 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump will win they blatantly cut his speech to be something it wasn’t to suit their bias they deserve to be sued for lying to us I doubt he will get his £10bn though that’s a hell if a lot to ask for " Total stupidity from this gangster. With luck the judge will have Trump removed to a lunatic asylum where he should be anyway. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hope he puts them out of business. " A forlorn hope, but if that’s your opinion 😂. The BBC lawyers are happy that the criminal has no case and I am much more persuaded by their opinion. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump's lawsuit against the BBC serves to highlight serious concerns about media accuracy and portrayal. The media needs to be mindful of the impact of their reporting, unfounded fabrications clearly damage reputations. In falsely portraying Trump, dear old Aunty Beeb has certainly chosen the wrong man to victimise and deserves to pay an appropriate penalty, another nail in the coffin of this dated and sullied establishment! " That would be the entirely honest and truthful, never knowingly misled or lied or covered up anything ever, never bullying POTUS? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I object to BBC staff deliberately trying to deceive me. The people directly involved in editing Trump's speech have not been sacked. In my view, they ought to have been. I will never trust Panorama again." I believe those directly involved were freelancers or/and a production company, probably struggle to get BBC work again, but BBC can’t fire them. Whilst not excusing the edit, if I thought the BBC were alone inthis I might be more upset, but such is the bias in other media especially print i cannot get worked up about it, the edit didn’t really alter the meaning, just cut out his ramblings. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I object to BBC staff deliberately trying to deceive me. The people directly involved in editing Trump's speech have not been sacked. In my view, they ought to have been. I will never trust Panorama again. I believe those directly involved were freelancers or/and a production company, probably struggle to get BBC work again, but BBC can’t fire them. Whilst not excusing the edit, if I thought the BBC were alone inthis I might be more upset, but such is the bias in other media especially print i cannot get worked up about it, the edit didn’t really alter the meaning, just cut out his ramblings." It completely changed the meaning. I watched it at the time it was first broadcast and remember thinking OMG I had no idea or recollection that he had been so blatant and direct in what he said. Over a year later it turns out he wasn't. Very misleading edit! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I object to BBC staff deliberately trying to deceive me. The people directly involved in editing Trump's speech have not been sacked. In my view, they ought to have been. I will never trust Panorama again." Have not trusted panorama for years and the BBC deserve to be sued especially as people responsible have not been sacked The amount of money Trump is taking for is however stupid | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump's lawsuit against the BBC serves to highlight serious concerns about media accuracy and portrayal. The media needs to be mindful of the impact of their reporting, unfounded fabrications clearly damage reputations. In falsely portraying Trump, dear old Aunty Beeb has certainly chosen the wrong man to victimise and deserves to pay an appropriate penalty, another nail in the coffin of this dated and sullied establishment! " Would you be very kind and point out how you were misled by the Panorama program in question? I watched quite a few live broadcasts of that utterly disgraceful attack which the criminal launched against democracy that day. The lunatic slabberd on for ages and any one would have had to cut this wind-bags ravings, I know that I was not misled in the slightest. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hope he puts them out of business. " That's the kind of drivel I'd expect to hear from Trump. What on earth would be the benefit of the BBC going out of business? For all its faults it is still a beacon of sense and order in an increasingly crazy world. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why don't we treat him like any other foreign head of state what's next Putin suing the BBC because they're nasty about him. " Well said 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I really hope the BBC can get a receptionist to send his writ back with fuck off written in Sharpie across the address.returnnto sender. Avoiding any expensive lawyers at all " I fully agree, and it would also be a good opportunity to point out that the US will refuse to accept convicted felons from here and we certainly don’t want there’s. Bringing that l pile of dung over here for a state visit was utterly disgraceful, another stain on Starmer. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"TBH after the way the BBC treat Trans people, I've no sympathy for them. I've just closed my bbc account ( no more Stuart Maconie, no more Cerys, no more Dr Who... oh well ). " I didn’t realise those were all trannies? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump will win they blatantly cut his speech to be something it wasn’t to suit their bias they deserve to be sued for lying to us I doubt he will get his £10bn though that’s a hell if a lot to ask for " Exactly,that was just wrong | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump will win they blatantly cut his speech to be something it wasn’t to suit their bias they deserve to be sued for lying to us I doubt he will get his £10bn though that’s a hell if a lot to ask for Total stupidity from this gangster. With luck the judge will have Trump removed to a lunatic asylum where he should be anyway." Total stupidity,so its ok to slander and libel someone and falsify things so people think he is something he's not or inciting violence | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump will win they blatantly cut his speech to be something it wasn’t to suit their bias they deserve to be sued for lying to us I doubt he will get his £10bn though that’s a hell if a lot to ask for Exactly,that was just wrong" Yes i think they should be made to transmit an on air public apology, as they blatantly lied by making Trumpet, say things that he didn't by splicing and joining tapes But don't give him any money | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump will win they blatantly cut his speech to be something it wasn’t to suit their bias they deserve to be sued for lying to us I doubt he will get his £10bn though that’s a hell if a lot to ask for Total stupidity from this gangster. With luck the judge will have Trump removed to a lunatic asylum where he should be anyway." So you think its ok for a national broadcaster to cut and paste material in a video clip, to make someone say something they never actually said. With that kind of a warped and twisted view on what's ok, I would suggest its you who is the lunatic and needs to be locked up. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So you think its ok for a national broadcaster to cut and paste material in a video clip, to make someone say something they never actually said. With that kind of a warped and twisted view on what's ok, I would suggest its you who is the lunatic and needs to be locked up." Says Vance... Trump actually said everything included in the clips. And it is fairly clear - from subsequent pardons issued to insurrectionists if nothing else - the BBC correctly assessed the dogwhistle Trump was sending to his supporters. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh how you lefties do scream! My god. You will make any excuse. Allow any comment. Turn a blind eye to any wrong doing that the bbc commits, if it is made against anyone or anything that is against your lefty dogma. Hope you all have nervous breakdowns if/when the bbc gets sued into extinction, which is all it deserves." Interesting that you think it is impossible to dislike your dayglow orange hero without subscribing to a dogma or being a "leftie". Looks like some kind of transference to me. The late Dick Cheney would have disagreed with you. (You may need to look him up: Bush 43's minder) Growing numbers of Republicans are getting very uneasy about what's going on. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"to make someone say something they never actually said" You are factually wrong. They didn't fake what he said at all. He said those things. Sure the edit distilled it into something more punchy, but he said them; I watched it unfold live. Fact, as if I need to repeat it. He wound up his supporters into doing what they thought was "fighting like hell" to try and get an election overturned by force of will, and violent action. They broke into the Capitol, ran riot and caused harm. And anybody who thinks they would have done that without Trump inciting them is an idiot, no apologies for using the word. He was trailing it for weeks beforehand, tweeting "it's going to be wild" etc. Roger Stone's greasy hand was all over it too. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"to make someone say something they never actually said You are factually wrong. They didn't fake what he said at all. He said those things. Sure the edit distilled it into something more punchy, but he said them; I watched it unfold live. Fact, as if I need to repeat it. He wound up his supporters into doing what they thought was "fighting like hell" to try and get an election overturned by force of will, and violent action. They broke into the Capitol, ran riot and caused harm. And anybody who thinks they would have done that without Trump inciting them is an idiot, no apologies for using the word. He was trailing it for weeks beforehand, tweeting "it's going to be wild" etc. Roger Stone's greasy hand was all over it too. " What complete and utter bullshit. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump may win his case, if it’s not thrown out by the court, but I doubt he’ll get punitive damages " As I understand it, as the program wasn’t broadcast in the states, they don’t have (or shouldn’t have) jurisdiction, it would need to be filed in the UK. Could be wrong but it will be interesting to see. Of course Tango man wants to file in the states because he has stacked the judiciary with his own appointments. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"to make someone say something they never actually said You are factually wrong. They didn't fake what he said at all. He said those things. Sure the edit distilled it into something more punchy, but he said them; I watched it unfold live. Fact, as if I need to repeat it. He wound up his supporters into doing what they thought was "fighting like hell" to try and get an election overturned by force of will, and violent action. They broke into the Capitol, ran riot and caused harm. And anybody who thinks they would have done that without Trump inciting them is an idiot, no apologies for using the word. He was trailing it for weeks beforehand, tweeting "it's going to be wild" etc. Roger Stone's greasy hand was all over it too. What complete and utter bullshit." Ha ha....they live amongst us and vote reform | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump may win his case, if it’s not thrown out by the court, but I doubt he’ll get punitive damages As I understand it, as the program wasn’t broadcast in the states, they don’t have (or shouldn’t have) jurisdiction, it would need to be filed in the UK. Could be wrong but it will be interesting to see. Of course Tango man wants to file in the states because he has stacked the judiciary with his own appointments." so you watch your German porn of donkey sex would mean you can’t get done for animal cruelty because the donkey was called klaus, media has no borders since the internet | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump may win his case, if it’s not thrown out by the court, but I doubt he’ll get punitive damages As I understand it, as the program wasn’t broadcast in the states, they don’t have (or shouldn’t have) jurisdiction, it would need to be filed in the UK. Could be wrong but it will be interesting to see. Of course Tango man wants to file in the states because he has stacked the judiciary with his own appointments. so you watch your German porn of donkey sex would mean you can’t get done for animal cruelty because the donkey was called klaus, media has no borders since the internet " You obviously have a poor understanding of the concept of jurisdiction - it is a case of where the offence was committed. If you commit a crime in one country, you don’t get to choose which country you get taken to court. Even in the UK there are at least 3 different judicial systems (England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland). | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"to make someone say something they never actually said You are factually wrong. They didn't fake what he said at all. He said those things. Sure the edit distilled it into something more punchy, but he said them; I watched it unfold live. Fact, as if I need to repeat it. He wound up his supporters into doing what they thought was "fighting like hell" to try and get an election overturned by force of will, and violent action. They broke into the Capitol, ran riot and caused harm. And anybody who thinks they would have done that without Trump inciting them is an idiot, no apologies for using the word. He was trailing it for weeks beforehand, tweeting "it's going to be wild" etc. Roger Stone's greasy hand was all over it too. What complete and utter bullshit." Is that really all you've got? One meaningless sentence? Come on then big-mouth with your juvenile attempt at a dismissive putdown, tell me what is untrue in anything I said. Because I know for a fact that Trump wound up his redneck supporters, that they showed up in a mob, that they ran riot because he told them to. The only thing that surprised me is that more violence wasn't done because he was dog whistling for it to happen. If the Beeb have good lawyers they will make this patently clear and get this bullshit (your word) suit thrown out of court. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They do produce the finest costume dramas " And Bill and Ben, the Woodentops too of course! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They do produce the finest costume dramas And Bill and Ben, the Woodentops too of course! " Back to your cocoa old man! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Weather you like Trump or not he has every right to sue the BBC for what they did, They misslead the public deliberately to fit their agenda, I for one believed that speech to be true and didn't want him back in the white house as a result, yes there are other things too but that peach made me believe it was And the beeb have been covering their own arses for years with the likes of Jimmy Saville brushing stuff under the carpet amongst other things, its about time they get held accountable and if that means they get taken to the cleaners so be it" Absolutely correct, not a great fan of him although there is a lot he says makes sense and also a lot of very strange things he says. On the BBC yes sue about time that organization gets it's ripped apart. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look, I didn't see the Panorama thing or the edit, but I did watch a lot of Jan 6 unfolding live as it happened. And in my opinion Trump did incite the riot; he and his shady henchmen and useful idiots had been trailing it for weeks beforehand, and most of his rhetoric on the day was inciteful, he riled up a crowd of pissed off rednecks and got something like the desired result although didn't manage to get his "disloyal" VP strung up by a lynch mob. I read his "go home in peace" stuff at the end as a belated realisation that his words had led to real damage and harm, and something that was probably forced on him by his PR team to calm the temperature before things got even more out of hand. He should have been done and tried for insurrection and I'm still baffled as to why he wasn't. Probably just the fear of an actual civil war starting and the possibility of the National Guard having to gun down raging civilians on US streets. " so you chose to not watch the bits that didn’t suit you & make an assumption- condemning trump & condoning the BBC’s backhanded tactics? …. Interesting | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Weather you like Trump or not he has every right to sue the BBC for what they did, They misslead the public deliberately to fit their agenda, I for one believed that speech to be true and didn't want him back in the white house as a result, yes there are other things too but that peach made me believe it was And the beeb have been covering their own arses for years with the likes of Jimmy Saville brushing stuff under the carpet amongst other things, its about time they get held accountable and if that means they get taken to the cleaners so be it" So how does a thin skinned orange man with a tenuous grip on truth himself(…his latest press conference about this says BBC made him say things he didn’t say…which isn’t true) achieve that? It is simply another way for a rich man to monetize his position. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look, I didn't see the Panorama thing or the edit, but I did watch a lot of Jan 6 unfolding live as it happened. And in my opinion Trump did incite the riot; he and his shady henchmen and useful idiots had been trailing it for weeks beforehand, and most of his rhetoric on the day was inciteful, he riled up a crowd of pissed off rednecks and got something like the desired result although didn't manage to get his "disloyal" VP strung up by a lynch mob. I read his "go home in peace" stuff at the end as a belated realisation that his words had led to real damage and harm, and something that was probably forced on him by his PR team to calm the temperature before things got even more out of hand. He should have been done and tried for insurrection and I'm still baffled as to why he wasn't. Probably just the fear of an actual civil war starting and the possibility of the National Guard having to gun down raging civilians on US streets. so you chose to not watch the bits that didn’t suit you & make an assumption- condemning trump & condoning the BBC’s backhanded tactics? …. Interesting " I said what I said. I watched most of it live and I know what I saw. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look, I didn't see the Panorama thing or the edit, but I did watch a lot of Jan 6 unfolding live as it happened. And in my opinion Trump did incite the riot; he and his shady henchmen and useful idiots had been trailing it for weeks beforehand, and most of his rhetoric on the day was inciteful, he riled up a crowd of pissed off rednecks and got something like the desired result although didn't manage to get his "disloyal" VP strung up by a lynch mob. I read his "go home in peace" stuff at the end as a belated realisation that his words had led to real damage and harm, and something that was probably forced on him by his PR team to calm the temperature before things got even more out of hand. He should have been done and tried for insurrection and I'm still baffled as to why he wasn't. Probably just the fear of an actual civil war starting and the possibility of the National Guard having to gun down raging civilians on US streets. so you chose to not watch the bits that didn’t suit you & make an assumption- condemning trump & condoning the BBC’s backhanded tactics? …. Interesting I said what I said. I watched most of it live and I know what I saw. " again … most of it - that’s my point, you can tell a story in the wrong order- it completely changes the story? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A bit like Les Dawson on the piano !!!"  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look, I didn't see the Panorama thing or the edit, but I did watch a lot of Jan 6 unfolding live as it happened. And in my opinion Trump did incite the riot; he and his shady henchmen and useful idiots had been trailing it for weeks beforehand, and most of his rhetoric on the day was inciteful, he riled up a crowd of pissed off rednecks and got something like the desired result although didn't manage to get his "disloyal" VP strung up by a lynch mob. I read his "go home in peace" stuff at the end as a belated realisation that his words had led to real damage and harm, and something that was probably forced on him by his PR team to calm the temperature before things got even more out of hand. He should have been done and tried for insurrection and I'm still baffled as to why he wasn't. Probably just the fear of an actual civil war starting and the possibility of the National Guard having to gun down raging civilians on US streets. so you chose to not watch the bits that didn’t suit you & make an assumption- condemning trump & condoning the BBC’s backhanded tactics? …. Interesting I said what I said. I watched most of it live and I know what I saw. again … most of it - that’s my point, you can tell a story in the wrong order- it completely changes the story? " Yes, and Donald Trump did not incite a riot that got some people killed just because I didn't watch every last second of his tedious rambles. You're living in a dreamworld. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump will win they blatantly cut his speech to be something it wasn’t to suit their bias they deserve to be sued for lying to us I doubt he will get his £10bn though that’s a hell if a lot to ask for Total stupidity from this gangster. With luck the judge will have Trump removed to a lunatic asylum where he should be anyway. So you think its ok for a national broadcaster to cut and paste material in a video clip, to make someone say something they never actually said. With that kind of a warped and twisted view on what's ok, I would suggest its you who is the lunatic and needs to be locked up." I assume that the mob that rioted and damaged and injured listened to every word themselves and didn’t only hear the fight like hell bit? I am sure they listened to all the waffle that filled in the bits between edits, how great some people are, how the election was a fix etc etc..of course they did. The edit was wrong but it didn’t change words or context. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look, I didn't see the Panorama thing or the edit, but I did watch a lot of Jan 6 unfolding live as it happened. And in my opinion Trump did incite the riot; he and his shady henchmen and useful idiots had been trailing it for weeks beforehand, and most of his rhetoric on the day was inciteful, he riled up a crowd of pissed off rednecks and got something like the desired result although didn't manage to get his "disloyal" VP strung up by a lynch mob. I read his "go home in peace" stuff at the end as a belated realisation that his words had led to real damage and harm, and something that was probably forced on him by his PR team to calm the temperature before things got even more out of hand. He should have been done and tried for insurrection and I'm still baffled as to why he wasn't. Probably just the fear of an actual civil war starting and the possibility of the National Guard having to gun down raging civilians on US streets. so you chose to not watch the bits that didn’t suit you & make an assumption- condemning trump & condoning the BBC’s backhanded tactics? …. Interesting I said what I said. I watched most of it live and I know what I saw. again … most of it - that’s my point, you can tell a story in the wrong order- it completely changes the story? Yes, and Donald Trump did not incite a riot that got some people killed just because I didn't watch every last second of his tedious rambles. You're living in a dreamworld. " the Americans seem to like him | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No... ..not Donald sucks black fella's cock. Who's gonna win? $$$$$$$$$$$$" What you talking about There's nothing better really lol | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Weather you like Trump or not he has every right to sue the BBC for what they did, They misslead the public deliberately to fit their agenda, I for one believed that speech to be true and didn't want him back in the white house as a result, yes there are other things too but that peach made me believe it was And the beeb have been covering their own arses for years with the likes of Jimmy Saville brushing stuff under the carpet amongst other things, its about time they get held accountable and if that means they get taken to the cleaners so be it So how does a thin skinned orange man with a tenuous grip on truth himself(…his latest press conference about this says BBC made him say things he didn’t say…which isn’t true) achieve that? It is simply another way for a rich man to monetize his position." And he needs to be made accountable for things he does and say, But this is about thet the beeb did and they was out off line and should pay for it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The thought of a president sueing a foreign tv channel is ridiculous. It would have had no impact in the usa as no one over there watched it. I hear he's now going back on a deal with Britain over tech. The mans an idiot. " A greedy, self obsessed, crooked idiot. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The thought of a president sueing a foreign tv channel is ridiculous. It would have had no impact in the usa as no one over there watched it. I hear he's now going back on a deal with Britain over tech. The mans an idiot. " So you agree with gross defamation of character and false portrayal by those who clearly oppose Trump in the media? .... That seems to serve to illustrate which man really meets the description you mention. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The thought of a president sueing a foreign tv channel is ridiculous. It would have had no impact in the usa as no one over there watched it. I hear he's now going back on a deal with Britain over tech. The mans an idiot. So you agree with gross defamation of character and false portrayal by those who clearly oppose Trump in the media? .... That seems to serve to illustrate which man really meets the description you mention." Defamation of character? He's character is that of a man child. Cannot be relied upon to keep a promise. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The thought of a president sueing a foreign tv channel is ridiculous. It would have had no impact in the usa as no one over there watched it. I hear he's now going back on a deal with Britain over tech. The mans an idiot. " Actually, idiot would be an upgrade for Trump. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we all know that Trump is a kind of 'oddball', and so many have fun trashing him, calling hem a 'man child' etc. But the fact is though he is not always wrong. His take on may issues is correct, hence he has a very large following. It's hardly a secret that the leftist BBC despises Trump and will do a 'hatchet job' as they would call it, if the chance arises. It seems pretty obvious that taking two clips from his speech over 50 minutes apart, and putting them together so that he seems to utter one sentence advocating voilence, was a deliberate attempt to trash Trump and mislead the viewers. If he wins he deserves to. Whether that means the damages should be billions of dollars is another matter. " Agreed! 👍👍👍 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No... ..not Donald sucks black fella's cock. Who's gonna win? $$$$$$$$$$$$" It's like Dr Evil in Austin Powers | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we all know that Trump is a kind of 'oddball', and so many have fun trashing him, calling hem a 'man child' etc. But the fact is though he is not always wrong. His take on may issues is correct, hence he has a very large following. It's hardly a secret that the leftist BBC despises Trump and will do a 'hatchet job' as they would call it, if the chance arises. It seems pretty obvious that taking two clips from his speech over 50 minutes apart, and putting them together so that he seems to utter one sentence advocating voilence, was a deliberate attempt to trash Trump and mislead the viewers. If he wins he deserves to. Whether that means the damages should be billions of dollars is another matter. " He's not and oddball, he's vile. Speaking ill of a man who's just been murdered along with his wife just because he disagreed with his view. Absolute piece of sh*t. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The thought of a president sueing a foreign tv channel is ridiculous. It would have had no impact in the usa as no one over there watched it. I hear he's now going back on a deal with Britain over tech. The mans an idiot. " The man is a power crazed narcissistic, thin skinned bully, nothing more nothing less. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The thought of a president sueing a foreign tv channel is ridiculous. It would have had no impact in the usa as no one over there watched it. I hear he's now going back on a deal with Britain over tech. The mans an idiot. The man is a power crazed narcissistic, thin skinned bully, nothing more nothing less." He’s a bully and anyone who stands up to him feels the wrath of him or his supporters. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc is a crooked organisation that should be disbanded immediately. " What purpose would that serve. There are any number of ‘crooked organizations’ that need disbanding before we get to the BBC, an organization that has direct competition, can easily be ignored and relies on the political whim of whoever is currently in power. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bbc is a crooked organisation that should be disbanded immediately. What purpose would that serve. There are any number of ‘crooked organizations’ that need disbanding before we get to the BBC, an organization that has direct competition, can easily be ignored and relies on the political whim of whoever is currently in power." Disband X, youtube, telegram, snapchat, tiktok and then introduce a bill opposite to Australia, where adults are banned from social media. That would fix much of the hysterics around the BBC or any legacy media. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No... ..not Donald sucks black fella's cock. Who's gonna win? $$$$$$$$$$$$" Trump will take a settlement. The BBC stupidly acknowledged they did wrong and fired bosses. Imo I hope the BBC shuts down. The think the general public owes them a living just because they self claim their a national treasure. Well true national treasures shouldn't be taking people with dementia to court for forgetting to pay for a licence. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we all know that Trump is a kind of 'oddball', and so many have fun trashing him, calling hem a 'man child' etc. But the fact is though he is not always wrong. His take on may issues is correct, hence he has a very large following. It's hardly a secret that the leftist BBC despises Trump and will do a 'hatchet job' as they would call it, if the chance arises. It seems pretty obvious that taking two clips from his speech over 50 minutes apart, and putting them together so that he seems to utter one sentence advocating voilence, was a deliberate attempt to trash Trump and mislead the viewers. If he wins he deserves to. Whether that means the damages should be billions of dollars is another matter. " ...he's nor always wrong...?....enlighten me...? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we all know that Trump is a kind of 'oddball', and so many have fun trashing him, calling hem a 'man child' etc. But the fact is though he is not always wrong. His take on may issues is correct, hence he has a very large following. It's hardly a secret that the leftist BBC despises Trump and will do a 'hatchet job' as they would call it, if the chance arises. It seems pretty obvious that taking two clips from his speech over 50 minutes apart, and putting them together so that he seems to utter one sentence advocating voilence, was a deliberate attempt to trash Trump and mislead the viewers. If he wins he deserves to. Whether that means the damages should be billions of dollars is another matter. Agreed! 👍👍👍" ...so you guys don't know about the cap on damages in the UK? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don’t think the programme was ever shown in the US & he won the election anyway ……so in what way was his reputation been damaged ? As always with Mr Trump it’s all about Donald & all about Publicity. And he’s a convicted Felon too , so his reputation is hardly whiter than white in the first place - Surprised he’s not blaming the BBC for that conviction too. " There’s time, he may get round to them helping Biden to ‘ste@l’ the previous election. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did they honestly think he would let them get away with it? " Who's side are you on ? Trump or the UK ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is nothing but a publicity stunt by the criminal head bin and it will never come to court. I expect that the BBC will just laugh at this deranged gangster ✌️✌️✌️" Settled out of court ... The BBC will issue a grovelling apology, wind their necks in like good little Subordinates ... and it will cost them millions. They only have themselves to blame ... and their days are numbered. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is nothing but a publicity stunt by the criminal head bin and it will never come to court. I expect that the BBC will just laugh at this deranged gangster ✌️✌️✌️ Settled out of court ... The BBC will issue a grovelling apology, wind their necks in like good little Subordinates ... and it will cost them millions. They only have themselves to blame ... and their days are numbered. " Who's side are you on ? Britain, or fascist Trump's America ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is nothing but a publicity stunt by the criminal head bin and it will never come to court. I expect that the BBC will just laugh at this deranged gangster ✌️✌️✌️ Settled out of court ... The BBC will issue a grovelling apology, wind their necks in like good little Subordinates ... and it will cost them millions. They only have themselves to blame ... and their days are numbered. Who's side are you on ? Britain, or fascist Trump's America ?" What are you talking about?... He's not suing 'Britain' ... He's suing the BBC. 'Facist Trump's America'??? A figment of your imagination .... Not sure that the BBC will be using that one as a defence to avoid culpability for their duplicitous actions. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is nothing but a publicity stunt by the criminal head bin and it will never come to court. I expect that the BBC will just laugh at this deranged gangster ✌️✌️✌️ Settled out of court ... The BBC will issue a grovelling apology, wind their necks in like good little Subordinates ... and it will cost them millions. They only have themselves to blame ... and their days are numbered. Who's side are you on ? Britain, or fascist Trump's America ? What are you talking about?... He's not suing 'Britain' ... He's suing the BBC. 'Facist Trump's America'??? A figment of your imagination .... Not sure that the BBC will be using that one as a defence to avoid culpability for their duplicitous actions. " We pay the licence fee so it is US he is sueing. And I don't care if the term fascist upsets you when describing the orange moron. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is nothing but a publicity stunt by the criminal head bin and it will never come to court. I expect that the BBC will just laugh at this deranged gangster ✌️✌️✌️ Settled out of court ... The BBC will issue a grovelling apology, wind their necks in like good little Subordinates ... and it will cost them millions. They only have themselves to blame ... and their days are numbered. Who's side are you on ? Britain, or fascist Trump's America ? What are you talking about?... He's not suing 'Britain' ... He's suing the BBC. 'Facist Trump's America'??? A figment of your imagination .... Not sure that the BBC will be using that one as a defence to avoid culpability for their duplicitous actions. We pay the licence fee so it is US he is sueing. And I don't care if the term fascist upsets you when describing the orange moron." 'Us'? ... You think you are being personally sued by Prez T now then? Your description doesn't upset me in the least .... It's meaningless and laughable. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To be 'defamed' you must be someone of good character and the person doing the defaming must have knowingly said something that was false. DJT is a convicted felon and has been found liable for sexual assault. He has pardoned numberous criminals and is closely tied to one of the most prolific paedophiles in history. He is not someone of good character. The BBC documentary was to show how his actions directly lead to the Jan 6th riots. Despite Trump trying to deny that the riots actually happened, they did. The riots happened as a direct result of his words. Not just the words he uttered immediately before the riot took place, but the months and months of talk by him and his associates to claim that the election was rigged, thus creating an environment where his supporters believed it and where angry and wanted revenge against the system. He created a tinder box and threw the final spark on it in the hours before the riot. He has spent time blaming Biden's FBI for starting the riot, even though he was the president at the time. He has blamed the police, the democrats and every other man and his dog. The only people he didn't blame where the thousands of people who took part in the riot. He later gave them all a pardon. Trump is a lunatic and needs to held to account for his actions for that day. The BBC must not back down and should take this to court. Trump will back down if directly challenged and asked to provide proof that he has been defamed." You are clearly a person of who has enjoyed good education and can clearly see exactly what this pile of dung Trump is and for that I applaud you 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
