecuted under Article 9 as amended by the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated
16.07.2025 № 210-VIII." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"(Addition to profile
"This site is for my exclusive use, and anyone who doesn't match my exact preferences and inclinations, should leave, because I can't be arsed filtering them out using the site controls. Infringement of this instruction will be prosecuted under Article 9 as amended by the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated
16.07.2025 № 210-VIII." "😂😂😂 Gotta love the disclaimer wankers | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am aware that throughout history, trans men and women have been vital to the formation of the gay/homosexual identity, time and time again trans individuals have played key roles that we have all benefitted from. We are meant to stand on the shoulders of giants." No, they really haven’t. They love to tell you that they have though. Us homosexual (and bi) men had our own sexual existence and we stood on the shoulders of our own giants. Coming out in the 70s, talking to gay mates, joining CHE, reading Gay News and other gay mags, attending meetings in Gay’s The Word, going on Gay Pride marches. No mention of trans anywhere of any substance at all (not even in Brighton!!) - it was Lesbiands and Gays doing it for ourselves. I’ve still got all my Gay Pride march photos and scrapbooks to prove it! There were always transvestites of course, but that is a thousand miles from where our “a man is a woman”society is now. Around 75% of transvestites were straight I was told when I volunteered at Gay Switchboard. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When I 1st joined fabGUYS IT WAS FOR MEN seems like the X dress trans Tv and etc have flooded the site alongside married men who have to be discreet ( as opposed to dishonest) In Abundance No prejudice but noticeable absence now of hot regular gay men and add to that ones that aren’t TIMEWASTERS Researching where to transfer too Anyone else noticed?" I think the op might either have memory problems or is a hypocrite! On a thread titled Sexy TVs, he posted this. "Horned Hot Phone now" I believe that was a in invitation to get off with a TV on the phone. When it suits him he is happy to associate with TVs. Which is his right. But perhaps he has forgotten that TVs where on the site when he joined. For the 3rd time on this thread, I will repeat TV/TS have always been an option on here. So for not one person has questioned this assertion. So if you have evidence I am wrong, please supply the some facts to prove I am wrong. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
