 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reports say that Woke York University students are staging a play called A Gay in Manger where Jesus is Gay and pretty much every charachter is gay. Liberal christians are annoyed. Tasteful or Distateful ?" A gay fictional character | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They wouldn't dare do it about Buddha or Allah as there would be outrage so why should they get away with doing it about Christ? " Buddha (and his followers) wouldn't give two hoots, "fill your boots" Buddha would say, just do it mindfully. Jesus would not approve, but he's made up, more importantly, Paul would not approve. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They wouldn't dare do it about Buddha or Allah as there would be outrage so why should they get away with doing it about Christ? Buddha (and his followers) wouldn't give two hoots, "fill your boots" Buddha would say, just do it mindfully. Jesus would not approve, but he's made up, more importantly, Paul would not approve. " Correct. And while we're hating the Muslims for objecting, let's not forget that another ME religion would likely not be too forgiving about "Moses and Elijah, the Bum Buddies" (cumming soon to a hypothesis near you) Here's some Christian reaction, anyway. Love your neighbour has its limits, eh? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15392985/Christian-students-fury-university-allows-nativity-play-Gay-Manger-ahead-starring-close-friends-Mary-Jo-Queen-Herod-new-King-Gays.html  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A gay in a manger No dick for his bed The hairy young stud Grabbed hold of his head I want you to suck me And if you heed my calls I'll jump in your manger And empty my balls 😂 " 😂 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reports say that Woke York University students are staging a play called A Gay in Manger where Jesus is Gay and pretty much every charachter is gay. Liberal christians are annoyed. Tasteful or Distateful ?" Is everything you post from the Daily Mail? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They wouldn't dare do it about Buddha or Allah as there would be outrage so why should they get away with doing it about Christ? Buddha (and his followers) wouldn't give two hoots, "fill your boots" Buddha would say, just do it mindfully. Jesus would not approve, but he's made up, more importantly, Paul would not approve. Correct. And while we're hating the Muslims for objecting, let's not forget that another ME religion would likely not be too forgiving about "Moses and Elijah, the Bum Buddies" (cumming soon to a hypothesis near you) Here's some Christian reaction, anyway. Love your neighbour has its limits, eh? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15392985/Christian-students-fury-university-allows-nativity-play-Gay-Manger-ahead-starring-close-friends-Mary-Jo-Queen-Herod-new-King-Gays.html "'Josiah Diamond, 21, a second-year politics and international relations student, wrote to the university raising concerns that the play discriminated against Christians.. He added that such a production would not be tolerated against Muslims and asked whether it would permit a performance called A Gay in Mecca. Mr Diamond said that many Christian students at the university plan to protest outside the building on the night of the play after being angered by the decision to allow it to proceed.' ••••••••••• I doubt very much that their protest will be on the same scale as the Charlie Hebdo slaughter in Paris. As myself and others have previously said, they don't have the balls to portray a gay Mohammed or Allah. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They wouldn't dare do it about Buddha or Allah as there would be outrage so why should they get away with doing it about Christ? Buddha (and his followers) wouldn't give two hoots, "fill your boots" Buddha would say, just do it mindfully. Jesus would not approve, but he's made up, more importantly, Paul would not approve. Correct. And while we're hating the Muslims for objecting, let's not forget that another ME religion would likely not be too forgiving about "Moses and Elijah, the Bum Buddies" (cumming soon to a hypothesis near you) Here's some Christian reaction, anyway. Love your neighbour has its limits, eh? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15392985/Christian-students-fury-university-allows-nativity-play-Gay-Manger-ahead-starring-close-friends-Mary-Jo-Queen-Herod-new-King-Gays.html
'Josiah Diamond, 21, a second-year politics and international relations student, wrote to the university raising concerns that the play discriminated against Christians..
He added that such a production would not be tolerated against Muslims and asked whether it would permit a performance called A Gay in Mecca.
Mr Diamond said that many Christian students at the university plan to protest outside the building on the night of the play after being angered by the decision to allow it to proceed.'
•••••••••••
I doubt very much that their protest will be on the same scale as the Charlie Hebdo slaughter in Paris. As myself and others have previously said, they don't have the balls to portray a gay Mohammed or Allah."That being said, Christians are not new to persecution; that they wouldn't kick up a fuss about it speaks to the validity of their faith, tolerance and compassion. Albeit misguided. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A gay in a manger No dick for his bed The hairy young stud Grabbed hold of his head I want you to suck me And if you heed my calls I'll jump in your manger And empty my balls. 😂 "  lol class | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reports say that Woke York University students are staging a play called A Gay in Manger where Jesus is Gay and pretty much every charachter is gay. Liberal christians are annoyed. Tasteful or Distateful ?" Lighten up, far rightie. Is your sexuality "woke" ? Give your head a wobble. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They wouldn't dare do it about Buddha or Allah as there would be outrage so why should they get away with doing it about Christ? Buddha (and his followers) wouldn't give two hoots, "fill your boots" Buddha would say, just do it mindfully. Jesus would not approve, but he's made up, more importantly, Paul would not approve. Correct. And while we're hating the Muslims for objecting, let's not forget that another ME religion would likely not be too forgiving about "Moses and Elijah, the Bum Buddies" (cumming soon to a hypothesis near you) Here's some Christian reaction, anyway. Love your neighbour has its limits, eh? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15392985/Christian-students-fury-university-allows-nativity-play-Gay-Manger-ahead-starring-close-friends-Mary-Jo-Queen-Herod-new-King-Gays.html
'Josiah Diamond, 21, a second-year politics and international relations student, wrote to the university raising concerns that the play discriminated against Christians..
He added that such a production would not be tolerated against Muslims and asked whether it would permit a performance called A Gay in Mecca.
Mr Diamond said that many Christian students at the university plan to protest outside the building on the night of the play after being angered by the decision to allow it to proceed.'
•••••••••••
I doubt very much that their protest will be on the same scale as the Charlie Hebdo slaughter in Paris. As myself and others have previously said, they don't have the balls to portray a gay Mohammed or Allah."Why don't you do it yourself then, big man ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see gays in Pret A Manger all the time. Nothing unusual." 😂 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reports say that Woke York University students are staging a play called A Gay in Manger where Jesus is Gay and pretty much every charachter is gay. Liberal christians are annoyed. Tasteful or Distateful ? Lighten up, far rightie. Is your sexuality "woke" ? Give your head a wobble." Just to try and remove the stick before someone pokes a hornet nest, there's really no need to call someone 'far right'. It seems to be proliferating on here and it just adds another layer of division. Let's pull together, not apart. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reports say that Woke York University students are staging a play called A Gay in Manger where Jesus is Gay and pretty much every charachter is gay. Liberal christians are annoyed. Tasteful or Distateful ? Lighten up, far rightie. Is your sexuality "woke" ? Give your head a wobble." Ah yes. 'Far-rightie' the latest playground insult | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They wouldn't dare do it about Buddha or Allah as there would be outrage so why should they get away with doing it about Christ? Buddha (and his followers) wouldn't give two hoots, "fill your boots" Buddha would say, just do it mindfully. Jesus would not approve, but he's made up, more importantly, Paul would not approve. Correct. And while we're hating the Muslims for objecting, let's not forget that another ME religion would likely not be too forgiving about "Moses and Elijah, the Bum Buddies" (cumming soon to a hypothesis near you) Here's some Christian reaction, anyway. Love your neighbour has its limits, eh? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15392985/Christian-students-fury-university-allows-nativity-play-Gay-Manger-ahead-starring-close-friends-Mary-Jo-Queen-Herod-new-King-Gays.html
'Josiah Diamond, 21, a second-year politics and international relations student, wrote to the university raising concerns that the play discriminated against Christians..
He added that such a production would not be tolerated against Muslims and asked whether it would permit a performance called A Gay in Mecca.
Mr Diamond said that many Christian students at the university plan to protest outside the building on the night of the play after being angered by the decision to allow it to proceed.'
•••••••••••
I doubt very much that their protest will be on the same scale as the Charlie Hebdo slaughter in Paris. As myself and others have previously said, they don't have the balls to portray a gay Mohammed or Allah.
Why don't you do it yourself then, big man ?"Why don't I do what myself? Try to make sense. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reports say that Woke York University students are staging a play called A Gay in Manger where Jesus is Gay and pretty much every charachter is gay. Liberal christians are annoyed. Tasteful or Distateful ? Lighten up, far rightie. Is your sexuality "woke" ? Give your head a wobble. Ah yes. 'Far-rightie' the latest playground insult "I know, unnecessary when we already have the words horrible nasty cunts | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some people need to wind their unintelligent, abusive necks in. There's no justification for some of the comments here." Here here. Oh you mean me? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Are you seriously bothered by some uni students putting on a silly comedic play? " One of the three kings wasn’t gay…. So they sent Frankinstead! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They wouldn't dare do it about Buddha or Allah as there would be outrage so why should they get away with doing it about Christ? Buddha (and his followers) wouldn't give two hoots, "fill your boots" Buddha would say, just do it mindfully. Jesus would not approve, but he's made up, more importantly, Paul would not approve. " I didn’t say Buddha or his followers would care. I said they wouldn’t dare do it. You don’t mention Allah I notice. The point is, they wouldn’t dare because the woke lefties would cry foul, racism, and any other ism they could muster. But they won’t worry about upsetting or insulting Christians. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They wouldn't dare do it about Buddha or Allah as there would be outrage so why should they get away with doing it about Christ? Buddha (and his followers) wouldn't give two hoots, "fill your boots" Buddha would say, just do it mindfully. Jesus would not approve, but he's made up, more importantly, Paul would not approve. I didn’t say Buddha or his followers would care. I said they wouldn’t dare do it. You don’t mention Allah I notice. The point is, they wouldn’t dare because the woke lefties would cry foul, racism, and any other ism they could muster. But they won’t worry about upsetting or insulting Christians. " Gayify an Old Testament story, and you won't just have the Muslims (for whom Jesus is a major prophet) on your back. You'll have Netanyahu, the Chief Rabbi, the CST and the Jerusalem Post lobbying MP's to punish your antisemitism. So let's have a little less unidirectional finger pointing, eh? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some people need to wind their unintelligent, abusive necks in. There's no justification for some of the comments here. Here here. Oh you mean me? " Well if the cap fits.......... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They wouldn't dare do it about Buddha or Allah as there would be outrage so why should they get away with doing it about Christ? Buddha (and his followers) wouldn't give two hoots, "fill your boots" Buddha would say, just do it mindfully. Jesus would not approve, but he's made up, more importantly, Paul would not approve. Correct. And while we're hating the Muslims for objecting, let's not forget that another ME religion would likely not be too forgiving about "Moses and Elijah, the Bum Buddies" (cumming soon to a hypothesis near you) Here's some Christian reaction, anyway. Love your neighbour has its limits, eh? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15392985/Christian-students-fury-university-allows-nativity-play-Gay-Manger-ahead-starring-close-friends-Mary-Jo-Queen-Herod-new-King-Gays.html
'Josiah Diamond, 21, a second-year politics and international relations student, wrote to the university raising concerns that the play discriminated against Christians..
He added that such a production would not be tolerated against Muslims and asked whether it would permit a performance called A Gay in Mecca.
Mr Diamond said that many Christian students at the university plan to protest outside the building on the night of the play after being angered by the decision to allow it to proceed.'
•••••••••••
I doubt very much that their protest will be on the same scale as the Charlie Hebdo slaughter in Paris. As myself and others have previously said, they don't have the balls to portray a gay Mohammed or Allah.
Why don't you do it yourself then, big man ?
Why don't I do what myself? Try to make sense."You literally said a sentence that included the words "they don't have the balls". Selective memory ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reports say that Woke York University students are staging a play called A Gay in Manger where Jesus is Gay and pretty much every charachter is gay. Liberal christians are annoyed. Tasteful or Distateful ?" Sounds like Coronation Street, that seems to have a majority of who are gay | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should be a new thread - gay angle on Xmas carols. I’ll start. We three queens of disorient are, baring gifts we rim from afar…" While shepherds washed their socks by night All seated round the tub A bar of soap came floating down And they began to scrub | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reports say that Woke York University students are staging a play called A Gay in Manger where Jesus is Gay and pretty much every charachter is gay. Liberal christians are annoyed. Tasteful or Distateful ? Sounds like Coronation Street, that seems to have a majority of who are gay" A few years ago the Welsh soap Pobol y Cwm--set in a valley deep in the heart of rural Wales--had a gay pantomime called Cinderello in the local pub. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They wouldn't dare do it about Buddha or Allah as there would be outrage so why should they get away with doing it about Christ? Buddha (and his followers) wouldn't give two hoots, "fill your boots" Buddha would say, just do it mindfully. Jesus would not approve, but he's made up, more importantly, Paul would not approve. Correct. And while we're hating the Muslims for objecting, let's not forget that another ME religion would likely not be too forgiving about "Moses and Elijah, the Bum Buddies" (cumming soon to a hypothesis near you) Here's some Christian reaction, anyway. Love your neighbour has its limits, eh? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15392985/Christian-students-fury-university-allows-nativity-play-Gay-Manger-ahead-starring-close-friends-Mary-Jo-Queen-Herod-new-King-Gays.html
'Josiah Diamond, 21, a second-year politics and international relations student, wrote to the university raising concerns that the play discriminated against Christians..
He added that such a production would not be tolerated against Muslims and asked whether it would permit a performance called A Gay in Mecca.
Mr Diamond said that many Christian students at the university plan to protest outside the building on the night of the play after being angered by the decision to allow it to proceed.'
•••••••••••
I doubt very much that their protest will be on the same scale as the Charlie Hebdo slaughter in Paris. As myself and others have previously said, they don't have the balls to portray a gay Mohammed or Allah.
Why don't you do it yourself then, big man ?
Why don't I do what myself? Try to make sense.
You literally said a sentence that included the words "they don't have the balls".
Selective memory ?"You seem to struggle with basic comprehension. I know exactly what I said, it's there in black and white. You ignored my question so I'll ask again, why don't I do what myself? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They wouldn't dare do it about Buddha or Allah as there would be outrage so why should they get away with doing it about Christ? Buddha (and his followers) wouldn't give two hoots, "fill your boots" Buddha would say, just do it mindfully. Jesus would not approve, but he's made up, more importantly, Paul would not approve. I didn’t say Buddha or his followers would care. I said they wouldn’t dare do it. You don’t mention Allah I notice. The point is, they wouldn’t dare because the woke lefties would cry foul, racism, and any other ism they could muster. But they won’t worry about upsetting or insulting Christians. " They can do whatever they want to Buddha, it's not a question of not daring, the jolly fellow has been mocked many times, it's irrelevant. Islam is, obviously, a whole different kettle of fish. Also, there's no need to chuck 'woke lefties' in there. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They wouldn't dare do it about Buddha or Allah as there would be outrage so why should they get away with doing it about Christ? Buddha (and his followers) wouldn't give two hoots, "fill your boots" Buddha would say, just do it mindfully. Jesus would not approve, but he's made up, more importantly, Paul would not approve. I didn’t say Buddha or his followers would care. I said they wouldn’t dare do it. You don’t mention Allah I notice. The point is, they wouldn’t dare because the woke lefties would cry foul, racism, and any other ism they could muster. But they won’t worry about upsetting or insulting Christians. They can do whatever they want to Buddha, it's not a question of not daring, the jolly fellow has been mocked many times, it's irrelevant. Islam is, obviously, a whole different kettle of fish. Also, there's no need to chuck 'woke lefties' in there. " You missed my point. Read the first line of my response. Mocking Buddha or being disrespectful would be condemned by the woke lefties, yes I said it again. You will probably still misunderstand again. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They wouldn't dare do it about Buddha or Allah as there would be outrage so why should they get away with doing it about Christ? Buddha (and his followers) wouldn't give two hoots, "fill your boots" Buddha would say, just do it mindfully. Jesus would not approve, but he's made up, more importantly, Paul would not approve. I didn’t say Buddha or his followers would care. I said they wouldn’t dare do it. You don’t mention Allah I notice. The point is, they wouldn’t dare because the woke lefties would cry foul, racism, and any other ism they could muster. But they won’t worry about upsetting or insulting Christians. They can do whatever they want to Buddha, it's not a question of not daring, the jolly fellow has been mocked many times, it's irrelevant. Islam is, obviously, a whole different kettle of fish. Also, there's no need to chuck 'woke lefties' in there. You missed my point. Read the first line of my response. Mocking Buddha or being disrespectful would be condemned by the woke lefties, yes I said it again. You will probably still misunderstand again. " Yep, I double checked, I still understand. It's a shame that you feel that way. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They wouldn't dare do it about Buddha or Allah as there would be outrage so why should they get away with doing it about Christ? Buddha (and his followers) wouldn't give two hoots, "fill your boots" Buddha would say, just do it mindfully. Jesus would not approve, but he's made up, more importantly, Paul would not approve. I didn’t say Buddha or his followers would care. I said they wouldn’t dare do it. You don’t mention Allah I notice. The point is, they wouldn’t dare because the woke lefties would cry foul, racism, and any other ism they could muster. But they won’t worry about upsetting or insulting Christians. They can do whatever they want to Buddha, it's not a question of not daring, the jolly fellow has been mocked many times, it's irrelevant. Islam is, obviously, a whole different kettle of fish. Also, there's no need to chuck 'woke lefties' in there. You missed my point. Read the first line of my response. Mocking Buddha or being disrespectful would be condemned by the woke lefties, yes I said it again. You will probably still misunderstand again. Yep, I double checked, I still understand. It's a shame that you feel that way. " I didn’t once suggest that the followers of Islam and Buddha would do anything in the circumstances, only that those with a woke agenda wouldn’t allow it, whilst not caring about an attack on Christianity. I’m pretty sure you missed the point. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They wouldn't dare do it about Buddha or Allah as there would be outrage so why should they get away with doing it about Christ? Buddha (and his followers) wouldn't give two hoots, "fill your boots" Buddha would say, just do it mindfully. Jesus would not approve, but he's made up, more importantly, Paul would not approve. I didn’t say Buddha or his followers would care. I said they wouldn’t dare do it. You don’t mention Allah I notice. The point is, they wouldn’t dare because the woke lefties would cry foul, racism, and any other ism they could muster. But they won’t worry about upsetting or insulting Christians. They can do whatever they want to Buddha, it's not a question of not daring, the jolly fellow has been mocked many times, it's irrelevant. Islam is, obviously, a whole different kettle of fish. Also, there's no need to chuck 'woke lefties' in there. You missed my point. Read the first line of my response. Mocking Buddha or being disrespectful would be condemned by the woke lefties, yes I said it again. You will probably still misunderstand again. Yep, I double checked, I still understand. It's a shame that you feel that way. I didn’t once suggest that the followers of Islam and Buddha would do anything in the circumstances, only that those with a woke agenda wouldn’t allow it, whilst not caring about an attack on Christianity. I’m pretty sure you missed the point. " Nope, got the point, all good. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They wouldn't dare do it about Buddha or Allah as there would be outrage so why should they get away with doing it about Christ? Buddha (and his followers) wouldn't give two hoots, "fill your boots" Buddha would say, just do it mindfully. Jesus would not approve, but he's made up, more importantly, Paul would not approve. Correct. And while we're hating the Muslims for objecting, let's not forget that another ME religion would likely not be too forgiving about "Moses and Elijah, the Bum Buddies" (cumming soon to a hypothesis near you) Here's some Christian reaction, anyway. Love your neighbour has its limits, eh? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15392985/Christian-students-fury-university-allows-nativity-play-Gay-Manger-ahead-starring-close-friends-Mary-Jo-Queen-Herod-new-King-Gays.html
'Josiah Diamond, 21, a second-year politics and international relations student, wrote to the university raising concerns that the play discriminated against Christians..
He added that such a production would not be tolerated against Muslims and asked whether it would permit a performance called A Gay in Mecca.
Mr Diamond said that many Christian students at the university plan to protest outside the building on the night of the play after being angered by the decision to allow it to proceed.'
•••••••••••
I doubt very much that their protest will be on the same scale as the Charlie Hebdo slaughter in Paris. As myself and others have previously said, they don't have the balls to portray a gay Mohammed or Allah."Very true | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Last week it was all about protecting Christian values because Tesco sold an evergreen tree, this week it’s allow people to make Jesus gay Pick a side and stick to it " Was Jesus gay tho? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Last week it was all about protecting Christian values because Tesco sold an evergreen tree, this week it’s allow people to make Jesus gay Pick a side and stick to it Was Jesus gay tho?" It was just bromance. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Last week it was all about protecting Christian values because Tesco sold an evergreen tree, this week it’s allow people to make Jesus gay Pick a side and stick to it Was Jesus gay tho?" Obviously your comment is tongue in cheek, but, if jesus was a real person he would have been an apocalyptic jew, definitely not gay, performed various miracles as a child, mostly withering people, had a twin brother, visited India where he picked up Buddhist teachings, was not born in bethelhem (?spelling) and was not raised from the dead. Asides from that, a stand up guy. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So Jesus mighf have been gay?" Not a chance. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So Jesus mighf have been gay? Not a chance. " Bisexual? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So Jesus mighf have been gay? Not a chance. Bisexual?" Nope. Don't forget that you're talking about a prophet of Islam here. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So Jesus mighf have been gay? Not a chance. Bisexual? Nope. Don't forget that you're talking about a prophet of Islam here. " And? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So Jesus mighf have been gay? Not a chance. Bisexual? Nope. Don't forget that you're talking about a prophet of Islam here. And?" And there is zero chance that the historical jesus was anything other than straight. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So Jesus mighf have been gay? Not a chance. Bisexual? Nope. Don't forget that you're talking about a prophet of Islam here. And? And there is zero chance that the historical jesus was anything other than straight. " Where is the evidence that he was straight ... or gay? He seems asexual and celibate | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So Jesus mighf have been gay? Not a chance. Bisexual? Nope. Don't forget that you're talking about a prophet of Islam here. And? And there is zero chance that the historical jesus was anything other than straight. Where is the evidence that he was straight ... or gay? He seems asexual and celibate " He was Jewish and a recognised prophet of Islam, he was straight. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So Jesus mighf have been gay? Not a chance. Bisexual? Nope. Don't forget that you're talking about a prophet of Islam here. And? And there is zero chance that the historical jesus was anything other than straight. Where is the evidence that he was straight ... or gay? He seems asexual and celibate He was Jewish and a recognised prophet of Islam, he was straight. " Any proof? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So Jesus mighf have been gay? Not a chance. Bisexual? Nope. Don't forget that you're talking about a prophet of Islam here. And? And there is zero chance that the historical jesus was anything other than straight. Where is the evidence that he was straight ... or gay? He seems asexual and celibate He was Jewish and a recognised prophet of Islam, he was straight. " He rejected/replaced Judaism ... and there was no such thing as Islam during his lifetime. There is also no record of him ever having a romantic or sexual interest in anyone .... Female or Male. Sounds asexual to me. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So Jesus mighf have been gay? Not a chance. Bisexual? Nope. Don't forget that you're talking about a prophet of Islam here. And? And there is zero chance that the historical jesus was anything other than straight. Where is the evidence that he was straight ... or gay? He seems asexual and celibate He was Jewish and a recognised prophet of Islam, he was straight. He rejected/replaced Judaism ... and there was no such thing as Islam during his lifetime. There is also no record of him ever having a romantic or sexual interest in anyone .... Female or Male. Sounds asexual to me. " He did not reject or replace Judaism, he was Jewish. Islam recognises him as a prophet. In the absence of anyone witnessing him having sex, the likely probability is that he was straight. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So Jesus mighf have been gay? Not a chance. Bisexual? Nope. Don't forget that you're talking about a prophet of Islam here. And? And there is zero chance that the historical jesus was anything other than straight. Where is the evidence that he was straight ... or gay? He seems asexual and celibate He was Jewish and a recognised prophet of Islam, he was straight. He rejected/replaced Judaism ... and there was no such thing as Islam during his lifetime. There is also no record of him ever having a romantic or sexual interest in anyone .... Female or Male. Sounds asexual to me. He did not reject or replace Judaism, he was Jewish. Islam recognises him as a prophet. In the absence of anyone witnessing him having sex, the likely probability is that he was straight. " The Old Testament is fundamentally Jewish (The Jewish Bible/Tanakh) .... The New Testement isn't a sequel to the Jewish Bible .... it replaces it. Christ, and Christianity is definitely a rejection and replacement to Judaism (for those that follow the teachings of Christ) As for Christ's sexuality ... It doesn't seem to get a mention at all. It could be argued that it is a rare example of Christ's conduct that Christians are not expected to follow - (Total celibacy and asexual behaviour) - Whatever Christ's sexuality, of course, nothing in his teachings suggests anything other than maintaining and promoting heterosexuality within the strict guidelines/laws of that time and place. Not a hint of 'Free sexual expression or homosexual behaviour' | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" He did not reject or replace Judaism, he was Jewish. Islam recognises him as a prophet. In the absence of anyone witnessing him having sex, the likely probability is that he was straight. The Old Testament is fundamentally Jewish (The Jewish Bible/Tanakh) .... The New Testement isn't a sequel to the Jewish Bible .... it replaces it. Christ, and Christianity is definitely a rejection and replacement to Judaism (for those that follow the teachings of Christ) As for Christ's sexuality ... It doesn't seem to get a mention at all. It could be argued that it is a rare example of Christ's conduct that Christians are not expected to follow - (Total celibacy and asexual behaviour) - Whatever Christ's sexuality, of course, nothing in his teachings suggests anything other than maintaining and promoting heterosexuality within the strict guidelines/laws of that time and place. Not a hint of 'Free sexual expression or homosexual behaviour' " The new testament superseded the old, not replaced, it was an update. But christ didn't write it. Jesus didn't preach Christianity, he preached the Jewish doctrines he agreed with and and argued against the doctrine he didn't agree with, just like the rest of the Jewish sects that didn't agree with each other. It was Paul who started the Christianity ball rolling and there's a good case to be made that this new religion should have been called Paul-ianity. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So Jesus mighf have been gay? Not a chance. Bisexual?" So what about the naked young man who fled the garden of Gethsemane just before Jesus’ arrest? What about his apostle who he loved more than the others? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So Jesus mighf have been gay? Not a chance. Bisexual? So what about the naked young man who fled the garden of Gethsemane just before Jesus’ arrest? What about his apostle who he loved more than the others?" I'm sure we've all fled naked from a garden at some point, it's not a big deal. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reports say that Woke York University students are staging a play called A Gay in Manger where Jesus is Gay and pretty much every charachter is gay. Liberal christians are annoyed. Tasteful or Distateful ?" Jesus could well have been gay, I've heard a few people say this. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" He did not reject or replace Judaism, he was Jewish. Islam recognises him as a prophet. In the absence of anyone witnessing him having sex, the likely probability is that he was straight. The Old Testament is fundamentally Jewish (The Jewish Bible/Tanakh) .... The New Testement isn't a sequel to the Jewish Bible .... it replaces it. Christ, and Christianity is definitely a rejection and replacement to Judaism (for those that follow the teachings of Christ) As for Christ's sexuality ... It doesn't seem to get a mention at all. It could be argued that it is a rare example of Christ's conduct that Christians are not expected to follow - (Total celibacy and asexual behaviour) - Whatever Christ's sexuality, of course, nothing in his teachings suggests anything other than maintaining and promoting heterosexuality within the strict guidelines/laws of that time and place. Not a hint of 'Free sexual expression or homosexual behaviour' The new testament superseded the old, not replaced, it was an update. But christ didn't write it. Jesus didn't preach Christianity, he preached the Jewish doctrines he agreed with and and argued against the doctrine he didn't agree with, just like the rest of the Jewish sects that didn't agree with each other. It was Paul who started the Christianity ball rolling and there's a good case to be made that this new religion should have been called Paul-ianity. " Correct. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" He did not reject or replace Judaism, he was Jewish. Islam recognises him as a prophet. In the absence of anyone witnessing him having sex, the likely probability is that he was straight. The Old Testament is fundamentally Jewish (The Jewish Bible/Tanakh) .... The New Testement isn't a sequel to the Jewish Bible .... it replaces it. Christ, and Christianity is definitely a rejection and replacement to Judaism (for those that follow the teachings of Christ) As for Christ's sexuality ... It doesn't seem to get a mention at all. It could be argued that it is a rare example of Christ's conduct that Christians are not expected to follow - (Total celibacy and asexual behaviour) - Whatever Christ's sexuality, of course, nothing in his teachings suggests anything other than maintaining and promoting heterosexuality within the strict guidelines/laws of that time and place. Not a hint of 'Free sexual expression or homosexual behaviour' The new testament superseded the old, not replaced, it was an update. But christ didn't write it. Jesus didn't preach Christianity, he preached the Jewish doctrines he agreed with and and argued against the doctrine he didn't agree with, just like the rest of the Jewish sects that didn't agree with each other. It was Paul who started the Christianity ball rolling and there's a good case to be made that this new religion should have been called Paul-ianity. Correct. " I suppose it's also been suggested by some that Paul was a flaming gay too then? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How can you tell if a new born baby is gay? What gives the others away as gay? Is Mary gay too? " Parents know from an early age.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How can you tell if a new born baby is gay? What gives the others away as gay? Is Mary gay too? Parents know from an early age.. " No they don't. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How can you tell if a new born baby is gay? What gives the others away as gay? Is Mary gay too? Parents know from an early age.. No they don't. " Oh yes they do... panto season | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How can you tell if a new born baby is gay? What gives the others away as gay? Is Mary gay too? Parents know from an early age.. No they don't. Oh yes they do... panto season" There's nothing funny about predetermining your child's sexuality. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How can you tell if a new born baby is gay? What gives the others away as gay? Is Mary gay too? Parents know from an early age.. " Not at baby age. Perhaps when they are of school age if they show effeminate traits but not all gays are effeminate. Some of us are far from it and still did all the boyish things | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reports say that Woke York University students are staging a play called A Gay in Manger where Jesus is Gay and pretty much every charachter is gay. Liberal christians are annoyed. Tasteful or Distateful ?" It just seems to be the nonsensical, flippant product of fertile and creative young minds, yet to reach full maturity and not intended to be taken seriously, such is the nature of creative freedom of expression. At the time of Christ, the concept of homosexuality would probably have been seen from a different perspective to that of today's modern society. In more ancient societies, it was widely accepted for older men to have sex with younger men, often as a social status symbol, particularly for rich and powerful men. In Jewish society, Biblical rules were seen as being against same-sex relationships, although, because of the nature of the topic itself, very little is specifically recorded in history. The general consensus of those who have studied the biblical era is that there is certainly evidence of same-sex relationships, but it was seen in a different way than we do today. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As an atheist I'm not particularly bothered. Interesting though that they aren't brave enough to make a similar production, only this time taking aim at Mohammed and Allah. I wonder how that would end?" . What a good point you make , go on you brave wild rebels ,do one about mo | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As an atheist I'm not particularly bothered. Interesting though that they aren't brave enough to make a similar production, only this time taking aim at Mohammed and Allah. I wonder how that would end?" True, Christians are always the easy target | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t think Muhammad ever claimed to have been conceived by God and born of a virgin. " Missed a trick there, did old Mo | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
