 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not used. People are using it to create non-consensual sexualised images of people and children." Why is their even a debate about it! It should be an illegal service! IMO, all Ai vids and images should have a clearly unidentifiable marker displayed as being fake! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I can’t find a way to understand the supposedly light hearted comments….pretty disgusting " Haven’t you heard of the Ukrainian lads setting fire to Starmers property? I understand Starmers issued a super injunction blocking the media from reporting it, so you may not have. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer probably uses it to make images of Ukrainian rent boys 😆 " Projecting much? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer probably uses it to make images of Ukrainian rent boys 😆 " You're obsessed with that non-story. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I can’t find a way to understand the supposedly light hearted comments….pretty disgusting Haven’t you heard of the Ukrainian lads setting fire to Starmers property? I understand Starmers issued a super injunction blocking the media from reporting it, so you may not have. " Complete fucking nonsense. The incidents you describe are acts of Russian, state-sponsored violence aimed at the very heart of our democracy, yet brain-dead people like you lap up this extreme-right propaganda just like they aimed for. They've got you eating out of their fucking hands. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer probably uses it to make images of Ukrainian rent boys 😆 You're obsessed with that non-story." It's a non story most likely due to a super injection. So there's definitely a story. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I can’t find a way to understand the supposedly light hearted comments….pretty disgusting Haven’t you heard of the Ukrainian lads setting fire to Starmers property? I understand Starmers issued a super injunction blocking the media from reporting it, so you may not have. Complete fucking nonsense. The incidents you describe are acts of Russian, state-sponsored violence aimed at the very heart of our democracy, yet brain-dead people like you lap up this extreme-right propaganda just like they aimed for. They've got you eating out of their fucking hands." Absolutely the normal left bs response | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He is only wanting to pick on its owner. Google and chat get does the same also. " Whilst ChatGPT 'can' put people in bikinis, it cannot do the more extreme things that Grok can do. X, the platform, should be banned until safeguards at put in to stop people from making these sort of awufl pictures. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are plenty of AI bots that remove clothes and turn images into sexual videos. It's only got interest and a quick 'ban' due to who owns X. Amazing how quick they acted on this yet the grooming enquiry hasn't even met for the first time yet!"  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are plenty of AI bots that remove clothes and turn images into sexual videos. It's only got interest and a quick 'ban' due to who owns X. Amazing how quick they acted on this yet the grooming enquiry hasn't even met for the first time yet!" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I can’t find a way to understand the supposedly light hearted comments….pretty disgusting Haven’t you heard of the Ukrainian lads setting fire to Starmers property? I understand Starmers issued a super injunction blocking the media from reporting it, so you may not have. Complete fucking nonsense. The incidents you describe are acts of Russian, state-sponsored violence aimed at the very heart of our democracy, yet brain-dead people like you lap up this extreme-right propaganda just like they aimed for. They've got you eating out of their fucking hands. Absolutely the normal left bs response " Only I'm not a member of 'the left'. The case is waiting to go to trial, all 3 suspects are currently remanded in custody. It has similarities with other cases where Russian operatives have recruited young people, over social media, to carry out crimes that are disruptive towards western democracy. You'd have to be especially naive not to recognise what they're up to. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer probably uses it to make images of Ukrainian rent boys 😆 " An attempt as discrediting him by those who are usually shouting about 'fighting age immigrants' Making them out to be boys being exploited as they don't fit the usual immigrant profile, using a homophobic spin that somehow if he were to be a part of the Gay community he is not suitable to be PM Trying to distract from the transparency of that line by suggesting that they were sex workers Further homophobia in drawing a conclusion based on the fact that one of them had aspirations to be a model, so he must be gay and a sex worker. They were using telegram to seek work, labouring jobs mainly, and one had posted he was "willing to do anything" which has been twisted to suit the narrative. It is suspected they were recruited by Russian agents due to the war in Ukraine. Knowing the address of a house Starmer lived in during the 90s, a house he rents out, and a car previously owned is likely to be foreign agency intelligence, albeit that it was outdated they were maybe chosen deliberately to send a wider message about their knowledge base, ability and reach, to all politicians. If Russian agents were involved, national security would likely be the reason for the super injunction, not a cover up for infidelity. Perhaps consider doing some research rather than perpetuating the use of homophobic based propaganda on a same sex hookup site. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are plenty of AI bots that remove clothes and turn images into sexual videos. It's only got interest and a quick 'ban' due to who owns X. Amazing how quick they acted on this yet the grooming enquiry hasn't even met for the first time yet!" Quite frankly, you're an idiot. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What is grok anybody used? And why Starmer ban" It's the latest AI platform designed to provide targeted misinformation and blazon Elon Fuck's vile persona across the planet. No, I haven't. Re the photo controversy, that's the least of Musk's crimes, it serves as a useful diversion from the rest...and as he well knows, no publicity is bad publicity. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
